What kinds of creative potential exist in silence – in not coming out? This ethnographic study takes the strategic silences that queer persons in Mumbai deploy regarding ‘coming out’ as productive for theorizing the connections between kinship and queerness. While some strands of queer critique conceptualize the relationship between kinship and queerness antagonistically, the author deploys the concept of agonistic intimacy outlined in Singh’s Poverty and the Quest for Life (2015) to consider how queers might inhabit heterosexual kinship networks through the interplay of contestation and submission. Silence, then, need not signal the image of the transnational queer in need of saving, but a mode of negotiating desires for respectability and queerness.
AllenJS (2011) Venceremos?, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2.
ArondekarA (2009) For the Record, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
BerlantLEdelmanL (2013) Sex, or the Unbearable, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
BerlantLWarnerM (1998) Sex in public. Critical Inquiry24(2): 547–566.
5.
BersaniL (1987) Is the rectum a grave?October43: 197–222.
6.
BoycePKhannaA (2011) Rights and representations: Querying the male-to-male sexual subject in India. Culture, Health & Sexuality13(1): 89–100.
7.
CassVC (1979) Homosexuality identity formation. Journal of Homosexuality4(3): 219–235.
8.
CohenL (2005) The Kothi wars: AIDS, cosmopolitanism and the morality of classification. In: AdamsVPiggL (eds) Sex in Development: Science, Sexuality, and Morality in Global Perspective, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 269–303.
9.
ColebrookC (2009) On the very possibility of queer theory. In: NigianniCStorrM (eds) Deleuze and Queer Theory, Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
10.
ConnollyWE (1991) Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11.
DaveNN (2011) Indian and lesbian and what came next: Affect, commensuration, and queer emergences. American Ethnologist38(4): 650–665.
12.
DaveNN (2012) Queer Activism in India, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
GopinathG (2005) Impossible Desires, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19.
HonigB (1993) Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
JagoseA (1996) Queer Theory: An Introduction, New York: NYU Press.
21.
JohnMENairJ (1998) A Question of Silence: The Sexual Economies of Modern India, London: Zed Books.
22.
ManalansanM (2003) Global Divas, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
23.
ManalansanM (2014) The stuff of archives. Radical History Review120(1): 94–107.
24.
MenonN (2007) Sexualities, London: Zed Books.
25.
MenonRBhasinK (1998) Borders & Boundaries, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
26.
MouffeC (1999) Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?Social Research66(3): 745–758.
27.
MouffeC (2013) Agonistics, London: Verso Books.
28.
NarrainA (2004) The articulation of rights around sexuality and health: Subaltern Queer cultures in India in the era of Hindutva. Health and Human Rights7(2): 142–164.
29.
NarrainABhanG (2005) Because I Have a Voice: Queer Politics in India, New Delhi: Yoda Press.
30.
OrneJ (2011) ‘You will always have to “out” yourself’: Reconsidering coming out through strategic outness. Sexualities14(6): 681–703.
31.
Plummer K (1995) Telling sexual stories in a late modern world. In: Denzin N (ed.) Studies in Symbolic Interaction 18(1): 101–120.
32.
PuarJK (2006) Mapping US homonormativities. Gender, Place & Culture13(1): 67–88.
33.
PuarJK (2007) Terrorist Assemblages, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
34.
PuarJK (2013) Homonationalism as assemblage: Viral travels, affective sexualities. Jindal Global Law Review4(2): 23–43.
35.
RambergL (2014) Given to the Goddess: South Indian Devadasis and the Sexuality of Religion, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36.
ReddyG (2005) With Respect to Sex, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
SedgwickEK (1990) Epistemology of the Closet, Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
ShahSP (2015) Queering critiques of neoliberalism in India: Urbanism and inequality in the era of transnational ‘LGBTQ’ rights. Antipode47(3): 635–651.
39.
ShahN (1993) Sexuality, identity, and the uses of history. In: RattiR (ed.) A Lotus of another Color, Boston, MA: Alyson Publications, pp. 113–132.
40.
SinghB (2011) Agonistic intimacy and moral aspiration in popular Hinduism: A study in the political theology of the neighbor. American Ethnologist38(3): 430–450.
41.
SinghB (2015) Poverty and the Quest for Life, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
SircarOJainD (2012) New intimacies/old desires: Law, culture, and queer politics in neoliberal times. Jindal Global Law Review4(1): 1–16.
43.
SircarOJainD (2013) Neoliberal modernity and the ambiguity of its discontents: Post/anti-colonial disruptions of queer imperialism. Jindal Global Law Review4(2): 1–22.
44.
TroidenRR (1989) The formation of homosexual identities. Journal of Homosexuality17(1): 43–73.
45.
VanitaR (2001) Queering India, New York: Routledge.
46.
WardEJ (2008) Respectably Queer, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
47.
WestonK (1991) Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship, New York: Columbia University Press.
