This article argues that in the context of debates regarding same sex marriage, too little attention has been paid to geographic specificity that not only reconstitutes sexualities but also remakes these in relation to material classed relations. In contrast to arguments that appear to transcend spatial differentiation, I will examine the differential effects of the Civil Partnership Act, particularly for those on state-based benefits. Using data collected from local government websites, I will argue that the implications for those who are now understood as ‘new couples’ vary according to local government district. ‘Acceptance’ of same sex relationships effects same sex couples in geographically diverse ways, with classed dimensions. Thus, the class and place-based benefits of sexual ‘equalities’ question the ubiquitous deployment of hetero/homonormativity to understand the ‘new landscapes of equality’. The article then goes on to focus on the city of Brighton and Hove to explore classed ‘choice’, exclusions and materialities. Arguing that the ‘queer unwanted’ may have no choice but to be unwantedly queer, the article looks at how ‘couples’ come into being through sanitized definitions that include shared accommodation, responsibility for children and future plans. Attention to the intersection of class and sexuality casts light on whose ‘choices’ are (dis)allowed in changing legal contexts, important when evaluating the differential effects of ‘new equalities’.
Ahmed S. ( 2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2.
Auchmuty R. ( 2004) Same sex marriage revived: Feminist critique and legal strategy. Feminism and Psychology4(1): 101-126.
3.
Badgett MVL ( 2003) Money, Myth and Change: The Economic Lives of Lesbians and Gay Men. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Barker N. ( 2006) Sex and the Civil Partnership Act: The future of (non) conjugality? Feminist Legal Studies14(2): 241-259.
5.
Barrett DC and Pollack LM ( 2005) Whose gay community? Social class, sexual self-expression and gay community. The Sociological Quarterly46(3): 437-456.
6.
Bell D. and Binnie J. ( 2000) The Sexual Citizen: Queer Politics and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
Bell D. and Valentine G. ( 1995) Mapping Desires: Geographies of Sexualities. London: Routledge.
8.
Bottomley A. and Wong S. ( 2006) Domestic partnerships: Stretching the marriage model? Feminist Legal Studies Special issue14(2): 141-143.
9.
Boyd SB and Young CFL ( 2003) ‘From same sex to no sex?’ Trends towards recognition of same sex relationships in Canada. Seattle Journal for Social Justice1(3): 757-793.
10.
Brandzel AL ( 2005) Queering citizenship? Same sex marriage and the state . GLQ11(2): 171-204.
11.
Brighton & Hove City Council (2005) Important Changes For Same sex Couples. Leaflet produced by Brighton & Hove City Council. URL (accessed 1 November 2010): http://www.spectrum-lgbt.org/cp/HB_CTB_same_sex_leaflet.pdf .
12.
Brighton & Hove City Council (2007) Housing and Council Tax Benefit. URL (accessed 14 July 2008 ): http://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/index.cfm?request=c1145263 .
13.
Brown G. ( 2009) Thinking beyond homonormativity: Performative explorations of diverse gay economies. Environment and Planning A41(6): 1496-1510. URL (accessed 1 November 2010): http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=a4162 .
14.
Brown G., Browne K. and Lim J. (in press) Sexual life. In: del Casino Jr VJ, Thomas M, Cloke P and Panelli R (eds) A Companion to Social Geography. London: Wiley Blackwell.
15.
Brown M. ( 2000) Closet Space: Geographies of Metaphors from the Body to the Globe. London: Routledge .
16.
Brown M. ( 2007) Counting on queer geography. In: Browne K, Lim J and Brown G (eds) Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics. Aldershot: Ashgate, 207-214.
17.
Brown M. and Knopp L. ( 2006) Place or polygons? Governmentality, scale and the Census in The Gay and Lesbian Atlas. Population, Space and Place12(4): 223-242.
18.
Browne K. and Davis P. ( 2008) Housing: Count Me In Too Additional Analysis Report. Spectrum and University of Brighton. URL (accessed 1 November 2010): http://www.spectrum-lgbt.org/cmiToo/downloads/CMIT_Housing_Report_April_08.pdf .
19.
