Since the mid-1990s political and religious conservatives and reactionaries have
constructed two seemingly contradictory threats to the American body politic: poor,
presumably heterosexual, single mothers who fail to marry, and same-sex couples,
presumed to be economically privileged, who seek to marry. Ironically, welfare
reformers in 1996 portrayed single mothers and cohabiting unmarried couples as
selfish for not getting married, and today these same politicians and
pundits denounce gay and lesbian couples as self-indulgent for seeking to get
married. They are also attacking gay and lesbian parenting, and lesbian
parenting in particular, as being ‘as bad’ for children as
single mother parenting. In both discourses about women on welfare and gay and
lesbian people, a central theme emerges: bad individual sexual choices are the key
causes of the problems poor women and gay people face, not flawed public policy and
social stigma.
Abramovitz, M.
(1996) Under Attack: Fighting Back.
New York: New York University Press
.
2.
American Enterprise Institute
(2000[1987]) ‘A Community of Self-Reliance: A New Consensus on Family
and Welfare’, in
M. Abramovitz
(ed.) Under Attack: Fighting Back, pp. 4,
19.
New York: New York University Press
.
3.
American Experiment Quarterly
(2001)
‘Using Welfare Reform to Strengthen Marriage’
, American Experiment Quarterly (Summer):
63-64
.
4.
Barr, B.
(1995)
‘District of Columbia Domestic Partner Benefits Debate’
, Congressional Record (November 1) 104th Congress, p.
H11657
. Washington DC: US Congress.
5.
Blankenhorn, David
(1999) ‘Introduction’, in
Wade Horn
,
D. Blankenhorn
and
M. B. Pearlstein
(eds) The Fatherhood Movement: A Call to Action, p.
xii.
New York: Lexington Books
.
6.
Blankenhorn, David
(2001)
‘A city with Foundations’
, American Experiment Quarterly (Summer):
94-95
.
7.
Bradford, Judith
,
Barrett, K.
and
Honnold, J. A.
(2002) 2000 Census and Same-Sex Households: A
User’s Guide (Internet). Policy Brief.
New York: Policy Institute of the National Gay
and Lesbian Task Force
. Available from:
<http://www.thetaskforce.org/library//census.htm> (accessed
9 February 2004).
8.
Cahill, Sean
and
Jones, Kenneth
T. (2001) Leaving Our Children Behind: Welfare Reform and the
Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Community (Internet). Policy
Brief.
New York: Policy Institute of the National Gay
and Lesbian Task Force
. Available from:
<http://www.thetaskforce.org/downloads/WelfRef.pdf>
(accessed 9 February 2004).
9.
Cahill, Sean
and
Slater, S.
(2004) Marriage: Legal Protections for Families and
Children (Internet). Policy Brief.
New York: Policy Institute of the National Gay
and Lesbian Task Force
. Available from:
<http://www.thetaskforce.org/marriagecenter> (accessed 9
February 2004).
10.
Cahill, Sean
,
Ellen, M.
and
Tobias, S.
(2003) Family Policy: Issues Affecting Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual
and Transgender Families (Internet). Policy Brief.
New York: Policy Institute of the National Gay
and Lesbian Task Force
. Available from:
<http://www.thetaskforce.org/library/familypolicy.htm>
(accessed 9 February 2004).
11.
Canady, C.
(1996) Congressional Record (July 11): 104th Congress. p.
H7443
. Washington DC: US Congress.
12.
Cianciotto, Jason
and
Colvin, R.
(2004) The Bush-Cheney Administration on Lesbian, Gay,
Bisexual and Transgender Issues (Internet).
New York: Policy Institute of the National Gay
and Lesbian Task Force
. Available from:
<http://www.thetaskforce.org/electioncenter> (accessed 9
February 2004).
13.
CNN Access
(2002) Quayle: Ten Years After Murphy Brown. Available
from:
<http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/09/quayle.cnna/>
(accessed 30 June 2004).
14.
Colton C., Campbell
and
Davidson, R. H.
(2000) ‘Gay and Lesbian Issues in the
Congressional Arena’, in
C. Rimmerman
,
K. Wald
and
C. Wilcox
(eds) The Politics of Gay Rights, p. 362.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
15.
Congressional Record
(1996)
‘DOMA debate’
, Congressional Record (July 12): 104th Congress, p.
H7482
. Washington DC: US Congress.
16.
Department of Justice, Canada
(2003) Reference to the Supreme Court of Canada
(Internet).
Backgrounder. Ontario Canada: Department of Justice
. Available from:
<http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/news/nr/2003/doc_30946.html>
(accessed 20 June 2004).
