For Rabelais,‘folk humour’ and its boundless forms are not frivolous, inconsequential aspects of the human condition but, rather, are central to modes of critique and the formation of discourses which seek radical cultural transformation by evading, exposing, resisting, scandalizing and mocking ‘official culture’. Taking its cue from Bakhtin’s exposition of the grotesque realism of the Rabelaisian novel, this article explores the abstract notion of ‘justice’ through the lens of ‘folk humour’—specifically, stand-up comedy which references securitization in the post-9/11 period. In so doing, it calls into question Habermasian discourse ethics, proposing instead a model of ‘doing justice’ predicated on Bakhtinian dialogism.
Aamer, Johina ( 2010) ‘Help Bring Shaker Home’, Amnesty International. Available at http://www.amnesty.org.uk/actions_details.asp?ActionID=675 (accessed 2 February 2010).
2.
Asen, Robert ( 2000) ‘Seeking the "Counter" in Counterpublics’ , Communication Theory10(4): 424-46.
3.
Asen, Robert and Daniel C. Brouwer ( 2001) ‘Introduction: Reconfigurations of the Public Sphere’ , in Robert Asen and Daniel C. Brouwer (eds) Counterpublics and the State, pp. 1-32. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
4.
Bakhtin, Mikhail ( 1981 [1935]) ‘Discourse in the Novel’ , in The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin , pp. 259-422. Trans. Michael Holquist and Carl Emerson. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
5.
Bakhtin, Mikhail ( 1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin . Trans. Michael Holquist and Carl Emerson. Ed. Michael Holquist.Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
6.
Bakhtin, Mikhail ( 1984[1965]) Rabelais and His World. Trans. Helene Iswolsky. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
7.
Bakhtin, Mikhail ( 1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Trans. and ed. Carl Emerson.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
Beck, Ulrich ( 1992) Risk Society. London: SAGE.
9.
Beck, Ulrich ( 1997) The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge: Polity.
10.
Benhabib, Seyla ( 1986) Critique, Norm and Utopia. New York : Columbia University Press.
11.
Benhabib, Seyla ( 1992) ‘Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition and Jürgen Habermas’, in Craig Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, pp. 73-98. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Benhabib, Seyla ( 2002) ‘Unholy Politics’, After September 11: Terrorism and Democratic Values, SSRC. Available at www.ssrc.org/sept11/essays/benhabib.htm (accessed 23 May 2009).
13.
Bigo, Didier ( 2002) ‘To Reassure and Protect after September 11’, After September 11: Terrorism and Democratic Values, SSRC . Available at www.ssrc.org/sept11/essays/bigo.htm (accessed 23 May 2009).
14.
Billig, Michael ( 2001) ‘Humour and Hatred: The Racist Jokes of the Ku Klux Klan’, Discourse and Society12(3): 267-89.
15.
Billig, Michael ( 2005) Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour . London: SAGE.
16.
Borradori, Giovanna ( 2003) Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
17.
Bottoms, Anthony ( 1995) ‘The Philosophy and Politics of Punishment and Sentencing’ , in Chris Clarkson and Rod Morgan (eds) The Politics of Sentencing Reform, pp. 17-49. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18.
Calhoun, Craig (ed.) (1992) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Cole, David and James X. Dempsey ( 2002) Terrorism and the Constitution, Sacrificing Civil Liberties in the Name of National Security. New York: New Press.
20.
Crossley, Nick and John M. Roberts (eds) (2004) After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere. Oxford: Blackwell . Also published as The Sociological Review (Special Issue) , 52(1).
21.
Dean, Mitchell ( 2002a) ‘Liberal Government and Authoritarianism’ , Economy and Society31(1): 37-61.
22.
Dean, Mitchell ( 2002b) ‘Powers of Life and Death beyond Governmentality’ , Cultural Values6(1&2): 119-38.
23.
Du Gay, Paul ( 2002) ‘A Common Power to Keep Them All in Awe: A Comment on Governance’, Cultural Values6(1): 11-27.
24.
Ferrell, Jeff and Clinton Sanders (eds) (1995) Cultural Criminology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press .
