The success of witness interviews in the criminal justice system depends on the accuracy of information obtained, which is a function of both amount and quality of information. Attempts to enhance witness retrieval such as mental reinstatement of context have been designed with typically developed adults in mind. In this article, the relative benefits of mental and sketch reinstatement mnemonics are explored with both typically developing children and children with autism. Children watched a crime event video, and their retrieval of event information was examined in free and probed recall phases of a cognitive interview. As expected, typically developing children recalled more correct information of all types than children with autism during free and probed recall phases. Sketching during free recall was more beneficial for both groups in both phases in reducing the amount of incorrect items, but the relative effect of sketching on enhancing retrieval accuracy was greater for children with autism. The results indicate the benefits of choosing retrieval mnemonics that are sensitive to the specific impairments of autistic individuals and suggest that retrieval accuracy during interviews can be enhanced, in some cases to the same level as that of typically developing individuals.
BarlowCMJolleyRPHallamJL (2011) Drawing as memory aids: optimising the drawing method to facilitate young children’s recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology25(3): 480–487.
2.
Ben ShalomD (2003) Memory in autism: review and synthesis. Cortex39: 1129–1138.
3.
BennettoLPenningtonBFRogersSJ (1996) Intact and impaired memory function in autism. Child Development67: 1816–1835.
4.
BoucherJ (1981) Memory for recent events in autistic-children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders11: 293–301.
5.
BoucherJBowlerDM (eds) (2008) Memory in Autism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BoucherJLewisV (1989) Memory impairments and communication in relatively able autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry30: 99–122.
7.
BoucherJMayesABighamS (2012) Memory in autistic spectrum disorder. Psychological Bulletin138(3): 458–496.
8.
BowlerDMGaiggSBGardinerJM (2008) Effects of related and unrelated context on recall and recognition by adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia46: 993–999.
9.
BowlerDMGaiggSBLindS (2011) Memory in autism: binding, self, and brain. In: RothIRezaieP (eds) Researching the Autism Spectrum Disorder: Contemporary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.316–346.
10.
BowlerDMGardinerJMBerthollierN (2004) Source memory in adolescents and adults with Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders34: 533–542.
11.
BowlerDMMatthewsNJGardinerJM (1997) Asperger’s syndrome and memory: similar to autism but not amnesia. Neuropsychologia35: 65–70.
12.
BrowningACaulfieldL (2011) The prevalence and treatment of people with Asperger’s syndrome in the criminal justice system. Criminology and Criminal Justice11(2): 165–180.
13.
ClarkeCMilneR (2001) A National Evaluation of the PEACE Investigative Interviewing Course. London: Home Office.
14.
CraikFIM (1981) Encoding and retrieval effects in human memory: a partial review. In: BaddeleyADLongJ (eds) Attention and Performance (vol. 9). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
DandoCJ (2013) Drawing to remember: external support of older adults’ eyewitness performance. PLoS ONE8: e69937.
16.
DandoCJWilcockRMilneR (2009a) The efficacy of a modified mental reinstatement of context procedure for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology23: 138–147.
17.
DandoCJWilcockRBehnkleC. (2011) Modifying the cognitive interview: countenancing forensic application by enhancing practicability. Psychology, Crime and Law17: 491–511.
18.
DandoCJWilcockRMilneR (2008) The cognitive interview: inexperienced police officers’ perceptions of their witness/victim interviewing practices. Legal and Criminological Psychology13: 59–70.
19.
DandoCJWilcockRMilneR. (2009b) An adapted cognitive interview procedure for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology23: 698–716.
20.
De JongR (2010) Cognitive load theory, educational research and instructional design: some food for thought. Instructional Science38: 105–134.
21.
DietzePMPowellMBThomsonDM (2010) Mental reinstatement of context with child witnesses: does it matter whether context is reinstated ‘out loud’?Psychology, Crime and Law16: 439–448.
22.
DunnLMDunnLMWhettonC. (1997) The British Picture Vocabulary Scale. 2nd ed.Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
23.
EamesKCoxMV (1994) Visual realism in the drawings of autistic, down’s syndrome and normal children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology12(2): 235–239.
24.
FisherRPCraikFI (1977) Interaction between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory3: 701–711.
25.
FisherRPGeiselmanRE (1992) Memory Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
26.
FisherRPGeiselmanRERaymondDS (1987) Critical analysis of police interviewing techniques. Journal of Police Science and Administration15: 177–185.
27.
FriestadMThorsonE (1993) Remembering ads: the effects of encoding strategies, retrieval cues, and emotional response. Journal of Consumer Psychology2: 1–23.
28.
GabigCS (2008) Verbal working memory and story retelling in school-age children with autism. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools39: 498–511.
29.
GaiggSBGardinerJMBowlerDM (2008) Free recall in autism spectrum disorder: the role of relational and item-specific encoding. Neuropsychologia46: 983–992.