Browne K., Lim J. and Brown G. ( 2007) Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics . Aldershot: Ashgate.
20.
Butler J. ( 2004) Undoing Gender. London: Routledge.
21.
Cahill S. ( 2005) Welfare moms and the two grooms: The concurrent promotion and restriction of marriage in US public policy. Sexualities8(2): 169-187.
22.
Casey M. ( 2007) The queer unwanted and their undesirable ‘otherness’ . In: Browne K, Lim J and Brown G (eds) Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics. Aldershot: Ashgate, 125-135.
23.
Clarke V. ( 2003) Lesbian and gay marriage: Transformation or normalization ? Feminism & Psychology13(4): 519-529.
24.
Clarke V. and Finlay SJ ( 2004) ‘For better or worse?’ Lesbian and gay marriage . Feminism & Psychology14(1): 17-23.
25.
Davis H. ( 2005) The difference of queer. Canadian Women’s Studies24(2-3): 23-27.
26.
Duggan L. ( 2002) The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism . In: Castronovo R and Nelson D (eds) Materializing Democracy. Durham NC: Duke University Press, 175-194.
27.
Duncan S. and Smith D. ( 2006) Individualisation versus the geography of ‘new’ families. Twenty-First Society1(2): 167-189.
28.
Elder G. ( 2002) Response to ‘Queer patriarchies, queer racisms, international’. Antipode34(5): 988-991.
29.
Freeman E. ( 2002) The wedding complex: Forms of belonging in modern American culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30.
Gates GJ and Ost J. ( 2004) The Gay & Lesbian Atlas. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
31.
Halberstam J. ( 2003) ‘What’s that smell?’ Queer temporalities and subcultural lives. International Journal of Cultural Studies6(3): 313-334.
32.
Harding R. ( 2006) ‘Dogs are ‘‘registered’’, people shouldn’t be’: Legal consciousness and lesbian and gay rights’. Social & Legal Studies15(4): 511-533.
33.
Harding R. ( 2008) Recognizing (and resisting) regulation: Attitudes to the introduction of civil partnership. Sexualities11(6): 740-760.
34.
Harding R. and Peel E. ( 2006) ‘We do’? International perspectives on equality, legality and same sex relationships. Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review7(2): 123-140.
35.
Hennessy R. ( 2000) Profit and pleasure: Sexual identities in late capitalism . London: Routledge .
36.
Hubbard P. ( 2000) Desire/disgust: Mapping the moral contours of heterosexuality . Progress in Human Geography24(2): 191-217.
37.
Ingraham C. ( 1999) White Weddings: Romancing Heterosexuality in Popular Culture . London: Routledge.
38.
Kandaswamy P. ( 2008) State austerity and the racial politics of same sex marriage in the USA. Sexualities11(6): 706-725.
39.
Kitchen L. ( 2000) Environmental policy and the differentiation of rural space. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning2(2): 135-147.
40.
Knopp L. ( 1998) Sexuality and urban space: Gay male identity politics in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. In: Fincher R and Jacobs J (eds) Cities of Difference. London: Guilford , 149-176.
41.
Mitchell M., Dickens S. and O’Connor W. ( 2009) Same Sex Couples and the Impact of Legislative Change . London: National Centre for Social Research.
42.
Munt SR ( 2007) Queer Attachments: The Cultural Politics of Shame . Aldershot: Ashgate.
43.
Murdoch J. and Ward N. ( 1997) Governmentality and territoriality: The statistical manufacture of Britain’s ‘national farm’. Political Geography16(4): 307-324.
44.
Nicol N. and Smith M. ( 2008) Legal struggles and political resistance: Same sex marriage in Canada and the USA. Sexualities11(6): 667-687.
45.
O’Brien J. ( 2008) Afterword: Complicating homophobia. Sexualities11(4): 496-512.
46.
Oerton S. ( 2008) Old wine in (new) champagne bottles. Sexualities11(6): 782-786.
47.
Oswin N. ( 2005) Towards radical geographies of complicit queer futures . ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographers3(2): 79-86.
48.
