Organ donation and transplantation has been extensively addressed in the biomedical and bioethics literature in relation to debates around organ allocation and procurement strategies, and concerns about consent, coercion and commodification. This article addresses the topic sociologically, drawing on data from face-to-face in-depth interviews undertaken between 2008 and 2010 with organ and tissue recipients, anonymous altruistic donors and donor family members to discuss questions of reciprocity and intercorporeality that arise in the course of tissue exchange. In particular, the article examines the place of anonymity protocol for organ donors and transplantation recipients in New Zealand and their responses to conventions and scripts surrounding this rule. The article concludes by calling for discussion to re-examine anonymity protocol and rituals around organ donation and transplantation, citing lessons from gamete donation policies and recent law in New Zealand as productive for thinking through matters of personhood and identity relating to organ transfer.
AdairVRoganC (1998) Infertility and parenting: The story so far. In: AdairVDixonR (eds) The Family in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Auckland: Addison Wesley Longman, 260–283.
2.
BerkingH (1999) Sociology of Giving. London: SAGE, 260–283.
3.
BlythECrawshawMSpeirsJ (eds) (1998) Truth and the Child 10 Years On: Information Exchange in Donor-Assisted Conception. Birmingham: British Association of Social Workers.
4.
BoyatzisRE (1998) Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
5.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3: 77–101.
6.
DanielsK (2004) Building a Family with the Assistance of Donor Insemination. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
7.
EllisJIrwinR (2002) Oocyte Recipients and Donors: Choosing a Relationship. Auckland: Fertility Associates.
8.
FoxRCSwazeyJP (1992) Spare Parts. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
FrankAW (1997) Illness as moral occasion: Restoring agency to ill people. health: 1(2): 131–148.
10.
GodelierM (2002) Some things you give, some things you sell, but some things you must keep for yourselves: What Mauss did not say about sacred objects. In: WyschogrodEGouxJ-JBoyntonE (eds) The Enigma of Gift and Sacrifice. New York: Fordham University Press, 19–37.
11.
GouldnerAW (1996) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. In: KomterAK (ed.) The Gift: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 49–66.
12.
GraceVMDanielsKRGillettW (2008) The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: Parents’ constructions in the case of donor insemination. Social Science & Medicine66(2): 301–314.
13.
HackingI (2007) Our neo-Cartesian bodies in parts. Critical Inquiry34(1): 78–105.
14.
HaddowG (2005) The phenomenology of death, embodiment and organ transplantation. Sociology of Health & Illness27(1): 92–113.
15.
HargreavesK (2006) Constructing families and kinship through donor insemination. Sociology of Health & Illness28(3): 261–283.
16.
HargreavesKDanielsK (2007) Parents dilemmas in sharing donor insemination conception stories with their children. Children & Society21(6): 420–431.
17.
HudsonMLAllanCABedfordKRBuckletonJSStuartK (2008) The impact of Māori cultural values on forensic science practice in New Zealand. Journal of Forensic Science53(2): 380–383.
18.
KomterAE (2005) Social Solidarity and the Gift. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
LewisGPickeringN (2003) Māori spiritual beliefs and attitudes towards organ donation. New Zealand Bioethics Journal4(1): 31–35.
20.
LockM (2002) Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
21.
LovelockK (2010) Conceiving reproduction: New reproductive technologies and the redefinition of kinship narrative in New Zealand society. Anthropological Forum20(2): 125–146.
22.
MaussM (1990) The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Trans. HallsWDForeword DouglasM. New York: WW Norton.
23.
McKennyGP (1999) The integrity of the body: Critical remarks on a persistent theme in bioethics. In: CherryMJ (ed.) Persons and Their Bodies: Rights, Responsibilities, Relationships. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 353–361.
24.
McLeishK (ed.) (1993) Guide to Human Thought: Ideas that Shaped the World. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
25.
PlevakDJ (2008) The emergence of ‘personhood’ in organ procurement. Transplantation Reviews22(3): 163–166.
26.
SahlinsMD (1996) On the sociology of primitive exchange. In: KomterAK (ed.) The Gift: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 26–38.
27.
SannerMA (2006) People’s attitudes and reactions to organ donation. Mortality11(2): 113–150.
28.
SharpLA (2006) Strange Harvest: Organ Transplants, Denatured Bodies, and the Transformed Self. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
29.
SharpLA (2007) Bodies, Commodities, and Biotechnologies: Death, Mourning, & Scientific Desire in the Realm of Human Organ Transfer. New York: Columbia University Press.
30.
ShawRM (2007) The gift-exchange and reciprocity of women in donor-assisted conception. Sociological Review55(2): 293–310.
31.
ShawRM (2008) Rethinking reproductive gifts as body projects. Sociology42(1): 11–28.
32.
ShawRM (2010) Perceptions of the gift relationship: Views of intensivists and donor and recipient coordinators. Social Science & Medicine70(4): 609–615.
33.
ShawRM (2011) The ethical risks of curtailing emotion in social science research: The case of organ transfer. Health Sociology Review20(1): 59–70.
34.
ShildrickM (2008) Contesting normative embodiment: Some reflections on the psycho-social significance of heart transplant surgery. Perspectives: International Postgraduate Journal of Philosophy1: 12–22.
35.
SiminoffLAChillagK (1999) The fallacy of the ‘gift of life’. The Hastings Center Report29(6): 34–41.
36.
SimmelG (1996) Faithfulness and gratitude. In: KomterAK (ed.) The Gift: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 39–48.
37.
Te Puni Kokiri (1999) Hauora o te Tinana me ona Tikanga: A Guide for the Removal, Retention, Return and Disposal of Māori Body Parts, Organ Donation and Post-Mortem: Māori and their Whānau. Wellington: Ministry of Māori Development.
38.
ToberDM (2002) Semen as gift, semen as goods: Reproductive workers and the market in altruism. In: Scheper-HughesNWacquantL (eds) Commodifying Bodies. London: SAGE, 137–160.
39.
TuttonR (2002) Gift relationships in genetics research. Science as Culture11(4): 523–542.
40.
TuttonR (2004) Person, property and gift: Exploring languages of tissue donation to biomedical research. In: TuttonRCorriganO (eds) Genetic Databases: Socio-Ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA. London: Routledge, 19–38.
41.
VamosM (2010) Organ transplantation and magical thinking. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry44: 883–887.
42.
WaldbyC (2002) Biomedicine, tissue transfer and intercorporeality. Feminist Theory3(3): 239–254.
43.
WaldbyCMitchellR (2006) Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
44.
WebbRShawRM (forthcoming2011) Whānau, whakapapa and identity in experiences of organ donation and transplantation. Sites: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies8(1).
45.
WilliamsBEntwistelVHaddowGWellsM (2008) Promoting research participation: Why not advertise altruism?Social Science & Medicine66(7): 1451–1456.