30.
GardinerJM (2001) Episodic memory and autonoetic consciousness: a first-person approach. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences356(1413): 1351–1361.
31.
GentleMPowellMBSharmanSJ (2014) Mental context reinstatement or drawing: which better enhances children’s recall of witnessed events and protects against suggestive questions?Australian Journal of Psychology66(3): 158–167.
32.
GoldsteinGMinshewNJSiegelDJ (1994) Age differences in academic achievement in high functioning autistic individuals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology16: 671–680.
33.
GoodmanGSMelinderA (2007) Child witness research and forensic interviews of young children: a review. Legal and Criminological Psychology12: 1–19.
34.
HalaSRasmussenCHendersonAM (2005) Three types of source monitoring by children with and without autism: the role of executive function. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders35(1): 75–89.
35.
HershkowitzIOrbachYLambME. (2002) A comparison of mental and physical context reinstatement in forensic interviews with alleged victims of sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology16(4): 429–441.
36.
HollidayRE (2003) The effect of a prior cognitive interview on children’s acceptance of misinformation. Applied Cognitive Psychology17: 443–457.
37.
JordanRRPowellSD (1995) Understanding and Teaching Children with Autism. Chichester: Wiley.
38.
JoutsenM (1987) Listening to the victim: the victim’s role in European criminal justice systems. Wayne Law Review34: 95–124.
39.
KebbellMRMilneR (1998) Police officers’ perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. The Journal of Social Psychology138: 323–330.
40.
LeeAHobsonP (2006) Drawing self and others: how do children with autism differ from those with learning difficulties?British Journal of Developmental Psychology24: 547–565.
41.
MarasKLBowlerDM (2010) The cognitive interview for eyewitnesses with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders40: 1350–1360.
42.
MarasKLBowlerDM (2012) Context reinstatement effects on eyewitness memory in autism spectrum disorder. British Journal of Psychology103(3): 330–342.
43.
MattisonMLADandoCJOrmerodT (2015) Sketching to remember: episodic free recall task support for child witnesses and victims with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders45(6): 1751–1765.
MemonAWarkLBullR. (1997) Isolating the effects of the cognitive interview techniques. British Journal of Psychology88: 179–198.
46.
MillwardCPowellSMesserD. (2000) Recall for self and other in autism: children’s memory for events experienced by themselves and their peers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders30: 15–28.
47.
MilneBPowellM (2010) Investigative Interviewing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.208–214.
48.
MilneRBullR (1999) Investigative Interviewing: Psychology and Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
49.
Ministry of Justice (MOJ) (2011) Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and Guidance on Using Special Measures. London: MOJ.
50.
MinshewNJGoldsteinG (1993) Is autism an amnesic disorder? Evidence from the California Verbal Learning Test. Neuropsychology7(2): 209.
51.
MinshewNJGoldsteinG (1998) Autism as a disorder of complex information processing. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews4: 129–136.
52.
MinshewNJGoldsteinG (2001) The pattern of intact and impaired memory functions in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry42: 1095–1101.
53.
MottronL (2004) Matching strategies in cognitive research with individuals with high-functioning autism: current practices, instrument biases, and recommendations. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders34: 19–27.
54.
MottronLBurackJ (2001) Enhanced perceptual functioning in the development of autism. In: BurackJACharmanTYirmiyaN. (eds) The Development of Autism: Perspectives from Theory and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, pp.131–148.
55.
OxburghGDandoCJ (2011) Interviewing witnesses and suspects: where now in our search for the truth?The British Journal of Forensic Practice13: 135–147.
56.
QuasJAMalloyLCMelinderA. (2007) Developmental differences in the effects of repeated interviews and interviewer bias on young children’s event memory and false reports. Developmental Psychology43(4): 823–837.
57.
RavenJRavenJCCourtJH (1999) Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Section 2: The Coloured Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
58.
RobinsonJMcGuireJ (2006) Suggestibility and children with mild learning disabilities: the use of the cognitive interview. Psychology, Crime and Law12(5): 537–556.
59.
RoebersCMMcConkeyKM (2003) Mental reinstatement of the misinformation context and the misinformation effect in children and adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology17: 477–493.
60.
SchacterDLNormanKAKoutstaalW (1998) The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory. Annual Review of Psychology49: 289–318.
TorresIJFlashmanLAO’LearyDS. (2001) Effects of retroactive and proactive interference on word list recall in schizophrenia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society7: 481–490.
63.
TulvingE (1983) Elements of Episodic Memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
64.
TulvingE (1985) How many memory systems are there?American Psychologist40(4): 385–398.
65.
TulvingEThomsonDM (1973) Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review80(5): 352–373.
66.
WhitehouseAJMayberyMTDurkinK (2006) Inner speech impairments in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry47: 857–865.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
