The influences of child participation in interest-based learning activities on the development of 17 preschoolers with autism was the focus of this brief report. The children’s mothers identified their children’s interests and the everyday family and community activities that provided opportunities for interest-based learning. Parents then implemented intervention procedures for 14 to 16 weeks to increase child participation in the selected activities. Based on an investigator-administered interestingness scale, the children were divided into high and low interest-based learning groups. The children’s language, cognitive, social, and motor development quotients obtained at the beginning, the middle, and the end of the intervention were the dependent measures. Results showed that the high interest-based group made considerably more developmental progress compared to the low interest-based group. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
Adams, L.W. ( 2000). Incorporating Narrow Interests into the School Tasks of Children with Autism (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International , 60(09), B4872.
2.
Bayley, N. ( 2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (3rd ed). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
3.
Bernt, F.M. ( 1998). Review of the ‘Developmental Observation Checklist System’, in J.C. Impara & B.S. Plake (eds), The Thirteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook (pp. 354-356). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
4.
Boyd, B.A., Conroy, M.A., Mancil, G.R., Nakao, T., & Alter, P.J. ( 2007). ‘Effects of Circumscribed Interests on the Social Behaviors of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders’, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders37: 1550-1561.
5.
Bronfenbrenner, U. ( 1992). ‘Ecological Systems Theory’, in R. Vasta (ed), Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues (pp. 187-248). Philadelphia : Jessica Kingsley.
6.
Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
D’Ailly, H. ( 2004). ‘The Role of Choice in Children’s Learning: A Distinctive Cultural and Gender Difference in Efficacy, Interest, and Effort’ , Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science36: 17-29.
8.
DeLoache, J.S., Simcock, G. & Macari, S. ( 2007). ‘Planes, Trains, Automobiles-and Tea Sets: Extremely Intense Interests in Very Young Children’, Developmental Psychology43: 1579-1586.
9.
Dixon, W. (ed). (1992). BMDP Statistical Software Manual: Volume 2. Berkeley, CA : University of California Press.
10.
Dunst, C.J., Bruder, M.B., Trivette, C.M., Hamby, D., Raab, M., & McLean, M. (2001). ‘Characteristics and Consequences of Everyday Natural Learning Opportunities’, Topics in Early Childhood Special Education21: 68-92.
11.
Dunst, C.J., Herter, S., & Shields, H. ( 2000). ‘Interest-Based Natural Learning Opportunities’ , in S. Sandall and M. Ostrosky (eds), Natural Environments and Inclusion ( Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series No . 2) (pp. 37-48). Longmont, CO : Sopris West.
12.
Dunst, C.J., Trivette, C.M., & Cutspec, P.A. ( 2007). An Evidence-Based Approach to Documenting the Characteristics and Consequences of Early Intervention Practices ( Winterberry Research Perspectives Vol. 1, No. 2). Asheville, NC: Winterberry Press.
13.
Griffiths, R., & Huntley, M. ( 1996). Griffiths Mental Development Scales-Revised: Birth to 2 Years. Oxford: Hogrefe.
14.
Hauser, R.M. ( 1994). ‘Measuring Socioeconomic Status in Studies of Child Development’, Child Development65: 1541-1545.
15.
Hollingshead, A.B. ( 1975). Four Factor Index of Social Status. Unpublished manuscript , Yale University, Department of Sociology , New Haven, CT.
16.
Hresko, W., Miguel, S., Sherbenou, R. & Burton, S. ( 1994). Developmental Observation Checklist System: A Systems Approach to Assessing Very Young Children: Examiner’s Manual . Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
17.
Johnson, K.E., Alexander, J.M., Spencer, S., Leibham, M.E., & Neitzel, C. ( 2004). ‘Factors associated with the Early Emergence of Intense Interests within Conceptual Domains’, Cognitive Development19: 325-343.
18.
Koegel, R.L., & Koegel, L.K. ( 2006). Pivotal Response Treatments for Autism: Communication, Social, and Academic Development. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
19.
Krug, D.A., Arick, J.R., & Almond, P.G. ( 1980). ‘Behavior Checklist for Identifying Severely Handicapped Individuals with High Levels of Autistic Behavior’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry21: 221-229.
20.
Pruden, S.M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R.M., & Hennon, E.A. ( 2006). ‘The Birth of Words: Ten-Month-Olds Learn Words through Perceptual Salience’, Child Development77: 266-280.
21.
Raab, M., & Dunst, C.J. ( 2007). Influence of Child Interests on Variations in Child Behavior and Functioning (Winterberry Research Syntheses Vol. 1, No. 21). Asheville, NC: Winterberry Press.
22.
Raab, M., Swanson, J., Roper, N., & Dunst, C.J. ( 2006). ‘Promoting Parent and Practitioner Identification of Interest-Based Everyday Child Learning Opportunities’, CASE tools, 2(6): 1-19. Available at http://www.fippcase.org/casetools/casetools_vol2_no6.pdf
23.
Reinhartsen, D.B., Garfinkle, A.N., & Wolery, M. ( 2002). ‘Engagement with Toys in Two-Year-Old Children with Autism: Teacher Selection versus Child Choice’, Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities27: 175-187.
24.
Renninger, K.A. ( 2000). ‘Individual Interest and Its Implications for Understanding Intrinsic Motivation’, in C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (eds), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance (pp. 373-404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
Renninger, K.A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (eds). (1992). The Role of Interests in Learning and Development . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
Rutter, M., LeCouteur, A., & Lord, C. ( 2003). Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised (ADI-R). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
27.
Schopler, E., Reichler, R., & Renner, B.R. ( 1993). Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
28.
Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. ( 2001). Situational Interest: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research’, Educational Psychology Review13: 23-52.
29.
Schwarting, G. ( 1998). Review of the ‘Developmental Observation Checklist System’, in J. C. Impara & B. S. Plake (eds), The Thirteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook (p. 356). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
30.
Swanson, J., Raab, M., Roper, N., & Dunst, C.J. ( 2006). ‘Promoting Young Children’s Participation in Interest-Based Everyday Learning Activities’, CASE tools, 2 (5) : 1-22. Available at http://www.fippcase.org/casetools/casetools_vol2_no5.pdf
31.
Thompson, B. ( 2001). ‘Significance, Effect Sizes, Stepwise Methods, and Other Issues: Strong Arguments Move the Field’, Journal of Experimental Education70: 80-93.
32.
Vacha-Haase, T., & Thompson, B. ( 2004). ‘How to Estimate and Interpret Various Effect Sizes’ , Journal of Counseling Psychology51: 473-481.
33.
Valentine, J.C., & Cooper, H. ( 2003). Effect Size Substantive Interpretation Guidelines: Issues in the Interpretation of Effect Sizes. Washington, DC: What Works Clearinghouse.
34.
Vismara, L.A., & Lyons, G.L. ( 2007). ‘Using Perseverative Interests to Elicit Joint Attention Behaviors in Young Children with Autism: Theoretical and Clinical Implications for Understanding Motivation’, Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions9: 214-228.
35.
Warreyn, P., Roeyers, H., Van Wetswinkel, U., & De Groote, I. ( 2007). ‘Temporal Coordination of Joint Attention Behavior in Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorder’, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders37: 501-512.
