The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance

Abstract

Recent research (Crookes, 1989: Foster and Skehan, 1996) has focused on the role of planning when tasks are used within language instruction. These studies have indicated that pre-task planning can have beneficial effects upon the nature of task performance, consistently leading to greater fluency and complexity and, less dependably, greater accuracy. The present study examines different sources of planning (teacher-led, solitary, group-based) as well as different foci for planning (towards language or towards content). Using a decision-making task (a ‘balloon debate’), data was collected using a 2×2 research design contrasting source of planning (teacher-led, group) and focus of planning (language vs content). In addition, to ensure comparability with previous research, solitary planning and control groups were also used. Results indicate a number of statistically significant effects. The teacher-fronted condition generated significant accuracy effects, while the solitary planning condition had greater influence on complexity, fluency and turn length. Group-based planning did not lead to performance significantly different from the control group. Finally, there was little effect on performance as a result of the language vs content planning condition. The results are discussed in relation to how teachers may more effectively make pedagogic decisions on task implementation conditions linked to selective pedagogic goals.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, J. R. 1995: Learning and memory. New York: Wiley .

Brock, C. 1986: The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse , TESOL Quarterly 20: 47-59 .

Brown, G. , Anderson, A. , Shilcock, R. and Yule, G. 1984: Teaching talk: strategies for production and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

Brumfit, C. J. 1984: Communicative methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

Crookes, G. 1989: Planning and interlanguage variation . Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11: 367-383 .

Doughty, C. 1991: Second language instruction does make a difference: evidence from an empirical study on SL relativization . Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 431-469 .

Duff, P. 1986: Another look at interlanguage talk: taking task to task. In Day, R. , editor, Talking to learn. Rowley, MA: Newbury House .

Ellis, R. 1987: Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: style shifting in the use of the past tense . Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9: 12-20 .

Ellis, R. 1994: The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

10.

Foster, P. and Skehan, P. 1996: The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning . Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 299-324 .

11.

Foster, P. , Tonkyn, A. and Wigglesworth, G. 1997: Measuring spoken language: a unit for all reasons . Paper presented at the Joint CALR/CALS Symposium, University of Reading, October 1997.

12.

Fotos, S. and Ellis, R. 1991: Communicating about grammar: a task-based approach . TESOL Quarterly 25: 608-628 .

13.

Givón, T. , editor 1979: Syntax and semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and semantics. New York: Academic Press .

14.

Givón, T. Function, structure, and language acquisition. In Slobin, D. , editor, The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .

15.

Harmer, J. 1992: The practice of English language teaching, 2nd edition. London: Longman .

16.

Howatt, A. P. R. 1984: A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

17.

Lapkin, S. and Swain, M. 1997: Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: exploring task effects . Paper presented at the AAAL Conference, Orlando, Florida, March 1997.

18.

Long, M. and Crookes, G. 1991: Three approaches to task-based syllabus design . TESOL Quarterly 26: 27-55 .

19.

Long, M. and Crookes, G. 1993: Units of analysis in syllabus design: the case for task. In Gass, S. and Crookes, G. , editors, Tasks in a pedagogical context: integrating theory and practice, Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters .

20.

Long, M. and Robinson, P. 1998: Focus on form: theory, research, and practice. In Doughty, C. and Williams, J. , editors, Focus on form in classroom SLA, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

21.

Loschky, L. and Bley-Vroman, R. 1993: Grammar and task-based methodology. In Crookes, G. and Gass, S. , editors, Tasks and language learning: integrating theory and practice, Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters .

22.

Mehnert, U. 1998: The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance . Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20(1): 83-108 .

23.

Ochs, E. 1979: Planned and unplanned discourse. In Givón T. , editor, Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and Semantics, New York: Academic Press .

24.

Robinson, P. , editor, 1996: Task complexity and second language syllabus design: data based studies and speculations. Special Issue of University of Queensland Working Papers in Language and Linguistics .

25.

Schmidt, R. 1990: The role of consciousness in second language learning . Applied Linguistics 11: 17-46 .

26.

Skehan, P. 1996: A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction . Applied Linguistics 17: 38-62 .

27.

Skehan, P. 1998: A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

28.

Skehan, P. in press: Task characteristics, fluency, and oral performance testing. In Clapham, C. , editor, Tasks in language testing, Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters .

29.

Skehan, P. and Foster, P. 1997: Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance . Language Teaching Research 1: 185-211 .

30.

Skehan, P. and Foster, P. 1999: The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings . Language Learning 49(1): 93-120 .

31.

Swain, M. 1995: Three functions of output in second language learning. In Cook, G. and Seidlehofer, B. , editors, Principle and practice in applied linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press , 245-256.

32.

Swain, M. 1996: Collaborative dialogue: its contribution to second language learning . Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 33-33 .

33.

Van Lier, L. and Matsuo, N. 1994: Variation in interlanguage conversation. Ms, Monterey Institute of International Studies .

34.

Van Patten, B. 1990: Attending to content and form in the input: an experiment in consciousness . Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 287-301 .

35.

Van Patten, B. 1996: Input processing and grammar instruction. New York: Ablex .

36.

Wigglesworth, G. 1997: An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse . Language Testing 14: 85-106 .

37.

Willis, D. 1991: The lexical syllabus. London: HarperCollins .

38.

Willis, D. and Willis, J. 1987: COBUILD Book 1, London: HarperCollins .

39.

Willis, D. and Willis, J. 1996: Consciousness-raising activities in the language classroom. In Willis, J. and Willis, D. , editors, Challenge and change in language teaching, London: Heinemann .

40.

Willis, J. 1996: A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman .

41.

Wright, T. 1987: The roles of teachers and learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press .