Policy promotes the active participation of those with lived experience of mental health difficulties in UK NHS mental health services, from the level of collaborative care-planning to service delivery, leadership and development. However, research indicates different forms of resistance to the implementation of such service user involvement. This article reports the findings of a qualitative, interview-based study which used Foucauldian discourse analysis and psychoanalytic theory to understand how resistances are produced through the interplay of clinical mental health professionals’ subjectivity and their organisational context. Service user involvement was found to highlight conflicts within clinicians’ roles. Central to this conflict was an ambivalent relationship to the power associated with these roles. Power could protect professionals from work related stresses, but could also be used to dominate, silence and coerce service users in ways that conflicted with the core function of providing care. Whilst important, raising awareness of such conflict will arouse discomfort and resistance where psychological defences are challenged. A parallel is drawn with psychotherapeutic change, in which resistance must be understood and worked with as part of meaningful change.
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn.Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
2.
BeePPriceOBakerJ, et al. (2015a) Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning. The British Journal of Psychiatry207: 104–114.
3.
BeePBrooksHFraserC, et al. (2015b) Professional perspectives on service user and carer involvement in mental health care planning: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies52: 1834–1845.
4.
BeresfordP (2002) Thinking about ‘mental health’: Towards a social model. Journal of Mental Health11(6): 581–584.
5.
BergerR (2015) Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research15(2): 219–234.
6.
BowenML (2016) Stigma: Content analysis of the representation of people with personality disorder in the UK popular press, 2001-2012. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing25(6): 598–605.
7.
BrosnanL (2012) Power and participation: An examination of the dynamics of mental health service-user involvement in Ireland. Studies in Social Justice6(1): 45–66.
8.
BurrV (1995) An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.
9.
ButlerJ (1997) The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
CheekJ (2004) At the margins? Discourse analysis and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research14(8): 1140–1150.
11.
DaviesBHarréR (2001) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. In: WetherellMTaylorSYatesSJ (eds) Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: SAGE, pp.261–271.
12.
DaviesJ (2014) Cracked: Why Psychiatry is Doing More Harm Than Good. London: Icon Books.
13.
DelmanJClarkJAEisenSV, et al. (2015) Facilitators and barriers to the active participation of clients with serious mental illnesses in medication decision making: The perceptions of young adult clients. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research42(2): 238–253.
14.
Department of Health (2012) Liberating the NHS: No Decision About Me, Without Me. London: Department of Health.
15.
FaulknerA (2017) Survivor research and Mad Studies: The role and value of experiential knowledge in mental health research. Disability & Society32(4): 500–520.
16.
ForbatL (2006) Practitioner views on service user involvement in mental health: Rhetoric and contradictions. The Journal of Mental Health Training Education and Practice1(3): 24–31.
17.
FoucaultM (2009) History of Madness. London: Routledge.
18.
FroshS (2003) Psychosocial studies and psychology: Is a critical approach emerging?Human Relations60: 234–250.
19.
FroshS (2010) Psychoanalysis Outside the Clinic: Interventions in Psychosocial Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
FroshSSaville-YoungL (2017) Psychoanalytic approaches to qualitative psychology. In: WilligCStainton-RogersW (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2nd edn.London: SAGE, pp.124–140.
21.
GillardS (2019) Peer support in mental health services: Where is the research taking us, and do we want to go there?Journal of Mental Health28(4): 341–344.
22.
GoffmanE (1961) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
23.
GrundyACBeePMeadeO, et al. (2016) Bringing meaning to user involvement in mental health care planning: A qualitative exploration of service user perspectives. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing23(1): 12–21.
24.
HollwayW (1989) Subjectivity and Method in Psychology: Gender, Meaning and Science. London: SAGE.
25.
HollwayW (2009) Applying the ‘experience-near’ principle to research: Psychoanalytically informed methods. Journal of Social Work Practice23(4): 461–474.
26.
HollwayWJeffersonT (2013) Doing Qualitative Research Differently: A Psychosocial Approach. London: SAGE.
27.
HookD (2007) Foucault, Psychology and the Analytics of Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
House of Commons (1990) The National Health Service and Community Care Act. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
29.
