Feedback-seeking behaviors (FSB), namely, attending to written comments (feedback monitoring) and requesting clarification or additional feedback (feedback inquiry), are central to writer agency and writing outcomes. Existing studies have yet to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the motivational underpinnings of FSB, particularly for adolescents. Prior FSB research also treated second language (L2) writers as a homogeneous group, overlooking variations in motivational configuration across different stages of writing development. Addressing these gaps, this study draws on situated expectancy-value theory (SEVT) to examine how motivation mediates a writing growth mindset’s influence on FSB and whether the associations vary across writing proficiency levels in a Chinese secondary-school context. Participants were 303 adolescent L2 writers. Structural equation modeling indicated that the associations between a growth mindset and feedback monitoring and inquiry were fully mediated rather than direct, operating through self-efficacy, utility, and interest. Notably, writing proficiency moderated these associations: utility was the only mediator for high-proficiency writers, self-efficacy was the primary mediator for middle-proficiency writers, and interest linked a growth mindset to feedback inquiry for low and middle-proficiency writers. These findings extend SEVT by illustrating how proficiency stages contextualize the mindset-motivation-behavior link, uncovering nuanced motivational drivers of FSB. Pedagogically, they point to proficiency-differentiated interventions targeting mindset-motivation linkages to enhance L2 writer agency in the exam-oriented secondary contexts.
AnseelF.BeattyA.S.ShenW.LievensF.SackettP.R. (2015). How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. Journal of Management, 41, 318–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313484521
2.
BaiB.GuoW. (2019). Motivation and self-regulated strategy use: Relationships to primary school students’ English writing in Hong Kong. Language Teaching Research, 25, 378–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819859921
3.
BaiB.GuoW.WangC. (2022). Relationships between struggling EFL writers’ motivation, self-regulated learning (SRL), and writing competence in Hong Kong primary schools. Applied Linguistics Review, 15, 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0131
4.
BaiB.WangJ. (2021). Hong Kong secondary students’ self-regulated learning strategy use and English writing: Influences of motivational beliefs. System, 96, Article 102404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102404
5.
BaiB.WangJ. (2023). The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. Language Teaching Research, 27, 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820933190
6.
BaiB.WangJ.NieY.Y. (2021). Self-efficacy, task values and growth mindset: What has the most predictive power for primary school students’ self-regulated learning in English writing and writing competence in an Asian Confucian cultural context?Cambridge Journal of Education, 51, 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2020.1778639
7.
BakkZ.TekleF.B.VermuntJ.K. (2013). Estimating the association between latent class membership and external variables using bias-adjusted three-step approaches. Sociological Methodology43, 272–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175012470644
8.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
9.
BerwegerB.BornS.DietrichJ. (2022). Expectancy-value appraisals and achievement emotions in an online learning environment: Within- and between-person relationships. Learning and Instruction, 77, Article 101546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101546
10.
BitchenerJ.StorchN. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Multilingual Matters.
11.
BllacaN.VillarrealI. (2025). Exploring patterns of interaction, LREs and writing performance of adolescent EFL learners. Language Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444825100888
12.
BruningR.DempseyM.KauffmanD.F.McKimC.ZumbrunnS. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029692
13.
ButlerD.L.WinneP.H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
14.
CaoZ.MaoZ. (2022). Studies on positive evidence feedback in second language writing: Status quo and implications. RELC Journal, 55, 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211072905
15.
ChenF.F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
16.
CheongC.M.YaoY.ZhangJ. (2023). Growth mindset and emotions in tandem: Their effects on L2 writing performance based on writers’ proficiency levels. Assessing Writing, 58, Article 100785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100785
17.
ChoK.W. (2023). Students’ age and noncognitive traits predict writing self-efficacy and motivation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 78, Article 101287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101287
18.
DegolJ.L.WangM.-T.ZhangY.AllertonJ. (2018). Do growth mindsets in math benefit females? Identifying pathways between gender, mindset, and motivation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 976–990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0739-8
DörnyeiZ. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42): Multilingual Matters.
21.
DörnyeiZ.DewaeleJ.-M. (2022). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (3rd ed.). Routledge.
22.
DweckC.S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York Psychology Press.
23.
DweckC.S. (2014). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
24.
EbelR.FrisbieD.A. (1986). Essentials of educational measurement (4th ed.) Prentice-Hall.
25.