17.
Eberly, D.
(1998) Civil Society and the Renewal of American
Culture.
New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers
.
18.
Eskridge, W.
and
Spedale, D.
(2004) ‘Response’,
Issues in Legal Scholarship 5 (July). Available from: <www.bepress.com/ils>
19.
Eskridge, W.
,
Sepdale, D.
and
Ytterberg, H.
(2004) ‘Nordic Bliss? Scandinavian Registered
Partnerships and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate’, Issues
in Legal Scholarship Article 4: Single-sex marriage. Available on
<http://www.freedomtomarry.org/pdf/scandinaviaBEPressArticle.pdf>
(accessed 22 December) and
<http://www.freedomtomarry.org/pdf/scandinaviaBEPressArticle.pdf>
(accessed 22 December 2004).
20.
Frank, N.
(2004) ‘Quack Gay Marriage Science:
Perverted’, The New Republic (3 May). Available from:
<https://ssl.tnr.com/p/docsub.mhtml?i=20040503&s=frank050304>
(accessed 20 June 2004).
21.
Goldstein, A.
(2001)
‘Looking Beyond Jobs in Welfare Reform: Conservatives Advise
States to Promote Marriage, Abstinence, Stronger Families’
, Washington Post (6 September):
A21
.
22.
Hardisty J.
(1999) Mobilizing Resentment: Conservative Resurgence from
the John Birch Society to the Promise Keepers.
Boston, MA: Beacon Press
.
23.
Hirczy de Mino, W.
(2000)
‘From Bastardy to Equality: The Rights of Non-marital Children
and their Fathers in Comparative Perspective’
, Journal of Comparative Family Studies31(2):
231-262
.
24.
Horn, W.
(1999) ‘Did you say
“movement?” ’ in
Wade Horn
,
D. Blankenhorn
and
M. B. Pearlstein
(eds) The Fatherhood Movement: A Call to Action, p. 11.
New York: Lexington Books
.
25.
Horn, W.
(2001)
‘Wedding Bell Blues: Marriage and Welfare Reform’
, Brookings Review19(3, summer):
39
.
26.
Horn, Wade
and
Bush, Andrew
(1997) Fathers, Marriage, and Welfare Reform (Hudson
Institute report, March). From
<http://welfarereformer.org/articles/father.htm> (accessed
1 November 2001).
27.
Horn, W.
and
Sawhill, I.
(2001) ‘Fathers, Marriage, and Welfare
Reform’, in
R. Haskins
and
R. Blank
(eds) The New World of Welfare.
Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute
.
28.
Horn, W.
,
Blankenhorn, D.
and
Pearlstein, M. B.
(eds) (1999) The Fatherhood Movement: A Call to Action.
New York: Lexington Books
.
29.
Hull, K. E.
(2003)
‘The Cultural Power of Law and the Cultural Enactment of
Legality: The Case of Same-Sex Marriage’
, Law and Social Inquiry28(3):
629-657
.
30.
Johnson, J.
(2001) ‘Homosexuals Seek Survivor Benefits
Intended for Families’, Cybercast News Service 22
October (CNSNews.com.). Available from:
<http://www.dadi.org/homogred.htm> (accessed 9 February 2004).
31.
Kim, R.
and
Reed, B.
(2004)
‘State of the Union’
, The Nation 5 July.
32.
Kurtz, S.
(2004)
‘The End of Marriage in Scandinavia: The “Conservative
Case” for Same-Sex Marriage Collapses’
, The Weekly Standard9(20).
33.
Lerner, S.
(2001) ‘An Orgy of Abstinence: Federal Funding
Pushes No-Sex Education into the Mainstream’, Village
Voice (1-7 August). Available from:
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0131/lerner.php (accessed 16 January 2004).
34.
Lewis, G.
and
Edelson, J.
(2000) ‘DOMA and ENDA: Congress Votes on Gay
Rights’, in
C. Rimmerman
,
K. Wald
and
C. Wilcox
(eds) The Politics of Gay Rights, pp.
193-216.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
35.
Marriage Movement, The
(n.d.) ‘A Statement of Principles’.
Institute for American Values
. Available from:
<http://www.marriagemovement.org/html/report.html>
(accessed 16 January 2004).
36.
Massachusetts Family Institute
(2003) Issue in Focus: Same-Sex Marriage. Available
from: <http://www.mafamily.org/samesexmarriage.htm>
(accessed 16 December 2003).
37.
National Fatherhood Initiative
(n.d.) ‘History’. Available from:
<http://www.fatherhood.org/history.htm> (accessed 16
January 2004).
38.
