“Obviously,we’re all oil industry”: The criminogenic structure of the offshore oil industry

Abstract

The 2010 BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill was one of the worst environmental disasters in the United States. The deviant actions of state and corporate actors involved in the Gulf of Mexico spill are not unique, but instead are symptomatic of a problem rooted much deeper in the US oil and gas industry. Building on Michalowski and Kramer’s Integrated Theoretical Model of State–Corporate Crime, this article explores the industry as a level of analysis. Early studies of white-collar crime that examined criminality within industries tended to approach the problem from the individual level and failed to consider the role of government in shaping the structural conditions of an industry. This article introduces the concept of “criminogenic industry structures” and examines the historical role of the federal government in shaping the criminogenic conditions of the offshore oil drilling industry that resulted in the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

Keywords

BP oil spill criminogenic industry structure environmental crime Minerals Management Service normalization of deviance state–corporate crime

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldrich

(1979) Organizations & Environments. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice- Hall.

Barstow

Dodd

Glanz

. (2010) Regulators failed to address risks in oil rig fail-safe device. New York Times, 20 June. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/21/us/21-blowout.html.

Bartley

(1953) The Tidelands Oil Controversy: A Legal and Historical Analysis. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Block

Bernard

(1988) Crime in the waste oil industry. Deviant Behavior 9(2): 113–129.

Boué

Jones

(2006) A Question of Rigs, of Rules, or of Rigging the Rules? Upstream Profits and Taxes in US Gulf Offshore Oil and Gas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Broder

(2008) Environmentalists wary of Obama’s interior pick. New York Times, 18 December. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/18/us/politics/18salazarcnd.html.

Broder

(2010) Obama to open offshore areas to oil drilling for first time. New York Times, 31 March. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/31/science/earth/31energy.html.

Clinard

Yeager

(2006) Corporate Crime. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Cruciotti

Matthews

(2006) The Exxon Valdez oil spill. In: Michalowski

Kramer

(eds) State-Corporate Crime: Wrongdoing at the Intersection of Business & Government. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, pp. 149–171.

10.

Denzin

(1977) Notes on the criminogenic hypothesis: A case study of the American liquor industry. American Sociological Review 42(6): 905–920.

11.

Energy Information Administration, Office of Oil and Gas (2005) Overview of U.S. legislation and regulations affecting offshore natural gas and oil activity. Available at: www.eia.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/feature_articles/2005/offshore/offshore.pdf.

12.

Ermann

Lundmann

(1982) Corporate Deviance. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

13.

Farberman

(1975) A criminogenic market structure: The automobile industry. Sociological Quarterly 16(4): 438–457.

14.

Fitzgerald

(2001) The Seaweed Rebellion: Federal-State Conflicts over Offshore Energy Development. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books.

15.

Freudenberg

Gramling

(1994) Oil in Troubled Waters: Perceptions, Politics and the Battle over Offshore Drilling. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

16.

Geis

(1977) The heavy electrical equipment antitrust cases of 1961. In: Geis

Meier

(eds) White-Collar Crime: Offenses in Business, Politics and the Professions. New York: The Free Press, pp. 117–132.

17.

Gibbs

Gore

McGarrell

. (2010) Introducing conservation criminology: Towards interdisciplinary scholarship on environmental crimes and risks. British Journal of Criminology 50: 124–144.

18.

Gold

Casselman

Chazan

(2010) Leaking oil well lacked safeguard device. Wall Street Journal, 28 April. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870-4423504575212031417936798.html.

19.

Government Accountability Office (2003) Mineral revenues: A more systematic evaluation of the royalty-in-kind pilots is needed. Available at: www.gao.gov/new.items/d03296.pdf.

20.

Government Accountability Office (2007) Royalties collection: Ongoing problems with interior’s efforts to ensure a fair return for taxpayers require attention. Available at: www.gao.gov/new.items/d07682t.pdf.

21.

Government Accountability Office (2008) Data management problems and reliance on self-reported data for compliance efforts put MMS royalty collections at risk. Available at: www.gao.gov/assets/100/95734.pdf.

22.

Government Accountability Office (2009) Royalty-in-kind program: MMS does not provide reasonable assurance it receives its share of gas, resulting in millions in lost revenue. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09744.pdf.

23.

Government Accountability Office (2010) Oil and gas management: Interior’s oil and gas production verification efforts do not provide reasonable assurance of accurate measurement of production volumes. Available at: www.gao.gov/new.items/d10313.pdf.

24.

Harvey

(2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

25.

Hogan

Long

Stretesky

(2006) Campaign contributions, post-war reconstruction contracts and state crime. Deviant Behavior 27(3): 269–297.

26.

Hogan

Long

Stretesky

(2010) Campaign contributions, lobbying and post-Katrina contracts. Disasters 34(3): 593–607.

27.

Juhasz

(2011) Black Tide: The Devastating Impact of the Gulf Oil Spill. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

28.

Kramer

(2010) From Guernica to Hiroshima to Baghdad: The normalization of the terror bombing of civilians. In: Chambliss

Michalowski

Kramer

(eds) State Crime in the Global Age. Portland: Willan, pp. 118–133.

29.

Kramer

Michalowski

(1990) Toward an integrated theory of state–corporate crime. Paper presented at a meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Baltimore, MD, November.

30.

