This study examines youth sexual agency during sexuality lessons in a New Zealand secondary school. Employing poststructuralist discourse analysis, examples are highlighted in which girls (and boys) gain access to sexual agency. Through conversation, girls are simultaneously positioned as ‘asked’ and ‘pursuer’ and boys as ‘asker’ and ‘pursued’ whilst abstinence and virginity are imbued with sexual agency for both sexes. This study demonstrates that it is discursive versions of agency which hold central importance in youth sexual development. Thus the capacities for sexual action that are fostered in classroom conversation cannot plausibly be separated from agentive sexual practices of young people beyond the classroom's walls.
AhearnLM (2010) Agency and language. In: JaspersJÖstmanJ-OVerschuerenJ (eds) Society and Language Use, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 28–48.
2.
AlbanesiHP (2010) Gender and Sexual Agency: How Young People Make Choices About Sex, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
3.
AllenL (2003a) Girls want sex, boys want love: Resisting dominant discourses of (hetero)sexuality. Sexualities6(2): 236–251.
4.
AllenL (2003b) Power talk: Young people negotiating (hetero)sex. Women's Studies International Forum26(3): 235–244.
5.
AllenL (2005) Sexual Subjects: Young People, Sexuality and Education, London: Palgrave.
6.
AllenL (2007) Denying the sexual subject: Schools' regulation of student sexuality. British Educational Research Journal33(2): 221–234.
7.
AllenL (2011) Young People and Sexuality Education: Rethinking Key Debates, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
Al ZidjalyN (2009) Agency as an interactive achievement. Language in Society38(2): 177–200.
9.
BakerP (2008) Sexed Texts: Language, Gender and Sexuality, London: Equinox.
10.
BaxterJ (2003) Positioning Gender in Discourse: A Feminist Methodology, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
BellSA (2012) Young people and sexual agency in rural Uganda. Culture, Health and Sexuality14(3): 283–296.
12.
BingJMBergvallVL (1996) The question of questions: Beyond binary thinking. In: BergvallVLBingJMFreedAF (eds) Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice, London: Longman, pp. 1–30.
13.
BucholtzMHallK (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7(4/5): 585–614.
14.
BurkeK (1969) A Grammar of Motives (California edn), London: University of California Press.
15.
BurkettMHamiltonK (2012) Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women's negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities15(7): 815–833.
16.
CameronDKulickD (2003) Language and Sexuality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
CarpenterLM (2001) The ambiguity of having sex: The subjective experience of virginity loss in the United States. The Journal of Sex Research38(2): 127–139.
18.
CarpenterLM (2002) Gender and the meaning and experience of virginity loss in the contemporary United States. Gender and Society16(3): 345–365.
19.
CarpenterLM (2005) Virginity Lost: An Intimate Portrait of First Sexual Experiences, New York: New York University Press.
CurrieDHKellyDPomerantzS (2006) ‘The geeks shall inherit the earth’: Girls' agency, subjectivity and empowerment. Journal of Youth Studies9(4): 419–436.
22.
De FinaA (2003) Identity in Narrative: A Study in Immigrant Discourse, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
23.
DurantiA (2004) Agency in language. In: DurantiA (eds) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 451–473.
24.
EckertP (2002) Demystifying sexuality and desire. In: Campbell-KiblerK (eds) Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 99–110.
25.
EckertP (2006 [1996]) Vowels and nail polish. In: CameronDKulickD (eds) The Language and Sexuality Reader, London: Routledge, pp. 189–195.
26.
De MonckVC (1998) Romantic Love and Sexual Behaviour: Perspectives from the Social Sciences, Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
27.
FineMMcClellandSI (2006) Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review76(3): 297–338.
28.
FroyumCM (2010) Making ‘good girls’: Sexual agency in the sexuality education of low-income black girls. Culture, Health and Sexuality12(1): 59–72.
29.
GillR (2008a) Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times. Subjectivity25: 432–445.
30.
GillR (2008b) Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism and Psychology18(1): 35–60.
31.
GoffmanE (1981) Forms of Talk, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
32.
HollandJ (2000) Deconstructing virginity – young people's accounts of first sex. Sexual and Relationship Therapy15(3): 221–232.
33.
JacksonSMCramF (2003) Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women's talk about heterosexuality. British Journal of Social Psychology42(1): 113–127.
34.
KehilyMJ (2002) Sexuality, Gender and Schooling: Shifting Agendas in Social Learning, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
35.
KendallN (2008) Sexuality education in an abstinence-only era: A comparative case study of two US states. Sexuality Research and Social Policy5(2): 23–44.
36.
KingBW (2011) Linguistic negotiations of sexual agency in sexuality education, Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University of WellingtonUnpublished PhD Thesis.
37.
KingBW (2014) Tracing the emergence of a community of practice: Beyond presupposition in sociolinguistic research. Language in Society43(1): 61–81.
38.
King BW (in press) Language and sexuality in education. In: Whelen P and Bolin A (eds), The Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
39.
KozetziK (2010) Power and ethnicity in construals of Greek women's heterosexualities. In: CanakisCKantsaVYannakopoulosK (eds) Language and Sexuality (Through and) Beyond Gender, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 87–112.
40.
KulickD (2003) No. Language and Communication23(2): 139–151.
41.
LeapWL (2008) Queering gay men's English. In: HarringtonK (eds) Gender and Language Research Methodologies, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 283–296.
42.
MartinP (2010) ‘These days virginity is just a feeling’: Heterosexuality and change in young urban Vietnamese men. Culture, Health and Sexuality12(Supplement): S5–S18.
43.
MaxwellCAggletonP (2010) Agency in action – young women and their sexual relationships in a private school. Gender and Education22(3): 327–343.
44.
McKendyJP (2006) ‘I'm very careful about that’: Narrative and agency of men in prison. Discourse and Society17(4): 473–502.
45.
MillerER (2010) Agency in the making: Adult immigrants' accounts of language learning and work. TESOL Quarterly44(3): 465–487.
46.
MurphyF (2001) Studs, Tools, and the Family Jewels: Metaphors Men Live By, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
47.
OwenASSteinSRVan de BergLR (2007) Bad Girls: Cultural Politics and Media Representations for Transgressive Women, New York: Peter Lang.
48.
PichlerP (2007) ‘This sex thing is such a big issue now’: Sex talk and identities in three groups of adolescent girls. In: SauntsonHKyratzisS (eds) Language, Sexualities and Desires: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 68–95.
49.
QuachT (2008) Femininity and sexual agency among young unmarried women in Hanoi. Culture, Health and Sexuality10SupplementS151–S161.
50.
ReganP (1998) Romantic love and sexual desire. In: De MonckVC (eds) Romantic Love and Sexual Behaviour: Perspectives from the Social Sciences, Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, pp. 91–112.
51.
ReynoldsN (2004) Geographies of Writing: Inhabiting Places and Encountering Difference, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.
52.
TainioL (2002) Negotiating gender identities and sexual agency in elderly couples' talk. In: McIlvennyP (eds) Talking Gender and Sexuality, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 181–206.
53.
TalbotM (2010) Language and Gender, (2nd edn). Cambridge: Polity Press.
54.
TaskerG (2000) Social and Ethical Issues in Sexuality Education: A Resource for Health Education Teachers of Year 12 and 13 Students, Christchurch: Christchurch College of Education.
