Modern heteronormativity in Hong Kong has been produced via British colonialism, land developers, and the family, and maintained through post-colonial administration. Together, these factors have resulted in a heterosexual culture of intimacy with rigid public/private distinctions. Homonormativity has emerged with the rise of tongzhi (synonym for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered) space in Hong Kong since the 1990s, but has had the effect of marginalizing certain tongzhi along lines of class, age, and the body. Based on the narratives of 14 older (60+) gay men in Hong Kong, this article discusses how they have negotiated same-sex intimacy in everyday sites at two specific times – in their parents’ homes and public toilets in the 1940s–1950s, when homosexuality was a crime and homosexual identity had not yet developed; and in their own homes and within the present-day tongzhi world, which presents them with new opportunities and challenges. Using a post-structuralist conception of power/resistance that juxtaposes power and resistance in the same site, this article argues that the private home and public spaces are sites of governmentality/resistance while tongzhi spaces are sites of desire/domination, with class and age being important social identifiers of Hong Kong gay men. Through radical use of spaces, a tongzhi heterotopia can be created and practised in both hetero-/homo-sexual worlds. This article contributes to the sociology of sexuality by exploring how governmentality via British colonialism (and post-colonialism), land use, and the family shape tongzhi bodies and space, exposing the domination of hetero-/homo-normativities in tongzhi lives, and highlighting tongzhi resistance in Hong Kong.
AltmanD (1997) Global gaze/global gays. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies3(4): 417–436.
3.
BellD(1995) Perverse dynamics, sexual citizenship and the transformation of intimacy. In: BellDValentineG (eds) Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities, London: Routledge, pp. 304–317.
4.
BellDBinnieJ(1998) Theatres of cruelty, rivers of desire: The erotics of the street. In: FyfeNR (ed.) Images of the Street: Planning, Identity and Control in Public Space, London: Routledge, pp. 129–140.
5.
BellDBinnieJ (2000) The Sexual Citizen: Queer Politics and Beyond, Cambridge: Polity.
6.
BellDValentineG (1995) Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities, London: Routledge.
7.
BerlantLWarnerM (1998) Sex in public. Critical Inquiry24(2): 547–566.
8.
BerryC (2001) Asian values, family values: Film, video, and lesbian and gay identities. Journal of Homosexuality40(3/4): 211–231.
9.
BerryCFarquharM (2006) China on Screen: Cinema and Nation, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
10.
BinnieJ(1995) Trading places: Consumption, sexuality and the production of queer space. In: BellDValentineG (eds) Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities, London: Routledge, pp. 182–199.
11.
BinnieJValentineG (1999) Geographies of sexuality: A review of progress. Progress in Human Geography23(2): 175–187.
12.
BrownG (2009) Thinking beyond heteronormativity: Performative explorations of diverse gay economies. Environment and Planning A41(6): 1496–1510.
13.
BrowneKLimJBrownG (2007) Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics, Aldershot: Ashgate.
14.
Census and Statistics Department (2011) Hong Kong Annual Digest of Statistics 2011, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), People’s Republic of China.
15.
ChanPCW (2007) Same-sex marriage/constitutionalism and their centrality to equality rights in Hong Kong: A comparative-socio-legal appraisal. The International Journal of Human Rights11(1): 33–84.
16.
ChaunceyG (1994) Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Making of the Gay Male World, 1890–1940, New York: Basic Books.
17.
ChowNWS(2000) Ageing in Hong Kong. In: PhilipsDR (ed.) Ageing in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Policies and Future Trends, London: Routledge, pp. 158–173.
18.
CuthbertAR (1995) The right to the city: Surveillance, private interest and the public domain in Hong Kong. Cities12(5): 293–310.
19.
De CerteauM (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life, (trans. S. Rendall). Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
DugganL(2002) The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In: CastronovoRNelsonDD (eds) Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics, Durham, NC: Duke, pp. 175–194.
21.
DuncanN(1996) Renegotiating gender and sexuality in public and private spaces. In: DuncanN (ed.) Bodyspace: Destabilizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality, London: Routledge, pp. 127–145.
22.
FaureD (1997) A Documentary History of Hong Kong: Society, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
23.
FoucaultM (1980) The History of Sexuality, Volume One: An Introduction (trans. R Hurley), New York: Vintage.
24.
FoucaultM (1986) Of other spaces. Diacritics16(1): 22–27.
25.
Gorman-MurrayA (2007) Reconfiguring domestic values: Meanings of home for gay men and lesbians. Housing, Theory and Society24(3): 229–246.
26.
HerekGM(1995) Psychological heterosexism in the United States. In: D’AugelliARPattersonCJ (eds) Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Identities over the Lifespan: Psychological Perspectives, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 321–346.
27.
HinschB (1990) Passions of the Cut Sleeve: The Male Homosexual Tradition in China, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ho PSY (1997) Politicising identity: Decriminalisation of homosexuality and the emergence of gay identity in Hong Kong. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Essex, UK.
30.
Hong Kong Government (1947) Annual Report on Hong Kong for the Year 1946, Hong Kong: Government Printer.
31.
Hong Kong Government (1952) Hong Kong Annual Report 1951, Hong Kong: Government Printer.
32.
HubbardP (2001) Sex zones: Intimacy, citizenship and public space. Sexualities4(1): 51–71.
33.
IngramGBBouthilletteAMRetterY (1997) Queers in Space: Communities/Public Places/Sites of Resistance, Washington DC: Bay Press.
