In this article we show that persons with communicative disabilities are often involved in storytelling that does not necessarily conform to the conventional expectations of what constitutes a narrative. By analyzing the relationship between story and storytelling event, and the relation between what could be called the primary storyteller and the vicarious storyteller, we show that storytellers with communicative disabilities are often quite inventive in finding ways of presenting themselves as competent storytellers even though they may have certain problems vocally animating a coherent, structured story. This lead us to conclude a necessary redefinition of what a narrative is - that it could be performed as well as it could be told - and that such a redefinition stresses methodological issues: in order to be able to study the life stories of people with communicative disabilities we need to use both narrative and ethnographic research methods.
Antelius, E. ( 2007). The meaning of the present: Hope and foreclosure in narrations about people with severe brain damage. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 21, 324-42.
2.
Antelius, E. ( 2009a). Whose body is it anyway? Verbalization, embodiment, and the creation of narratives. Health:, 13, 357-75.
3.
Antelius, E. ( 2009b). ‘Would you like to use one of these or would you rather be able to talk?’ Facilitated and/or augmentative communication and the preference for speaking. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 11, 257-74.
4.
Antelius, E. ( 2009c). Different voices, different storiesCommunication, identity and meaning among people with acquired brain damage. Dissertation. Linköping: Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, Linköping University.
5.
Bauman, R. ( 1987). Story, performance, and event: Contextual studies of oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bauman, R. & Briggs, C.L. ( 1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59-88.
7.
Carlsson, E., Paterson, B.L., Scott-Findlay, S., Ehnfors, M. and Ehrenberg, A. ( 2007). Methodological issues in interviews involving people with communication impairments after acquired brain damage. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1361-71.
8.
Couser, G.T. ( 2004). Vulnerable subjects: ethics and life writing. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9.
Estroff, S.E. ( 1995). Whose story is it anyway? Authority, voice and responsibility in narratives of chronic illness. In S.K. Toombs, D. Barnard and R.A. Carson (Eds.) pp. 77-102, Chronic illness: From experience to policy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
10.
Gerrig, R.J. ( 1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
Goffman, E. ( 1981). Forms of talk. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
12.
Goode, D. ( 1995). A world without words: The social construction of children born deaf and blind. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
13.
Goodley, D. and Tragaskis, C. ( 2006). Storying disability and impairment: Retrospective accounts of disabled family life. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 630-46.
14.
Goodwin, C. ( 2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak: The social life of aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14, 151-70.
15.
Gubrium, J.F. and Holstein, J.A. ( 2008). Narrative ethnography. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.) pp. 241-64, Handbook of emergent methods. New York: Guilford.
16.
Heath, S.B. ( 1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Hydén, L.C. ( 2008). Broken and vicarious voices in narratives. In L.C. Hydén and J. Brockmeier (Eds.), Health, culture and illness: Broken narratives. New York: Routledge .
18.
Hydén, L.C. and Brockmeier, J. ( 2008). Introduction: The field of illness narratives. In L.C. Hydén and J. Brockmeier (Eds.) pp. 1-15, Health, culture and illness: Broken narratives. New York: Routledge.
19.
Hydén, L.C. and Örulv, L. ( 2009). Narrative and identity in Alzheimer’s disease: A case study. Journal of Aging Studies, 23(4).
20.
Hymes, D.H. ( 1964). Towards ethnographies of communication: The analysis of communicative events. American Anthropologist, 66, 1-34.
21.
Iser, W. ( 1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
Kovarsky, D. & Crago, M. ( 1991). Towards the ethnography of communication disorders. National Student Speech Language Hearing Association Journal, 18, 44-55.
23.
Langellier, K. ( 2001). ‘You’re marked’: Breast cancer, tattoo, and the narrative performance of identity. In J. Brockmeier & D. Carbaugh (Eds.) pp. 145-84, Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
24.
Langellier, K.M. and Peterson, E.E. ( 2004). Storytelling in daily life: Performing narrative. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
25.
Linell, P. ( 2005). The written language bias in linguistics. London: Routledge.
26.
Mattingly, C. ( 1994). The concept of therapeutic ‘emplotment’. Social Science and Medicine, 38, 811-22.
27.
Mattingly, C. ( 1998). Healing dramas and clinical plots: The narrative structure of experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Mishler, E.G. ( 1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
