Recent theories of autism have emphasised the cognitive strengths and weaknesses in those with autism, which are also seen to some degree in non-clinical samples with higher autistic-like traits. The dual process theory of autism proposes that people with autism and non-clinical people with a higher degree of autistic-like traits have a propensity to show reduced intuitive processing (automatic and typically faster) alongside enhanced propensity towards deliberative processing (dependent on general cognitive ability and typically slower). This study aimed to further test the dual process theory of autism by investigating syllogistic reasoning (whether a conclusion can be logically deduced from two propositions) in addition to the cognitive reflection test (correct responses to which reflect deliberative processing over-riding intuitive processing) with respect to the degree of autistic-like traits and general cognitive ability in a non-clinical sample of 189 adults. Results showed that higher levels of autistic-like traits were related to lower levels of intuitive processing and higher levels of deliberative processing, which was found across both the syllogistic reasoning and cognitive reflection test measures – over and above the effect of general cognitive ability. The findings are consistent with the dual process theory of autism, and implications for autism are discussed.
AdolphsR (2003) Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience4: 165–178.
2.
AlmeidaRADickinsonJEMayberyMTet al. (2010) A new step towards understanding embedded figures test performance in the autism spectrum: the radial frequency search task. Neuropsychologia48: 374–381.
American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed.Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
5.
AshwinCBrosnan M (in press) The dual process theory of autism. In: MorsanyiKByrneRMJ (eds) Thinking and Reasoning in Autism. London: Routledge.
6.
AshwinCBaron-CohenSWheelwrightSet al. (2007) Differential activation of the amygdala and the ‘social brain’ during fearful face-processing in Asperger syndrome. Neuropsychologia45(1): 2–14.
7.
AuyeungBBaron-CohenSWheelwrightSet al. (2008) The autism spectrum quotient: children’s version (AQ-child). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders38: 1230–1240.
8.
BaghdadliARussetFMottronL (2017) Measurement properties of screening and diagnostic tools for autism spectrum adults of mean normal intelligence: a systematic review. European Psychiatry44: 104–124.
9.
Baron-CohenSAshwinEAshwinCet al. (2009) Talent in autism: hyper-systemizing, hyper-attention to detail and sensory hypersensitivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences364: 1377–1383.
10.
Baron-CohenSHoekstraRAKnickmeyerRet al. (2006) The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ) – adolescent version. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders36: 343–350.
11.
Baron-CohenSWheelwrightSHillJet al. (2001) The ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry42: 241–251.
12.
BölteSWesterwaldEHoltmannMet al. (2011) Autistic traits and autism spectrum disorders: the clinical validity of two measures presuming a continuum of social communication skills. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders41(1): 66–72.
13.
BrosnanMAshwinC (2018) Reasoning on the autism spectrum. In: VolkmarFR (ed.) Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders. New York, NY: Springer.
14.
BrosnanMGavinJ (2015) Are ‘Friends’ electric? Why those with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) thrive in online cultures but suffer in offline cultures. In: RosenLDCheeverNACarrierLM (eds) The Wiley Handbook of Psychology, Technology, and Society. London: Blackwell, pp.250–270.
15.
BrosnanMAshwinCLewtonM (2017) Brief report: intuitive and reflective reasoning in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders47: 2595–2601.
16.
BrosnanMChapmanEAshwinC (2014) Adolescents with autism spectrum disorder show a circumspect reasoning bias rather than ‘jumping-to-conclusions’. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders44: 513–520.
17.
BrosnanMJohnsonHGrawmeyerBet al. (2015) Emotion recognition in animated compared to human stimuli in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders45(6): 1785–1796.
18.
BrosnanMLewtonMAshwinC (2016) Reasoning on the autism spectrum: a dual process theory account. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders46(6): 2115–2125.
19.
CampitelliGGerransP (2014) Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach. Memory & Cognition42: 434–447.
20.
ConstantinoJNToddRD (2003) Autistic traits in the general population: a twin study. Archives of General Psychiatry60: 524–530.
21.
De MartinoBHarrisonNAKnafoSet al. (2008) Explaining enhanced logical consistency during decision making in autism. The Journal of Neuroscience28: 10746–10750.
22.
DijkstraKAPligtJKleefGA (2013) Deliberation versus intuition: decomposing the role of expertise in judgment and decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making26: 285–294.
23.
