This is an empirical study of the way in which celiac disease patients manage the risk of gluten intake in their everyday life.The article examines naturally occurring conversational data in order to study how patients cope interactionally with constantly being at risk in their day-to-day living. They reject quitting the diet as a valid option, and instead construct a ‘diet world’ in which dietary transgression is presented as an integrated part of everyday life. In this way, patients can manage occasional diet lapses without putting the validity of the diet itself at stake. By examining how the gluten-free diet is treated in interaction, we find out more about the pre-existing everyday strategies that have to be taken into account when new therapies are being introduced.
Antaki, C., Ardevol, E., Nunez, F. and Vayreda, A. (2005). ‘For she who knows who she is’: Managing accountability in online forum messages. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), 114-32.
2.
Arminen, I. ( 1998). Organization of participation in meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 59-98.
3.
Arminen, I. ( 2001). Closings of turns in the meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous . Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34(2), 211-52.
4.
Arminen, I. ( 2004). Second stories: The salience of interpersonal communication for mutual help in Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Pragmatics , 36(2), 319-47.
5.
Balfe, M. ( 2005). Diets and discipline: The narratives of practice of university students with type 1 diabetes. Sociology of Health and Illness , 29(1), 136-53.
6.
Celiac Disease Consortium. (2008). http://www.celiac-disease-consortium.nl/ (accessed 1 June 2008).
7.
Ciacci, C., Iavarone, A., Sinisicalchi, M., Romano, R. and de Rosa, A. ( 2002). Psychological dimensions of celiac disease: Toward an integrated approach. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 47(9), 2082-7.
8.
Clayman, S. and Heritage, J. ( 2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Danoff-Burg, S., Ayala, J. and Revenson, T.A. ( 2000). Researcher knows best? Toward a closer match between the concept and measurement of coping. Journal of Health Psychology , 5(2), 183-94.
10.
Davidson, K.P., Pennebaker, J.W. and Dickerson, S.S. ( 2000). Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups . American Psychologist, 55(2), 205-17.
11.
Dunn-Galvin, A., de BlokFlokstra, B.M., Burks, A.W., Dubois, A.E. and Hourihane, J.O. ( 2008). Food allergy QoL questionnaire for children aged 0-12 years: Content, construct, and cross-cultural validity. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 38(6), 977-86.
12.
Edwards, D. ( 1994). Two to tango: Script formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(4), 319-50.
13.
Edwards, D. ( 1997). Discourse and cognition. London: SAGE.
14.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. ( 1992). Discursive psychology. London: SAGE.
15.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. ( 2005). Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions . In H. te Molder and J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition , pp. 241-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Garcia, A.C. and Jacobs, J.B. ( 1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 337-67.
17.
Gavin, J., Rodham, K. and Poyer, H. ( 2008). The presentation of ‘pro-anorexia’ in online group interactions. Qualitative Health Research, 18(3), 325-33.
18.
Guise, J., Widdicombe, S. and McKinlay, A. ( 2007). ‘What is it like to have ME?’: The discursive construction of ME in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction . health:, 11(1), 87-108.
19.
Hallert, C., Grännö, C., Hulten, S., Midhagen, G., Ström, M., Svensson, H. and Valdimarsson , T. (2002). Living with coeliac disease: Controlled study of the burden of illness. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 37(1), 39-42.
20.
Herring, S.C. ( 2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S.A. Barab , R. Kling and J.H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, pp. 338-76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Horton-Salway, M. ( 2001). Narrative identities and the management of personal accountability in talk about ME: A discursive psychology approach to illness narrative. Journal of Health Psychology, 6(2), 247-59.
22.
Horton-Salway, M. ( 2002). Bio-psycho-social reasoning in GPs’ case narratives: The discursive construction of ME patients’ identities. health:, 6(4), 401-21.
23.
Horton-Salway, M. ( 2004). The ‘ME bandwagon’ and other labels: Constructing the genuine case in talk about a controversial illness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(4), 895-914.
24.
Hutchby, I. ( 2001). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the internet. Cambridge: Polity Press .
25.
Lamerichs, J. ( 2003). Discourse of support: Exploring online discussions on depression. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, the Netherlands.
26.
Lamerichs, J. and te Molder, H.F.M. ( 2003). Computer-mediated communication: From a cognitive to a discursive model. New Media and Society, 5(4), 451-73.
27.
Lawson, V.L., Lyne, P.A., Harvey, J.N. and Bundy, C. ( 2005). Understanding why people with type 1 diabetes do not attend for specialist advice: A qualitative analysis of the views of people with insulin-dependent diabetes who do not attend diabetes clinic. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(3), 409-23.
28.
Lazarus, R.S. ( 2005). Emotions and interpersonal relationships: Toward a person-centered conceptualization of emotions and coping. Journal of Personality , 74(1), 9-46.
29.
Lee, A. and Newman, J.M. ( 2003). Celiac diet: Its impact on quality of life. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 103(11), 1533-5.
30.
Maclean, H.M. ( 1991). Patterns of diet related self-care in diabetes. Social Science and Medicine, 32(6), 689-96.
31.
Peel, E., Parry, O., Douglas, M. and Lawton, J. ( 2005). Taking the biscuit? A discursive approach to managing diet in type 2 diabetes. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(6), 779-91.
32.
Potter, J. ( 1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: SAGE.
33.
Potter, J. ( 2002). Two kinds of natural. Discourse Studies , 4(4), 539-42.
34.
Reed, D. ( 2001). ‘Making conversation’: Sequential integrity and the local management of interaction on Internet newsgroups. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2001/0981/04/09814035abs.htm (accessed 1 June 2008).
35.
Robinson, J.D. ( 2007). The role of numbers and statistics within conversation analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 65-75.
36.
Sacks, H. ( 1984). On doing ‘being ordinary’. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, pp. 413-29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Sandaunet, A. ( 2008). The challenge of fitting in: Non-participation and withdrawal from an online self-help group for breast cancer patients. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(1), 131-44.
38.
Schönfeldt, J. and Golato, A. ( 2003). Repair in chats: A conversation analytic approach. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(3), 241-84.
39.
Sneijder, P. and te Molder, H.F.M. ( 2005). Moral logic and logical morality: Attributions of responsibility and blame in online discourse on veganism. Discourse and Society , 16(5), 675-96.
40.
Svenker, A., Hensing, G. and Hallert, C. ( 2005). ‘Controlled by food’: Lived experiences of coeliac disease. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics , 18(6), 171-80.
41.
te Molder, H. and Potter, J., Eds. (2005). Conversation and cognition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
te Molder, H., Bovenhoff, M., Gremmen, B. and van Woerkum, C. (Forthcoming). Talking future technologies: How celiac disease patients accept nor reject ‘a simple pill’.
43.
Wiggins, S. and Hepburn, A., Eds. (2007). Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
44.
Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C. ( 2000). Thinking differently about thinking positive: A discursive approach to cancer patients’ talk. Social Science and Medicine, 50(6), 797-811.
