The cultural shift leading to increased tolerance for diverse sexualities over the past few decades has transformed the landscape of traditionally queer spaces. Given the mainstream trend towards homonormativity and respectability politics, this paper examines the consequences of these changes for the articulation of queer intimacy and sexual freedom. Drawing from comments posted to an online public forum, I consider how men engage in the queer occupation of Korean spas by reimagining these businesses as places for queer sex. I position Korean spas as a “queer heterotopia” allowing men space to violate the centering of homonormative subjectivity. While the sexual practices of these men resist queer normativity, they simultaneously mobilize hegemonic racialized discourses, ultimately threatening the queer heterotopic potential of the space. Thus, this work offers instances of both queer promise and failure where normative structures are simultaneously challenged and upheld.
BinnieJSkeggsB (2004) Cosmopolitan knowledge and the production and consumption of sexualized space. The Sociological Review52(1): 39–61.
3.
BlumerH (1954) What is wrong with social theory?American Sociological Review19(1): 3–10.
4.
BoellstorfTNardiBPearceC, et al. (2012) Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
BrodynAGhazianiA (2018) Performative progressiveness: Accounting for new forms of inequality in the gayborhood. City & Community17(2): 307–329.
6.
BrowneKBakshiL (2011) We are here to party? Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans leisurescapes beyond commercial gay scenes. Leisure Studies30(2): 179–196.
7.
BurawoyM (1998) The extended case method. Sociological Theory16(1): 4–33.
8.
CallanderDMartinHNewmanCE (2012) Just a preference: Racialized language in the sex-seeking profiles of gay and bisexual men.Culture, Health & Sexuality14(9): 1049–1063.
9.
ChaunceyGeorge.1994. Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Making of the Gay Male World, 1890-1940. New York: Basic Books
10.
DelanyS (1999) Times Square Red, Times Square Blue. New York: NYU Press.
11.
DelphE (1978) The Silent Community: Public Homosexual Encounters. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
DoanLLoehrAMillerLR (2014) Formal rights and informal privileges for same-sex couples. American Sociological Review79(6): 1172–1195.
13.
DoanPLHigginsH (2011) The demise of queer space? Resurgent gentrification and the assimilation of LGBT neighborhoods. Journal of Planning Education and Research311(1): 6–25.
14.
DugganL (2002) The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In: CastronovoRNelsonDD (eds) Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 175–184.
15.
DugganL (2003) The Twilight of Equality: Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. New York: Beacon.
16.
EdelmanL (2004) No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
EspirituYL (1997) All men are not created equal. In: KimmelMMessnerM (eds) Men’s Lives. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 35–44.
18.
EynonRFryJSchroederR (2008) The ethics of internet research. In: FieldingNLeeRMBlankG (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 23–41.
19.
FlowersPMarriottCHartG (2000) ‘The bars, the bogs, and the bushes’: The impact of locale on sexual cultures. Culture, Health & Sexuality2(1): 69–86.
20.
ForstieClare (2019) Disappearing Dykes? Post-Lesbian discourse and shifting identities and communities. Journal of Homosexuality.
21.
FoucaultM (1986) Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias.Diacritics16(1): 22–27.
22.
GamsonJ (1995) Must identity movements self-destruct? A queer dilemma. Social Problems42(3): 390–407.
23.
GhazianiA (2011) Post-Gay collective identity construction. Social Problems58(1): 99–125.
24.
GhazianiA (2014) There Goes the Gayborhood? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
GhazianiA (2015) ‘Gay enclaves face prospect of being PassÉ’: How assimilation affects the spatial expressions of sexuality in the United States. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39(4): 756–771.
26.
GhazianiA (2019) Cultural archipelagos: New directions in the study of sexuality and space. City & Community18(1): 4–22.
27.
GreenAI (2014) Sexual Fields: Towards a Sociology of Collective Sexual Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
GreeneT (2014) Gay neighborhoods and the rights of the vicarious citizen. City and Community13(2): 99–118.
29.
HalberstamJ (2005) In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: NYU Press.
30.
HanCW (2007) They don’t want to cruise your type: Gay men of color and the racial politics of exclusion. Social Identities13(1): 51–67.