National Fatherhood Initiative
(1999)
‘Dispatches from the States: Mississippi’
, Policy and Practice (March):
12-13
(Internet). Available from:
<www.fatherhood.org/statelocal.asp> (accessed 1 November 2001).
39.
National Gay
and
Lesbian Task Force
(2004) Marriage Map. Available from:
<http://www.ngltf.org/issues> (accessed 28 January 2004).
40.
Perrin, Ellen C., MD
, and
the Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health
(2002)
‘Technical Report: Coparent or Second-Parent Adoption by Same-Sex Parents’
. Pediatrics109(2):
341-344
.
41.
Popenoe, David
(1999) ‘Challenging the Culture of
Fatherlessness’, in
Wade Horn
,
D. Blankenhorn
and
M. B. Pearlstein
(eds) The Fatherhood Movement: A Call to Action, p. 18.
New York: Lexington Books
.
42.
Press, E.
(2001)
‘Faith-based Discrimination: The Case of Alicia Pedreia’
, New York Times Magazine 1 April.
43.
Ratzinger, Joseph
(Cardinal) and
Bovone, A.
(1986)
‘Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Pastoral
Care of Homosexual Persons’
(Internet) Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
The Vatican, Rome. Available on
<www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfai_th_doc_19861001_homosexual-persons_en.html>
(accessed 15 July 2004).
44.
Reagan Administration, White House Working Group on the Family
(1996[1986]) ‘The Family: Preserving
America’s Future’ (Press Release and Report of the
US Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary, 13 November 1986), in
M. Abramovitz
(ed.) Under Attack: Fighting Back, pp.
20-21.
New York: New York University Press
.
45.
Rector, R.
(1994) Combating Family Disintegration, Crime and Dependence:
Welfare Reform and Beyond (Backgrounder 8 April).
Washington DC: Heritage Foundation
.
46.
Rector, R.
(2001)
‘Using Welfare Reform to Strengthen Marriage’
, American Experiment Quarterly (summer):
65
.
47.
Sack, K.
(1996 [1995])
‘In Mississippi, Will Poor Grow Poorer with Welfare Plan?’New York Times (23 October):
A1
.
48.
Quoted in
M. Abramovitz
(ed.) Under Attack: Fighting Back, p. 30.
New York: New York University Press
.
49.
Sheldon, L.
(2003)
‘Discrimination and Tolerance’
, Traditional Values Coalition Report21(1) February.
50.
Smith, A. (n.d.) ‘The Politicization of Marriage in Contemporary
American Public Policy: The Defense of Marriage Act and the Personal Responsibility
Act’, unpublished dissertation, p. 19, Department of Government, Cornell University.
51.
Smith, R.
(2001) ‘Judge Dismisses Bias Claim Against Ky.
Agency’, The Washington Blade (27 July).
Washington DC
.
52.
Stacey, J.
(2001)
‘Family Values Forever: In the Marriage Movement, Conservatives
and Centrists Find a Home Together’
, The Nation: 27 (9 July).
53.
Stanton, G.
(n.d.) Is Marriage in Jeopardy?Washington DC: Focus on the Family
. Available from:
<http://family.org/cforum/fosi/marriage/FAQs/a0026916.cfm>
(accessed 3 October 2003).
54.
Stoever, J.
(2002) ‘Delegated Vote for Adoption
Policy’, FP Report (17 October). Available from:
<www.aafp.org/fpr/assembly2002/1017/7.html> (accessed 3
November 2002).
55.
Traditional Values Coalition
(n.d.) Homosexual Sex = Death from HIV Infection. Available from:
<http://www.traditionalvalues.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1364>
(accessed 16 January 2004).
56.
US Department of Health and Human Services
(n.d.a) Biography of Wade F. Horn: Assistant Secretary for Children and
Families, US Department of Health and Human Services. Available from:
<http://www.hhs.gov/about/bios/acf.html> (accessed 16
January 2004).
57.
US Department of Health and Human Services
(n.d.b) Fatherhood Initiative, FY 2002 Budget. Available from:
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2002/bud11.html>
(accessed 1 November 2001).
58.
White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
(2003) Protecting the Civil Rights of Religious Liberty and
Faith-Based organizations (June). Available from:
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/onpolitics/articles/booklet.pdf>
(accessed 16 January 2004).
59.
Wildermuth, J.
(2001)
‘Welfare Reform Heading Back to Congress Next Year’
, San Francisco Chronicle (4 November):
A11
.
60.
Zeller, T.
(2004)
‘Two Fronts: Promoting Marriage, Fighting Poverty’
, New York Times (18 January): P,
WK3
.
