We compared scanpath similarity in response to repeated presentations of social and nonsocial images representing natural scenes in a sample of 30 participants with autism spectrum disorder and 32 matched typically developing individuals. We used scanpath similarity (calculated using ScanMatch) as a novel measure of attentional bias or preference, which constrains eye-movement patterns by directing attention to specific visual or semantic features of the image. We found that, compared with the control group, scanpath similarity of participants with autism was significantly higher in response to nonsocial images, and significantly lower in response to social images. Moreover, scanpaths of participants with autism were more similar to scanpaths of other participants with autism in response to nonsocial images, and less similar in response to social images. Finally, we also found that in response to nonsocial images, scanpath similarity of participants with autism did not decline with stimulus repetition to the same extent as in the control group, which suggests more perseverative attention in the autism spectrum disorder group. These results show a preferential fixation on certain elements of social stimuli in typically developing individuals compared with individuals with autism, and on certain elements of nonsocial stimuli in the autism spectrum disorder group, compared with the typically developing group.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
2.
AndersonN. C.AndersonF.KingstoneA.BischofW. F. (2015). A comparison of scanpath comparison methods. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1377–1392. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0550-3
3.
Baron-CohenS. (2009). Autism: The empathizing-systemizing (E-S) theory. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1156, 68–80. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04467.x
4.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.SpongA.ScahillV.LawsonJ. (2001). Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent? A test with children with Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 5, 47–78.
ChevallierC.KohlsG.TroianiV.BrodkinE. S.SchultzR. T. (2012). The social motivation theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 231–239. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.02.007
7.
ChevallierC.Parish-MorrisJ.McVeyA.RumpK. M.SassonN. J.HerringtonJ. D.SchultzR. T. (2015). Measuring social attention and motivation in autism spectrum disorder using eye-tracking: Stimulus type matters. Autism Research, 8, 620–628. doi:10.1002/aur.1479
8.
Chita-TegmarkM. (2016). Attention allocation in ASD: A review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 3, 209–223. doi:10.1007/s40489-016-0077-x
9.
Chita-TegmarkM.ArunachalamS.NelsonC. A.Tager-FlusbergH. (2015). Eye-tracking measurements of language processing: Developmental differences in children at high risk for ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 3327–3338. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2495-5
10.
CocoM. I.KellerF. (2014). Classification of visual and linguistic tasks using eye-movement features. Journal of Vision, 14(3), 11.doi:10.1167/14.3.11
11.
CristinoF.MathôtS.TheeuwesJ.GilchristI. D. (2010). ScanMatch: A novel method for comparing fixation sequences. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 692–700. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.3.692
12.
DawsonG.TothK.AbbottR.OsterlingJ.MunsonJ.EstesA.LiawJ. (2004). Early social attention impairments in autism: Social orienting, joint attention, and attention to distress. Developmental Psychology, 40, 271–283. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.271
13.
ElisonJ. T.SassonN. J.Turner-BrownL. M.DichterG. S.BodfishJ. W. (2012). Age trends in visual exploration of social and nonsocial information in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 842–851. doi:10.1016/J.RASD.2011.11.005
14.
FoulshamT.DewhurstR.NystromM.JarodzkaH.JohanssonR.UnderwoodG.HolmqvistK. (2012). Comparing scanpaths during scene encoding and recognition: A multi-dimensional approach. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(4), 1–14. doi:10.16910/jemr.5.4.3
15.
FoulshamT.UnderwoodG. (2008). What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. Journal of Vision, 8(2), 6. doi:10.1167/8.2.6
16.
FrazierT. W.StraussM.KlingemierE. W.ZetzerE. E.HardanA. Y.EngC.YoungstromE. A. (2017). A meta-analysis of gaze differences to social and nonsocial information between individuals with and without autism. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 56, 546–555. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2017.05.005
17.
GuillonQ.HadjikhaniN.BaduelS.RogéB. (2014). Visual social attention in autism spectrum disorder: Insights from eye tracking studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 279–297. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.013
18.
HayesT. R.HendersonJ. M. (2018). Scan patterns during scene viewing predict individual differences in clinical traits in a normative sample. PLoS ONE, 13(5), e0196654. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196654
19.
