New Zealand leads the world in rates of home dialysis use, yet little is known about the experience of home dialysis from the patient’s perspective. This article contributes to the literature on the self-care of dialysis patients by examining the relevance of the concept of the machine–body and cyborg embodiment for the lived experience of people with end-stage renal failure. The article, which presents a discussion of 24 in-depth interviews undertaken between 2009 and 2012, shows that although dialysis therapy is disruptive of being and time, study participants experience home dialysis in terms of flexibility, control and independence. While they do not use the term machine–body as a descriptor, the concept resonates with felt experience. Data also indicate that positive experience of home dialysis is relative to socio-economic positioning and the lived relation of patients to others, necessitating further research to examine these factors.
AgarJWM (2008) Home hemodialysis in Australia and New Zealand: Practical problems and solutions. Hemodialysis International12: 526–532.
2.
Al-ArabiS (2006) Quality of life: Subjective descriptions of challenges to patients with end stage renal disease. Nephrology Nursing Journal33(3): 285–292.
3.
AllenDWainwrightMHutchinsonT (2011) ‘Non-compliance’ as illness management: Hemodialysis patients’ descriptions of adversarial patient-clinician interactions. Social Science & Medicine73: 129–134.
4.
BayhakkiHatthakitU (2012) Lived experiences of patients on hemodialysis: A meta-synthesis. Nephrology Nursing Journal39(4): 295–304.
5.
BevanMT (2000) Dialysis as ‘deus ex machina’: A critical analysis of haemodialysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing31(2): 437–443.
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3: 77–101.
7.
CalveyDMeeL (2011) The lived experience of the person dependent on haemodialysis. Journal of Renal Care37(4): 201–207.
8.
CasesADempsterMDaviesM. (2011) The experience of individuals with renal failure participating in home haemodialysis: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Health Psychology16(6): 884–894.
9.
ClarksonKARobinsonK (2010) Life on dialysis: A lived experience. Nephrology Nursing Journal37(1): 29–35.
10.
CourtsNF (2000) Psychosocial adjustment of patients on home hemodialysis and their dialysis partners. Clinical Nursing Research9(2): 177–190.
11.
CourtsNFBoyetteBG (1998) Psychosocial adjustment of males on three types of dialysis. Clinical Nursing Research7(1): 47–63.
12.
CreswellJW (2007) Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
DelgadoCEYDelgadoFLYBetancourtMLV. (2010) A qualitative study of patient’s perceptions of a preventive renal programme in Colombia 2008. Chronic Illness6: 252–262.
14.
FranklinS (1997) Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.
15.
GabeJBuryMElstonMA (2006) Key Concepts in Medical Sociology. London: SAGE.
16.
GilesS (2003) Transformations: A phenomenological investigation into the life-world of home haemodialysis. Social Work in Health Care38(2): 29–50.
17.
GilesS (2005) Struggles between the body and machine: The paradox of living with a home haemodialysis machine. Social Work in Health Care41(2): 19–35.
18.
GuestGMacQueenKMNameyEE (2012) Applied Thematic Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
19.
HagrenBPettersenI-MSeverinssonE. (2001) The haemodialysis machine as a lifeline: Experiences of suffering from end-stage renal disease. Journal of Advanced Nursing34(2): 196–202.
20.
HagrenBPettersenI-MSeverinssonE. (2005) Maintenance haemodialysis: Patients’ experiences of their life situation. Journal of Clinical Nursing14: 294–300.
21.
HarawayD (1990) A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In: NicholsonL (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge, pp. 190–233.
22.
HarwoodLLeitchR (2006) Home dialysis therapies. Nephrology Nursing Journal33(1): 46–59.
23.
HeideggerM (2008) Being and Time (trans. MacquarrieJRobinsonE). New York: Harper Perennial.
24.
KieransC (2010) Transplantation, organ donation and (in)human experience: Re-writing boundaries through embodied perspectives on kidney failure. In: EttoreE (ed.) Culture, Bodies and the Sociology of Health. Surrey: Ashgate, pp. 21–43.
25.
KuzelA (1992) Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: CrabtreeBMillerW (eds) Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, pp. 31–44.
26.
LevyNB (1981) Psychological reactions to machine dependency: Hemodialysis. Psychiatric Clinics of North America4(2): 351–363.
27.
LevyNB (2000) Psychiatric considerations in the primary medical care of the patient with renal failure. Advances in Renal Replacement Therapy7(3): 231–238.
28.
LynnKLButtimoreAL (2005) Future of home haemodialysis in Australia and New Zealand. Nephrology10: 231–233.
29.
MarshallMRHawleyCMKerrPG. (2011) Home hemodialysis and mortality risk in Australian and New Zealand Populations. American Journal of Kidney Diseases58(5): 782–793.
30.
MoranAScottPADarbyshireP (2009) Existential boredom: The experience of living on haemodialysis therapy. Medical Humanities35: 70–75.
31.
PidgeonG (2012) New Zealand dialysis and transplantation audit 2010. National Renal Advisory Board. Available at: http://www.moh.govt.nz/nrab (accessed 27 November 2012).
32.
PolaschekN (2003) Living on dialysis: Concerns of clients in a renal setting. Journal of Advanced Nursing41(1): 44–52.
33.
PolaschekN (2006) Managing home dialysis: The client perspective on independent treatment. Renal Society of Australasia Journal2(3): 53–63.
34.
RittmanMNorthseaCHausauerN. (1993) Living with renal failure. ANNA Journal20(3): 327–332.
35.
ShawR (2012) Thanking and reciprocating under the New Zealand organ donation system. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine16(3): 298–313.
36.
ShildrickMMcKeeverPAbbeyS. (2009) Troubling dimensions of heart transplantation. Medical Humanities35: 35–38.
37.
SmithJA (2004) Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology1: 39–54.
38.
TimmermansSBergM (2003) The practice of medical technology. Sociology of Health & Illness25: 97–114.
39.
TimmersLThongMDekkerFW. (2008) Illness perceptions in dialysis patients and their association with quality of life. Psychology & Health23(6): 679–690.
40.
Van ManenM (1990) Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
