The concept of a penal or carceral state has quickly become a staple in punishment and criminal justice literatures. However, the concept, which suffers from a proliferation of meanings and is frequently undefined, gives readers the impression that there is a single, unified, and actor-less state responsible for punishment. This contradicts the thrust of recent punishment literature, which emphasizes fragmentation, variegation, and constant conflict across the actors and institutions that shape penal policy and practice. Using a case study of late-century Michigan, this article develops an analytical approach that fractures the penal state. We demonstrate that the penal state represents a messy, often conflicted amalgamation of the various branches and actors in charge of punishment, who resist the aims and policies sought by their fellow state actors. Ultimately, we argue that fracture is itself a variable that scholars must measure empirically and incorporate into their accounts of penal change.
Michigan Department of Corrections (1974) As one of Milliken’s proposals: Sentencing reform recommended. Frontline2(9): 1–16.
2.
Michigan Department of Corrections (1975) Vantage point. Dialogues52(1): 1–4.
3.
Michigan Department of Corrections (1976) 1975–1976 Dimensions. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Corrections.
4.
Michigan Department of Corrections (1977) 1976–1977 Dimensions. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Corrections.
5.
Michigan Department of Corrections (1978a) New Laws Tough on Drug Dealers. Dialogues32: 4.
6.
Michigan Department of Corrections (1978b) 1977–1978 Dimensions. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Corrections.
7.
Michigan Department of Corrections (1979) Build more prisons—for less money—but not here. Deadline1(3): 1–2.
8.
Michigan Department of Corrections (1990) Looking at the 1980s. Signal3(1): 1–12.
9.
Michigan Department of Corrections (1994) 1992 Statistical Report. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Corrections.
10.
Michigan Department of Corrections (2003) Department of Corrections’ five year plan. FYI14(7): 1–8.
11.
Michigan Department of Corrections (2005) Task force on jail and prison overcrowding. News Release22, April.
12.
Michigan Department of Corrections (2007) A message to MDOC employees from director Caruso. FYI19(30): 1.
13.
AviramH (2015) Cheap on Crime: Recession-Era Politics and the Transformation of American Punishment. Oakland, California: University of California Press.
14.
BarkerV (2009) The Politics of Imprisonment: How the Democratic Process Shapes the Way American Punishes Offenders. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
BeckettK (1997) Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
BeckettKMurakawaN (2012) Mapping the shadow carceral state: Toward an institutionally capacious approach to punishment. Theoretical Criminology16(2): 221–244.
17.
BernsteinE (2012) Carceral politics as gender justice? The “traffic in women” and neoliberal circuits of crime, sex, and rights. Theory and Society41(3): 233–259.
18.
CampbellMC (2011) Politics, prisons, and law enforcement: An examination of the emergence of “law and order” politics in Texas. Law & Society Review45(3): 631–665.
19.
CampbellMCSchoenfeldH (2013) The transformation of America’s penal order: A historicized political sociology of punishment. American Journal of Sociology118(5): 1375–1423.
20.
CheliotisLK (2006) How iron is the iron cage of new penology? The role of human agency in the implementation of criminal justice policy. Punishment & Society8(3): 313–340.
21.
ComfortM (2008) Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of the Prison. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
22.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23.
Esping-AndersenG (1996) Welfare States in Transition. London: SAGE.
24.
FeeleyMRubinE (2000) Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
25.
FriedmanMGrawertACullenJ (2017) Crime Trends: 1990-2016. New York, NY: Brennan Center for Justice.
26.
GarlandD (1996) The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. British Journal of Criminology36(4): 445–471.
27.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
GarlandD (2013) Penality and the penal state. Criminology51(3): 475–517.
29.
GilmoreRW (1999) You have dislodged a boulder: Mothers and prisoners in the post Keynesian California landscape. Transforming Anthropology8(1–2): 12–38.
30.
GoodmanPPageJPhelpsM (2015) The long struggle: An agonistic perspective on penal development. Theoretical Criminology19(3): 315–335.
31.
GoodmanPPageJPhelpsM (2017) Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle over Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
GottschalkM (2005) Dismantling the carceral state: The future of penal policy reform. Texas Law Review84: 1693–1749.
33.
