Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-4
Neural dynamics of executive function in cognitively able kindergarteners with autism spectrum disorders as predictors of concurrent academic achievement
Although electrophysiological (electroencephalography) measures of executive functions (e.g. error monitoring) have been used to predict academic achievement in typically developing children, work investigating a link between error monitoring and academic skills in children with autism spectrum disorder is limited. In this study, we employed traditional electrophysiological and advanced time–frequency methods, combined with principal component analyses, to extract neural activity related to error monitoring and tested their relations to academic achievement in cognitively able kindergarteners with autism spectrum disorder. In total, 35 cognitively able kindergarteners with autism spectrum disorder completed academic assessments and the child-friendly “Zoo Game” Go/No-go task at school entry. The Go/No-go task successfully elicited an error-related negativity and error positivity in children with autism spectrum disorder as young as 5 years at fronto-central and posterior electrode sites, respectively. We also observed increased response-related theta power during errors relative to correct trials at fronto-central sites. Both larger error positivity and theta power significantly predicted concurrent academic achievement after controlling for behavioral performance on the Zoo Game and intelligence quotient. These results suggest that the use of time–frequency electroencephalography analyses, combined with traditional event-related potential measures, may provide new opportunities to investigate neurobiological mechanisms of executive function and academic achievement in young children with autism spectrum disorder.
Abundis-GutiérrezA.ChecaP.CastellanosC.Rosario RuedaM. (2014). Electrophysiological correlates of attention networks in childhood and early adulthood. Neuropsychologia, 57, 78–92.
2.
ActonA. (2013). Issues in neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry, and psychophysiology: 2013 edition. Atlanta, GA: ScholarlyEditions.
3.
AgamY.HämäläinenM. S.LeeA. K. C.DyckmanK. A.FriedmanJ. S.IsomM.. . . ManoachD. S. (2011). Multimodal neuroimaging dissociates hemodynamic and electrophysiological correlates of error processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 17556–17561.
4.
AllanN. P.HumeL. E.AllanD. M.FarringtonA. L.LoniganC. J. (2014). Relations between inhibitory control and the development of academic skills in preschool and kindergarten: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2368–2379.
5.
BarryR. J.De BlasioF. M. (2015). Performance and ERP components in the equiprobable go/no-go task: Inhibition in children. Psychophysiology, 52, 1228–1237.
6.
BernatE. M.WilliamsW. J.GehringW. J. (2005). Decomposing ERP time–frequency energy using PCA. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 1314–1334.
7.
BishopS. L.FarmerC.ThurmA. (2015). Measurement of nonverbal IQ in autism spectrum disorder: Scores in young adulthood compared to early childhood. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 966–974.
8.
BlairC. (2002). School readiness: Integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization of children’s functioning at school entry. American Psychologist, 57, 111–127.
9.
BlairC. (2016). Executive function and early childhood education. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 102–107.
10.
BotvinickM. M.CohenJ. D.CarterC. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539–546.
11.
BowersM. E.BuzzellG. A.BernatE. M.FoxN. A.BarkerT. V. (2018). Time-frequency approaches to investigating changes in feedback processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychophysiology, 55, e13208.
12.
BrownJ. W.BraverT. S. (2005). Learned predictions of error likelihood in the anterior cingulate cortex. Science, 307, 1118–1121.
13.
BuzzellG. A.BarkerT. V.Troller-RenfreeS. V.BernatE. M.BowersM. E.MoralesS.. . . FoxN. A. (2018). Adolescent cognitive control, theta oscillations, and social motivation. bioRxiv. Retrieved from https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/366831v2.full#ref-77
14.
BuzzellG. A.RichardsJ. E.WhiteL. K.BarkerT. V.PineD. S.FoxN. A. (2017). Development of the error-monitoring system from ages 9–35: Unique insight provided by MRI-constrained source localization of EEG. NeuroImage, 157, 13–26.
15.
CameronC. E.BrockL. L.MurrahW. M.BellL. H.WorzallaS. L.GrissmerD.MorrisonF. J. (2012). Fine motor skills and executive function both contribute to kindergarten achievement. Child Development, 83, 1229–1244.
16.
CarterC. S.MacdonaldA. M.BotvinickM.RossL. L.StengerV. A.NollD.CohenJ. D. (2000). Parsing executive processes: Strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 1944–1948.
17.
CavanaghJ. F.FrankM. J. (2014). Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 414–421.
18.
CiesielskiK. T.HarrisR. J.CoferL. F. (2004). Posterior brain ERP patterns related to the Go/No-Go task in children. Psychophysiology, 41, 882–892.
19.
CohenM. X. (2014). Analyzing neural time series data: Theory and practice. Cambridge: The MIT press.
20.
