Drawing from a critical sociology of knowledge perspective, we situate the production of genetic information within relevant political, financial, and professional contexts. We consider as well the broad range of social conditions that render genetic knowledge salient in clinical settings and for population health. This sociological analysis of genetic knowledge highlights how genetic knowledge flourishes and shapes social environments and how in turn environments select for particular forms of genetic knowledge. We examine the role of the laboratory, regulatory state, and social movements in the production of genetic knowledge and the clinic, family, and population health as critical sites where genetic knowledge becomes actionable.
AgarN (2004) Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AtkinsonPFeatherstoneKGregoryM (2013) Kinscapes, timescapes and genescapes: Families living with genetic risk. Sociology of Health & Illness35(8): 1227–1241.
3.
AtkinsonPParsonsEFeatherstoneK (2001) Professional constructions of family and kinship in medical genetics. New Genetics and Society20(1): 5–24.
4.
BaileyDBSkinnerDWarrenSF (2005) Newborn screening for developmental disabilities: Reframing presumptive benefit. American Journal of Public Health95(11): 1889–1893.
5.
BarkerKK (2005) The Fibromyalgia Story: Medical Authority and Women’s Worlds of Pain. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
6.
BeckerHS (1982) Art Worlds. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles,CA: University of California Press.
7.
BenjaminR (2013) People’s Science: Bodies and Rights on the Stem Cell Frontier. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
BergerPLLuckmannT (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
9.
BlissC (2012) Race Decoded: The Genomic Fight for Social Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
BoardmanFK (2014) The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: The experiences of families living with genetic disease. Social Science & Medicine107: 18–25.
11.
BoardmanJDBlalockCLPampelFC. (2011) Population composition, public policy, and the genetics of smoking. Demography48(4): 1517–1533.
12.
BogardusSTHolmboeEJekelJF (1999) Perils, pitfalls, and possibilities in talking about medical risk. JAMA281: 1037–1047.
13.
BourretPRabeharisoaV (2008) Medical judgment and medical decision-making in a high-uncertainty situation: When clinical practices meet genetics. Sciences Sociales et Sante26(1): 33–66.
14.
BrownerCHMabelPH (2010) Neurogenic Diagnoses: The Power of Hope and the Limits of Today’s Medicine. New York: Routledge.
15.
BrownerCHMabelPHCasadoMC. (2003) Genetic counseling gone awry: Miscommunication between prenatal genetic service providers and Mexican-origin clients. Social Science & Medicine56(9): 1933–1946.
16.
BuryM (1982) Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness4: 167–182.
17.
CallonMRabeharisoaV (2004) Gino’s lesson on humanity: Genetics, mutual entanglements and the sociologist’s role. Economy and Society33(1): 1–27.
18.
ClarkeAEShimJKMamoL. (2003) Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review68: 161–194.
19.
CollinsFC (2010) The Language of Life. New York: Harper Collins.
20.
ConradPGabeJ (eds) (1999) Sociological Perspectives on the New Genetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
21.
DumitJ (2006) Illnesses you have to fight to get: Facts as forces in uncertain, emergent illnesses. Social Science & Medicine62(3): 577–590.
22.
DusterT (2005) Medicine: Race and Reification in Science. Science307(5712): 1050–1051.
23.
Editorial (2015) Newborn screening: Spotting for more. The Lancet385(9963): 90.
24.
EpsteinS (2007) Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
FranklinSRobertsC (2006) Born and Made: An Ethnography of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
FreeseJ (2008) Genetics and the social science explanation of individual outcomes. American Journal of Sociology114: S1–S35.
27.
FreeseJShostakS (2009) Genetics and social inquiry. Annual Review of Sociology35: 107–128.
28.
FujimuraJHDeborahABRamyaR. (2014) Clines without classes: How to make sense of human variation. Sociological Theory32(3): 208–227.
29.
FullwileyD (2007) Race and genetics: Attempts to define the relationship. BioSocieties2: 221–237.
30.
GeronimusATPearsonJALinnenbringerE. (2015) Race-ethnicity, poverty, urban stressors, and Telomere length in a Detroit community-based sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior56(2): 199–224.
31.
GuoGStearnsE (2002) The social influences on the realization of genetic potential for intellectual development. Social Forces80(3): 881–910.
32.
HedgecoeAM (2003) Expansion and uncertainty: Cystic fibrosis, classification and genetics. Sociology of Health & Illness25(1): 50–70.
33.