Kramer

Michalowski

(2012) Is global warming a state–corporate crime? In: White

(ed.) Climate Change from a Criminological Perspective. New York: Springer, pp. 71–88.

31.

Leonard

Weber

(1970) Automakers and dealers: A study of criminogenic market forces. Law & Society Review 4(3): 407–424.

32.

Long

Hogan

Stretesky

. (2007) The relationship between postwar reconstruction contracts and political donations: The case of Afghanistan and Iraq. Sociological Spectrum 27: 453–472.

33.

Long

Stretesky

Lynch

. (2012) Crime in the coal industry: Implications for green criminology and treadmill of production. Organization and Environment 25(3): 328–346.

34.

Luthra

Bankston

Kalich

. (2007) Economic fluctuation and crime: A time-series analysis of the effects of oil development in the coastal regions of Louisiana. Deviant Behavior 28(2): 113–130.

35.

Lynch

(1990) The greening of criminology: A perspective for the 1990s. The Critical Criminologist 2(3): 3–4, 11–12.

36.

Lynch

Stretesky

(2003) The meaning of green: Contrasting criminological perspectives. Theoretical Criminology 7: 217–238.

37.

Lynch

Burns

Stretesky

(2011) Global warming and state–corporate crime: The politicization of global warming under the Bush administration. Crime, Law, & Social Change 54: 213–239.

38.

Lynch

Long

Stretesky

(2013) Add parsimony and stir … Exploring the explanation of state crime. American Journal of Criminal Justice 38: 99–118.

39.

Michalowski

Kramer

(eds) (2006) State–Corporate Crime: Wrongdoing at the Intersection of Business & Government. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

40.

Miller

(1984) Offshore federalism: Evolving federal-state relations in offshore oil and gas development. Ecology Law Quarterly 11: 401–450.

41.

Mills

(1956) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

42.

Pelofsky

Daggett

(2008) Bush lifts offshore drilling ban in symbolic move. Reuters, 14 July. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/07/14/us-usa-energy-idUSN1437813720080714.

43.

Priest

(2007) The Offshore Imperative: Shell Oil’s Search for Petroleum in Postwar America. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.

44.

Project on Government Oversight (2008) Drilling the taxpayer: Department of Interior’s royalty-in-kind program. Available at: http://pogoarchives.org/m/nr/rik/report-20080918.pdf

45.

Ruggiero

South

(2013) Toxic state–corporate crimes, neo- liberalism and green criminology: The hazards and legacies of the oil, chemical and mineral industries. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 2(2):12–26.

46.

Samandych

Kueneman

(2010) The Canadian-Alberta tar sands: A case study of state–corporate environmental crime. In: White

(ed.) Global Environmental Harm: Criminological Perspectives. Portland, OR: Willian, pp. 87–109.

47.

Schrager

Short

(1978) Toward a sociology of organizational crime. Social Problems 25(4): 407–419.

48.

South

(1998) A green field for criminology? A proposal for a perspective. Theoretical Criminology 22: 211–233.

49.

Stretesky

Lynch

(2011) Coal strip mining, mountain top removal and the distribution of environmental violations across the United States, 2002–2008. Landscape Research 36(2): 209–230.

50.

Stretesky

Long

Lynch

(2013) Does environmental enforcement slow the treadmill of production? The relationship between large monetary penalties, ecological disorganization and toxic releases within offending corporations. Journal of Crime and Justice 36(2): 235–249.

51.

Sumi

(2012) Executive summary: Breaking all the rules: The crisis in oil and gas regulatory enforcement. Earthworks, September. Available at: http://www.earthworksaction.org/files/publications/FINAL-ES-enforcement-sm.pdf.

52.

Sutherland

Cressey

(1978) Criminology. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott.

53.

US Department of the Interior, Office of the Inspector General, Minerals Management Service (2008) Investigative report: MMS Oil Marketing Group–Lakewood. 9 September. Available at: http://www.doioig.gov/images/stories/reports/pdf//RIKinvestigation.pdf.

54.

US Department of the Interior, Office of the Inspector General, Minerals Management Service (2010a) Investigative report: Island Operating Company et al. Available at: http://www.doi-oig.gov/images/stories/reports/pdf/IslandOperatingCo.pdf.

55.

US Department of the Interior, Office of the Inspector General, Minerals Management Service (2010b) Press release: Salazar; IG report on abuses in MMS is “yet another reason to clean house”. 25 May. Available at: http://www.doi.gov/news/pressreleases/IG-Report-MMS-Abuses-Yet-Another-Reason-to-Clean-House.cfm.

56.

US National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling (2011) Deep water: The gulf oil disaster and the future of offshore oil drilling, report to the President. January. Available at: www.oilspillcommission.gov/sites/default/files/documents/DEEPWATER_Reportto-thePresident_FINAL.pdf.

57.

United States v. California, 332 US 19, (1947)

58.

United States v. Louisianna, 339 U.S. 619, (1950)

59.

United States v. Texas, 339 U.S. 707, (1950)

60.

Vaughan

(1996) The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance and NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

61.

Vaughan

(2007) Beyond macro- and micro-levels of analysis, organizations, and the cultural fix. In: Pontell

Geis

(eds) International Handbook of White-Collar and Corporate Crime. New York: Springer, pp. 3–24.

62.

Wonders

Solop

(1993) Understanding the emergence of law and public policy: Toward a relational model of the state. In: Chambliss

Zatz

(eds) Making Law. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 204–225.