25.
Ferrell, Jeff, Keith Hayward and Jock Young ( 2008) Cultural Criminology. London : SAGE.
26.
Gardiner, Michael ( 2004) ‘Wild Publics and Grotesque Symposiums: Habermas, Bakhtin on Dialogue, Everyday Life and the Public Sphere’, The Sociological Review52(1): 28-48.
27.
Garland, David ( 2001a) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
Garland, David ( 2001b) Mass Imprisonment in the USA: Social Causes and Consequences . London: SAGE.
29.
Garvey, T. Gregory ( 2000) ‘The Value of Opacity: A Bakhtinian Analysis of Habermas’s Discourse Ethics’, Philosophy and Rhetoric33(4): 370-90.
30.
Giddens, Anthony ( 1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge : Polity.
31.
Giddens, Anthony ( 1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy . Cambridge: Polity.
32.
Gilroy, Paul ( 1987) There Ain’t No Black in the Union Jack: The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation. London: Hutchinson.
33.
Gray, Ann, Jan Campbell, Mark Erickson, Sturat Hanson and Helen Wood (eds) ( 2007) CCCS: Selected Working Papers. Volume 2. London: Routledge.
34.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1984) The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume I. Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1987) The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume II. Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
36.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1989 [1962]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, MA & London : MIT Press.
37.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1992) ‘Further Reflections on the Public Sphere’ , in Craig Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, pp. 421-61. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1993) Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics . Trans. Ciaran P. Cronin. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
39.
Habermas, Jürgen ( 1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Trans. William Rehg. Cambridge : Polity Press.
40.
Hall, Stuart and Tony Jefferson (eds) (1993) Resistance through Rituals: Youth Sub-Cultures in Postwar Britain. London: Routledge.
41.
Hall, Stuart, Chas Critcher, Tony Jefferson, John Clark and Brian Roberts ( 1978) Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order . London: Macmillan.
42.
Hansen, Randall and Desmond King ( 2000) ‘Illiberalism and the New Politics of Asylum: Liberalism’s Dark Side’, The Political Quarterly71(4): 396-403.
43.
Hayward, Keith ( 2004) City Limits: Crime, Consumer Culture and the Urban Experience . London: Glasshouse .
44.
Hindess, Barry ( 2001) ‘The Liberal Government of Unfreedom’ , Alternatives: Social Transformation and Humane Governance26(1): 93-111.
45.
Hirschkop, Kenneth ( 2004) ‘Justice and Drama: On Bakhtin as a Complement to Habermas’, The Sociological Review52(1): 49-66.
46.
How, Alan R. ( 1985) ‘A Case of Creative Misreading: Habermas’ Evaluation of Gadamer’s Hermeneutics’, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology16: 32-44.
47.
Howitt, Dennis and Kwame Owusu-Bempah ( 2009) ‘Race and Ethnicity in Popular Humour’ , in Michael Pickering and Sharon Lockyer (eds) Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour , pp. 45-62. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
Hudson, Barbara ( 2003) Justice in the Risk Society. London : SAGE.
49.
Hutton, Neil ( 2005) ‘Beyond Populist Punitiveness’, Punishment and Society7(3): 243-58.
50.
Jayasuriya, Kansishka ( 2002) ‘9/11 and the New "Anti-politics" of "Security"’, After September 11: Terrorism and Democratic Values, SSRC . Available at www.ssrc.org/sept11/essays/jayasuriya.htm (accessed 1 May 2009).
51.
Katz, Jack ( 1988) Seductions of Crime: Moral and Sensual Attractions of Doing Evil. New York: Basic Books .
52.
Kelly, Michael (ed.) (1994) Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53.
King, Desmond ( 1999) In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the United States and Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
Kosik, Karel ( 1976) Dialectics of the Concrete: A Study on Problems of Man and World. Boston, MA & Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
55.
Lafont, Cristina ( 2003) ‘Procedural Justice: Implications of the Rawls-Habermas Debate for Discourse Ethics’, Philosophy and Social Criticism29(2): 163-81.
56.
