The gendered dimensions of partner support in relationships where one partner has a chronic condition has been a recurring focus within the literature on gender and health. Such literature however typically focuses exclusively on heterosexual couples while same-sex relationships are rendered invisible, leading to the discourse around partner support being heteronormative. This article examines gendered dimensions within accounts of lesbian, gay and bisexual people with diabetes using a discursive psychological approach. The analysis identifies how participants drew upon a range of interpretative repertoires, including: (1) notions that women are more caring than men; (2) that men can take control in an emergency; (3) that gay men are caring; (4) that grown men can take care of themselves; and (5) that gay men are more independent than heterosexual men. It is argued that rather than simply dismissing heteronormative repertoires of gender and health, non-heterosexuals draw upon them in ways that display ideological tensions.
BarryK (2007) Femininity in Flight: A History of Flight Attendants. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2.
CampbellRPoundPPopeCet al. (2003) Evaluating meta-ethnography: A synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science & Medicine56: 671–684.
3.
ClarkeVPeelE (2007) From lesbian and gay psychology to LGBTQ psychologies: A journey into the unknown (or unknowable)? In: ClarkeVPeelE (eds) Out in Psychology: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer Perspectives. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 11–37.
4.
ClarkeVBurgoyneCBurnsM (2005) For love or money? Comparing lesbian and gay and heterosexual relationships. The Psychologist18: 356–358.
5.
ConnellRW (1987) Gender and Power. Oxford: Polity Press.
6.
DunneGA (1997) Lesbian Lifestyles: Women’s Work and the Politics of Sexuality. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
EdleyN (2001) Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In: WetherellMTaylorSYatesSJ (eds) Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 189–228.
8.
EdwardsD (1995) Two to tango: Script formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction28: 319–350.
9.
GallantMP (2003) The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: A review and directions for research. Health Education & Behavior30: 170–195.
10.
GallantMPSpitzeGDProhaskaTR (2007) ‘Help or hinderance? How family and friends influence chronic illness self-management among older adults. Research on Aging29: 375–409.
11.
GilbertGNMulkayM (1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
GoldenbergTClarkeDStephensonR (2013) ‘Working together to reach a goal’: MSM’s perceptions of dyadic HIV care for same-sex male couples. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes64: S52–S61.
13.
GoughB (2006) Try to be healthy, but don’t forgo your masculinity: Deconstructing men’s health discourse in the media. Social Science & Medicine63: 2476–2488.
14.
HardingT (2007) The construction of men who are nurses as gay. Journal of Advanced Nursing60: 636–644.
15.
JowettA (2010) ‘Just a regular guy’: A discursive analysis of gay masculinities. Psychology of Sexualities Review1: 19–38.
16.
JowettAPeelE (2009) Chronic illness in non-heterosexual contexts: An online survey of experiences. Feminism & Psychology19: 454–474.
17.
JowettAPeelEShawRL (2011a) Online interviewing in psychology: Reflections on the process. Qualitative Research in Psychology8: 354–369.
18.
JowettAPeelEShawRL (2011b) Sex and diabetes: A thematic analysis of gay and bisexual men’s accounts. Journal of Health Psychology17: 409–418.
19.
KemmerD (2000) Tradition and change in domestic roles and food preparation. Sociology34: 323–333.
20.
KitzingerC (2001) Boy meets boy, girl meets girl: The psychology of same sex relationships. Psychology Review8: 2–5.
21.
KurdekLA (2007) The allocation of household labor by partners in gay and lesbian couples. Journal of Family Issues28: 132–148.
22.
LyonsACWillottS (1999) From suet pudding to superhero: Representations of men’s health for women. Health3: 283–302.
23.
MacleanHM (1991) Patterns of diet related self-care in diabetes. Social Science & Medicine32: 689–696.
24.
MartireLMLustigAPSchulzRet al. (2004) Is it beneficial to involve a family member? A meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for chronic illness. Health Psychology23: 599–611.
25.
MillerDBrownJL (2005) Marital interactions in the process of dietary change for type 2 diabetes. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior37: 226–234.
26.
NorcrossWRamirezCPalkinkasA (1996) The influence of women on the health care-seeking behaviour of men. The Journal of Family Practice43: 475–480.
27.
OhmanMSoderbergS (2004) The experiences of close relatives living with a person with serious chronic illness. Qualitative Health Research14: 396–410.
28.
PeelE (2005) Effeminate ‘fudge nudgers’ and tomboyish ‘lettuce lickers’: Language and the construction of sexualities in diversity training. Psychology of Women Section Review7: 22–34.
29.
PeelEParryODouglasMet al. (2005) Taking the biscuit? A discursive approach to managing diet in type 2 diabetes. Journal of Health Psychology10: 779–791.
30.
PomerantzAM (1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies9: 219–230.
31.
PomerantzAM (1988) Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs55: 360–373.
32.
PotterJ (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: SAGE.
33.
PotterJWetherellM (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: SAGE.
34.
RadleyABilligM (1996) Accounts of health and illness: Dilemmas and representations. Sociology of Health & Illness18: 220–240.
35.
Seymour-SmithS (2015) Applying discursive approaches to health psychology. Health Psychology34: 371–380.
36.
Seymour-SmithSWetherellM (2006) ‘What he hasn’t told you’: Investigating the micro-politics of gendered support in heterosexual couples’ co-constructed accounts of illness. Feminism & Psychology16: 105–127.
37.
Seymour-SmithSWetherellMPhoenixA (2002) ‘My wife ordered me to come!’: A discursive analysis of doctors’ and nurses’ accounts of men’s use of general practitioners. Journal of Health Psychology7: 253–267.
38.
StokoeE (2010) ‘Have you been married, or …?’: Eliciting and accounting for relationship histories in speed-dating interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction43: 260–282.
39.
UmbersonD (1992) Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior. Social Science & Medicine34: 907–917.
40.
WetherellM (1988) Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society9: 387–412.
WongMGucciardiELiLet al. (2005) Gender and nutrition management in type 2 diabetes. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research66: 215–220.
43.
WrubelJStumboSJohnsonMO (2010) Male same-sex couple dynamics and received social support for HIV medication adherence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships27: 553–572.
