Drawing on the developing literature on a ‘European penology’ this article seeks to use counterterrorism as a lens through which to re-examine arguments concerning penal moderation in Europe. Counterterrorism measures adopted in the EU and the USA in the post-9/11 period are therefore scrutinized for the lessons they hold about the role of European values and institutions as a ‘shield’ against punitiveness or indeed their ability to, swordlike, cut deep into citizens’ freedoms. The resulting analysis raises questions about the need for a more refined approach to the question of ‘European’ penal values as well as pointing up the continued existence of a culture of rights in the USA.
Amnesty International (2005) Human rights dissolving at the borders? Counter terrorism and EU criminal law. Brussels: Amnesty International EU Office.
2.
AnagnostopoulosI (2014) Criminal justice cooperation in the European Union after the first few ‘steps’: A defence view. ERA Forum15(1): 9–24.
3.
ArgomanizJ (2009) Post-9/11 institutionalisation of European counter-terrorism: Emergence, acceleration and inertia. European Security18(2): 151–172.
4.
ArgomanizJ (2011) The EU and Counter-Terrorism: Politics, Polity and Policies after 9/11. London: Routledge.
5.
ArgomanizJBuresOKaunertC (2015) A decade of EU counter-terrorism and intelligence: A critical assessment. Intelligence and National Security30(2–3): 191–206.
6.
BakerE (2010) Governing through crime? The case of the European Union. European Journal of Criminology7(3): 187–213.
7.
BakerE (2013) The emerging role of the EU as a penal actor in European penology? In: DaemsTVan Zyyl SmitDSnackenS (eds) European Penology?Oxford: Hart Publishing.
8.
BakerERobertsJ (2005) Globalization and the new punitiveness. In: PrattJBrownDBrownM. (eds) The New Punitiveness: Trends, Theories, Perspectives. Cullompton, Devon: Willan.
9.
BanksWC (2005) United States responses to September 11. In: RamrajVVHorMRoachK (eds) Global Antiterrorism Law and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Body-GendrotSHoughMKerezsiK. (2013) The Routledge Handbook of European Criminology. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
BuresO (2011) EU Counterterrorism Policy: A Paper Tiger?London: Routledge.
13.
CaneppeleS (2013) The terrorist threat before and after 9/11. In: Body-GendrotSHoughMKerezsiK. (eds) Routledge Handbook of European Criminology. London: Routledge.
ChavesM (2015) EU’s harmonization of national criminal law: Between punitiveness and moderation. European Public Law21(3): 527–553.
16.
ColeD (2003) Security and freedom: Are the governments’ efforts to deal with terrorism violative of our freedoms?Canada–United States Law Journal29: 339–349.
ColeD (2013) Guantanamo and beyond: Exceptional courts and military commissions in comparative perspective. In: Ni AolainFGossO (eds) Law in Times of Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
CoolasetR (ed.) (2011) Jihadi Terrorism and the Radicalisation Challenge: European and American Experiences. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
20.
CoolasetR (2016) Counterterrorism and counter-radicalisation in Europe. In: CoolasetR (ed.) Jihadi Terrorism and the Radicalisation Challenge: European and American Experiences (2nd edn). London: Routledge.
21.
Council of the European Union (2002a) Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States. 2002/584/JHA.
22.
Council of the European Union (2002b) Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism. 2002/475/JHA.
23.
DaemsT (2013) Punishment and the question of Europe. In: DaemsTVan Zyyl SmitDSnackenS (eds) European Penology?Oxford: Hart Publishing.
24.
DaemsTVan Zyl SmitDSnackenS (eds) (2013) European Penology?Oxford: Hart Publishing.
25.
DannemannG (2006) Comparative law: Study of similarities or differences? In: ReimannMZimmermannR (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
Den BoerM (2006) Fusing the fragments: Challenges for EU internal security governance on terrorism. In: MahnckeDMonarJ (eds) International Terrorism: A European Answer to a Global Threat. Brussels: Peter Lang.
27.
Douglas-ScottS (2004) The rule of law in the European Union: Putting the security into the area of freedom, security and justice. European Law Review29(2): 219–242.
28.
Douglas-ScottS (2008–2009) The EU’s area of freedom, security and justice: A lack of fundamental rights, mutual trust and democracy?Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies11: 53–85.
29.
DumortierEGutwirth (2012) The rise of the penal state: What can human rights do about it? In: SnackenSDumortierE (eds) Resisting Punitiveness in Europe?Abingdon: Routledge.
30.
DworkinD (2003) Terror and the attack on civil liberties. New York Review of Books, 6November, 37–41.
31.
DynzenhausD (2007) Deference, security and human rights. In: LarazusLGooldB (eds) Security and Human Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
32.
European Commission (2007) Report from the Commission based on Article 11 of the Council Framework Decision on combatting terrorism of 13 June 2002. COM (2007) 681.
33.
European Commission (2011) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation since 2007 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States. COM/2011/0175.
34.
European Commission (2014) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Council Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA of 28 November 2008 amending Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism. COM/2014/0554.
35.
European Parliament (2007) Resolution of 14 February 2007 on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners. 2006/2200(INI).
36.
European Parliament (2008) Report on the proposal for a Council Framework Decision amending Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism. COM/2007/0650.
37.
European Parliament (2014) Resolution of 27 February 2014 with recommendations to the Commission on the review of the European Arrest Warrant. A7–0039/2014.
38.
FennellyN (2007) European Arrest Warrant: Recent developments. Address to the Academy of European Law Conference, EU Courts in the Area of Freedom and Justice: Recent Developments, Trier, 14/15June.
39.
GaraponA (2006) The oak and the reed: Counter-terrorism mechanisms in France and the United States of America. Cardozo Law Review27(5): 2041–2077.
