This study examined the discourses of gay and bisexual men who seek Party-n-Play (PNP; sex that occurs under the influence of drugs) on mobile apps and websites. In-depth interviews were conducted with 44 gay and bisexual men who lived in Toronto, and who used drugs before or during sex in the previous month. Data were analysed using critical discourse analysis. The study findings presented evidence for subcultural discourses of gay and bisexual men who seek PNP online, and revealed how these discourses were implicated in recasting the practices of biopolitics, as well as enacting risk subjectivities of these men.
AdamBD (2005)
Constructing the neoliberal sexual actor: Responsibility and care of the self in the discourse of barebackers.Culture, Health & Sexuality7(4): 333–346.
2.
AllmanDMyersTXuK, et al. (2012)
The social technographics of gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM) in Canada: Implications for HIV research, outreach and prevention. Digital Culture & Education4(1): 127–145.
3.
AshfordC (2009)
Male sex work and the Internet effect: Time to re-evaluate the criminal law?The Journal of Criminal Law73(3): 258–280.
4.
AtkinsonD (1990)
Discourse analysis and written discourse conventions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics11: 57–76.
5.
BakhtinMM (1981) The Dialogic Imagination.
Austin:
University of Texas Press.
6.
BakhtinMM (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics.
Minneapolis:
Minneapolis University Press.
7.
BakhtinMM (1986) Speech Genres and Other Essays.
Austin:
University of Texas Press.
8.
BakhtinMM (1990) Art and Answerability.
Austin:
University of Texas Press.
9.
BenotschEGKalichmanSCageM (2002)
Men who have met sex partners via the Internet: Prevalence, predictors, and implications for HIV prevention. Archives of Sexual Behavior31(2): 177–183.
10.
BergRC (2008)
Barebacking among MSM Internet users.AIDS and Behavior12(5): 822–833.
11.
BlumerH (1962) Society as symbolic interaction. In: RoseAM (ed.) Human Behavior and Social Processes: An Interactionist Approach.
Abingdon:
Routledge, pp. 179–192.
12.
BourdieuP (1992) Language and Symbolic Power.
Cambridge:
Polity Press.
13.
BourneAReidDHicksonF, et al. (2014) The Chemsex study: Drug use in sexual settings among gay and bisexual men in Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham. Technical Report, Sigma Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London. Available at: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/2197245/ (accessed 28 August 2018).
14.
BourneAReidDHicksonF, et al. (2015)
Illicit drug use in sexual settings (‘chemsex’) and HIV/STI transmission risk behaviour among gay men in South London: Findings from a qualitative study.Sexually Transmitted Infections91(8): 564–568.
15.
CaronD (2009) My Father & I: The Marais and the Queerness of Community.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
16.
CarpianoRMKellyBCEasterbrookA, et al. (2011)
Community and drug use among gay men: The role of neighborhoods and networks.Journal of Health and Social Behavior52(1): 74–90.
17.
DavisMHartGBoldingG, et al. (2006)
E-dating, identity and HIV prevention: Theorising sexualities, risk and network society. Sociology of Health & Illness28(4): 457–478.
18.
DeimelDStöverHHößelbarthS, et al. (2016)
Drug use and health behaviour among German men who have sex with men: Results of a qualitative, multi-centre study.Harm Reduction Journal13(1): 36.
19.
DowsettGWWainDKeysD (2005)
Good gay men don’t get ‘messy’: Injecting drug use and gay community.Sexuality Research & Social Policy2(1): 22–36.
20.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change.
Cambridge:
Polity.
21.
FaircloughN (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language.
Harlow:
Longman.
22.
FaircloughN (2001) Language and Power.
Harlow:
Longman.
23.
FaircloughN (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research.
London:
Routledge.
24.
FischerCS (1995)
The subcultural theory of urbanism: A twentieth-year assessment. American Journal of Sociology101(3): 543–577.
25.
FoucaultM (1971)
Orders of discourse. Social Science Information10(2): 7–30.
26.
FoucaultM (1976) The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, volume 1.
New York:
Vintage.
27.
FoucaultM (1978) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979.
New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
FoucaultM (1988) Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault.
Amherst:
University of Massachusetts Press.
29.
FoucaultM (1991) Governmentality. In: BurchellGGordonC andMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press, pp. 87–104.
30.
FrederickBJPerroneD (2014)
‘Party n Play’ on the Internet: Subcultural formation, craigslist, and escaping from stigma. Deviant Behavior35(11): 859–884.
31.
GeePJ (2005) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method.
London:
Routledge.
32.
GeeJ (2015) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses.
London:
Routledge.
33.
GreenIAHalkitisPN (2006)
Crystal methamphetamine and sexual sociality in an urban gay subculture: An elective affinity.Culture, Health & Sexuality8(4): 317–333.
34.
GrovC (2010)
Risky sex-and drug-seeking in a probability sample of men-for-men online bulletin board postings.AIDS and Behavior14(6): 1387–1392.
35.
GrovC (2012)
HIV risk and substance use in men who have sex with men surveyed in bathhouses, bars/clubs, and on Craigslist.org: Venue of recruitment matters.AIDS and Behavior16(4): 807–817.
36.
GrovCDeBuskJABimbiDS, et al. (2007)
Barebacking, the Internet, and harm reduction: An intercept survey with gay and bisexual men in Los Angeles and New York City.AIDS and Behavior11(4): 527–536.
