Drawing its examples from National Crime Victimization Survey narratives, this article proposes a theoretical framework for elucidating victims’ non-reporting accounts, the rationales that victims use to justify why they do not report sexual victimization to police. The framework delineates four account types—denying criminal intent, denying serious injury, denying victim innocence, and rejecting a victim identity—that each problematize one or more critical elements of real and reportable crime. By delineating victims’ accounts of unwanted sexual incidents, along with each account’s distinct neutralization strategies, non-reporting rationales, and cognitive benefits, this article contributes theoretically to discourses on unreported and unacknowledged rape, as well as to a broader literature on non-reported crime.
AgnewRobert S. (1985) ‘Neutralizing the Impact of Crime’, Criminal Justice and Behavior12(2): 221–39.
2.
AndersonIrinaDohertyKathy (2008) Accounting for Rape. New York: Routledge.
3.
BachmanRonet (1998) ‘The Factors Related to Rape Reporting Behavior and Arrest: New Evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey’, Criminal Justice and Behavior25(1): 8–29.
4.
BarkanSteven E. (2009) Criminology: A Sociological Understanding (4th edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
BaumerEric P.FelsonRichard B.StevenF. Messner (2003) ‘Changes in Police Notification for Rape, 1973–2000’, Criminology41(3): 841–73.
6.
Bennett HerbertTracySilverRoxanne CohenEllardJohn H. (1991) ‘Coping with an Abusive Relationship: How and Why Do Women Stay?’, Journal of Marriage and the Family53(2): 311–25.
7.
BensonMichael L. (1985) ‘Denying the Guilty Mind: Accounting for Involvement in a White-Collar Crime’, Criminology23(4): 583–607.
8.
BergenRaquel Kennedy (1998) ‘The Reality of Wife Rape: Women’s Experiences of Sexual Violence in Marriage’, in BergenRaquel Kennedy (ed.) Issues in Intimate Violence, pp. 237–50. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
9.
BlumerHerbert G. (1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
CaringellaSusan (2008) Addressing Rape Reform in Law and Practice. New York: Columbia Press.
11.
Clay-WarnerJ.BurtC.H. (2005) ‘Rape Reporting after Reforms: Have Times Really Changed?’, Violence against Women11(2): 150–76.
12.
CornishDerekClarkeRonald (1986) The Reasoning Criminal. New York: Springer.
13.
CurrieD.H. (1998) ‘Violent Men or Violent Women? Whose Definition Counts?’, in BergenR.K. (ed.) Issues in Intimate Violence, pp. 97–110. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
14.
DavisJoseph E. (2005) ‘Victim Narratives and Victim Selves: False Memory Syndrome and the Power of Accounts’, Social Problems52(4): 529–48.
15.
De HaanWillemVosJaco (2003) ‘A Crying Shame: The Over-Rationalized Conception of Man in the Rational Choice Perspective’, Theoretical Criminology7(1): 29–54.
16.
DuganLauraLaFreeGaryPiqueroAlex R. (2005) ‘Testing a Rational Choice Model of Airline Hijackings’, Criminology43(4): 1031–65.
17.
DunnJennifer L. (2001) ‘Innocence Lost: Accomplishing Victimization in Intimate Stalking Cases’, Symbolic Interaction24(3): 285–313.
18.
EstrichSusan (1987) Real Rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
FelsonRichard B.ParéPaul-Philippe (2005) ‘The Reporting of Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault by Nonstrangers to the Police’, Journal of Marriage and Family67(August): 597–610.
20.
FelsonRichard B.MessnerSteven F.HoskinAnthony W.DeaneGlenn (2002) ‘Reasons for Reporting and Not Reporting Domestic Violence to the Police’, Criminology40(3): 617–48.
21.
FerraroKathleen J.JohnsonJohn M. (1983) ‘How Women Experience Battering: The Process of Victimization’, Social Problems30(3): 325–39.
22.
FestingerLeon (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
FinkelhorDavidWolakJanis (2003) ‘Reporting Assaults against Juveniles to the Police: Barriers and Catalysts’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence18(2): 103–28.
24.
FisherBonnie S.CullenFrancis T.TurnerMichael G. (2000) The Sexual Victimization of College Women. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics and National Institute of Justice.
25.
FisherBonnie S.DaigleLeah E.CullenFrancis T.TurnerMichael G. (2003) ‘Reporting Sexual Victimization to the Police and Others: Results from a National-Level Study of College Women’, Criminal Justice and Behavior30(1): 6–38.
