Abstract
In this article we offer a reconceptualization of security that attempts to reconcile
a post-critical and normative agenda. The article proceeds by unpacking features of
the dominant security discourse and then resituating the question in a radical
politics. We contend that moving forward on this question requires a rejection of
the association between security, certainty and authority. Rather than following the
classical realist view that security requires exceptions from politics, we choose to
see security as dependent on political uncertainty. Borrowing from
Häanninen’s idea that politics is ‘living with
ambiguity’ and taking from post-Foucauldian thought against the violence
of tyranny, we advocate the ongoing
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
