A major topic of debate is whether children with autism spectrum disorder should be educated in inclusive or specialized settings. We examined the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of delivering the Group-Early Start Denver Model to children with autism spectrum disorder in inclusive versus specialized classrooms. We randomly assigned 44 preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder to receive the Group-Early Start Denver Model across one school calendar year in classrooms that included only children with autism spectrum disorder or mostly children who were typically developing. Blind-rated indicators of teaching quality showed similar results across settings, which were above the local benchmark. Children showed improvements across blinded proximal measures of spontaneous vocalization, social interaction, and imitation and across distal measures of verbal cognition, adaptive behavior, and autism symptoms irrespective of intervention setting. Mothers of participants experienced a reduction in stress irrespective of child intervention setting. Across both settings, age at intervention start was negatively associated with gains in verbal cognition. Delivery of Group-Early Start Denver Model in an inclusive setting appeared to be feasible, with no significant differences in teaching quality and child improvements when the program was implemented in inclusive versus specialized classrooms.
AbidinRR (2012) Parenting Stress Index 4th Edition: Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: Par Inc.
2.
BitsikaVSharpleyCF (2004) Stress, anxiety and depression among parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools14(2): 151–161.
3.
BodfishJWSymonsFJParkerDEet al. (2000) Varieties of repetitive behavior in autism: comparisons to mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders30(3)> 237–243.
4.
BosworthK (ed.) (2015) Prevention Science in School Settings: Complex Relationships and Processes. New York: Springer.
5.
Bottema-BeutelKTurielEDeWittMNet al. (2017) To include or not to include: evaluations and reasoning about the failure to include peers with autism spectrum disorder in elementary students. Autism21(1): 51–60.
6.
BoydBAHumeKMcBeeMTet al. (2014) Comparative efficacy of LEAP, TEACCH and non-model-specific special education programs for preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders44(2): 366–380.
7.
BrickerD (1995) The challenge of inclusion. Journal of Early Intervention19(3): 179–194.
8.
BromleyJHareDJDavisonKet al. (2004) Mothers supporting children with autistic spectrum disorders: social support, mental health status and satisfaction with services. Autism8(4): 409–423.
9.
ChangYCShireSYShihWet al. (2016) Preschool deployment of evidence-based social communication intervention: JASPER in the classroom. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders46(6): 2211–2223.
10.
CliffordSHudryKBrownLet al. (2010) The modified-classroom observation schedule to measure intentional communication (M-COSMIC): evaluation of reliability and validity. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders4(3): 509–525.
11.
CookTD (2002) Randomized experiments in educational policy research: a critical examination of the reasons the educational evaluation community has offered for not doing them. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis24(3): 175–199.
12.
Data Accountability Center (2007) Children with Disabilities Receiving Special Education Under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Act, 1997–2006. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis.
13.
DawsonGRogersSMunsonJet al. (2010) Randomized, controlled trial of an intervention for toddlers with autism: the Early Start Denver Model. Pediatrics125(1): e17–e23.
14.
GarfinkleANSchwartzIS (2002) Peer imitation: increasing social interactions in children with autism and other developmental disabilities in inclusive preschool classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education22(1): 26–38.
15.
GilkersonJRichardsJA (2008) The LENA natural language study. LENA foundation technical report LTR-02-2. Boulder, CO: LENA Foundation (accessed 3 March 2009).
16.
HarrisSLHandlemanJSKristoffBet al. (1990) Changes in language development among autistic and peer children in segregated and integrated preschool settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders20(1): 23–31.
17.
HarrowerJKDunlapG (2001) Including children with autism in general education classrooms. A review of effective strategies. Behavior Modification25(5): 762–784.
18.
HornbyG (2014) Inclusive Special Education: Evidence-Based Practices for Children with Special Needs and Disabilities. New York: Springer.
19.
HowardSJSirajIMelhuishECet al. (2018) Measuring interactional quality in pre-school settings: introduction and validation of the Sustained Shared Thinking and Emotional Wellbeing (SSTEW) scale. Early Child Development and Care. Epub ahead of print 17 August. DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2018.1511549.
20.
IadarolaSShihWDeanMet al. (2018) Implementing a manualized, classroom transition intervention for students with ASD in underresourced schools. Behavior Modification42(1): 126–147.
21.
JonesLWellsK (2007) Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research. JAMA297(4): 407–410.
22.
KaaleAFagerlandMWMartinsenEWet al. (2014) Preschool-based social communication treatment for children with autism: 12-month follow-up of a randomized trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry53(2): 188–198.
23.
LittleC (2017) Supporting Social Inclusion for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Insights from Research and Practice. Abingdon; New York: Taylor & Francis.
24.
LockeJWolkCBHarkerCet al. (2017) Pebbles, rocks, and boulders: The implementation of a school-based social engagement intervention for children with autism. Autism21(8)> 985–994.
25.
LordCRutterMDiLavorePCet al. (2012) Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: ADOS-2. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
26.
LowenthalB (1999) Early childhood inclusion in the United States. Early Child Development and Care150(1): 17–32.
