Assessing the influence of researcher–partner involvement on the process and outcomes of participatory research in autism spectrum disorder and neurodevelopmental disorders: A scoping review
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2014
Assessing the influence of researcher–partner involvement on the process and outcomes of participatory research in autism spectrum disorder and neurodevelopmental disorders: A scoping review
Participatory research aims to increase the relevance and broaden the implementation of health research by involving those affected by the outcomes of health studies. Few studies within the field of neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly autism spectrum disorders, have involved autistic individuals as partners. This study sought to identify and characterize published participatory research partnerships between researchers and individuals with autism spectrum disorder or other neurodevelopmental disorders and examine the influence of participatory research partnerships on the research process and reported study outcomes. A search of databases and review of gray literature identified seven studies that described participatory research partnerships between academic researchers and individuals with autism spectrum disorder or other neurodevelopmental disorders. A comparative analysis of the studies revealed two key themes: (1) variations in the participatory research design and (2) limitations during the reporting of the depth of the partner’s involvement. Both themes potentially limit the application and generalizability of the findings. The results of the review are discussed in relation to the use of evaluative frameworks for such participatory research studies to determine the potential benefits of participatory research partnerships within the neurodevelopmental and autism spectrum disorder populations.
AbmaTANierseCJWiddershovenGAM (2009) Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qualitative Health Research19(3): 401–415.
2.
AmanMG (2006) Reactions to “ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research” by Dr. Teresa Lacono. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability31(3): 180–182.
3.
ArkseyHO’MalleyL (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology8: 19–32.
4.
AtkinsonDWalmsleyJ (1999) Using autobiographical approaches with people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society14(2): 203–216.
5.
AtkinsonDWilliamsF (1990) Know Me as I Am: An Anthology of Prose, Poetry, and Art by People with Learning Difficulties. Sevenoaks: Hodder & Stoughton.
6.
BigbyCFrawleyP (2010) Reflections on doing inclusive research in the “Making life good in the community” study. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability35(2): 53–61.
7.
BlackstockKLKellyGJHorseyBL (2007) Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecological Economics60(4): 726–742.
8.
BooteJTelfordRCooperC (2002) Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy (Amsterdam, the Netherlands)61(2): 213–236.
9.
Brookman-FrazeeLStahmerACLewisK (2012) Building a research-community collaborative to improve community care for infants and toddlers at-risk for autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Community Psychology40(6): 715–734.
10.
BurkeAMcMillanJCumminsL (2003) Setting up participatory research: a discussion of the initial stages. British Journal of Learning Disabilities31(2): 65–69.
11.
CargoMMercerSL (2008) The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health29: 325–350.
12.
ConderJMilnerPMirfin-VeitchB (2011) Reflections on a participatory project: the rewards and challenges for the lead researchers. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability36(1): 39–48.
13.
CornwallAJewkesR (1995) What is participatory research?Social Science & Medicine41(12): 1667–1676.
14.
GauldSSmithSKendallMB (2011) Using participatory action research in community-based rehabilitation for people with acquired brain injury: from service provision to partnership with Aboriginal communities. Disability and Rehabilitation33(19–20): 1901–1911.
15.
GiachelloALArromJODavisM (2003) Reducing diabetes health disparities through community-based participatory action research: the Chicago Southeast Diabetes Community Action Coalition. Public Health Reports118(4): 309–323.
16.
GilbertT (2004) Involving people with learning disabilities in research: issues and possibilities. Health & Social Care in the Community12(4): 298–308.
17.
GreenLWMercerSL (2001) Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities?American Journal of Public Health91(12): 1926–1929.
18.
HamMJonesNMansellI (2004) “I’m a researcher!” Working together to gain ethical approval for a participatory research study. Journal of Learning Disabilities8(4): 397–407.
19.
IsraelBASchulzAJParkerEA (1998) Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health19: 173–202.
20.
JagoshJPluyePMacaulayAC (2011) Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review. Implementation Science6: 24.
21.
KeightleyMLRatnayakeRMinoreB (2009) Rehabilitation challenges for Aboriginal clients recovering from brain injury: a qualitative study engaging health care practitioners. Brain Injury23(3): 250–261.
22.
KiernanC (1999) Participation in research by people with learning disability: origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities27: 43–47.
23.