Oswin N. ( 2008) Critical geographies and the uses of sexuality: Deconstructing queer space. Progress in Human Geography32(1): 89-103.
49.
Peel E. and Harding R. ( 2004) Civil partnerships: A new couple’s conversation . Feminism and Psychology14(1): 41-46.
50.
Peel E. and Harding R. ( 2008) Editorial introduction: Recognizing and celebrating same sex relationships: Beyond the normative debate. Sexualities11(6): 659-666.
51.
Phillips R., Watt D. and Shuttleton D. ( 2000) De-Centring Sexualities: Politics and Representations Beyond the Metropolis. London: Routledge.
52.
Rasmussen CE ( 2006) ‘We’re no metrosexuals: Identity, place and sexuality in the struggle over gay marriage. Social & Cultural Geography7(5): 807-825.
53.
Richardson D. ( 1998) Sexuality and citizenship. Sociology32(1): 83-101.
54.
Richardson D. ( 2004) Locating sexualities: From here to normality. Sexualities7(4): 391-411.
55.
Richardson D. ( 2005) Desiring sameness? The rise of a neoliberal politics of normalisation. Antipode37(3): 515-535.
56.
Rothblum ED, Balsam KF and Solomon SE ( 2008) Comparisons of same sex couples who were married in Massachusetts, had domestic partnerships in California or had civil unions in Vermont. Journal of Family Issues29(1): 48-78.
57.
Seidman S. ( 2002) Beyond the Closet: The Transformation of Gay and Lesbian Life. London: Routledge .
58.
Shipman B. and Smart C. ( 2007) ‘It’s made a huge difference’: Recognition, rights and the personal significance of civil partnerships, Sociological Research Online12(1). URL: (accessed 1 November 2010): http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/1/shipman.html.
59.
Smart C. ( 2008) ‘Can I Be Bridesmaid?’ Combining the personal and political in same sex weddings. Sexualities11(6): 761-776.
60.
Sociological Research Online (2007) URL (accessed 1 November 2010): http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/1/contents.html .
61.
Spade D. ( 2007) Gender reclassification, the administrative state and trans survival. Space and Sexuality Pre-Conference , San Francisco 17 April 2007.
62.
Spectrum (2008) Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Community Forum. URL (accessed 1 November 2010): www.spectrum-lgbt.org .
63.
Steinbugler AC ( 2005) Visibility as privilege and danger: Heterosexual and same sex inter-racial intimacy in the 21st century. Sexualities8(4): 425-443.
64.
Stonewall (2005) Get Hitched leaflet. URL (accessed November 2010): http://www.stonewall.org.uk/documents/get_hitched_a_guide_to_civil_partnership_english.pdf .
65.
Stychin C. ( 2006) Las Vegas is not where we are: Queer readings of the Civil Partnership Act. Political Geography25(8): 899-920.
66.
Taylor J. ( 2005) Who manages feminist-inspired reform? An in-depth look at Title IX Coordinators in the United States. Gender & Society19(3): 358-375.
67.
Taylor Y. ( 2007) Working Class Lesbian Life: Classed Outsiders. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
68.
Taylor Y. ( 2008) ‘That’s not really my scene’: Working-class lesbians in (and out of) place. Sexualities11(5): 523-546.
69.
Taylor Y. ( 2009) Lesbian and Gay Parenting: Securing Social and Educational Capital. London: Palgrave.
70.
Tucker A. ( 2008) Queer Visibilities: Space, Identity and Interaction in Cape Town. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwells .
71.
Valocchi S. ( 2002) Not yet queer enough: The lessons of queer theory for the sociology of gender and sexuality. Gender & Society19(6): 750-770.
72.
Walsh K. ( 2007) ‘It got very debauched, very Dubai!’ Heterosexual intimacy amongst singleBritish expatriates. Social & Cultural Geography8(4): 507-533.
73.
Warner M. ( 1999) The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer life. New York: The Free Press.
74.
Weeks J. ( 2007) The World We Have Won. London : Routledge.
75.
Weston K. ( 1995) Get thee to a big city: Sexual imaginary and the great gay migration. GLQ: Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies2(253): 277.
