Recent attention to the non-monogamous identity known as the “unicorn” has increased the visibility of a poorly understood sexual minority. Conflicting definitions in popular media, heightened social stigma, and reports of inequitable, and even abusive, relationship dynamics justify attention to unicorns. With very few academic studies to date on unicorn identity, an exploratory study was conducted to address a gap in sexuality research. Discourse analysis of an online polyamorous community offered a definition of unicorns and revealed that those interested in unicorn dynamics are treated as an “out-group” in polyamorous spaces. Further, evidence of community gatekeeping revealed that unicorns threaten polyamorous identity security and trigger identity negotiations that may be impeding queer feminist efforts to undo relational and sexual hierarchies.
BarkerMLangdridgeD (2010) Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory. Sexualities13(6): 748–772.
2.
BegganJK (2020) Monomyth or monogamyth? Polyamory’s conceptual challenges to the hero’s journey. Heroism Science: An Interdisciplinary Journal5(2): 1–46.
3.
BennionJ (2020) Polyamory in Paris: a social network theory application. Sexualities25(3): 1–25.
4.
BensonKL (2017) Tensions of subjectivity: the instability of queer polyamorous identity and community. Sexualities20(1–2): 24–40.
5.
BrandtSACarmichaelCL (2020) Does online support matter? The relationship between online identity-related support, mattering, and well-being in sexual minority men. Computers in Human Behavior111: 1–11.
6.
CardosoDRosaADa SilvaMT (2021) (De)Politicizing polyamory: Social media comments on media representations of consensual non-monogamies. Archives of Sexual Behavior50(4): 1325–1340.
ConleyTDMoorsACMatsickJL, et al. (2013) The fewer the merrier?: Assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy13(1): 1–30.
DurkheimE (1893/1960) The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press. Translated by Simpson G.
11.
FerrerJN (2018) Mononormativity, polypride, and the “mono–poly wars”. Sexuality & Culture22(3): 817–836.
12.
FitzpatrickF (2019) Understanding Intercultural Interaction: An Analysis of Key Concepts. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing Limited.
13.
GaudetteTScrivensRDaviesG, et al. (2020) Upvoting extremism: collective identity formation and the extreme right on Reddit. New Media & Society23(12): 1–18.
HackelBMorrisA (2014) Finding community and contesting heteronormativity; queer young people’s engagement in an Australian online community. Journal of Youth Studies17(7): 872–886.
16.
HardyJWEastonD (2017) Ethical Slut, Third Edition: A Practical Guide to Polyamory, Open Relationships, and Other Freedoms in Sex and Love. California and New York: Ten Speed Press.
17.
HaritawornJLinCKlesseC (2006) Poly/logue: a critical introduction to polyamory. Sexualities9(5): 515–529.
18.
HayfieldN (2021) Bisexual and Pansexual Identities: Exploring and Challenging Invisibility and Invalidation. London and New York: Routledge.
19.
HeissA (2017, 9 February) Confessions of a Real-Life Unicorn: Being a Unicorn—Someone Who Sleeps with Couples—In 2017 Is Both Easier and Trickier than It’s Ever Been. GQ. Available at:https://www.gq.com/story/confessions-of-a-real-life-unicorn (Accessed 4 August 2021).
20.
HutzlerKTGiulianoTAHerselmanJR, et al. (2016) Three’s a crowd: public awareness and (mis)perceptions of polyamory. Psychology and Sexuality7(2): 69–87.
21.
KlesseC (2014) Polyamory: intimate practice, identity or sexual orientation?Sexualities17(1–2): 81–99.
22.
KlesseC (2006) Polyamory and its ‘others’: contesting the terms of non-monogamy. Sexualities9(5): 565–583.
23.
MacNeelaPMurphyA (2015) Freedom, invisibility, and community: A qualitative study of self-identification with asexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior44(3): 799–812.
24.
MassanariA (2017) Gamergate and the fappening: how Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society19(3): 329–346.
NobleD (2014) So, somebody called you a unicorn hunter?Unicorn-r-us. Available at:https://www.unicorns-r-us.com (accessed 4 August 2021).
28.
RecuberT (2016) Digital discourse analysis: finding meaning in small online spaces. In: DanielsJGregoryKMcMillan CottomT (eds), Digital societies. Great Britain: Policy Press, 47–60.
29.
RobinsonM (2013) Polyamory and monogamy as strategic identities. Journal of Bisexuality13(1): 21–38.
RubelANBurleighTJ (2020) Counting polyamorists who count: prevalence and definitions of an under-researched form of consensual nonmonogamy. Sexualities23(1–2): 3–27.
32.
RubinG (1984) Thinking sex: notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In: ParkerRAggletonP (eds), Culture, Society and Sexuality. London: Routlege, 143–178.
33.
SéguinLJ (2019) The good, the bad, and the ugly: lay attitudes and perceptions of polyamory. Sexualities22(4): 669–690.
34.
SheffE (2014) The Polyamorist Nextdoor: Inside Multiple-Partner Relationship and Families. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
TableBSandovalJAWegerH (2017) Transitions in polyamorous identity and intercultural communication: an application of identity management theory. Journal of Bisexuality17(3): 277–299.
37.
TaorminoT (2008) Opening up: A Guide to Creating and Sustaining Open Relationships. San Francisco: Cleis Press.
38.
TaylorYFalconerESnowdenR (2014) Queer youth, Facebook, and faith: Facebook methodologies and online identities. News Media and Society16(7): 1138–1153.
39.
Ting-ToomeyS (2015) Identity negotiation theory. In: BennettJ (ed), Sage Encyclopedia of Intercultural Competence. Los Angeles: SAGE, 418–422.
