This study investigated equivalence of autism symptom domains in males and females with autism. Symptom data were obtained from 2643 children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (352 females, 2291 males; age range = 4–17 years) included in the Simons Simplex Collection. Items from the Social Responsiveness Scale and Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised were mapped to nine a priori symptom dimensions. Multi-group confirmatory factor models, including measurement equivalence and item response theory analyses, examined whether males and females showed measurement or structural differences in autism symptom constructs. Results indicated mean differences in restricted interests that were not due to measurement bias. No other symptom dimension showed evidence of measurement bias and autism symptom structure was highly similar between males and females. Future studies are needed to carefully estimate any sex differences in the content, frequency, or intensity/severity of restricted interests in females and males.
BentlerPM (1988) Comparative fit indexes in structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin107: 238–246.
2.
BishopSLHavdahlKAHuertaM. (2016) Subdimensions of social-communication impairment in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. Epub ahead of print 8January2016. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12510.
3.
BishopSLHusVDuncanA. (2013) Subcategories of restricted and repetitive behaviors in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders43(6): 1287–1297.
4.
BorsboomDRomeijnJWWichertsJM (2008) Measurement invariance versus selection invariance: Is fair selection possible?Psychological Methods13(2): 75–98.
5.
BrowneMWCudeckR (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: BollenKALongJS (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publishing, pp.136–162.
6.
ChenCVan HornJD (2016) Developmental neurogenetics and multimodal neuroimaging of sex differences in autism. Brain Imaging and Behavior. Epub ahead of print 19January2016. DOI: 10.1007/s11682-015-9504-3.
7.
CheungGWRensvoldRB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal9(2): 233–255.
8.
ConstantinoJNGruberCP (2005) Social Responsiveness Scale: Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
9.
CuccaroMLShaoYGrubberJ. (2003) Factor analysis of restricted and repetitive behaviors in autism using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-R. Child Psychiatry and Human Development34(1): 3–17.
10.
DukuESzatmariPVaillancourtT. (2013) Measurement equivalence of the autism symptom phenotype in children and youth. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines54(12): 1346–1355.
11.
ElsabbaghMDivanGKohYJ. (2012) Global prevalence of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders. Autism Research5(3): 160–179.
12.
EmbretsonSEReiseSP (2000) Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
FischbachGDLordC (2010) The Simons Simplex Collection: a resource for identification of autism genetic risk factors. Neuron68(2): 192–195.
14.
FrazierTWGeorgiadesSBishopSL. (2014a) Behavioral and cognitive characteristics of females and males with autism in the Simons Simplex Collection. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry53(3): 329–340.e321–e323.
15.
FrazierTWRatliffKRGruberC. (2014b) Confirmatory factor analytic structure and measurement invariance of quantitative autistic traits measured by the Social Responsiveness Scale-2. Autism18(1): 31–44.
16.
FrazierTWYoungstromEAHardanAY. (2015) Quantitative autism symptom patterns recapitulate differential mechanisms of genetic transmission in single and multiple incidence families. Molecular Autism6: 58.
17.
FrazierTWYoungstromEAKubuCS. (2008) Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the autism diagnostic interview-revised. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders38(3): 474–480.
18.
GillbergCCederlundMLambergK. (2006) Brief report: “the autism epidemic.” The registered prevalence of autism in a Swedish urban area. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders36(3): 429–435.
19.
HambletonRKSwaminathanHRogersHJ (1991) Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
20.
HuLBentlerP (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6: 1–55.
21.
JacquemontSCoeBPHerschM. (2014) A higher mutational burden in females supports a “female protective model” in neurodevelopmental disorders. American Journal of Human Genetics94(3): 415–425.
22.
KlineRB (1998) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
23.
LaiDCTsengYCHouYM. (2012) Gender and geographic differences in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in children: Analysis of data from the national disability registry of Taiwan. Research in Developmental Disabilities33(3): 909–915.
24.
LaiMCLombardoMVPascoG. (2011) A behavioral comparison of male and female adults with high functioning autism spectrum conditions. PLoS ONE6(6): e20835.
25.
LamKSAmanMG (2007) The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised: independent validation in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders37(5): 855–866.
26.
LiNChenGSongX. (2011) Prevalence of autism-caused disability among Chinese children: A national population-based survey. Epilepsy & Behavior22(4): 786–789.
27.
LordCRutterMDiLavorePC. (2002) Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: ADOS Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
28.
MandyWChilversRChowdhuryU. (2012) Sex differences in autism spectrum disorder: Evidence from a large sample of children and adolescents. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders42(7): 1304–1313.
29.
MarshHWHauKTWenZ (2004) In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling11: 320–341.
30.
MeadeAWLautenschlagerGJ (2004) Same Question, Different Answers: CFA and Two IRT Approaches to Measurement Invariance. In: Symposium presented at the 19th annual conference of the society for industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago, IL, 2 April 2004.
OzonoffSYoungGSCarterA. (2011) Recurrence risk for autism spectrum disorders: A baby siblings research consortium study. Pediatrics128(3): e488–e495.
33.
RutterMLe CouteurALordC (2003) Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
34.
SouthMOzonoffSMcMahonWM (2005) Repetitive behavior profiles in Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders35(2): 145–158.
35.
SzatmariPLiuXQGoldbergJ. (2012) Sex differences in repetitive stereotyped behaviors in autism: Implications for genetic liability. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B-Neuropsychiatric Genetics159B(1): 5–12.
36.
WerlingDMGeschwindDH (2015) Recurrence rates provide evidence for sex-differential, familial genetic liability for autism spectrum disorders in multiplex families and twins. Molecular Autism6: 27.
37.
Yeargin-AllsoppMRiceCKarapurkarT. (2003) Prevalence of autism in a US metropolitan area. Journal of the American Medical Association289(1): 49–55.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
