This article investigates the extent to which post-Soviet states have successfully reformed the system of criminal justice that they inherited from the USSR, and in particular reduced accusatorial bias and achieved procedural fairness. I argue that with the notable exception of Estonia, these countries have not eliminated the defining features of the Soviet criminal justice, what I call ‘distorted neo-inquisitorialism’—namely the excessive power of investigators and weakness of judges. The article examines in detail the reform of criminal justice in Russia, Estonia and Ukraine from 1992 to the present.
AleksandrovAS (2013) Obvinitelnost dolzhna byt obvinitelnoi, a sostizatelnost—sotiazatelnoi. Unpublished paper.
2.
AleksandrovASKukhtaAA (2009) Vlast sledstvennaia i vlast obvinitelnaia: kvadratury kurga. Pravovedenie4: 22–28.
3.
AleksandrovASLapatnikovMVTerekhinVV (2013) Ot polusostizatelnosti k polnoi inkvizitsii: traektoriia razvitiia sovremennogo russkogo ugolovno-protsessualnogo prava. Unpublished paper.
4.
AlkonC (2007) The increased use of reconciliation in criminal cases in central Asia: A sign of restorative justice, reform or cause for concern?Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Journal8(1): 41–116.
5.
AlkonC (2010) Plea bargaining as a legal transplant: A good idea for troubled criminal justice systems?Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems19: 355–419.
6.
AnnusTTavitsM (2004) Judicial behavior after a change of regime: The effects of judge and defendant characteristics. Law & Society Review38(4): 711–736.
7.
AzubalyteR (2010) Tendencies of the development of the Lithuanian criminal procedure law. Jurisprudencija/Jurisprudenc1(119): 281–296.
8.
BryntsevVD (2001) Mozaika ‘Velikoi’ Sudebno-pravovoi reformy Ukrainy: (videnie sudi, ili vzgliad iznutri). Kharkov: Ksilon.
9.
BryntsevVD (2005) Sudebnaia reforma v Ukraine. In: Zaitsev, l.l. (compiler)Sudebnye reformy v stranakh SNG. Minsk: Tesei, 71–88.
10.
BurnhamWKahnJ (2008) Russia’s Criminal Procedure Code five years out. Review of Central and East European Law33(1): 1–94.
11.
CEELI (2005) Judicial Reform Index for Ukraine. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
12.
Centre for Political and Legal Reforms (2013) Implementation of the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine in 2013. Monitoring report, Kyiv.
13.
Chaika: ‘Ob’ektivnaia istina’ privedet k obvinitelnomu uklonu v sudakh (2014a) 29April. Available at: pravo.ru.
14.
DamaskaM (1986) The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
HendleyK (2012) The unsung heroes of the Russian judicial system: The Justice-of-the-Peace courts. Journal of Eurasian Law5(3): 337–366.
18.
HuskeyE (1986) The politics of the Soviet criminal process: Expanding the right to counsel in pretrial proceedings. American Journal of Comparative Law34(1): 93–112.
JehleJ-M (2009) Criminal Justice in Germany: Facts and Figures. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Justice.
21.
JordanP (2005) Defending Rights in Russia: Lawyers, the State and Legal Reform in the Post-Soviet Era. Vancouver: UBC Press.
22.
KergandbergE (2000) Estonian Code of Criminal Procedure as legal political decision. Juridica International85–93.
23.
KergandbergE (2012)European Court of the Human Rights—court of fourth instance in Estonia? In: The role of Supreme Courts in the protection of human rights conference, Riga, 2 May.
24.
Kontseptsiia (1992) Kontseptsiia sudebnoi reformy v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Moscow: Respublika, and in English translation (1994) in Statutes and Decisions30(2): 7–92.
KupatadzeA (2012) Explaining Georgia’s anti-corruption drive. European Security21(1): 16–36.
27.
KuybidaR (2014) Judicial reform in Ukraine: Challenges and recommendations. Policy Brief, Centre for Political and Legal Reform, 11March. Available at: www.en.pravo.orga.ua/indes/php/148.
28.
LaffranqueJ (2009) Harmonization of Estonian law with European Union law. In: Estonia’s Way into the European Union. Tallinn: Estonian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 99–107.
29.
LigiT (2012) Judicial independence in Estonia. In: Seibert-FohrA (ed.) Judicial Independence in Transition. Heidelberg: Springer, 739–793.
30.
MahoneyP (2004) Right to a fair trial in criminal matters under Article 6 E.C.H.R. Judicial Studies Institute Journal4(2): 107–129.
31.
MerrymanJH (1985) The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
O’MalleyK (2006) Not guilty until the Supreme Court finds you guilty: A reflection on jury trials in Russia. Demokratizatsiya14(1): 42–58.
38.
PaneyakhE (2014) Faking performance together: Systems of performance evaluation in Russian enforcement agencies and production of bias and privilege. Post-Soviet Affairs30(2–3): 115–136.
39.