Lewis, Carol W. ( 2005) ‘The Clash between Security and Liberty in the US Response to Terror’, Public Administration Review65(1): 18-30.
57.
Lockyer, Sharon and Michael Pickering ( 2009) ‘Breaking the Mould: Conversations with Omid Djalili and Shazia Mirza’, in Michael Pickering and Sharon Lockyer (eds) Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour, pp. 98-125. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
Matthews, Roger ( 2005) ‘The Myth of Punitiveness’, Theoretical Criminology9(2): 175-201.
59.
Meyers, Peter A. ( 2002) ‘Defend Politics against Terrorism’, After September 11: Terrorism and Democratic Values, SSRC . Available atwww.ssrc.org/sept11/essays/meyers.htm (accessed 22 May 2009).
60.
Nash, Kate ( 2001) ‘The "Cultural Turn" in Social Theory: Towards a Theory of Cultural Politics’, Sociology35(1): 77-92.
61.
Nielsen, Greg ( 1995) ‘Bakhtin and Habermas: Toward a Transcultural Ethics’ , Theory and Society24(6): 803-35.
62.
O’Malley, Pat ( 1999) ‘Volatile and Contradictory Punishment’ , Theoretical Criminology3(2): 175-96.
63.
O’Malley, Pat ( 2008) ‘Experiments in Risk and Criminal Justice’ , Theoretical Criminology12(4): 451-69.
64.
Outhwaite, William ( 1994) Habermas: A Critical Introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
65.
Pantazis, Christina and Simon Pemberton ( 2009) ‘From the "Old" to the "New" Suspect Community: Explaining the Impacts of Recent UK Counter-Terrorism Legislation’, British Journal of Criminology49(5): 646-66.
66.
Perrin, Andrew J. ( 2005) ‘National Threat and Political Culture: Authoritarianism, Antiauthoritarianism, and the September 11 Attacks’, Political Psychology26(2): 167-94.
67.
Pratt, John ( 2007) Penal Populism. London: Routledge.
68.
Pratt, John, David Brown , Mark Brown, Simon Hallsworth and Wayne Morrison (eds) (2005) The New Punitiveness: Trends, Theories, Perspectives . Cullompton: Willan.
69.
Presdee, Mike ( 2000) Cultural Criminology and the Carnival of Crime . London: Routledge.
70.
Roberts, John M. and Nick Crossley ( 2004) ‘Introduction’, The Sociological Review52(1): 1-27.
71.
Roberts, Julian V., Loretta S. Stalans, David Indermaur and Mike Hough ( 2003) Penal Populism and Public Opinion: Lessons From Five Countries . New York: Oxford University Press .
72.
Sparks, Chris ( 2003) ‘Liberalism, Terrorism and the Politics of Fear’ , Politics23(3): 200-6.
73.
Stears, Marc ( 2001) ‘Beyond the Logic of Liberalism: Learning from Illiberalism in Britain and the United States’, Journal of Political Ideologies6(2): 215-30.
74.
Theoretical Criminology (2004) Special Issue on Cultural Criminology, 8(3).
75.
Trey, George A. ( 1992) ‘Communicative Ethics in the Face of Alterity: Habermas, Levinas and the Problem of Post-conventional Universalism’ , Praxis International11(4): 412-27.
76.
Valier, Claire ( 2004) Crime and Punishment in Contemporary Culture. London: Routledge.
77.
Valverde, Marianna ( 1996) ‘"Despotism" and Ethical Governance’ , Economy and Society25(3): 357-72.
78.
Vice, Sue ( 1997) Introducing Bakhtin. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
79.
Wade, Marianne ( 2007) ‘Fear vs Freedom Post 9/11-a European Debate: Introduction’ , European Journal of Criminal Policy Research13(1&2): 3-12.
80.
Warner, Michael ( 2002) Publics and Counterpublics. New York : Zone Books.
81.
White, Allon ( 1993) Carnival, Hysteria and Writing: Collected Essays and an Autobiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
82.
Yalof, David A. and Kenneth Dautrich ( 2002) The First Amendment and the Media in the Court of Public Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
