Thisarticleexaminestheattitudesandreportedbehaviorsof physicians, nurses, and midwives regarding complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), with respect to one key theme that emerged from a broader qualitative study. Of central interest are the structural influences identified by study participants that either act as constraints or opportunities for their professional use of or referral for CAM. In an effort to interpret these results, the analysis is situated within the sociology literature that documents the influences of professional socialization, practice philosophy, regulation, and organizations on professional behavior. These influences are classified as either professional-level structures or work/organizational structures. The main conclusion is that future research should pay more attention to such structural dimensions that may be exerting influence on the decisions of providers about whether or not to professionally use or refer for CAM. This article is offered as a conceptual starting point for doing so.
Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labour. Chicago, IL & London: University Chicago Press.
2.
Adams, J. and Tovey, P. (2001). Nurses use of professional distancing in the appropriation of CAM: A text analysis. Complementary Therapies in Medicine , 9(3), 136-40.
3.
Astin, J.A. (1998). Why patients use alternative medicine: Results of a national study. Journal of the American Medical Association , 279(19), 1548-53.
4.
Berman, B.M., Bausell, R.B. and Lee, W.L. (2002). Use and referral patterns for 22 complementary and alternative medical therapies by members of the American College of Rheumatology: Results of a national survey. Archives of Internal Medicine , 162(7), 766-70.
5.
Berman, B.M., Bausell, R.B., Hartnoll, S.M., Beckner, M. and Bareta, J. (1999). Compliance with requests for complementary-alternative medicine referrals: A survey of primary care physicians. Integrative Medicine, 2(1), 11-17.
6.
Berman, B.M., Singh, B.B., Hartnoll, S.M., Singh, B.K. and Reilly, D. (1998). Primary care physicians and complementary-alternative medicine: Training, attitudes, and practice patterns. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 11(4), 272-81.
7.
Berman, B.M., Singh, B.K., Lao, L., Singh, B.B., Ferentz, K.S. and Hartnoll, S.M. (1995). Physicians attitudes toward complementary or alternative medicine: A regional survey. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 8(5), 361-6.
8.
Boreham, P. (1983). Indetermination: Professional knowledge, organization and control. The Sociological Review, 31(4), 693-718.
9.
Botting, D.A. and Cook, R. (2000). Complementary medicine: Knowledge, use and attitudes of doctors. Complementary Therapies in Nursing & Midwifery , 6(1), 41-7.
10.
Bourgeault, I.L. and Hirschkorn, K.A. (forthcoming). CAM integration in inter-professional context: Nursing, midwifery and medicine in Canada. In J. Adams and P. Tovey (Eds.), International perspectives on CAM in nursing. London: Routledge.
11.
Brint, S. (1994). In an age of experts: The changing role of professionals in politics and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
Broadbent, J. and Laughlin, R. (1997). Accounting logic and controlling professionals . In J. Broadbent, M. Dietrich and J. Roberts (Eds.), The end of the professions? The restructuring of professional work, pp. 34-49. London & New York: Routledge .
13.
Bucher, R. and Strauss, A. (1961). Professions in process. American Journal of Sociology, 66(4), 325-34.
14.
Burns, E., Blamey, C., Ersser, S.J., Lloyd, A.J. and Barnetson, L. (2000). The use of aromatherapy in intrapartum midwifery practice: An observational study. Complementary Therapies in Nursing & Midwifery, 6(1), 33-4.
15.
Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M. (1961). The management of innovation. In M.J. Handel (Ed.) (2003), The sociology of organizations: Classic, contemporary, and critical readings , pp. 45-51. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
Canadian Nurses Association (CNA). (1999). Complementary therapies: Finding the right balance. Canadian Nurse, 95(8), 5-8.
17.
Cattell, E. (1999). Nurse practitioners role in complementary and alternative medicine: Active or passive? Nursing Forum, 34(3), 14-23.
18.
Cohen, M.H. and Eisenberg, D.M. (2002). Potential physician malpractice liability associated with complementary and integrative medical therapies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 136(8), 596-603.
19.
DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1991). Introduction. In W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, pp. 1-38. Chicago, IL & London: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Ernst, E., Resch, K. and White, A. (1995). Complementary medicine: What physicians think of it: A meta-analysis. Archives of Internal Medicine, 155(22), 2405-8.
21.
Etzioni, A. (1969). The semi-professions and their organization: Teachers, nurses, and social workers. New York: Free Press.
22.
Etzioni, A. (1975). A comparative analysis of complex organizations . New York: The Free Press (Macmillan).
23.
Evetts, J. (2002). New directions in state and international professional occupations: Discretionary decision-making and acquired regulation. Work, Employment and Society, 16(2), 341-53.
24.
Evetts, J. (2004). Organizational or occupational professionalism: Centralized regulation or occupational trust. Presentation to ISA RC52 Interim Conference, Versailles , September.