PaneyakhETitaevKDVolkovVV. (2010) Obvinitelnyi uklon v ugolovnom protsesse: faktor prokurora. Analiticheskaia zapiska Instituta problem pravoprimeneniia, St Petersburg, March.
40.
PizziWMontagnaM (2004) The battle to establish an adversarial trial system in Italy. Michigan Journal of International Law25: 429–466.
41.
Podrobnosti (2012) Ianukovich predlagaet reformu UPK. 12January. Available at: http://podrobnosti.ua.
Prosecutor General of Ukraine (2013) Application of the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: Data as of 15 October 2013. Translation by the Denmark project ‘Support to Criminal Justice Reform in Ukraine’. Kyiv, October.
49.
RiedelJ (2005) Recruitment, professional evaluation, and career of judges and prosecutors in Germany. In: Di FedericoG (ed.), Recruitment, Professional Evaluation and Career of Judges and Prosecutors in Europe. Bologna: Editice Lo Scarabio, 69–126.
50.
Samoilova (2014) Nazad k ‘ob’ektivnoni istine. 3February. Available at: politkom.ru.
51.
Seibert-FohrA (2012) Judicial independence in Germany. In: Seibert-FohrA (ed.) Judicial Independence in Transition. Heidelberg: Springer, 447–520.
52.
SemukhinaOV (2007) Russian cultural factors related to perceived criminal fairness: The juxtaposition of policy and practice. Unpublished PhD thesis, Public Affairs Program, University of Central Florida.
SillaotsM (2004) Admission and confession of guilt in settlement proceedings under Estonian criminal procedure. Juidica Intenational116–124.
55.
SolomonPHJr (1987) The case of the vanishing acquittal: Informal norms and the practice of Soviet criminal justice. Soviet Studies39(4): 531–555.
56.
SolomonPHJr (1996) Soviet Criminal Justice under Stalin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
SolomonPHJr (2004) Courts in Russia: Independence, power, and accountability. In: SajoA (ed.) Judicial Integrity. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 225–252.
58.
SolomonPHJr (2005) The Criminal Procedure Code of 2001: Will it make Russian justice more fair? In: PridemoreW (ed.) Ruling Russia: Law, Crime and Justice in a Changing Society. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield, 77–100.
59.
SolomonPHJr (2007) Informal practices in Russian justice: Probing the limits of post-Soviet reform. In: FeldbruggeF (ed.) Russia, Europe, and the Rule of Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 79–92.
60.
SolomonPHJr (2008) Criminal justice and its reform in post-Soviet Ukraine. Unpublished paper.
61.
SolomonPHJr (2010) The Yanukovich judicial reform: Design and first impressions. Unpublished paper.
SolomonPHJr (2013) Beyond acquittals: Achieving fairness through prosecutorial discretion, diversion, and dismissal. Unpublished paper.
64.
SolomonPHJr (2014) The unexpected demise of Russia’s High Arbitrazh Court and the politicization of judicial reform. Russian Analytical Digest147(17April): 2–4.
65.
SolomonPHJr (2015) Law and courts in authoritarian regimes. In: WrightJD (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
66.
TrochevA (2010) Meddling with justice: Competitive politics, impunity, and distrusted courts in post-Orange Ukraine. Demokratizatsiya18(2): 122–147.
67.
TrochevA (2013) How judges arrest and acquit: Soviet legacies in post-Communist criminal justice. Unpublished paper.
68.
TrochevA (2014) Between convictions and reconciliation: Processing criminal cases in Kazakhstani courts. Unpublished paper.
69.
Ukraine (2006a) Concept for the improvement of the judicial system and ensuring fair trial in Ukraine in line with European standards. Translated US AID/Rule of Law project.
70.
Ukraine (2006b) Draft Law of Ukraine on the Judiciary. Approved by the National Commission on Strengthening Democracy and the Rule of Law, 11July. Translated USAID/Rule of Law Project.
71.
Ukraine (2006c) Draft Law of Ukraine on the Status of Judges. Approved by the National Commission on Strengthening Democracy and the Rule of Law, 11July. Translated by US AID/Ukraine Rule of Law Project.
72.
Ukraine (2010) Law of Ukraine NO.2453-VI ‘On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges’. Translation by the USAID Ukraine Rule of Law Project.
73.
Ukraine (2012) Ugolovno-protsessualnyi kodeks Ukrainy ot 13 Aprelia 2012 goda. Translation into Russian by faculty at the Donetsk Juridical Institute of the MVD Ukraine. Posted by the International Union of Assistance to Justice. Available at: http://www.iuaj.net/node/1099.
74.
Ukraine High Court (2013) Review of court statistics on the application of certain provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (CPC) as of 1 October 2013. Prepared by the High Specialised Court of Ukraine on Civil and Criminal Cases, Kyiv, October.
75.
Van CleaveR (2007) Italy. In: BradleyCM (ed.) Criminal Procedure: A Worldwide Study. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 303–350.