KochTMarksJTookeE (2001) Evaluating a community nursing service: listening to the voices of clients with an intellectual disability and/or their proxies. Journal of Clinical Nursing10(3): 352–363.
24.
KottorpABernsangBFisherAG (2003) Validity of a performance assessment of activities of daily living for people with developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability47(Pt 8): 597–605.
25.
MacadamMSutcliffeJ (1996) Still a Chance to Learn? A Report on the Impact of the Further and Higher Education Act (1992) on Education for Adults with Learning Difficulties. Leicester: National Institute for Continuing Adult Education.
26.
MacaulayAC (2007) Promoting participatory research by family physicians. Annals of Family Medicine5(6): 557–560.
27.
MacaulayACCommandaLEFreemanWL (1999) Participatory research maxmises community and lay involvement. North American Primary Care Research Group. British Medical Journal319(7212): 774–778.
28.
MacaulayACIngASalsbergJ (2007) Community-based participatory research: lessons from sharing results with the community: Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action1(2): 143–152.
29.
MacaulayACJagoshJSellerR (2011) Assessing the benefits of participatory research: a rationale for a realist review. Global Health Promotion18(2): 45–48.
30.
McKevittCFudgeNWolfeC (2010) What is involvement in research and what does it achieve? Reflections on a pilot study of the personal costs of stroke. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy13(1): 86–94.
31.
MarchJSteingoldBJusticeSMitchellP (1997). Follow the yellow brick road! People with learning difficulties as co-researchers. British Journal of Learning Disabilities25: 77–80.
32.
McVillyKRStancliffeRJParmenterTR (2006) Self-advocates have the last say on friendship. Disability & Society21(7): 693–708.
33.
MarcusMTWalkerTSwintJM (2004) Community-based participatory research to prevent substance abuse and HIV/AIDS in African-American adolescents. Journal of Interprofessional Care18(4): 347–359.
34.
NicolaidisCRaymakerDMcDonaldK (2011) Collaboration strategies in nontraditional community-based participatory research partnerships: lessons from an academic-community partnership with autistic self-advocates. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action5(2): 143–150.
35.
NicolaidisCRaymakerDMcDonaldK (2013) Comparison of healthcare experiences in autistic and non-autistic adults: a cross-sectional online survey facilitated by an academic-community partnership. Journal of General Internal Medicine28(6): 761–769.
36.
NierseCJAbmaTA (2011) Developing voice and empowerment: the first step towards a broad consultation in research agenda setting. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research55(4): 411–421.
37.
NindM (2008) Conducting qualitative research with people with learning, communication and other disabilities: methodological changes. Project Report, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, Southampton, November.
38.
OliverSClarke-JonesLReesR (2004) Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)8(15): 1–148.
39.
PellicanoEStearsM (2011) Bridging autism, science and society: moving toward an ethically informed approach to autism research. Autism Research: Official Journal of the International Society for Autism Research4(4): 271–282.
40.
PowersLEGarnerTValnesB (2007) Building a successful adult life: findings from youth-directed research. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal15(1): 45–56.
41.
RoyleJOliverS (2004) Consumer involvement in the health technology assessment program. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care20(4): 493–497.
42.
SandovalJALuceroJOetzelJ (2012) Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: a matrix of existing measures. Health Education Research27(4): 680–690.
43.
StalkerK (1998) Some ethical and methodological issues in research with people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society13(1): 5–19.
44.
TimmonsJCHallACBoseJ (2011) Choosing employment: factors that impact employment decisions for individuals with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities49(4): 285–299.
WalmsleyJ (2001) Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability. Disability & Society16(2): 187–205.
48.
WalmsleyJ (2004) Involving users with learning difficulties in health improvement: lessons from inclusive learning disability research. Nursing Inquiry11(1): 54–64.
49.
WalmsleyJJohnsonK (2003) Inclusive Research with People with Learning Disabilities: Past, Present, and Futures. London: Jessica Kingsley.
50.
WilliamsP (1990) Networks, Workbook 2 of Learning Disability: Changing Perspectives. Buckingham: Open University.
51.
YonasMAJonesNEngE (2006) The art and science of integrating Undoing Racism with CBPR: challenges of pursuing NIH funding to investigate cancer care and racial equity. Journal of Urban Health83(6): 1004–1012.