27.
MajokoT (2016) Inclusion of children with autism spectrum disorders: listening and hearing to voices from the grassroots. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders46(4): 1429–1440.
28.
MakrygianniMKGenaAKatoudiSet al. (2018) The effectiveness of applied behavior analytic interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analytic study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders51: 18–31.
MazurekMOHandenBLWodkaELet al. (2014) Age at first autism spectrum disorder diagnosis: the role of birth cohort, demographic factors, and clinical features. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics35(9): 561–569.
31.
MesibovGBSheaV (1996) Full inclusion and students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders26: 337–346.
32.
MullenEM (1995) Mullen Scales of Early Learning Manual. Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
33.
NahmiasASKaseCMandellDS (2014) Comparing cognitive outcomes among children with autism spectrum disorders receiving community-based early intervention in one of three placements. Autism18(3): 311–320.
34.
OdomSLMcEvoyMA (1990) Mainstreaming at the preschool level: potential barriers and tasks for the field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education10(2): 48–61.
35.
OdomSLHansonMJLieberJet al. (2001) The costs of preschool inclusion. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education21(1): 46–55.
36.
PaneraiSZingaleMTrubiaGet al. (2009) Special education versus inclusive education: the role of the TEACCH program. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders39(6): 874–882.
37.
PellicanoLBölteSStahmerA (2018) The current illusion of educational inclusion. Autism22: 386–387.
38.
RaffertyYBoettcherCGriffinKW (2001) Benefits and risks of reverse inclusion for preschoolers with and without disabilities: parents’ perspectives. Journal of Early Intervention24(4): 266–286.
39.
ReedP (2015) Interventions for Autism: Evidence for Educational and Clinical Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
40.
ReedPOsborneLAWaddingtonEM (2012) A comparative study of the impact of mainstream and special school placement on the behaviour of children with autism spectrum disorders. British Educational Research Journal38(5): 749–763.
41.
RogersSJDawsonG (2010) Early Start Denver Model for Young Children with Autism: Promoting Language, Learning, and Engagement. New York: Guilford Press.
42.
RogersSJEstesALordCet al. (2012) Effects of a brief Early Start Denver Model (ESDM)-based parent intervention on toddlers at risk for autism spectrum disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry51(10): 1052–1065.
43.
RogersSJVivantiGRochM (2017) Helping young children with autism spectrum disorder develop social ability: The early start denver model approach. In: LeafJ (ed) Handbook of Social Skills and Autism Spectrum Disorder. Cham: Springer, Cham, pp.197–222.
44.
RutterMBaileyALordCet al. (2003) Social Communication Questionnaire. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
45.
SchoplerEBristolM (1980) Autistic children in public school. ERIC Exceptional Child Education Report, Council for Exceptional Children, Reston, VA, August.
46.
ShireSYChangYCShihWet al. (2017) Hybrid implementation model of community-partnered early intervention for toddlers with autism: a randomized trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry58(5): 612–622.
47.
SirajIKingstonDMelhuishEC (2015) Assessing Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Sustained Shared Thinking and Emotional Well-Being (SSTEW) Scale for 2–5-Year-Olds Provision. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
48.
SmithTKlormanRMruzekDW (2015) Predicting outcome of community-based early intensive behavioral intervention for children with autism. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology43(7): 1271–1282.
StrainPS (1984) Social interactions of handicapped preschoolers in developmentally-integrated and specialized settings. In: FieldTRoopnarineJLSegalM (eds) Friendships in Normal and Handicapped Children. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp.187–207.
51.
United Nations (2006) United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD). Strasbourg: Assembly of European Regions. Available at: www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/convtexte.htm (accessed 22 May 2017).
52.
VivantiGDissanayakeC and Victorian ASELCC Team (2016a) Outcome for children receiving the Early Start Denver Model before and after 48 months. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders46(7): 2441–2449.
53.
VivantiGDuncanEDawsonGet al. (2017) Implementing the Group-Based Early Start Denver Model for Preschoolers with Autism. New York: Springer.
54.
VivantiGHockingDRFanningPet al. (2016b) Social affiliation motives modulate spontaneous learning in Williams syndrome but not in autism. Molecular Autism7(1): 40.
55.
VivantiGKasariCGreenJet al. (2018) Implementing and evaluating early intervention for children with autism: where are the gaps and what should we do?Autism Research11(1): 16–23.
56.
VivantiGPaynterJDuncanEet al. (2014) Effectiveness and feasibility of the Early Start Denver Model implemented in a group-based community childcare setting. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders44(12): 3140–3153.
WingL (2007) Children with autistic spectrum disorders. In: CigmanR (ed.) Included or Excluded? The Challenge of the Mainstream for Some SEN Children. New York: Routledge, pp.23–33.
59.
XuDYapanelUGrayS (2009) Reliability of the LENA Language Environment Analysis System in young children’s natural home environment. LENA foundation technical report LTR-05-2. Boulder, CO: LENA Foundation. Available at: http://www.lenafoundation.org/TechReport.aspx/Reliability/LTR-05-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