DawsonG.RogersS.MunsonJ.SmithM.WinterJ.GreensonJ.. . . VarleyJ. (2010). Randomized, controlled trial of an intervention for toddlers with autism: The early start Denver model. Pediatrics, 125(1), e17–e23.
21.
DelormeA.MakeigS. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21.
22.
DuPuisD.RamN.WillnerC. J.KaralunasS.SegalowitzS. J.Gatzke-KoppL. M. (2015). Implications of ongoing neural development for the measurement of the error-related negativity in childhood. Developmental Science, 18(3), 452–468.
23.
ElliottC. D. (2007). Differential Ability Scales (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
24.
FalkensteinM.HohnsbeinJ.HoormannJ.BlankeL. (1991). Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 447–455.
FusterJ. M. (1997). The prefrontal cortex: Anatomy, physiology, and neuropsychology of the frontal lobe. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven.
27.
GehringW. J.GossB.ColesM. G.MeyerD. E.DonchinE. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4, 385–390.
28.
GothamK.PicklesA.LordC. (2009). Standardizing ADOS scores for a measure of severity in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 693–705.
29.
GrammerJ. K.CarrascoM.GehringW. J.MorrisonF. J. (2014). Age-related changes in error processing in young children: A school-based investigation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 93–105.
30.
GroenY.WijersA. A.MulderL. J. M.WaggeveldB.MinderaaR. B.AlthausM. (2008). Error and feedback processing in children with ADHD and children with autistic spectrum disorder: An EEG event-related potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 2476–2493.
31.
HajcakG.McDonaldN.SimonsR. F. (2003). To err is autonomic: Error-related brain potentials, ANS activity, and post-error compensatory behavior. Psychophysiology, 40, 895–903.
32.
HappéF.BoothR.CharltonR.HughesC. (2006). Executive function deficits in autism spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Examining profiles across domains and ages. Brain and Cognition, 61, 25–39.
33.
HarperJ.MaloneS. M.BernatE. M. (2014). Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a go/no-go task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 125, 124–132.
34.
HendersonH.SchwartzC.MundyP.BurnetteC.SuttonS.ZahkaN.PradellaA. (2006). Response monitoring, the error-related negativity, and differences in social behavior in autism. Brain and Cognition, 61, 96–109.
KemnerC.VerbatenM. N.CuperusJ. M.CamffermanG.Van EngelandH. (1994). Visual and somatosensory event-related brain potentials in autistic children and three different control groups. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 92, 225–237.
37.
KenaG.Musu-GilletteL.RobinsonJ.WangX.RathbunA.ZhangJ.VelezE. D. V. (2015). The condition of education 2015 (NCES 2015-144). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
38.
KenworthyL.AnthonyL. G.NaimanD. Q.CannonL.WillsM. C.Luong-TranC.. . . WallaceG. L. (2014). Randomized controlled effectiveness trial of executive function intervention for children on the autism spectrum. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 374–383.
39.
KimE. Y.IwakiN.ImashioyaH.UnoH.FujitaT. (2007). Error-related negativity in a visual go/no-go task: Children vs. adults. Developmental Neuropsychology, 31, 181–191.
40.
KimM. H.GrammerJ.MarulisL.CarrascoM.MorrisonF.GehringW. (2016). Early math and reading achievement are associated with the error positivity. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 18–26.
41.
KimM. H.MarulisL. M.GrammerJ. K.MorrisonF. J.GehringW. J. (2017). Motivational processes from expectancy–value theory are associated with variability in the error positivity in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 155, 32–47.
42.
KimS. H.BalV. H.LordC. (2017). Longitudinal follow-up of academic achievement in children with autism from age 2 to 18. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59, 258–267.
43.
KimS. H.GrammerJ.BenreyN.MorrisonF.LordC. (2018). Stimulus processing and error monitoring in more-able kindergarteners with autism spectrum disorder: A short review and a preliminary Event-Related Potentials study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 47, 556–567.
44.
KonstantareasM. M.StewartK. (2006). Affect regulation and temperament in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 143–154.
45.
KramerJ. H.MungasD.PossinK. L.RankinK. P.BoxerA. L.RosenH. J.. . . WidmeyerM. (2014). NIH examiner: Conceptualization and development of an executive function battery. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20, 11–19.
46.
LammC.WalkerO. L.DegnanK. A.HendersonH. A.PineD. S.McDermottJ. M.FoxN. A. (2014). Cognitive control moderates early childhood temperament in predicting social behavior in 7-year-old children: An ERP study. Developmental Science, 17, 667–681.
47.
LarsonM. J.ClaysonP. E.ClawsonA. (2014). Making sense of all the conflict: A theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 93, 283–297.
48.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables (Vol. 7). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
49.