40.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
GarlandD (2010) Peculiar Institution: American’s Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
GarlandD (2011) Concepts of culture in the sociology of punishment. In: MelossiDSozzoMSparksR (eds) Travels of the Criminal Question: Cultural Embeddedness and Diffusion. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
43.
GreenbergKJDratelDL (2005) The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HassanO (2010) Constructing crises, (in)securitising terror: The punctuated evolution of EU counter-terror strategy. European Security19(3): 445–466.
46.
HillyardP (1994) The normalization of special powers from Northern Ireland to Britain. In: LaceyN (ed.) A Reader on Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
HoseinG (2005) Threatening the open society: Comparing anti-terror policies in the US and Europe. London: Privacy International.
IgnatieffM (2009) Introduction: American exceptionalism and human rights. In: IgnatieffM (ed.) American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
JacobsonM (2006) The West at War: US and European Counterterrorism Efforts, Post-September 11. Washington, DC: Washington Institute for Near East Studies.
52.
KaunertK (2007) Without the power of purse or sword: The European Arrest Warrant and the role of the Commission. Journal of European Integration29(4): 387–404.
53.
KrasmannS (2012) Law’s knowledge: On the susceptibility and resistance of legal practices to security matters. Theoretical Criminology16(4): 373–394.
54.
LazarusLGooldB (2007) Introduction: Security and human rights: The search for a language of reconciliation. In: LarazusLGooldB (eds) Security and Human Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
55.
LazarusLGooldBGossC (2013) Control without punishment: Understanding coercion. In: SimonJSparksR (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Punishment and Society. London: SAGE.
LoaderI (2002) Policing, securitisation and democratisation in Europe. Criminal Justice2(2): 125–153.
59.
MacGuillJ (2012) European Arrest Warrant in Ireland: An uneven playing field. Paper presented at European Arrest Warrant and EU-US Extradition Conference, Irish Centre for European Law, Trinity College Dublin, 19 June.
60.
MagyarG (2012) The European Arrest Warrant: A current evaluation. Paper presented at seminar on the pre-Lisbon instruments: Special Focus on the European Arrest Warrant, European Centre for Judges and Lawyers (European Institute of Public Administration), Cracow, 16 February.
MitsilegasVMonarJReesW (2003) The European Union and Internal Security. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
65.
MonarJ (2005) Anti-terrorism law and policy: The case of the European Union. In: RamrajVVHorMRoachK (eds) Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
MurphyC (2011) EU counter-terrorism & the rule of law in a post-‘war on terror’ world. In: ScheininM (ed.) European and United States Counter-Terrorism Policies, the Rule of Law and Human Rights. RSCAS Policy Paper 2011/03. Available at: www.cesruc.org/uploads/soft/130221/1–130221192106.pdf.
67.
MurphyC (2012a) EU Counterterrorism Law: Pre-Emption and the Rule of Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
MurphyC (2013) Counter-terrorism law and policy: Operationalisation and normalisation of exceptional law after the ‘war on terror’. In: Acosta ArcarazoDMurphyC (eds) EU Security and Justice Law: After Lisbon and Stockholm. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
70.
OliverioA (2008) US versus European approaches to terrorism: Size really does matter. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice2(4): 252–264.
RoachK (2011) The 9/11 Effect: Comparative Counter-Terrorism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73.
RoachK (2013) Introduction: Comparative counter-terrorism law comes of age. In: RoachK (ed.) Comparative Counter-Terrorism Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74.
SalasD (2005) La volunté de punir: Essai sur le populisme pénal. Paris: Hachette.
75.
SECILE (2013) Catalogue of EU counter terrorism measures adopted since 11 September 2011. Available at: http://secile.eu/.
76.
ServentAR (2010) Point of no return? The European Parliament after Lisbon and Stockholm. European Security19(2): 191–207.
77.
SimonJ (2007) Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Has Transformed American Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
78.
SnackenS (2006) A reductionist prison policy and European human rights standards. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research12: 143–164.
79.
SnackenS (2010) Resisting punitiveness in Europe. Theoretical Criminology14(3): 273–292.
80.
SnackenSDumortierE (eds) (2012) Resisting Punitiveness in Europe?Abingdon: Routledge.
81.
SnackenSVan Zyl SmitD (2013) European penology and penal policy-making. In: DaemsTVan Zyl SmitDSnackenS (eds) European Penology?Oxford: Hart Publishing.
82.
SparksR (2001) Degrees of estrangement: The cultural theory of risk and comparative criminology. Theoretical Criminology5(2): 159–176.
83.
Statewatch (2004) Scoreboard on post-Madrid counter-terrorism plans. Statewatch News Online, March. Available at: www.statewatch.org.
84.
ThamH (2013) Book review: European penology?Punishment & Society15(5): 564–566.
85.
Van SliedregtE (2010) European approaches to fighting terrorism. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law20: 222–235.
86.
Van Zyl SmitDSnackenS (2009) Principles of European Prison Law and Policy: Penology and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87.
VaughanBKilcomminsS (2007) The Europeanisation of human rights and the limits of authoritarian policing in Ireland. European Journal of Criminology4(4): 437–459.
88.
VaughanBKilcomminsS (2010) The governance of crime and the negotiation of justice. Criminology and Criminal Justice10(1): 59–75.
89.
WeberLFishwickEMarmoM (2014) Crime, Justice and Human Rights. London: Palgrave.
90.
WhitmanJ (2003) Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
91.
ZednerL (2007) Pre-crime and post-criminology?Theoretical Criminology11(2): 261–275.
92.
ZednerL (2013) Review of 9/11 effect. University of Toronto Law Journal63(4): 161–165.
93.
ZednerL (2014) Terrorising the criminal law. Criminal Law and Philosophy8: 99–121.
