The phenomenon of heteroflexibility, wherein a heterosexual character engages in same-sex intimacy, provides a good example of how modern narratives of sexuality can contain promises of subversion yet also shore up heteronormative schemas. To fully understand how the notion of heteroflexibility functions to broaden and/or restrict our understandings of (female) sexuality, we need to examine how these narratives are taken up by the audience. This article explores this tension by analysing how readers reacted to a heteroflexible storyline featured in the Buffy the Vampire Slayer comic books. By examining how this story was interpreted, rejected and/or embraced by readers, I show that readers who disliked the heteroflexible storyline as well as those who enjoyed it draw on liberal discourses that obscure how heteronormativity operates. This in turn limits heteroflexibility’s potential for disrupting dominant heteronormative discourses.
AbbottS (2010) The Cult TV Book. New York: IB Tauris.
2.
AdamsML (1997) The Trouble with Normal: Postwar Youth and the Making of Heterosexuality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
3.
AmbroseE (2009) Heteroflexibility: Bending the existing label triangle. Colorado State University Journal of Student Affairs18: 69–75.
4.
AndersonSJJohnsonJT (2003) The who and when of ‘gender-blind’ attitudes: Predictors of gender-role egalitarianism in two different domains. Sex roles49(9–10): 527–532.
5.
BattlesKHilton-MorrowW (2002) Gay characters in conventional spaces: Will & Grace and the situation comedy genre. Critical Studies in Media Communication19(1): 87–105.
6.
BaumeisterRF (2000) Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin126(3): 347–374.
7.
BeckerR (2006) Gay TV and Straight America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8.
BendixR (1997) In Search of Authenticity: The Formation of Folklore Studies. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
9.
10.
BeirneR (2008) Lesbians in Television and Text After the Millennium. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
Bonilla-SilvaE (2002) The linguistics of color blind racism: How to talk nasty about Blacks without sounding ‘racist’. Critical Sociology28(1–2): 41–63.
12.
Bonilla-SilvaE (2006) Racism without racists, 2nd edn. Oxford: Roman and Littlefield.
13.
Bonilla-SilvaERayV (2009) When Whites love a Black leader: Race matters in Obamerica. Journal of African American Studies13(2): 176–183.
14.
15.
BrauckmanS (2001) ‘Nothing else matters but sex’: Cold war narratives of deviance and the search for lesbian teachers in Florida, 1959–1963. Feminist Studies27(3): 553–575.
16.
BrickellC (2001) Whose ‘special treatment’? Heterosexism and the problems with liberalism. Sexualities4(2): 211–235.
17.
BrickellC (2004) The transformation of heterosexism and its paradoxes. In: IngrahamC (ed.) Thinking Straight: The Power, Promise and Paradox of Heterosexuality. New York: Routledge, pp. 85–108.
18.
BrickellC (2006) Sexology, the homo/hetero binary, and the complexities of male sexual history. Sexualities9(4): 423–447.
19.
BritzmanD (1998) Lost Subjects, Contested Objects. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
20.
21.
22.
23.
CapsutoS (2000) Alternate channels: The Uncensored Story of Gay and Lesbian Images on Radio and Television: 1930s to the Present. New York: Ballantine Books.
24.
ChasinA (2001) Selling Out: The Gay and Lesbian Movement Goes to Market. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
ClarkeE (2000) Virtuous Vice: Homoeroticism and the Public Sphere. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
ClarkeVKitzingerC (2004) Lesbian and gay parents on talk shows: Resistance or collusion in heterosexism?. Qualitative Research in Psychology1(3): 195–217.
27.
CollinsPH (2004) Black Sexual Politics: African-Americans, Gender and the New Racism. New York: Routledge.
28.
CurrieDKellyDPomerantzS (2009) Girl Power: Girls Reinventing Girlhood. New York: Peter Lang.
29.
DaughertyAM (2001) Just a girl: Buffy as icon. In: KaveneyR (ed.) Reading the Vampire Slayer: An Unofficial Critical Companion to Buffy and Angel, 2nd edn. New York: Tauris Park, pp.148–165.