LordC.RutterM.DiLavoreP. C.RisiS.GothamK.BishopS. (2012). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: ADOS–2. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
50.
LuceR. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
LuckS. J.KappenmanE. S. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
McClellandM. M.AcockA. C.MorrisonF. J. (2006). The impact of kindergarten learning-related skills on academic trajectories at the end of elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 471–490.
53.
McClellandM. M.CameronC. E.ConnorC. M.FarrisC. L.JewkesA. M.MorrisonF. J. (2007). Links between behavioral regulation and preschoolers’ literacy, vocabulary, and math skills. Developmental Psychology, 43, 947–959.
54.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA.WagerT. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
55.
MorrisonF. J.PonitzC. C.McClellandM. M. (2010). Self-regulation and academic achievement in the transition to school. In CalkinsS. D.Ann BellM. (Eds.), Child development at the intersection of emotion and cognition (pp. 203–224). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
56.
NolanH.WhelanR.ReillyR. B. (2010). FASTER: Fully automated statistical thresholding for EEG artifact rejection. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 192, 152–162.
57.
OverbeekT. J.NieuwenhuisS.RidderinkhofK. R. (2005). Dissociable components of error processing: On the functional significance of the Pe vis-à-vis the ERN/Ne. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 319–329.
58.
PassolunghiM. C.CostaH. M. (2016). Working memory and early numeracy training in preschool children. Child Neuropsychology, 22, 81–98.
59.
PonitzC. C.McClellandM. M.MatthewsJ. S.MorrisonF. J. (2009). A structured observation of behavioral self-regulation and its contribution to kindergarten outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 605–619.
60.
PosnerM. I.RaichleM. E. (1994). Images of mind. New York, NY: Scientific American Library/Scientific American Books.
61.
RaverC. C.Smith-DonaldR.HayesT.JonesS. M. (2005, April). Self-regulation across differing risk and sociocultural contexts: Preliminary findings from the Chicago School Readiness Project. Paper presented at Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA.
62.
SantessoD. L.DrmicI. E.JethaM. K.BrysonS. E.GoldbergJ. O.HallG. B.. . . SchmidtL. A. (2011). An event-related source localization study of response monitoring and social impairments in autism spectrum disorder. Psychophysiology, 48, 241–251.
63.
SchneiderW. (2010). Metacognition and memory development in childhood and adolescence. In WatersH. S.SchneiderW. (Eds.), Metacognition, Strategy Use, and Instruction (pp. 54–81). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
64.
SokhadzeE. M.BaruthJ. M.SearsL.SokhadzeG. E.El-BazA. S.CasanovaM. F. (2012). Prefrontal neuromodulation using rTMS improves error monitoring and correction function in autism. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 37, 91–102.
SteeleV. R.AndersonN. E.ClausE. D.BernatE. M.RaoV.AssafM.. . . KiehlK. A. (2016). Neuroimaging measures of error-processing: Extracting reliable signals from event-related potentials and functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage, 132, 247–260.
67.
SteinhauserM.YeungN. (2010). Decision processes in human performance monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 15643–15653.
68.
TaylorS. F.SternE. R.GehringW. J. (2007). Neural systems for error monitoring recent findings and theoretical perspectives. The Neuroscientist, 13, 160–172.
69.
Troller-RenfreeS.ZeanahC. H.NelsonC. A.FoxN. A. (2018). Neural and cognitive factors influencing the emergence of psychopathology: Insights from the Bucharest early intervention project. Child Development Perspectives, 12, 28–33.
70.
UllspergerM.FischerA. G.NigburR.EndrassT. (2014). Neural mechanisms and temporal dynamics of performance monitoring. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 259–267.
71.
UzefovskyF.AllisonC.SmithP.Baron-CohenS. (2016). Brief report: The Go/No-Go task online: Inhibitory control deficits in autism in a large sample. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 2774–2779.
72.
VlamingsP. H. J. M.JonkmanL. M.HoeksmaM. R.van EngelandH.KemnerC. (2008). Reduced error monitoring in children with autism spectrum disorder: An ERP study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 399–406.
73.
WesselJ. R.AronA. R. (2017). On the globality of motor suppression: Unexpected events and their influence on behavior and cognition. Neuron, 93, 259–280.
74.
WiebeS. A.EspyK. A.CharakD. (2008). Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: I. Latent structure. Developmental Psychology, 44, 575–587.
75.
WilliamsB. R.PonesseJ. S.SchacharR. J.LoganG. D.TannockR. (1999). Development of inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 35, 205–213.
76.
WilloughbyM. T.KupersmidtJ. B.Voegler-LeeM. E. (2012). Is preschool executive function causally related to academic achievement?Child Neuropsychology, 18, 79–91.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