34.
JeyasinghamD (2010) Building heteronormativity: The social and material reconstruction of men’s public toilets as spaces of heterosexuality. Social & Cultural Geography11(4): 307–325.
35.
JohnstonLValentineG(1995) Wherever I lay my girlfriend, that’s my home: The performance and surveillance of lesbian identities in domestic environments. In: BellDValentineG (eds) Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities, London: Routledge, pp. 99–113.
36.
JonesJPughS (2005) Ageing gay man: Lessons from the sociology of embodiment. Men and Masculinities7(3): 248–260.
37.
KangWQ (2009) Obsession: Male Same-Sex Relations in China, 1900–1950, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press (Queer Asia Series).
38.
KongTSK (2011) The Chinese Male Homosexualities: Memba, Tongzhi and Golden Boy, London: Routledge.
39.
KramerJL(1995) Bachelor farmers and spinsters: Gay and lesbian identities and communities in rural North Dakota. In: BellDValentineG (eds) Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities, London: Routledge, pp. 200–213.
40.
LauSK (1982) Society and Politics in Hong Kong, Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
41.
LawWS(1998) Managerializing colonialism. In: ChenKH (ed.) Trajectories: Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, London: Routledge, pp. 109–121.
42.
LethbridgeHJ (1976) The quare fellow: Homosexuality and the law in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Law Journal6(3): 292–326.
43.
LeungHHS (2008) Undercurrents: Queer Culture and Postcolonial Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
44.
LevineM (1979) Gay ghetto. Journal of Homosexuality4(4): 363–377.
45.
LimK (2004) Where love dares (not) speak its name: The expression of homosexuality in Singapore. Urban Studies41(9): 1759–1788.
46.
LouieK (2002) Theorising Chinese Masculinity: Society and Gender in China, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
LouieK(2003) Chinese, Japanese and global masculine identities. In: LouieKLowM (eds) Asian Masculinities: The Meaning and Practice of Manhood in China and Japan, London: RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 1–15.
48.
MartinF (2000) From citizenship to queer counterpublic: Reading Taipei’s New Park. Communal/Plural8(1): 81–94.
49.
MillerN (1995) Out of the Past: Gay and Lesbian History from 1869 to the Present, New York: Vintage.
50.
OngAW (1993) On the edge of empires: Flexible citizenship among Chinese in diaspora. positions: east asia culture critiques1(3): 745–778.
51.
OswinN (2008) Critical geographies and the uses of sexuality: Deconstructing queer space. Progress in Human Geography32(1): 89–103.
52.
PainRMowlGTalbotC (2000) Difference and the negotiation of ‘old age’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18(3): 377–393.
53.
PlummerK(1992) Speaking its name: Inventing a lesbian and gay studies. In: PlummerK (ed.) Modern Homosexualities: Fragments of Lesbian and Gay Experience, London: Routledge, pp. 3–25.
54.
PlummerK (2010) Generational sexualities, subterranean traditions, and the hauntings of the sexual world: Some preliminary remarks. Symbolic Interaction33(2): 163–190.
55.
PuarJ (2002) A transnational feminist critique of queer tourism. Antipode34(5): 935–946.
56.
RichA (1980) Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs5(4): 631–660.
57.
RichardsonD(2001) Extending citizenship: Cultural citizenship and sexuality. In: StevensonN (ed.) Culture and Citizenship, London: SAGE, pp. 153–166.
58.
RooneyN (2003) At Home with Density, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
59.
RuanFFTsaiYM (1987) Male homosexuality in the traditional Chinese literature. Journal of Homosexuality14(3–4): 21–33.
60.
SalaffJ (1981) Working Daughters of Hong Kong: Filial Piety or Power in the Family?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Samshasha (1997) Zhongguo tongxinglian shilu [History of Homosexuality in China]. Hong Kong: Rosa Winkel Press [Chinese].
62.
SaundersP (1989) The meaning of ‘home’ in contemporary English culture. Housing Studies4(3): 177–192.
63.
SeidmanS (1996) Queer Theory/Sociology, Cambridge: Blackwell, pp. 1–29.
64.
SomervilleP (1992) Homelessness and the meaning of home: Rooflessness or rootlessness?International Journal of Urban and Regional Research16(4): 529–539.
65.
SongG (2004) The Fragile Scholar: Power and Masculinity in Chinese Culture, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
66.
TangDTS (2011) Conditional Spaces: Hong Kong Lesbian Desires and Everyday Life, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
67.
Too WT (2007) A study of private/public space in Hong Kong. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Hong Kong.
68.
ValentineG (1993) (Hetero)sexing space: Lesbian perceptions and experiences of everyday spaces. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11(4): 395–413.
69.
ValentineG(2002) Queer bodies and the production of space. In: RichardsonDSeidmanS (eds) Handbook of Lesbian and Gay Studies, London: SAGE, pp. 145–160.
70.
WeinbergG (1973) Society and the Healthy Homosexual, Boston, MA: Alyson Publications.
71.
WhiteheadK (2001) Hong Kong Murders, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72.
WhittleS(1994) Consuming differences: The collaboration of the gay body with the cultural state. In: WhittleS (ed.) The Margins of the City: Gay Men’s Urban Lives, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 27–41.
73.
WoodheadD(1995) ‘Surveillant gays’: HIV, space and the constitution of identities. In: BellDValentineG (eds) Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities, London: Routledge, pp. 231–244.