JansenTLHanssenI (2017) Patient participation: Causing moral stress in psychiatric nursing?Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences31: 388–394.
30.
JohnstoneLBoyleM (2018) The Power Threat Meaning Framework: Towards the Identification of Patterns in Emotional Distress, Unusual Experiences and Troubled or Troubling Behaviour, as an Alternative to Functional Psychiatric Diagnosis. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
31.
JohnstoneLDallosR (2013) Formulation in Psychology and Psychotherapy: Making Sense of People’s Problems, 2nd edn.Hove: Routledge.
32.
JørgensenKRendtorffJD (2018) Patient participation in mental health care - perspectives of healthcare professionals: An integrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences32: 490–501.
33.
KennyKFotakiM (2014) The Psychosocial and Organization Studies: Affect at Work. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
KilpatrickEKeeneySMcCauleyCO (2017) Tokenistic or genuinely effective? Exploring the views of voluntary sector staff regarding the emerging peer support worker role in mental health. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing24: 503–512.
35.
LappingC (2007) Interpreting ‘resistance’ sociologically: A reflection on the recontextualisation of psychoanalytic concepts into sociological analysis. Sociology41(4): 627–644.
36.
LewisL (2009) Politics of recognition: What can a human rights perspective contribute to understanding users’ experiences of involvement in mental health services?Social Policy and Society8(2): 257–274.
37.
LewisL (2014) User involvement in mental health services: A case of power over discourse. Sociological Research Online19(1): 1–15.
38.
LockAStrongT (2010) Social Constructionism: Sources and Stirrings in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
McNayL (1994) Foucault: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
MesserSB (2002) A psychodynamic perspective on resistance in psychotherapy: Vive al résistance. Psychotherapy in Practice58(2): 157–163.
42.
MooreTZeemanL (2021) More ‘milk’ than ‘psychology or tablets’: Mental health professionals’ perspectives on the value of peer support workers. Health Expectations24: 234–242.
43.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2016) Transition between inpatient mental health settings and community or care home settings. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng53 (accessed 6 October 2021).
ParkerI (2007) Revolution in Psychology: Alienation to Emancipation. London: Pluto Press.
46.
PilgrimDMcCranieA (2013) Recovery and Mental Health: A Critical Sociological Account. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
RamonS (2008) Neoliberalism and its implications for mental health in the UK. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry31: 116–125.
48.
RowanJ (1998) The Reality Game: A Guide to Humanistic Counselling and Psychotherapy, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
49.
SpandlerHAndersonJSapeyB (2015) Madness, Distress and the Politics of Disablement. Bristol: Policy Press.
50.
SzaszT (1974) Ideology and Insanity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
51.
TickleABrownDHaywardM (2014) Can we risk recovery? A grounded theory of clinical psychologists’ perceptions of risk and recovery-oriented mental health services. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice87: 96–110.
52.
United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (2017) Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health. Geneva: United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner.
53.
van der HamAJShieldsLSvan der HorstR, et al. (2014) Facilitators and barriers to service user involvement in mental health guidelines: Lessons from the Netherlands. Administration and Policy in Mental Health41: 712–723.
54.
VandewalleJDebyserBBeeckmanD, et al. (2016) Peer workers’ perceptions and experiences of barriers to implementation of peer worker roles in mental health services: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies60: 234–250.
55.
WalshFTickleA (2017) Listen to me, I’m talking: Involvement and recovery. Mental Health Review Journal22(2): 111–123.
56.
WatsonJ (2019) Drop the Disorder! Challenging the Culture of Psychiatric Diagnosis. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
57.
WeinsteinJ (2010) Mental Health, Service User Involvement and Recovery. London: Jessica Kingsley.
58.
WilligC (2008) Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2nd edn.Maidenhead: Open University Press.
59.
World Health Organisation (2021) Guidance on Community Mental Health Services: Promoting Person-Centred and Rights-Based Approaches. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
60.
WrightNRowleyEChopraA, et al. (2016) From admission to discharge in mental health services: A qualitative analysis of service user involvement. Health Expectations19: 367–376.
61.
ZeemanLArandaKGrantA (2014) Queer challenges to evidence-based practice. Nursing Inquiry21(2): 101–111.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
