This article uses case study data to discuss how a new procurement policy (Local Improvement Finance Trust, or LIFT) in English primary care may affect general practitioners’ control over their work. LIFT, a series of 51 public—private partnerships, will enable over the medium term a shift towards the corporate ownership of surgeries and the creation of polyclinics or ‘onestop-shops’. In this article, I explore the struggles over work autonomy and control within these new LIFT structures, as expressed by clinicians and managers in meetings and in research interviews. More generally, I consider how the findings inform debates over the changing position of professionals within increasingly financialized ‘local health economies’.
Aldred, R. ( 2007a). Governing ‘local health economies’: Neo-liberalism and NHS LIFT. PhD Thesis, University of London.
2.
Aldred, R. ( 2007b). Closed policy networks, broken chains of communication and the stories behind an ‘entrepreneurial policy’: The case of NHS Local Improvement Finance Trust (NHS LIFT). Critical Social Policy, 27(1), 139-51.
3.
Aldred, R. ( 2007c). Community governance or corporate governance? Two models for primary care provision in England. Social Theory & Health, 5, 338-55.
4.
Aldred, R. ( 2008). Managing risk and regulation within new local ‘health economies’: The case of NHS LIFT (Local Improvement Finance Trust). Health, Risk & Society, 10(1), 23-36.
5.
Alexander, M., Arayo, M., Britt, J., Harihara, V., Marks, W. and Wanford, L. ( 2004). Patient and public involvement in health [Letter] . Health Service Journal. Available at http://www.ppif.org.uk/laspf.htm (accessed 7 November 2006).
6.
Braverman, H. ( 1974). Labor and monopoly capitalism: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
7.
British Medical Association (BMA). (2001). National survey of GP opinion. Available at http://www.bma.org/ap.nsf/650f3eec0dfb990fca25692100069854/80256b140033ce0780256b1a004e0211/$FILE/ATT0GTSX/uk.pdf,PDFfile (accessed 7 November 2006).
8.
Coburn, D. ( 1992). Freidson then and now: An internalist critique of Freidson’s past and present views of the medical-profession. International Journal of Health Services, 22(3), 497-512.
9.
Coburn, D. ( 1999). Phases of capitalism, welfare states, medical dominance, and health care in Ontario. International Journal of Health Services29(4): 833-52.
10.
Department of Health. (2007). About NHS LIFT. Available at http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Procurementandproposals/Publicprivatepartnership/NHSLIFT/DH_4000519 (accessed 29 May 2008).
11.
Elliott, C. ( 2003). Better than well: American medicine meets the American Dream. New York: W.W. Norton .
12.
Fairclough, N. ( 2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research . London: Routledge.
13.
Harrison, S. and Ahmad, W. ( 2000). Medical autonomy and the UK state 1975-2025. Sociology, 34(1), 129-46.
14.
Harrison, S. and Dowswell, G. ( 2002). Autonomy and bureaucratic accountability in primary care: What English GPs say. Sociology of Health and Illness , 24(2), 208-26.
15.
Haug, M. ( 1973). Deprofessionalization: An alternate hypothesis for the future. Sociological Review Monograph, 20, 195-221.
16.
McKinlay, J.B. and Stoeckle, J.D. ( 2001). Corporatization and the social transformation of doctoring . In P. Conrad (Ed.), The sociology of health and illness: Critical perspectives, 6th edn, pp. 186-97. New York: Worth Publishers .
17.
Marcus, G.E. ( 1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology , 24, 95-117.
18.
Marshall, J. and Aldhous, P. ( 2006). Patient groups special: Swallowing the best advice?New Scientist, 2575, 18-22. Available at http://www.newscientist.com/channel/health/mg19225755.100-patient-groups-special-swallowing-the-best-advice.html
19.
Oppenheimer, M. ( 1973). The proletarianization of the professional. Sociological Review Monograph, 20, 213-27.
20.
Perrucci, R. ( 1973). In the service of man: Radical movements in the professions . Sociological Review Monograph, 20, 179-94.
21.
Pollock, A. ( 2004). NHS plc. London: Verso.
22.
Pope, C. ( 2003). Resisting evidence: The study of evidence-based medicine as a contemporary social movement. health: An InterdisciplinaryJournal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 7(3), 267-82.
23.
Rose, N. ( 1993). Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism . Economy and Society, 22(3), 282-300.
24.
Ruane, S. ( 2000). Acquiescence and opposition: The private finance initiative in the National Health Service. Policy and Politics , 28(3), 411-24.
25.
Sheaff, R., Marshall, M., Rogers, A., Roland, M., Sibbald, B. and Pickard, S. ( 2004). Governmentality by network in English primary healthcare . Social Policy and Administration, 38(1), 89-103.
26.
Weiss, M. and Fitzpatrick, R. ( 1997). Challenges to medicine: The case of prescribing . Sociology of Health & Illness, 19(3), 297-327.
27.
White, K. ( 2000). What’s happening in general practice? Capitalist monopolisation and state administrative control: A profession bailing out ? Health Sociology Review, 10(1), 5-18.
28.
Williams, G. and Popay, J. ( 1994). Lay knowledge and the privilege of experience . In J. Gabe, D. Kelleher and G. Williams (Eds.), Challenging medicine, pp. 118-39. London: Routledge.