EvansJSB (2011) Dual-process theories of reasoning: contemporary issues and developmental applications. Developmental Review31: 86–102.
24.
EvansJSBFrankishKE (2009) In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
EvansJSBStanovichKE (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science8: 223–241.
26.
EvansJSBBarstonJLPollardP (1983) On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition11: 295–306.
27.
EvansJSBHandleySJHarperCN (2001) Necessity, possibility and belief: a study of syllogistic reasoning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A54(3): 935–958.
28.
FarmerGDBaron-CohenSSkylarkWJ (2017) People with autism spectrum conditions make more consistent decisions. Psychological Science28(8): 1067–1076.
29.
FrederickS (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives19: 25–42.
30.
FreemanDEvansNListerR (2012) Gut feelings, deliberative thought, and paranoid ideation: a study of experiential and rational reasoning. Psychiatry Research197: 119–122.
31.
FrithU (1989) Autism: Explaining the Enigma. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
32.
FrithUHappéFSiddonsF (1994) Autism and theory of mind in everyday life. Social Development3: 108–124.
33.
GernsbacherMAStevensonJLDernS (2017) Specificity, contexts, and reference groups matter when assessing autistic traits. PLoS ONE12(2): e0171931.
34.
GolanOBaron-CohenS (2006) Systemizing empathy: teaching adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism to recognize complex emotions using interactive multimedia. Development and Psychopathology18(2): 591–617.
35.
GolanOAshwinEGranaderYet al. (2010) Enhancing emotion recognition in children with autism spectrum conditions: an intervention using animated vehicles with real emotional faces. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders40: 269–279.
36.
HarmsMBMartinAWallaceGL (2010) Facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorders: a review of behavioral and neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychology Review20: 290–322.
37.
HertzogCSmithRMArielR (2017) Does the cognitive reflection test actually capture heuristic versus analytic reasoning styles in older adults?Experimental Aging Research44: 18–34.
38.
HoekstraRAVinkhuyzenAAWheelwrightSet al. (2011) The construction and validation of an abridged version of the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ-Short). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders41(5): 589–596.
39.
HolyoakKJMorrisonRG (2012) Thinking and reasoning: a reader’s guide. In: HolyoakKJMorrisonRG (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.1–10.
40.
HorhotaMMienaltowskiABlanchard-FieldsF (2012) If only I had taken my usual route: age-related differences in counterfactual thinking. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition19: 339–361.
41.
HurleyRSLoshMParlierMet al. (2007) The broad autism phenotype questionnaire. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders37: 1679–1690.
42.
JobeLEWhiteSW (2007) Loneliness, social relationships, and a broader autism phenotype in college students. Personality and Individual Differences42: 1479–1489.
43.
KadakMTDemirelÖFYavuzMet al. (2014) Recognition of emotional facial expressions and broad autism phenotype in parents of children diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry55: 1146–1151.
44.
KahnemanD (2011) Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Strous & Giroux.
45.
KanneSMWangJChristSE (2012) The subthreshold autism trait questionnaire (SATQ): development of a brief self-report measure of subthreshold autism traits. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders42: 769–780.
46.
KerenGSchulY (2009) Two is not always better than one a critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science4: 533–550.
47.
KlauerKCMuschJNaumerB (2000) On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Review107: 882–854.
48.
KokisJVMacphersonRToplakMEet al. (2002) Heuristic and analytic processing: age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology83: 26–52.
49.
KruglanskiAWGigerenzerG (2011) Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review118: 97–119.
50.
LesageENavarreteGDe NeysW (2013) Evolutionary modules and Bayesian facilitation: the role of general cognitive resources. Thinking & Reasoning19: 27–53.
LoshMAdolphsRPivenJ (2011) The broad autism phenotype. In: AmaralDDawsonGGeschwindD (eds) Autism Spectrum Disorders. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.457–476.
53.
McKenzieREvansJSBTHandleySJ (2010) Conditional reasoning in autism: activation and integration of knowledge and belief. Developmental Psychology46: 391–403.
54.
MarksADHinesDWBloreRLet al. (2008) Assessing individual differences in adolescents’ preference for rational and experiential cognition. Personality and Individual Differences44: 42–52.
55.
MorsanyiKBusdraghiCPrimiC (2014) Mathematical anxiety is linked to reduced cognitive reflection: a potential road from discomfort in the mathematics classroom to susceptibility to biases. Behavioral and Brain Functions10: 31.
