Regulation plays a key role in the construction of sexuality. Given the extent to which new forms of communication technology have had a liberating effect on the production of new discourses emanating from historically marginalized sexual communities, this study examines how zoosexuals active in an online community work to construct, assert and manage their sex-based identities, situate their sexual practices, attempt to resolve ethical dilemmas, as well as moderate and sanction dissidents for the greater civility of zoosexual discourse. We conclude by further considering the complications inherent in accomplishing these interactive tasks in a virtual space.
AdlerPAAdlerP (2008) The cyber worlds of self-injurers: Deviant communities, relationships, and selves. Symbolic Interaction31(1): 35–56.
2.
AggrawalA (2011) A new classification of zoophilia. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine18(2): 73–78.
3.
AltheideDL (1996) Qualitative Media Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
American Psychological Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
5.
Animal Legal Defense Fund (2012) The crime of bestiality/zoophilia: Sexual assault of an animal. [online] Available at: http://www.aldf.org/article.php?id=1098 (Accessed 9 March 2013).
6.
AtkinsonEDePalmaR (2008) Dangerous spaces: Constructing and contesting sexual identities in an online discussion forum. Gender and Education20(2): 183–194.
7.
BeirneP (2001) Peter Singer’s “Heavy Petting” and the politics of animal sexual assault. Critical Criminology10(1): 43–55.
8.
Bowman-GrieveL (2009) Exploring “Stormfront”: A virtual community of the radical right. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism32(11): 989–1007.
9.
BrentsBGHausbeckK (2007) Marketing sex: US legal brothels and late capitalist consumption. Sexualities10(4): 425–439.
10.
BrentsBGSandersT (2010) Mainstreaming the sex industry: Economic inclusion and social ambivalence. Journal of Law and Society37(1): 40–60.
11.
CartyV (2002) Technology and counter-hegemonic movements: The case of Nike Corporation. Social Movement Studies1(2): 129–146.
12.
ClarkJDThemudoNS (2006) Linking the web and the street: Internet-based“dotcauses” and the “anti-globalization” movement. World Development34(1): 50–74.
13.
CooleyCH (1902) Human Nature and the Social Order, New York: Scribner’s.
14.
DayKKeysT (2008) Starving in cyberspace: A discourse analysis of pro-eating-disorder websites. Journal of Gender Studies17(1): 1–15.
15.
DekkersM (2000) Dearest Pet, New York: Verso.
16.
DurkinKFForsythCJQuinnJF (2006) Pathological Internet communities: A new research direction for sexual deviance research in a post modern era. Sociological Spectrum26(6): 595–606.
17.
EarlsCMLalumiereML (2009) A case study of preferential bestiality. Archives of Sexual Behavior38(4): 605–609.
18.
Foucault M (1981) The order of discourse. In: Young R (ed.) Untying the Text. London: Routledge, pp. 17–41.
19.
FoucaultM (1985) The History of Sexuality, vol. 2, New York: Pantheon.
20.
Foucault M (1997) The ethics for the concern of the self as a practice of freedom. In: Rabinow P (ed.) Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, vol. 1. New York: New Press, pp. 281–301.
21.
Foucault M (2001) Fearless Speech. Pearson J (ed.) Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
22.
Fraser N (1990) Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25/26: 56–80.
23.
FraserN (1997) Justice Interruptus, New York: Routledge.
GrebowiczM (2010) When species meat: Confronting bestiality pornography. Humanimalia1(2): 1–17.
27.
HarawayDJ (2008) When Species Meet, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
28.
HerekGM (2002) Gender gaps in public opinion about lesbians and gay men. Public Opinion Quarterly66(1): 40–66.
29.
HugheyMWDanielsJ (2013) Racist comments at online news sites: A methodological dilemma for discourse analysis. Media, Culture & Society35(3): 332–347.
30.
HuntM (1974) Sexual Behavior in the 1970s, New York: Dell.
31.