GottschalkM (2006) The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
GottschalkM (2008) Hiding in plain sight: American politics and the carceral state. Annual Review of Political Science11: 235–260.
35.
GottschalkM (2009) The long reach of the carceral state: The politics of crime, mass imprisonment, and penal reform in the united states and abroad. Law & Social Inquiry34(2): 439–472.
36.
GottschalkM (2014a) Democracy and the carceral state in America. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science651(1): 288–295.
37.
GottschalkM (2014b) Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
GrassoA (2017) Broken beyond repair: Rehabilitative penology and American political development. Political Research Quarterly70(2): 394–407.
39.
GreeneJMauerM (2010) Downscaling Prisons: Lessons from Four States. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
40.
GuetzkowJSchoonE (2015) If you build it, they will fill it: The consequences of prison overcrowding litigation. Law & Society Review49(2): 401–432.
41.
Hannah-MoffatK (1999) Moral agent or actuarial subject: Risk and Canadian women’s imprisonment. Theoretical Criminology3(1): 71–94.
42.
HernándezKLMuhammadKGThompsonHA (2015) Introduction: Constructing the carceral state. Journal of American History102(1): 18–24.
43.
HutchinsonS (2006) Countering catastrophic criminology: Reform, punishment and the modern liberal compromise. Punishment & Society8(4): 443–467.
44.
JacobsJB (1977) Stateville: The Penitentiary in Mass Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
KaufmanNKaiserJRumpfC (2016) Beyond punishment: The penal state’s interventionist, covert, and negligent modalities of control. Law & Social Inquiry. Epub ahead of print 4November2016. DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12237.
46.
KennedyL (2013) “Longtermer blues”: Penal politics, reform, and carceral experiences at Angola. Punishment & Society15(3): 304–322.
47.
KruttschnittCGartnerR (2005) Marking Time in the Golden State: Women’s Imprisonment in California. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
LaceyN (2010) Differentiating among penal states. British Journal of Sociology61(4): 778–794.
49.
LermanAEWeaverVM (2014) Arresting Citizenship: The Democratic Consequences of American Crime Control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
LeviR (2011) Class and criminal justice in neoliberal times: Wacquant dissects the penal state. Punishment & Society13(4): 480–488.
51.
LichtensteinA (1996) Twice the Work of Free Labor: The Political Economy of Convict Labor in the New South. London: Verso.
52.
LichtensteinA (2011) A labor history of mass incarceration. Labor8(3): 5–14.
53.
LuckenK (1998) Contemporary penal trends: Modern or postmodern?British Journal of Criminology38(1): 106–123.
54.
LynchM (1998) Waste managers? The new penology, crime fighting, and parole agent identity. Law & Society Review32(4): 839–870.
55.
LynchM (2000) Rehabilitation as rhetoric: The ideal of reformation in contemporary parole discourse and practices. Punishment & Society2(1): 40–65.
56.
LynchM (2010) Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
57.
LynchM (2011) Mass incarceration, legal change, and locale. Criminology & Public Policy10(3): 673–698.
58.
McKimA (2014) Roxanne’s dress: Governing gender and marginality through addiction treatment. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society39(2): 433–458.
59.
McLennanRM (1999) Citizens and criminals: The rise of the American carceral state, 1890–1935. PhD thesis, Columbia University, USA.
60.
McLennanRM (2008) The Crisis of Imprisonment: Protest, Politics, and the Making of the American Penal State, 1776–1941. New York: Cambridge University Press.
61.
MatthewsR (2005) The myth of punitiveness. Theoretical Criminology9(2): 175–201.
62.
MauruttoPHannah-MoffatK (2006) Assembling risk and the restructuring of penal control. British Journal of Criminology46(3): 438–454.
63.
Maynard-MoodySMushenoM (2003) Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
64.
MillerLL (2008) The Perils of Federalism: Race, Poverty, and the Politics of Crime. New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
MillerLL (2016) The Myth of Mob Rule: Violent Crime and Democratic Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
66.
MillerRJ (2014) Devolving the carceral state: Race, prisoner reentry, and the micro-politics of urban poverty management. Punishment & Society16(3): 305–335.
67.
MitchellT (1991) The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics. American Political Science Review85(1): 77–96.
68.