37.
HalkitisPNSingerSN (2018)
Chemsex and mental health as part of syndemic in gay and bisexual men.International Journal of Drug Policy55: 180–182.
38.
HallS (1996) The meaning of New Times In: MorleyDChenK (eds) Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies.
London:
Routledge, pp. 222–236.
39.
HammoudMAVaccherSJinF, et al. (2018)
The new MTV generation: Using methamphetamine, Truvada™, and Viagra™ to enhance sex and stay safe. International Journal of Drug Policy55: 197–204.
40.
HebdigeD (1979) Subculture: The Meaning of Style.
London:
Routledge.
41.
HegaziALeeMJWhittakerW, et al. (2017)
Chemsex and the city: Sexualised substance use in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men attending sexual health clinics. International Journal of STD & AIDS28(4): 362–366.
42.
HukillPBJacksonJL (1961)
The spoken language of medicine: Argot, slang, cant. American Speech36(2): 145–151.
43.
JägerSMaierF (2009) Theoretical and methodological aspects of Foucauldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE, pp. 34–61.
44.
KeaneH (2003)
Critiques of harm reduction, morality and the promise of human rights. International Journal of Drug Policy14(3): 227–232.
45.
KippaxS (2008)
Understanding and integrating the structural and biomedical determinants of HIV infection: A way forward for prevention.Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS3(4): 489–494.
46.
Klein H (2011)
Using a syndemics theory approach to study HIV risk taking in a population of men who use the internet to find partners for unprotected sex.American Journal of Men’s Health5(6): 466–476.
47.
LuptonD (1999) Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
48.
McKirnanDHoustonETolou-ShamsM (2007)
Is the Web the culprit? Cognitive escape and Internet sexual risk among gay and bisexual men.AIDS and Behavior11(1): 151–160.
49.
MizrachS (1997)
Iterative discourse and the formation of new subcultures. Anthropology of Consciousness8(4): 133–143.
50.
MooreD (2008)
Erasing pleasure from public discourse on illicit drugs: On the creation and reproduction of an absence. International Journal of Drug Policy19(5): 353–358.
51.
MowlabocusS (2019) ‘
What a skewed sense of values’: Discussing PreP in the British press. Sexualities. Epub ahead of print 25 September 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1363460719872726
52.
O’MalleyP (2000)
Introduction: Configurations of risk. Economy and Society29(4): 457–459.
53.
O’MalleyPValverdeM (2004)
Pleasure, freedom and drugs: The uses of ‘pleasure’ in liberal governance of drug and alcohol consumption. Sociology38(1): 25–42.
54.
O’MalleyPWeirLShearingC (1997)
Governmentality, criticism, politics. Economy and Society26(4): 501–517.
55.
PattonMQ (2014) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
56.
PollardANadarzynskiTLlewellynC (2018)
Syndemics of stigma, minority-stress, maladaptive coping, risk environments and littoral spaces among men who have sex with men using chemsex.Culture, Health & Sexuality20(4): 411–427.
57.
RaceK (2015a)
Speculative pragmatism and intimate arrangements: Online hook-up devices in gay life.Culture, Health & Sexuality17(4): 496–511.
58.
RaceK (2015b) ‘
Party and play’: Online hook-up devices and the emergence of PNP practices among gay men. Sexualities18(3): 253–275.
59.
RambukkanaN (2007) Taking the leather out of leathersex: The internet, identity, and the sadomasochistic public sphere. In: O’RiordanKPhillipsDJ (eds) Queer Online: Media Technology & Sexuality .
New York:
Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 67–80.
60.
RogersRMalancharuvil-BerkesEMosleyM, et al. (2005)
Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research75(3): 365–416.
61.
RoseN (1996)
The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. International Journal of Human Resource Management25(3): 327–356.
62.
RoseN (2006) The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
63.
RoseNMillerP (1992)
Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology43(2): 173–205.
64.
SolomonTMHalkitisPNMoellerRM, et al. (2011)
Sex parties among young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in New York City: Attendance and behavior.Journal of Urban Health88(6): 1063–1075.
65.
SouleymanovRAllmanD (2015)
Articulating connections between the harm-reduction paradigm and the marginalisation of people who use illicit drugs.British Journal of Social Work46(5): 1429–1445.
66.
SouleymanovRHuangYT (2016)
‘Men who use the Internet to seek sex with men’: Rethinking sexuality in the transnational context of HIV prevention.Global Public Health11(7–8): 888–901.
67.
SouleymanovRFantusSLachowskyN, et al. (2018)
How bisexual-identified men use the Internet to seek sex with other men in Ontario: Factors associated with HIV/STI testing and condom use. Journal of Bisexuality18(4): 1–19.
68.
Van DijkTA (1993)
Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society4(2): 249–283.
69.
Van DijkTA (2003) Critical discourse analysis. In: SchiffrinDTannenDHamiltonHE (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis.
Oxford:
Blackwell Publishing, pp. 466–486.
70.
Van DijkTA (2009) Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis.
London:
SAGE, pp. 62–86.
71.
WodakRChiltonP (eds) (2005) A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity.
Amsterdam:
John Benjamins Publishing.
72.
YoungIBoydellNPattersonC, et al. (2020)
Configuring the PrEP user: Framing pre-exposure prophylaxis in UK newsprint 2012–2016. Culture, Health & Sexuality. Epub ahead of print 7 April 2020. DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2020.1729420.