HayesT. R.HendersonJ. M.BorsD. A.HendersonJ. M. W. S. J.van de WeijerJ. (2017). Scan patterns during real-world scene viewing predict individual differences in cognitive capacity. Journal of Vision, 17(5), 23. doi:10.1167/17.5.23
20.
HendersonJ. M.HayesT. R. (2018). Meaning guides attention in real-world scene images: Evidence from eye movements and meaning maps. Journal of Vision, 18(6), 10. doi:10.1167/18.6.10
21.
JonesW.CarrK.KlinA. (2008). Absence of preferential looking to the eyes of approaching adults predicts level of social disability in 2-year-old toddlers with autism spectrum disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 946–954. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.8.946
22.
JuddC. M.WestfallJ.KennyD. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 54–69. doi:10.1037/a0028347
23.
KennedyD. P.D’OnofrioB. M.QuinnP. D.BölteS.LichtensteinP.Falck-YtterT. (2017). Genetic influence on eye movements to complex scenes at short timescales. Current Biology, 27, 3554–3560. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.007
24.
KlinA.LinD. J.GorrindoP.RamsayG.JonesW. (2009). Two-year-olds with autism orient to non-social contingencies rather than biological motion. Nature, 459, 257–261. doi:10.1038/nature07868
25.
LordC.RutterM.DiLavoreP.RisiS.GothamK.BishopS. L. (2012). Autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS-2): Manual (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
26.
MannanS. K.WoodingD. S.RuddockK. H. (1997). Fixation sequences made during visual examination of briefly presented 2D images. Spatial Vision, 11, 157–178. doi:10.1163/156856897X00177
27.
ManyakovN. V.BangerterA.ChatterjeeM.MasonL.NessS.LewinD.. . . PandinaG. (2018). Visual exploration in autism spectrum disorder: Exploring age differences and dynamic features using recurrence quantification analysis. Autism Research, 11, 1554–1566. doi:10.1002/aur.2021
28.
MooreA.WozniakM.YousefA.BarnesC. C.ChaD.CourchesneE.PierceK. (2018). The geometric preference subtype in ASD: Identifying a consistent, early-emerging phenomenon through eye tracking. Molecular Autism, 9(1), Article 19. doi:10.1186/s13229-018-0202-z
29.
NotonD.StarkL. (1971). Scanpaths in eye movements during pattern perception. Science, 171, 308–311. doi:10.1126/science.171.3968.308
30.
PierceK.MarineroS.HazinR.McKennaB.BarnesC. C.MaligeA. (2016). Eye tracking reveals abnormal visual preference for geometric images as an early biomarker of an autism spectrum disorder subtype associated with increased symptom severity. Biological Psychiatry, 79, 657–666. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.03.032
31.
SassonN. J.ElisonJ. T.Turner-BrownL. M.DichterG. S.BodfishJ. W. (2011). Brief report: Circumscribed attention in young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 242–247. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1038-3
32.
SassonN. J.TouchstoneE. W. (2014). Visual attention to competing social and object images by preschool children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 584–592. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1910-z
33.
SassonN. J.Turner-BrownL. M.HoltzclawT. N.LamK. S. L.BodfishJ. W. (2008). Children with autism demonstrate circumscribed attention during passive viewing of complex social and nonsocial picture arrays. Autism Research, 1(1), 31–42. doi:10.1002/aur.4
34.
SchultzR. T. (2005). Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: The role of the amygdala and fusiform face area. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 23, 125–141. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.12.012
WangS.XuJ.JiangM.ZhaoQ.HurlemannR.AdolphsR. (2014). Autism spectrum disorder, but not amygdala lesions, impairs social attention in visual search. Neuropsychologia, 63, 259–274. doi:10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.2014.09.002
37.
WechslerD. (1974). Manual of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
38.
WechslerD. (1983). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
39.
XuJ.JiangM.WangS.KankanhalliM. S.ZhaoQ. (2014). Predicting human gaze beyond pixels. Journal of Vision, 14, 28–28. doi:10.1167/14.1.28
40.
YarbusA. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