HoeyerK (2007) Person, patent, and property: A critique of the commodification hypothesis. BioSocieties2(3): 327–348.
34.
KatzGSchweitzerSO (2010) Implications of genetic testing for health policy. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics10(1): 90–134.
35.
KeatingPCambrosioA (2000) Real compared to what? Diagnosing leukemias and lymphomas. In: LockMMYoungACambrosioA (eds) Living and Working with the New Medical Technologies: Intersections of Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–134.
36.
KerrA (2003) Genetics and citizenship. Society40(6): 44–50.
37.
KrukenbergRCKollerDLWeaverDD. (2013) Two decades of Huntington disease testing: Patient’s demographics and reproductive choices. Journal of Genetic Counselling22(5): 643–653.
38.
LandeckerH (2011) Food as exposure: Nutritional epigenetics and the new metabolism. BioSocieties6(2): 167–194.
39.
LandeckerHPanofskyA (2013) From Social structure to gene regulation, and back: A critical introduction to environmental epigenetics for sociology. Annual Review of Sociology39: 333–357.
40.
LatimerJFeatherstoneKAtkinsonP. (2006) Rebirthing the clinic: The interaction of clinical judgment and genetic technology in the production of medical science. Science, Technology & Human Values31(5): 599–630.
41.
LinkBGPhelanJC (1995) Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior35(extra issue): 80–94.
42.
LippmanA (1991) Prenatal genetic testing and screening: Construcing needs and reinforcing inequalities. American Journal of Law & Medicine17: 15–50.
43.
LipworthWForsythRKerridgeI (2011) Tissue donation to biobanks: A review of sociological studies. Sociology of Health & Illness33(5): 792–811.
44.
LockMMFreemanJChilibeckG. (2007) Susceptibility genes and the question of embodied identity. Medical Anthropology Quarterly21(3): 256–276.
45.
MacdonaldADaviesPDalyA. (2008) Does maternal knowledge and parent education affect blood phenylalanine control in phenylketonuria?Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics21(4): 351–358.
46.
McKinlayJB (1979) Epidemiological and political determinants of social policies regarding public health. Social Science & Medicine13(5): 541–558.
47.
McLaughlinJ (2008) Seeking and rejecting certainty: Exposing the sophisticated lifeworlds of parents of disabled babies. Sociology42(2): 317–335.
48.
MarkensSBrownerCHPressN (1999) ‘Because of the risks’: How US pregnant women account for refusing prenatal screening. Social Science & Medicine49(3): 359–369.
49.
MontayaM (2011) Making the Mexican Diabetic: Race, Science, and the Genetics of Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
50.
MorningA (2012) Does genomics challenge the social construction of race?Sociological Theory32(3): 189–207.
51.
NavonD (2011) Genomic designation: How genetics can delineate new, phenotypically diffuse medical categories. Social Studies of Science41(2): 203–226.
52.
NovasCRoseN (2000) Genetic risk and the birth of the somatic individual. Economy and Society29(4): 485–513.
53.
PanofskyA (2014) Misbehaving Science: Controversy and the Development of Behavior Genetics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54.
PescosolidoBA (2006) Of pride and prejudice: The role of sociology and social networks in integrating the health sciences. Journal of Health and Social Behavior47(3): 189–208.
55.
PescosolidoBAPerryBLLongJS. (2008) Under the influence of genetics: How transdisciplinarity leads us to rethink social pathways to illness. American Journal of Sociology114(Suppl. 1): S171–S201.
56.
PetrynaA (2002) Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
57.
PhelanJCLinkBGTehranifarP (2010) Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior51(Suppl.): S28–S40.
58.
PrainsackBSiegalG (2006) The rise of genetic couplehood? A comparative view of premarital genetic testing. BioSocieties1(1): 17–36.
59.
RabeharisoaVBourretP (2009) Staging and weighting evidence in biomedicine: Comparing clinical practices in cancer genetics and psychiatric genetics. Social Studies of Science39(5): 691–715.
60.
RabinowP (1996) Artificiality and enlightenment: From sociobiology to biosociality. In: RabinowP (ed.) Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 91–111.
61.
RajanKS (2006) Biocapital: The Constitution of Post-Genomic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
62.
RappR (2000) Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York and London: Routledge.
63.
RaspberryKASkinnerD (2011) Negotiating desires and options: How mothers who carry the fragile X gene experience reproductive decisions. Social Science & Medicine72(6): 992–998.
64.