26.
FrohmannLisa (1991) ‘Discrediting Victims’ Allegations of Sexual Assault: Prosecutorial Accounts of Case Rejections’, Social Problems38(2): 213–26.
27.
GaveyNicola (1999) ‘I Wasn’t Raped, But … Revisiting Definitional Problems in Sexual Victimization’, in LambSharon (ed.) New Versions of Victims: Feminists Struggle with the Concept, pp. 57–81. New York: New York University Press.
28.
GaveyNicola (2006) ‘Viagra and the Coital Imperative’, in SeidmanS.FischerN.MeeksC. (eds) Introducing the New Sexuality Studies: Original Essays and Interviews, pp. 127–32. New York: Routledge.
29.
GoffmanErving (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
30.
GreenbergMartin S.RubackR. Barry (1992) After the Crime: Victim Decision Making. New York: Plenum Press.
31.
HartTimothy C.RennisonCalllie (2003) Reporting Crime to the Police, 1992–2000. NCJ 195710, March. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
32.
HeiderF. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
33.
HewittJohn P.StokesRandall (1975) ‘Disclaimers’, American Sociological Review40(1): 1–11.
34.
HorneyJulieSpohnCassia (1996) ‘The Influence of Blame and Believability Factors on the Processing of Simple versus Aggravated Rape Cases’, Criminology34(2): 135–61.
35.
KahnArnold S.MathieVirginia AndreoliCyndeeTorgler (1994) ‘Rape Scripts and Rape Acknowledgment’, Psychology of Women Quarterly18(1): 53–66.
36.
KarmenAndrew (2007) Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology (6th edn). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
37.
KimmelMichael S. (2003) ‘Masculinity as Homophobia’, in DischEstelle (ed.) Reconstructing Gender: A Multicultural Anthology, 3rd edn, pp. 103–9. New York: McGraw Hill.
38.
KonradiAmanda (1996) ‘Understanding Rape Survivors’ Preparations for Court: Accounting for the Influence of Legal Knowledge, Cultural Stereotypes, Personal Efficacy, and Prosecutor Contact’, Violence against Women2(1): 25–62.
39.
KossMary P.CookSarah L. (1993) ‘Date and Acquaintance Rape Are Significant Problems for Women’, in GellesRichard J.LosekeDonileen R. (eds) Current Controversies on Family Violence, pp. 104–19. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
40.
KossMary P.GidyczChristine A.WisniewskiNadine (1987) ‘The Scope of Rape: Incidence and Prevalence of Sexual Aggression and Victimization in a National Sample of Higher Education Students’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology55(2): 162–70.
41.
KossMary P.DineroThomas E.SeibelCynthia A.CoxSusan L. (1988) ‘Stranger and Acquaintance Rape: Are There Differences in the Victim’s Experiences?’, Psychology of Women Quarterly12(1): 1–24.
42.
LambSharon (1999) ‘Constructing the Victim: Popular Images and Lasting Labels’, in LambSharon (ed.) New Versions of Victims: Feminist Struggle with the Concept, pp. 108–38. New York: New York University Press.
43.
LaymanMelissa J.GidyczChristine A.LynnSteven Jay (1996) ‘Unacknowledged versus Acknowledged Rape Victims: Situational Factors and Posttraumatic Stress’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology105(1): 124–31.
44.
LeisenringAmy (2006) ‘Confronting “Victim” Discourses: The Identity Work of Battered Women’, Symbolic Interaction29(3): 307–30.
45.
LopezPatricia (1992) ‘He Said … She Said … An Overview of Date Rape from Commission through Prosecution through Verdict’, Criminal Justice Journal13(2): 275–302.
46.
McCallG.JSimmonsJ.L. (1978) Identities and Interactions. New York: Free Press.
47.
MarunaShaddCopesHeith (2005) ‘What Have We Learned from Five Decades of Neutralization Research?’, in TonryMichael (ed.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 32, pp. 221–320. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
MichenerH. AndrewDeLamaterJohn D. (1999) Social Psychology (4th edn). New York: Harcourt Brace & Co.
49.
MillsRobert B.Malley-MorrisonKathleen (1998) ‘Emotional Commitment, Normative Acceptability and Attributions for Abusive Partner Behaviors’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence13(6): 682–699.
50.
MullaneyJamie L. (2007) ‘Telling It Like a Man: Masculinities and Battering Men’s Accounts of Their Violence’, Men and Masculinities10(2): 222–47.