56.
OakhillJJohnson-LairdPNGarnhamA (1989) Believability and syllogistic reasoning. Cognition31: 117–140.
57.
PachurTMataRSchoolerLJ (2009) Cognitive aging and the adaptive use of recognition in decision making. Psychology and Aging24: 901–915.
58.
PennycookGCheyneJAKoehlerDJet al. (2013) Belief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review20: 806–811.
59.
PennycookGCheyneJAKoehlerDJet al. (2015) Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?Behavior Research Methods48: 341–348.
60.
PlominRHaworthCMADavisOSP (2009) Common disorders are quantitative traits. Nature Reviews Genetics10: 872–878.
61.
PosserudMBLundervoldAJGillbergC (2006) Autistic features in a total population of 7–9-year-old children assessed by the ASSQ (Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry47: 167–175.
62.
RandDGGreeneJDNowakMA (2012) Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature489(7416): 427–430.
63.
RavenJRavenJCCourtJH (2000) Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Oxford: OPP Ltd.
64.
RavenJC (1962) Advanced Raven’s Progressive Matrices. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
65.
RobertsMJSykesED (2003) Belief bias and relational reasoning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A56: 131–154.
66.
RonaldAHoekstraRA (2011) Autism spectrum disorders and autistic traits: a decade of new twin studies. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics156(3): 255–274.
67.
RussellABrosnanM (in press) Habits and autism: restricted, repetitive patterns of behaviour and thinking in autism. In: VerplankenB (ed.) The psychology of habit. London: SAGE.
68.
RutherfordMDMcIntoshDN (2007) Rules versus prototype matching: strategies of perception of emotional facial expressions in the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders37: 187–196.
69.
RuzichEAllisonCChakrabartiBet al. (2015a) Sex and STEM occupation predict autism-spectrum quotient (AQ) scores in half a million people. PLoS ONE10: e0141229.
70.
RuzichEAllisonCSmithPet al. (2015b) Measuring autistic traits in the general population: a systematic review of the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ) in a nonclinical population sample of 6,900 typical adult males and females. Molecular Autism6: 2.
71.
Savage-McGlynnE (2012) Sex differences in intelligence in younger and older participants of the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices Plus. Personality and Individual Differences53: 137–141.
72.
ShahPCatmurCBirdG (2016) Emotional decision-making in autism spectrum disorder: the roles of interoception and alexithymia. Molecular Autism7: 43.
73.
ShynkarukJMThompsonVA (2006) Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning. Memory & Cognition34: 619–632.
74.
SirotaMJuanchichMHagmayerY (2014) Ecological rationality or nested sets? Individual differences in cognitive processing predict Bayesian reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review21: 198–204.
75.
SkuseDMandyWSteerCet al. (2009) Social communication competence and functional adaptation in a general population of children: preliminary evidence for sex-by-verbal IQ differential risk. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry48: 128–137.
76.
SkylarkWJBaron-CohenS (2017) Initial evidence that non-clinical autistic traits are associated with lower income. Molecular Autism8: 61.
77.
SpikerDLotspeichLJDimiceliSet al. (2002) Behavioral phenotypic variation in autism multiplex families: evidence for a continuous severity gradient. American Journal of Medical Genetics114: 129–136.
78.
StanovichKEWestRF (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral and Brain Sciences23: 645–665.
79.
StanovichKEWestRF (2008) On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology94: 672–695.
80.
ToplakMEWestRFStanovichKE (2014) Assessing miserly information processing: an expansion of the cognitive reflection test. Thinking & Reasoning20: 147–168.
81.
TraversERolisonJJFeeneyA (2016) The time course of conflict on the cognitive reflection test. Cognition150: 109–118.
82.
TverskyAKahnemanD (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science185: 1124–1131.
83.
TverskyAKahnemanD (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science211: 453–458.
84.
UnsworthNHeitzRPSchrockJCet al. (2005) An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods37: 498–505.
85.
WalshJAVidaMDRutherfordMD (2014) Strategies for perceiving facial expressions in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders44: 1018–1026.
86.
Woodbury-SmithMRRobinsonJWheelwrightSet al. (2005) Screening adults for Asperger syndrome using the AQ: a preliminary study of its diagnostic validity in clinical practice. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders35(3): 331–335.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