RazAViznerY (2008) Carrier matching and collective socialization in community genetics: Dor Yeshorim and the reinforcement of stigma. Social Science & Medicine67(9): 1361–1369.
65.
ReardonJ (2005) Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in the Age of Genomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
RichardsonS (2015) Maternal bodies in the postgenomic order: Gender and the explanatory landscape of epigenetics. In: RichardsonSStevensH (eds) Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 210–231.
67.
RopkaMEWenzelJPhillipsEK. (2006) Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: A systematic review. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention15(5): 840–855.
68.
RoseN (2007) The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
RossTP (2015) Motivations of women with sickle cell disease for asking their partners to undergo genetic testing. Social Science & Medicine139: 36–43.
70.
SankarPChoMKMountainJ (2007) Race and ethnicity in genetic research. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A143A(9): 961–970.
71.
SarangiSBennertKHowellL. (2003) ‘Relatively speaking’: Relativisation of genetic risk in counselling for predictive testing. Health, Risk & Society5(2): 155–170.
72.
SaukkoPMRichardsSHShepherdMH. (2006) Are genetic tests exceptional? Lessons from a qualitative study on thrombophilia. Social Science & Medicine63: 1947–1959.
73.
ScottSPriorLWoodF. (2005) Repositioning the patient: The implications of being “at risk.”Social Science & Medicine60: 1869–1879.
74.
ShanahanMBauldrySFreemanJ (2010) Beyond Mendel’s ghost. Social Context9(4): 34–39.
75.
ShiaoJLThomasDAmberB. (2012) The genomic challenge to the social construction of race. Sociological Theory30(2): 67–88.
76.
ShimJKAckermanSLDarlingKW. (2014) Race and ancestry in the age of inclusion: Technique and meaning in post-genomic science. Journal of Health and Social Behavior55(4): 504–518.
77.
ShostakS (2013) Exposed Science: Genes, the Environment and the Politics of Population Health. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
78.
ShostakSZarhinDOttmanR (2011) What’s at stake? Genetic information from the perspective of people with epilepsy and their family members. Social Science & Medicine73(5): 645–654.
79.
ShostakSMoinesterS (2015) Beyond genetization: Regimes of perceptibility and the social determinants of health. In: SusanEBAnneEF (eds) Reimagining (Bio)Medicalication, Pharmaceuticals and Genetics: Old Critiques and New Engagements. London: Routledge, pp. 216–238.
80.
TallbearK (2013) Genomic articulations of indigeneity. Social Studies of Science43(4): 509–534.
81.
TehranifarPNeugutAIPhelanJC. (2009) Medical advances and racial/ethnic disparities in cancer survival. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention18(10): 2701–2708.
82.
TimmermansS (2015) Trust in standards: Transitioning clinical exome sequencing from bench to bedside. Social Studies of Science45(1): 77–99.
83.
TimmermansSBuchbinderM (2012) Expanded newborn screening: Articulating the ontology of diseases with bridging work in the clinic. Sociology of Health & Illness34: 208–220.
84.
TimmermansSBuchbinderM (2013) Saving Babies? The Consequences of Newborn Genetic Screening. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
85.
TrundleCScottBI (2013) Elusive genes: Nuclear test veterans’ experiences of genetic citizenship and biomedical refusal. Medical Anthropology32(6): 501–517.
86.
VaillyJ (2008) The expansion of abnormality and the biomedical norm: Neonatal screening, prenatal diagnosis and cystic fibrosis in France. Social Science & Medicine66: 2532–2543.
87.
WailooKPembertonK (2006) The Troubled Dream of Genetic Medicine. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
88.
WaldbyCMitchellR (2006) Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
89.
WatsonMSLloyd-PuryearMAMannMY. (2006) Newborn screening: Toward a uniform screening panel and system. Genetics in Medicine8(Suppl. 5): 12S–53S.
90.
WhitmarshI (2008) Biomedical Ambiguity: Race, Asthma, and the Contested Meaning of Genetic Research in the Caribbean. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
91.
WhitmarshIDavisAMSkinnerD. (2007) A place for genetic uncertainty: Parents valuing an unknown in the meaning of disease. Social Science & Medicine65: 1082–1093.
92.
WilliamsDRMohammedSALeavellJ. (2010) Race, socioeconomic status, and health: Complexities, ongoing challenges, and research opportunities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1186: 69–101.
93.
WoodFPriorLGrayJ (2003) Translations of Risk: Decision Making in a Cancer Genetics Service. Health, Risk & Society5(2): 185–198.
