After an accident, the author and researcher of this article had a period of serious contemplation and decided to take positive transformative action over the long year of her rehabilitation. Her broken arm highlighted her vulnerability as a researcher, but opened new doorways to navigating different methods of research, documentation and presentation of lived experiences. This injury was not only the means to draw attention and participation in research, but also an invitation to share our vulnerabilities in ordinarily daily lives and to see charm in wounds, whether they are visible or invisible. We all have memories of suffering that have gone unrecognized and unreconciled. Autobiography through documentary films is one way of validating suffering and aestheticizing pain directly or vicariously through the sharing of experiences.
BarnettR (1997) Higher Education: A Critical Business, Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
2.
BurgessR (1985) Issues in Educational Research, London: Falmer Press.
3.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, London: SAGE.
4.
DavisonJ (2004) Dilemmas in research: Issues of vulnerability and disempowerment for the social worker/researcher. Journal of Social Work Practice18(3): 379–393.
5.
DenzinN (1997) Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
DowneyHHamiltonKCatterallM (2007) Researching vulnerability: What about the researcher?European Journal of Marketing41(7–8): 734–739.
7.
EllisCBochnerA(2000) Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 733–768.
8.
FlemonssDGreenS(2002) Stories that conform/stories that transform: A conversation in four parts. In: BochnerAPEllisC (eds) Ethnographically Speaking: Autoethnography, Literature, and Aesthetics, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, pp. 87–95.
9.
FrankA (1995) The Wounded Story Teller, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
10.
GubaELincolnY (1982) Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology30(4): 233–252.
11.
HoPSY (1999) Developing a social constructionist therapy approach in working with gay men and their families in Hong Kong. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services9(4): 69–97.
12.
HoPSY (2007a) Eternal mothers or flexible housewives: Middle-aged Chinese married women in Hong Kong. Sex Roles: A Journal of Sex Research57(3): 249–265.
13.
HoPSY (2007b) Desperate housewives – The case of ‘Si-nai’ in Hong Kong. Affilia, Journal of Women and Social Work22(3): 255–270.
14.
HoPSYTsangAKT (2005) Beyond the vagina-clitoris debate: From naming the sex organ to the reclaiming of the body. Women’s Studies International Forum28: 523–534.
15.
HoganBLindenWNajarianB (2002) Social support interventions. Do they work?Clinical Psychology Review22(3): 381–440.
16.
NiemiHKemmisS (1999) Communicative evaluation. Lifelong Learning in Europe4(1): 55–64.
17.
PlummerK (1995) Telling Sexual Stories: Power, Change, and Social Worlds, New York: Routledge.
18.
PowellJ (2002) The changing conditions of social work research. British Journal of Social Work32(1): 17–33.
19.
ReasonP(1994) Three approaches to participative inquiry. In: DenzinNLincolnY (eds) Handhook of Qualitative Research, London: SAGE, pp. 324–339.
20.
ReissmanCK(1994) Making sense of marital violence: One woman’s narrative. In: ReissmanCK (ed.) Qualitative Studies in Social Work, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 113–132.
21.
RichardsonL(2000) Writing: A method of Inquiry. In: DenzinKLincolnY (eds) Handbook of qualitative Methods, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 923–948.
22.
Savin-BadenM (2004) Achieving reflexivity, moving researchers from analysis to interpretation in collaborative inquiry. Journal of Social Work Practice18(3): 365–378.
23.
SparkesA (1996) The fatal flaw: A narrative of the fragile body-self. Qualitative Inquiry2(4): 463–494.
24.
SparksAC(2002) Interlude: Autoethnography: Self-indulgence or something more? In: BochnerAPEllisC (eds) Ethnographically Speaking:Autoethnography, Literature, and Aesthetics, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, pp. 209–233.
25.
TsangAKTHoPSY (2007) Lost in translation: Sex and sexuality in elite discourse and everyday language. Sexualities10(5): 623–644.
26.
TurnerV (1974) Drama, Fields and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Societies, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