25.
Fielding, A.G. and Portwood, D. (1980). Professions and the State - towards a typology of bureaucratic professions. Sociological Review, 28(1), 23-53.
26.
Freidson, E. (1970). Professional dominance: The social structure of medical care. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company/Atherton Press.
27.
Freidson, E. (1986). Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Friedman, A.L. (2003). Professional autonomy compared with other types of strategies for maintaining task and social control. Paper presented at the European Sociological Association Meeting, pp. 1-14, Murcia, Spain, September.
29.
Geddes, N. and Henry, J.K. (1997). Nursing and alternative medicine: Legal and practice issues. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 15(3), 271-81.
30.
Glaus, A. (1988). The position of nursing: Between school medicine and alternative medicine. Cancer Nursing, 11(4), 250-3.
31.
Haas, J. and Shaffir, W. (1987). Becoming doctors: The adoption of a cloak of competence. Greenwich, CT & London: JAI Press Inc.
32.
Hafferty, F.W. (2000). Reconfiguring the sociology of medical education: Emerging topics and pressing issues. In C. Bird, P. Conrad and A.M. Fremont (Eds.), Handbook of medical sociology , pp. 238-57. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
Hall, R.H. (1968). Professionalization and bureaucratization. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 92-104.
34.
Hirschkorn, K.A. and Bourgeault, I.L. (2005). Conceptualizing mainstream health care providers behaviours in relation to complementary and alternative medicine. Social Science and Medicine, 61(1), 157-70.
35.
Hirschkorn, K. and Bourgeault, I. (2007). Actions speak louder than words: Mainstream health providers definitions and behaviour regarding complementary and alternative medicine. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 13(1), 29-37.
36.
Hughes, E.C. (1971). The sociological eye: Selected papers. Chicago, IL & New York: Aldine Atherton.
37.
Johnson, G. (2000). Should nurses practise complementary therapies?Complementary Therapies in Nursing & Midwifery, 6(3), 120-3.
38.
Johnson, T.J. (1972). Professions and power. London : MacMillan Press Ltd.
39.
Jump, J., Yarbrough, L., Kilpatrick, S. and Cable, T. (1998). Physicians attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine. Integrative Medicine, 1(4), 149-53.
40.
Larson, M.S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
41.
Larson, M.S. (1979). Professionalism: Rise and fall. International Journal of Health Services, 9(4), 607-27.
42.
Leicht, K.T. and Fennell, M.L. (1997). The changing organizational context of professional work. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 215-31.
43.
Leicht, K.T. and Fennell, M.L. (2001). Professional work: A sociological approach. Massachusetts: Blackwell.
44.
Lorenzo, P. (2003). Complementary therapies - theyre not without risk . RN, 66(1), 65-6, 68.
45.
Mishler, E.G., Amara-Singham, L.R., Hauser, S.T., Liem, R., Osherson, S.D. and Waxler, N.E. (1981). Social contexts of health, illness and patient care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Roberts, K.A. and Donahue, K.A. (2000). Professing professionalism: Bureacratization and deprofessionalization in the Academy [Presidential address]. Sociological Focus, 33(4), 365-83.
47.
Rothman, B.K. (1983). Midwives in transition: The structure of a clinical revolution. Social Problems, 30(3), 262-71.
48.
Sakala, C. (1988). Content of care by independent midwives: Assistance with pain in labor and birth. Social Science and Medicine , 26(11), 1141-58.
49.
Scott, R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P.J. and Caronna, C.A. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organizations . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Sikand, A. and Laken, M. (1998). Pediatricians experience with and attitudes toward complementary/alternative medicine. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 152(11), 1059-64.
51.
Silverman, R. (1995). Use of alternative therapies in childbirth. British Journal of Midwifery, 3(4), 196-200.
52.
Straub, L.A. and Henley, E. (2000). Complementary medicine in rural Illinois: Provider views. Rural Research Report, 11(8), 1-8.
53.
Tiran, D. and Mack, S. (2000). Complementary therapies for pregnancy and childbirth . Edinburgh: Bailliere Tindall.
54.
Tovey, P. and Adams, J. (2003). Nostalgic and nostophobic referencing and the authentication of nurses use of complementary therapies. Social Science and Medicine, 56(7), 1469-80.
55.
Waters, M. (1989). Collegiality, bureaucratization, and professionalization: A Weberian analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 94(5), 945-72.
56.
Wearn, A.M. and Greenfield, S.M. (1998). Access to complementary medicine in general practice: Survey in one UK health authority. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 91(9), 465-70.
57.
Wilensky, H.L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone? American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 137-58.
58.
Winslow, L.C. and Shapiro, H. (2002). Physicians want education about complementary and alternative medicine to enhance communication with their patients. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162(10), 1176-81.
