In this article, we applied a ‘sex critical’ lens to discursively analyse online sex advice available to Australian readers in the first 3 months of ‘lockdown’ during the COVID-19 pandemic (March–June 2020). We explored how sex and intimacy were being talked about within the pandemic context, examining if and how this was different to pre-pandemic sex advice. We found both the perpetuation of dominant discourses that limit understandings of sex and sexual practices, and challenges to these which open exciting possibilities for new sexual intimacies.
BarkerMJHancockJ (2017) Enjoy Sex (How, When and If You Want To). London: Icon.
5.
BarkerMJGillRHarveyL (2018) Mediated Intimacy: Sex Advice in Media Culture. UK: Polity Press.
6.
Bay-ChengLY (2017) Critically sex/ed: asking critical question of neoliberal truths in sexuality education. In: AllenLRasmussenM (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Sexuality Education. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
7.
BowlegL (2020) We’re not all in this together: on COVID-19, intersectionality, and structural inequality. American Journal of Public Health110: 917.
8.
CoombeJKongFYSBittlestonH, et al. (2020) Love during lockdown: findings from an online survey examining the impact of COVID-19 on the sexual health of people living in Australia. Sexually Transmitted Infections97(5): 357–362.
9.
DöringN (2020) How Is the COVID-19 pandemic affecting our sexualities? An overview of the current media narratives and research hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior49(8): 2765–2778.
10.
End Rape on Campus (2017) Connecting the Dots: Understanding Sexual Assault in. University Communities.
11.
FarvidPBraunV (2014) The “Sassy woman” and the “performing man”: heterosexual casual sex advice and the (re)constitution of gendered subjectivities. Feminist Media Studies14: 118–134.
12.
FoucaultM (1980) The history of sexuality. London: Allen Lane, Vol. 1.
13.
GillR (2018) Discourse analysis in media and communications research. In: KearneyMCKackmanM (eds) The Craft of Criticism: Critical Media Studies in Practice . London: Routledge.
14.
GondwalRPalAPaulS, et al. (2020) Sexual behavior during the times of COVID-19-related lockdown in India: results from an online survey. Journal of Psychosexual Health2(3–4): 242–246.
15.
GrantRNashM (2018) Navigating unintelligibility: Queer Australian young women’s negotiations of safe sex and risk. Journal of Health Psychology23: 306–319.
16.
HassinoffAA (2016) How to have great sext: consent advice in online sexting tips. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies13(1): 58–74.
17.
HindesSFilebornB (2019) Girl power gone wrong”: #MeToo, Aziz Ansari, and media reporting of (grey area) sexual violence. Feminist Media Studies20(5): 639–656.
18.
LehmillerJJGarciaJRGesselmanAN, et al. (2020) Less sex, but more sexual diversity: Changes in sexual behavior during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Leisure Sciences43(1–2): 295–304.
19.
LuptonD (1993) Risk as moral danger: the social and political functions of risk discourse in public health. International Journal of Health Services23(3): 425–435.
20.
McPhillipsKBraunVGaveyN (2001) Defining (hetero)sex: how imperative is the “coital imperative”. Women’s Studies International Forum24(2): 229–240.
NkengasongJIwasakiAVictoraC, et al. (2020) The global response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Med (NY)1(1): 3–8.
23.
PanzeriMFerrucciRCozzaA, et al. (2020) Changes in sexuality and quality of couple relationships during the Covid-19 lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology11: 565823.
24.
RubinG (1984) Thinking sex: notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In: VanceC (ed) Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. Boston: Routledge.
25.
SimonLDanebackK (2013) Adolescents’ use of the internet for sex education: a thematic and critical review of the literature. International Journal of Sexual Health25(4): 305–319.
26.
ScottJB (2020) How can we (have) queer sex in a pandemic?QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking7(3): 185–194.
27.
StroebeWvanDellenMRAbakoumkinGLemay EPJrSchiavoneWM, et al. (2022) Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: longitudinal and cross-national evidence. PLOS ONE 17(1): e0263100.