30.
DiamondL (2005) ‘I’m straight, but I kissed a girl’: The trouble with American media representations of female–female sexuality. Feminism and Psychology15(1): 104–110.
31.
DiamondL (2008) Sexual Fluidity: Understanding Women’s Love and Desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
DysonME (1994) Essentialism and the Complexities of Racial Identity. In: GoldgergDT (ed.) Multiculturalism: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 218–229.
33.
EnglandP (2010) The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender and Society24(2): 149–166.
34.
35.
FejesF (2003) Advertising and the political economy of lesbian/gay identity. In: DinesGMcMahon HumezJ (eds) Gender, Race, and Class in Media: A Text-Reader. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pp. 212–222.
36.
FejesFPetrichK (1993) Invisibility, homophobia and heterosexism: Lesbians, gays and the media. Critical Studies in Mass Communication10(4): 396–422.
37.
FoucaultM (1980) History of Sexuality: Volume 1. New York: Vintage.
38.
Frohard-DourlentH (2010) ‘Lez-faux’ representations: How Buffy season eight navigates the politics of female heteroflexibility. In: WaggonerE (ed.) Sexual Rhetoric in the Works of Joss Whedon. Jefferson, NC: MacFarland, pp. 31–47.
39.
40.
GarrityJ (2001) Mediating the taboo: The straight lesbian gaze. In: ThomasC (ed.) Straight with a Twist. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 191–231.
41.
GressonA (1995) The Recovery of Race in America. Minnapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
43.
44.
45.
HennessyR (1994) Queer visibility in commodity culture. Cultural Critique29: 31–76.
46.
JacksonS (2006) Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: The complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity. Feminist Theory7(1): 105–121.
47.
JacksonSGilbertsonT (2009) ‘Hot lesbians’: Young people talk about representations of lesbianism. Sexualities12(2): 199–224.
48.
JenkinsT (2005) ‘Potential lesbians at two o’clock’: The heterosexualization of lesbianism in the recent teen film. The Journal of Popular Culture38(3): 491–504.
49.
JowettL (2005) Sex and the Slayer: A Gender Studies Primer for the Buffy Fan. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
50.
KaveneyR (2004) Reading the Vampire Slayer: An Unofficial Critical Companion to Buffy and Angel, 2nd edn. New York: IB Tauris.
51.
KimJSorsoliCCollinsK (2007) From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. The Journal of Sex Research44(2): 145–157.
52.
KinnishKStressbergDTurnerC (2005) Sex differences in the flexibility of sexual orientation: A multidimensional retrospective assessment. Archives of Sexual Behavior34(2): 173–183.
53.
KinsmanG (2007) Constructing sexual problems: ‘These things may lead to the tragedy of our species’. In: AnthonyWSamuelsonL (eds) Power and Resistance: Critical Thinking About Canadian Social Issues, 4th edn. Halifax: Fernwood, pp. 85–119.
54.
KitzingerC (1987) The Social Construction of Lesbianism. London: SAGE.
55.
Ladson-BillingsG (1998) Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?. Qualitative Studies in Education11(1): 7–24.
56.
LuhmannS (1998) Queering/querying pedagogy? Or, pedagogy is a pretty queer thing. In: PinarW (ed.) Queer Theory in Education. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 141–155.
57.
ManningT (1996) Gay culture: Who needs it?. In: SimpsonM (ed.) Anti-Gay. London: Cassell, pp. 98–117.
58.
MaskovskyJ (2002) Do we all ‘reek of the commodity’? Consumption and the erasure of poverty in lesbian and gay studies. In: LewinELeapW (eds) Out in Theory: The Emergence of Lesbian and Gay Anthropology. University of Illinois Press, pp. 264–286.
59.
McDermottE (2011) The world some have won: Sexuality, class and inequality. Sexualities14(1): 63–78.
60.
MendlesohnF (2002) Surpassing the love of vampires; or, why (and how) a queer reading of the Buffy/Willow relationship is denied. In: WilcoxRLaveryD (eds) Fighting the Forces: What’s at Stake in Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 45–60.
