Rather than appealing to penal parsimony as a constraint on the otherwise insatiable demands of the criminal justice system, we should develop a positive account of the proper aims of criminal law which shows parsimony, or moderation, to be integral to those aims. We can do this by developing a republican conception of criminal law as a law that citizens impose on themselves: such a law will be modest in its scope, and will provide a criminal process of trial and punishment that addresses those subjected to it with the respect due to them as citizens.
Abrams, N. ( 1989) ‘The New Ancillary Offenses’, Criminal Law Forum1(1): 1-39.
2.
Alldridge, P. ( 1990) ‘Rules for Courts and Rules for Citizens’ , Oxford Journal of Legal Studies10(4): 487-504.
3.
Ashworth, A.J. ( 2002) ‘Testing Fidelity to Legal Values: Official Involvement and Criminal Justice’, in S. Shute and A.P. Simester (eds) Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part, pp. 299-330. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
4.
Ashworth, A.J. ( 2009) Principles of Criminal Law (6th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
Ashworth, A.J. and M. Blake ( 1996) ‘The Presumption of Innocence in English Criminal Law’, Criminal Law Review May 306-17.
6.
Ashworth, A.J. and L. Zedner ( 2008) ‘Defending the Criminal Law: Reflections on the Changing Character of Crime, Procedure, and Sanctions’, Criminal Law and Philosophy2(1): 21-51.
7.
Ashworth, A.J. and L. Zedner ( 2010, forthcoming) ‘Preventive Orders: A Problem of Under-Criminalization?’ , in R.A. Duff, L. Farmer, S.E. Marshall, V. Tadros and M. Renzo (eds) The Boundaries of the Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Braithwaite, J. and P. Pettit ( 1990) Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
9.
Christie, N. ( 1977) ‘Conflicts as Property’, British Journal of Criminology17(1): 1-15.
10.
Cotterrell, R. ( 1995) Law’s Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Dagger, R. ( 1997) Civic Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
Dan-Cohen, M. ( 1984) ‘Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law’, Harvard Law Review97(3): 625-77.
13.
De Keijser, J.W. (forthcoming) ‘Never Mind the Pain; It’s a Measure: Justifying Measures as Part of the Dutch Bifurcated System of Sanctions’, in M. Tonry (ed.) Punishment Futures. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
14.
Dennis, I.H. ( 2007) The Law of Evidence (3rd edn). London: Sweet & Maxwell.
15.
Díez, C.G.-J. (2008) ‘Enemy Combatants versus Enemy Criminal Law’ , New Criminal Law Review11(4): 529-62.
16.
Downes, D. and R. van Swaaningen ( 2007) ‘The Road to Dystopia? Changes in the Penal Climate of the Netherlands’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research35: 31-72.
17.
Dubber, M.D. ( 2001) ‘Policing Possession: The War on Crime and the End of Criminal Law’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology91(4): 829-996.
18.
Duff, R.A. ( 2001) Punishment, Communication and Community. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Duff, R.A. ( 2007) Answering for Crime. Oxford: Hart.
20.
Duff, R.A., L. Farmer, S.E. Marshall and V. Tadros ( 2007) The Trial on Trial (3): Towards a Normative Theory of the Criminal Trial. Oxford: Hart .
21.
Floud, J. and W. Young ( 1981) Dangerousness and Criminal Justice. London: Heinemann.
22.
Goldman, A.I. ( 1979) ‘The Paradox of Punishment’, Philosophy and Public Affairs9(Fall): 42-58.
23.
Harcourt, B.E. ( 1999) ‘The Collapse of the Harm Principle’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology90(1): 109-94.
24.
Hart, H.L.A. ( 1968) ‘Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment’ , in H.L.A. HartPunishment and Responsibility, pp. 1-27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
Hart, H.L.A. ( 1994) The Concept of Law (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
Husak, D.N. ( 2002) Legalize This! The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs. London: Verso.
27.
Husak, D.N. ( 2004) ‘The Criminal Law as a Last Resort’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies24(2): 207-35.
28.
Husak, D.N. ( 2007) Overcriminalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
Jareborg, N. ( 2005) ‘Criminalization as Last Resort (Ultima Ratio)’ , Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law2(2): 521-34.
30.
Kelsen, H. ( 1945) General Theory of Law and State. Trans. A. Wedberg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Lacey, N. ( 1988) State Punishment. London: Routledge.
32.
Marshall, S.E. and R.A. Duff ( 1998) ‘Criminalization and Sharing Wrongs’, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence11(1): 7-22.
33.
Moore, M.S. ( 1997) Placing Blame: A General Theory of the Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
Moore, M.S. ( 2009) ‘A Tale of Two Theories’, Criminal Justice Ethics28(1): 27-48.
35.
Nagel, T. ( 1978) Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Pettit, P. ( 1999) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
Playfair, G. ( 1971) The Punitive Obsession. London: Gollancz.
38.
Raz, J. ( 1986) The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Stewart, H. ( 2009) ‘The Limits of the Harm Principle’, Criminal Law and Philosophy4(1): 17-35.
40.
Tadros, V. ( 2007) ‘Justice and Terrorism’, New Criminal Law Review10(4): 658-89.
41.
Von Hirsch, A. ( 1996) ‘Extending the Harm Principle: "Remote" Harms and Fair Imputation’, in A.P. Simester and A.T.H. Smith (eds) Harm and Culpability , p. 259. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
Von Hirsch, A. and A.P. Simester (eds) (2006) Incivilities: Regulating Offensive Behaviour. Oxford: Hart.
43.
Weigend, T. ( 1988) ‘The Legal and Practical Problems Posed by the Difference between Criminal Law and Administrative Penal Law’, Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal59.
44.
Zedner, L. ( 2007) ‘Preventive Justice or Pre-Punishment? The Case of Control Orders’, Current Legal Problems60: 174-203.