51.
NicholsLawrence (1990) ‘Reconceptualizing Social Accounts: An Agenda for Theory Building and Empirical Research’, Social Theory10: 113–44.
52.
PeacockPatricia (1998) ‘Marital Rape’, in BergenRaquel Kennedy (ed.) Issues in Intimate Violence, pp. 225–36. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
53.
PetersonZoe D.MuehlenhardCharlene L. (2010) ‘Conceptualizing the “Wantedness” of Women’s Consensual and Nonconsensual Sexual Experiences: Implications for How Women Label Their Experiences with Rape’, in MooreNelwyn B.SrDavidsonJ. KennethFisherTerri D. (eds) Speaking of Sexuality: Interdisciplinary Readings, 3rd edn, pp. 525–40. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
PollackWilliam (2003) ‘Inside the World of Boys: Behind the Mask of Masculinity’, in DischeEstelle (ed.) Reconstruction Gender: A Multicultural Anthology, 3rd edn, pp. 219–21. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
55.
PresserLois (2004) ‘Violent Offender, Moral Selves: Constructing Identities and Accounts in the Research Interview’, Social Problems51(1): 82–101.
56.
PresserLois (2009) ‘The Narratives of Offenders’, Theoretical Criminology13(2): 177–200.
57.
PtacekJames (1998) ‘Why Do Men Batter Their Wives?’, in BergenRaquel Kennedy (ed.) Issues in Intimate Violence, pp. 181–96. Los Angeles: SAGE.
58.
RennisonCallie Marie (2002) Rape and Sexual Assault: Reporting to Police and Medical Attention, 1992–2000. NCJ 194530. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
59.
RennisonCallie MarieWelchansSarah (2000) Intimate Partner Violence. NSJ 178247. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
60.
SaboDon (2003) ‘The Myth of the Sexual Athlete’, in DischEstelle (ed.) Reconstructing Gender: A Multicultural Anthology, 3rd edn, pp. 263–7. New York: McGraw Hill.
61.
SchwartzMartin D.DeKeseredyWalter S. (1997) Sexual Assault on the College Campus. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
62.
ScottMarvin B.LymanStanford M. (1968) ‘Accounts’, American Sociological Review33(February): 46–62.
63.
ScullyDianaMarollaJoseph (1984) ‘Convicted Rapists’ Vocabulary of Motive: Excuses and Justifications’, Social Problems31(June): 530–44.
64.
SykesGresham M.DavidMatza (1957) ‘Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency’, American Sociological Review22(December): 664–70.
65.
ThomasWilliam I.DorothyThomas (1928) The Child in America. New York: Knopf.
66.
TjadenPatriciaThoennesNancy (2000) Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence against Women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control.
67.
US Census Bureau (2000) National Crime Victimization Survey Interviewing Manual for Field Representatives. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
68.
US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (2003) National Crime Victimization Survey, 1992–2000 [computer file]. Conducted by US Dept of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. ICPSR, ed. Ann Arbor, MI, Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor]. Introduction, pp. 1–30.
69.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2006). National Crime Victimization Survey. [computer file]. Conducted by US Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. ICPSR, ed. Ann Arbor, MI, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor]. National Crime Victimization Survey crime incident report (NCVS-2). Also available for download at: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/ncvs204.pdf
70.
WarshawR. with afterword by KossM.P. (1988) I Never Called It Rape: The Ms. Report on Recognizing, Fighting and Surviving Date and Acquaintance Rape. New York: Ms. Foundation/Harper & Row.
71.
WeissKaren G. (2006) ‘(Re)Defining Sexual Victimization: An Interpretive Analysis of Victim Accounts and Responses’, Doctoral Dissertation, Stony Brook University, UMI Publishing.
72.
WeissKaren G. (2009) ‘Boys Will Be Boys and Other Gendered Accounts: An Exploration of Victim Excuses and Justifications for Unwanted Sexual Contact and Coercion’, Violence against Women15(7): 810–34.
73.
WeissKaren G. (2010a) ‘Male Sexual Victimization: An Exploration of Men’s Experiences and Perceptions’, Men and Masculinities12(3): 275–98.
74.
WeissKaren G. (2010b) ‘Too Ashamed to Report: Deconstructing the Shame of Sexual Victimization’, Feminist Criminology5(3): 286–310.
75.
WilliamsLinda S. (1984) ‘The Classic Rape: When Do Victims Report?’, Social Problems31(4): 459–67.