HurleyALSullivanPMcCarthyJ (2007) The construction of self in onlinesupport groups for victims of domestic violence. British Journal of Social Psychology46(4): 859–874.
32.
JacobsK (2004) Pornography in small places and other spaces. Cultural Studies18(1): 67–83.
33.
JenkinsREThomasAR (2004) Deviance Online: Portrayals of Bestiality on the Internet, Oneonta, NY: Center for Social Science Research.
34.
Johnston H, Larana E, and Gusfield JR (1994) Identities, grievances, and new social movements. In: Larana E, Johnston H, and Gusfield JR (eds.) New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, pp. 3–35.
35.
KinseyACPomeroyWBMartinCE (1948) Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, Philadelphia: PA: Saunders.
36.
KinseyACPomeroyWBMartinCEGebhardPH (1953) Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, Philadelphia: PA: Saunders.
37.
KochNSSchockmanHE (1998) Democratizing Internet access in the lesbian, gay and bisexual communities. In: EboB (eds) Cyberghetto or Cybertopia?, Westport, CT: Praeger.
38.
LangdridgeDButtT (2004) A hermeneutic phenomenological investigation of the construction of sadomasochistic identities. Sexualities7(1): 31–53.
39.
LoflandJ (1969) Deviance and Identity, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40.
MarateaRJ (2011) Screwing the pooch: Legitimizing accounts in a zoophile online community. Deviant Behavior32(10): 918–943.
41.
MatthewsM (1994) The Horseman, Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
42.
McKennaKYABarghJA (1998) Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity ‘demarginalization’ through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology75(3): 681–694.
43.
MeeksC (2001) Civil society and the sexual politics of difference. Sociological Theory19(3): 325–344.
44.
MiletskiH (2001) Zoophilia– Implications for therapy. Journal of Sex Education & Therapy26(2): 85–89.
45.
MiletskiH (2002) Understanding Bestiality and Zoophilia, Bethesda, MD: East-West: LLC.
NipJYM (2004) The Queer Sisters and its electronic bulletin: A study of the Internet for social movement mobilization. Information, Communication & Society7(1): 23–49.
48.
PolettaFJasperJM (2001) Collective identity, social movements. Annual Review of Sociology27: 283–305.
49.
Rabinow P (1997) Introduction: The history of systems of thought. In: Rabinow P (ed.) Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, vol. 1. New York: New Press, pp. xi–xlii.
50.
RosenbergMKaplanHA (1982) Social Psychology of the Self-Concept, Arlington Heights, IL: Harlan Davidson..
51.
RubinG (1984) Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In: VanceC (eds) Pleasure and Danger, London: Routledge, pp. 143–178.
52.
Rudy K (2012) LGBTQ…Z?. Hypatia 27(3): 601–615.
53.
SchwalbeMLMason-SchrockD (1996) Identity work as group process. Advances in Group Processes13(1): 113–147.
SeidmanS (2009) The Social Construction of Sexuality, 2nd edn. New York: W.W. Norton.
56.
SerpellJA (2003) Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection: Beyond the “cute response.”. Society & Animals11(1): 83–100.
57.
Taylor C (2014) Sexual ethics and other animals: An ecofeminist critique of zoosex. In: 2nd Students for critical animal studies conference, Montreal, QC, 28–30 March 2014. Montreal: McGill University.
58.
TraversA (2000) Writing the Public in Cyberspace, New York: Garland.
WilcoxDTFossCMDonathyML (2005) A case study of a male sex offender with zoosexual interests and behaviors. Journal of Sexual Aggression11(3): 305–317.
61.
WilliamsCJWeinbergMS (2003) Zoophilia in men: A study of sexual interest in animals. Archives of Sexual Behavior32(6): 523–535.
62.
WilliamsJPCopesH (2005) How edge are you? Constructing authentic identities and subcultural boundaries in a straightedge Internet forum. Symbolic Interaction28(1): 67–89.