61.
NicholsM (2004) Lesbian sexuality/female sexuality: Rethinking ‘lesbian bed death’. Sexual and Relationship Therapy19(4): 363–371.
62.
ParkerALyleS (2008) ‘Sport’, masculinity and consumption: Metrosexuality, ‘chav’ culture and social class. In: AtkinsonMYoungK (eds) Tribal Play: Subcultural Journeys Through Sport. Bingley: Emerald.
63.
PascoeCJ (2005) ‘Dude, you’re a fag’: Adolescent masculinity and the fag discourse. Sexualities8(3): 329–346.
64.
PeplauLAGarnetsL (2002) A new paradigm for understanding women’s sexuality and sexual orientation. Journal of Social Issues56(2): 330–350.
65.
PhelanS (2001) Sexual strangers: Gays, Lesbians, and Dilemmas of Citizenship. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
66.
PlaydonZ (2004) What you are, what’s to come: Feminism, citizenship and the divine in Buffy. In: KaveneyR (ed.) Reading the Vampire Slayer: An Unofficial Critical Companion to Buffy and Angel, 2nd edn. New York: Tauris Parke, pp. 156–194.
67.
RichardsonD (2004) Locating sexualities: From here to normality. Sexualities7(4): 391–411.
68.
RiordanE (2001) Commodified agents and empowered girls: Consuming and producing feminism. Journal of Communication Inquiry25(3): 280–297.
69.
RubinG (1993) Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In: AbeloveHBaraleMAHalperinD (eds) The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 3–44.
70.
RussoV (1981) The Celluloid Closet: Homosexuality in the Movies. (revised edn). New York: Harper.
71.
SeidmanS (2004) From polluted homosexual to the normal gay: Changing patterns of sexual regulation in America. In: IngrahamC (ed.) Thinking Straight: The Power, Promise and Paradox of Heterosexuality. New York: Routledge, pp. 39–62.
72.
Shibley-HydeJDurikAM (2000) Gender differences in erotic plasticity—evolutionary or sociocultural forces?. Comment on Baumeister (2000) Psychological Bulletin126(3): 375–379.
73.
SiemannC (2002) Darkness falls on the endless summer: Buffy as Gidget for the Fin de Siècle. In: WilcoxRLaveryD (eds) Fighting the Forces: What’s at Stake in Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 120–129.
TateW (1997) Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. In: AppleM (ed.) Review of Research in Education, 2. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association, pp. 191–243.
77.
TaylorY (2011) Sexualities and class. Sexualities14(1): 3–11.
78.
TaylorYHinesSCaseyM (2010) Theorizing Intersectionality and Sexuality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
TorresS (1993) Prime time lesbianism. In: AbeloveHBaraleMAHalperinD (eds) The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 176–185.
81.
Van DijkT (2008) Discourse and Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
82.
Velázquez VargasY (2010) A Queer Eye for Capitalism: The Commodification of Sexuality in American Television. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
83.
VintS (2002) ‘Killing us softly’?: A feminist search for the ‘real’ Buffy. Slayage5: 2–12.
84.
WaltersSD (2001) All the Rage: The Story of Gay Visibility in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
85.
86.
87.
88.
WeeksJ (1981) Sex, Politics And Society: The Regulation of Sexuality Since 1800. New York: Longman.
89.
WilcoxRLaveryD (2002) Fighting the Forces: What’s at Stake in Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
90.
WilkinsonS (1996) Bisexuality ‘a la mode’. Women’s Studies International Forum19(3): 293–301.
91.
WiseT (2010) Colorblind: The Rise of Post-Racial Politics and the Retreat from Racial Equity. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Open Media.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
YaksichM (2005) Consuming queer: The commodification of culture and its effects on social acceptance. Elements Spring:25–35.
99.
YepGA (1997) Changing homophobic and heterosexist attitudes. In: SearsJTWilliamsWL (eds) Overcoming Heterosexism and Homophobia: Strategies that Work. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 49–64.