31.
HarrisPJ (2003) Gatekeeping and remaking: The politics of respectability in African-American women’s history and black feminism. Journal of Women’s History15(1): 212–220.
32.
HartlessJ (2019) Questionably queer: Understanding straight presence in the post-gay bar.Journal of Homosexuality66(8): 1035–1057.
33.
HigginbothamEB (1993) Righteous Discontent: The Women’s Movement in the Black Baptist Church, 1880-1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
HoangNT (2014) A View from the Bottom: Asian American Masculinity and Sexual Representation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
35.
HumphreysL (1970) Tearoom Trade: A Study of Homosexual Encounters in Public Places. Chicago, IL: Aldine Pub. Co.
JonesA (2011) Introduction: Queer Utopias, queer futurity, and potentiality in Quotidian practice. In: JonesA (ed.) A Critical Inquiry into Queer Utopias. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–17.
38.
LeaTde WitJReynoldsR (2015) “Post-Gay” yet? The relevance of the lesbian and gay scene to same-sex attracted young people in contemporary Australia.Journal of Homosexuality62(9): 1264–1285.
39.
LoftusJ (2001) America’s liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review66(5): 762–782.
McCarthyJ (2019) U.S. Support for Gay Marriage Stable, at 63%. Washington, DC: Gallup.
42.
MeyerD (2015) Violence Against Queer People: Race, Class, Gender, and the Persistence of Anti-LGBT Discrimination. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
43.
MuñozJE (2009) Cruising Utopia. New York: New York University Press.
44.
NewportF (2018) In U.S., Estimate of LGBT Population Rises to 4.5%. Washington, DC: Gallup.
45.
OrneJ (2017) Boystown: Sex and Community in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
PuarJ (2007) Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
47.
RichardsonD (2004) Locating sexualities: From here to normality. Sexualities7(4): 391–411.
48.
RobinsonBA (2013) The queer potentiality of barebacking: Charging, whoring, and breeding as Utopian practices. In: JonesA (ed.) A Critical Inquiry into Queer Utopias. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 101–128.
49.
RobinsonBA (2015) “Personal preference” as the new Racism: Gay desire and racial cleansing in cyberspace. Sociology of Race & Ethnicity1(2): 317–330.
50.
RosenfeldD (2009) Heteronormativity and homonormativity as practical and moral resources: The case of lesbian and gay elders. Gender & Society23(5): 617–638.
51.
RubinG (1984) Thinking sex. In: VanceC (ed.) Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 267–319.
52.
RushbrookD (2002) Cities, queer space, and the cosmopolitan tourist. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies8(1–2): 183–206.
53.
SimulaB (2013) Queer Utopias in painful spaces. In: JonesA (ed.) A Critical Inquiry into Queer Utopias. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 71–100.
54.
SpringA (2013) Declining segregation of same-sex partners: Evidence from census 2000 and 2010. Population Research and Policy Review32(5): 678–716.
55.
StillwagonRGhazianiA (2019) Queer pop-ups: A cultural innovation in urban life. City and Community18(3): 874–895.
56.
StrykerS (2008) Transgender history, homonormativity, and disciplinarity.Radical History Review100: 145–157.
57.
TattelmanI (1999) Speaking to the gay bathhouse. In: LeapWJ (ed.) Public Sex/Gay Space, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 71–94.
58.
TewksburyR (2008) Finding erotic oases. Journal of Homosexuality55(1): 1–19.
59.
WaltersS (2014) The Tolerance Trap: How God, Genes, and Good Intentions are Sabotaging Gay Equality. New York: NYU Press.
60.
WardJ (2003) Producing ‘pride’ in West Hollywood: Queer cultural capital for queers with cultural capital. Sexualities6(1): 65–94.
61.
WardJ (2008) Respectably Queer: Diversity Culture in LGBT Activist Organizations. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
62.
WardJ (2015) Not Gay: Sex Between Straight White Men. New York: NYU Press.
63.
WarnerM (1999) The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
WeissM (2008) Gay shame and BDSM pride: Neoliberalism, privacy, and sexual politics.Radical History Review100: 87–101.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