MorganKOrloffA (eds) (2017) The Many Hands of the State: Theorizing Political Authority and Social Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
MüllerM (2012) The rise of the penal state in Latin America. Contemporary Justice Review15(1): 57–76.
NicholsR (2014) The colonialism of incarceration. Radical Philosophy Review17(2): 435–455.
72.
PageJ (2011) The Toughest Beat: Politics, Punishment, and the Prison Officers Union in California. New York: Oxford University Press.
73.
PeckJ (2003) Geography and public policy: Mapping the penal state. Progress in Human Geography27(2): 222–232.
74.
Pew Center on the States (2009) One in 31: The long reach of American corrections. Report, March. Washington DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts.
75.
PfaffJ (2017) Locked In: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration—and How to Achieve Real Reform. New York: Basic Books.
76.
PhelpsMS (2014) From managing risk to reforming punishment: The development of mass probation in Michigan. Conference Paper presented at American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, CA, 19–22 November.
77.
PhelpsMS (2016) Possibilities and contestation in twenty-first-century US criminal justice downsizing. Annual Review of Law & Social Science12: 153–170.
78.
PhelpsMS (2017) Mass probation: Toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment. Punishment & Society19(1): 53–73.
79.
PhelpsMSPagerD (2016) Inequality and punishment. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science663(1): 185–203.
80.
RengifoAFStemenD (2010) Context and impact of organizational changes in state corrections agencies: A study of local discourses and practices in Kansas and Michigan. Final report to the National Institute of Corrections. Grant #09PEI32GKA7.
81.
RobinsonG (2008) Late-modern rehabilitation: The evolution of a penal strategy. Punishment & Society10(4): 429–445.
82.
RobinsonGMcNeillF (eds) (2015) Community Punishment: European Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
83.
RubinAT (2016a) Penal change as penal layering: A case study of proto-prison adoption and capital punishment reduction, 1785–1822. Punishment & Society18(4): 420–441.
84.
RubinAT (2016b) Professionalizing prison: Primitive professionalization and the administrative defense of Eastern State Penitentiary, 1829–1879. Law & Social Inquiry. Epub ahead of print 25November. DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12263.
85.
Rudes DS (2012) Framing organizational reform: Misalignments and disputes among parole and union middle managers. Law & Policy34(1): 1–31.
86.
SaratA (1999) The Killing State: Capital Punishment in Law, Politics, and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
87.
SchoenfeldH (2010) Mass incarceration and the paradox of prison conditions litigation. Law & Society Review44(3–4): 731–768.
88.
SchoenfeldH (2011) Crime or insecurity: Who is ‘the state’? And what is it ‘responding to’?. Punishment & Society13(1): 473–479.
89.
SchoenfeldH (2014) The delayed emergence of penal modernism in Florida. Punishment & Society16(3): 258–284.
90.
SchoenfeldH (2016) A research agenda on reform. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science664(1): 155–174.
91.
SeedsC (2016) Bifurcation nation: American penal policy in late mass incarceration. Punishment & Society. Epub ahead of print 19 October 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516673822.
92.
ShammasVL (2016) The rise of a more punitive state: On the attenuation of Norwegian penal exceptionalism in an era of welfare state transformation. Critical Criminology24(1): 57–74.
93.
SimonJ (2013) Punishment and the political technologies of the body. In: SimonJSparksR (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Punishment and Society. London: SAGE, 60–89.
SugrueTJ (2014) The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
96.
ThompsonHA (2010) Why mass incarceration matters: Rethinking crisis, decline, and transformation in postwar American history. Journal of American History97(3): 703–734.
97.
ThompsonHAMurchD (2015) Rethinking urban America through the lens of the carceral state. Journal of Urban History41(5): 751–755.
98.
TurnerSFDavisLMFainTet al. (2015) A national picture of prison downsizing strategies. Victims & Offenders10(4): 401–419.
99.
US Department of Justice (2017) Uniform Crime Reporting Data Tool. Available at: https://www.ucrdatatool.gov/ (accessed 30 June 2017).
100.
WacquantLJ (1997) Elias in the dark ghetto. Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift24(3–4): 340–348.
101.
WacquantL (2009a) Prisons of Poverty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
102.
WacquantL (2009b) Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
103.
WacquantL (2009c) The body, the ghetto and the penal state. Qualitative Sociology32(1): 101–129.