EcclesJ.AdlerT.F.FuttermanR.GoffS.B.KaczalaC.M.MeeceJ.MidgleyC. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In SpenceJ.T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). W.H. Freeman.
EcclesJ.WigfieldA. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
28.
FathiJ.PawlakM.SaeedianS.GhaderiA. (2024). Exploring factors affecting foreign language achievement: The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy, and L2 grit. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241227603
29.
FongC.J.SchallertD.L. (2023). ‘Feedback to the future’: Advancing motivational and emotional perspectives in feedback research. Educational Psychologist, 58, 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2134135
30.
FujiiA.MackeyA. (2009). Interactional feedback in learner-learner interactions in a task-based EFL classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47, 267–301. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.012
31.
HidiS.BoscoloP. (2007). Writing and motivation. Elsevier.
32.
HylandK.HylandF. (Eds.). (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
33.
KarabenickS.A.BergerJ.-L. (2013). Help seeking as a self-regulated learning strategy. In BembenuttyM.ClearyT.J.KitsantasA. (Eds.), Applications of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines: A tribute to Barry J. Zimmerman (pp. 237–261). Information Age.
34.
KeithT.Z. (2019). Multiple regression and beyond: An introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Routledge.
35.
KhajavyG.H.PourtahmasbF.LiC. (2022). Examining the domain-specificity of language mindset: a case of L2 reading comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16, 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1956936
36.
KimH.-I. (2024). Exploring the interplay of language mindsets, self-efficacy, engagement, and perceived proficiency in L2 learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 1295. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03783-y
37.
KingR.B.McInerneyD.M. (2016). Culturalizing motivation research in educational psychology. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12106
38.
KiuruN.SpinathB.ClemA.-L.EklundK.AhonenT.HirvonenR. (2020). The dynamics of motivation, emotion, and task performance in simulated achievement situations. Learning and Individual Differences, 80, Article 101873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101873
39.
KlineR.B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
40.
Larson-HallJ. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. Routledge.
41.
LeeH.W.YuS.L.KimM.KoenkaA.C. (2021). Concern or comfort with social comparisons matter in undergraduate physics courses: Joint consideration of situated expectancy-value theory, mindsets, and gender. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 67, Article 102023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102023
42.
LiemA.D.LauS.NieY. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
43.
LittleT.D.CunninghamW.A.ShaharG.WidamanK.F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
44.
LouN.M.NoelsK.A. (2019). Promoting growth in foreign and second language education: A research agenda for mindsets in language learning and teaching. System, 86, Article 102126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102126
45.
MaoZ.LeeI.LiS. (2024). Written corrective feedback in second language writing: A synthesis of naturalistic classroom studies. Language Teaching, 57, 449–477. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000393
NassajiH.KartchavaE. (2021). The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in second language learning and teaching (NassajiH.KartchavaE. Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
48.
NicolD.J.Macfarlane-DickD. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
49.
NoelsK.A.PelletierL.G.ClémentR.VallerandR.J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50, 57–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00111
50.
OxfordR. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Heinle & Heinle.
51.
OzturkE.ZhaoM.Y.HoffmanA.J., et al (2024). Developmental trajectories of adolescents’ math motivation: The role of mindset and perceptions of informal STEM learning site inclusivity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53, 1542–1563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-024-01949-0
52.
PajaresF. (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In SchunkD.H.ZimmermanB.J. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. (pp. 111–139). Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
PajaresF.JohnsonM.J. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and the writing performance of entering high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199604)33:2<163::AID-PITS10>3.0.CO;2-C
54.
PapiM.Abdi TabariM.SatoM. (2024). The importance of seeking feedback for benefiting from feedback: A case of second language writing. The Modern Language Journal, 108, 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12923
55.
PapiM.BondarenkoA.V.WawireB.JiangC.ZhouS.Y. (2020). Feedback-seeking behavior in second language writing: Motivational mechanisms. Reading and Writing, 33, 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09971-6
56.
PapiM.RiosA.PeltH.OzdemirE. (2019). Feedback-seeking behavior in language learning: Basic components and motivational antecedents. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12538
57.
PapiM.TeimouriY. (2014). Language learner motivational types: A cluster analysis study. Language Learning, 64, 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12065
58.
PapiM.WolffD.NakatsukasaK.BellwoarE. (2021). Motivational factors underlying learner preferences for corrective feedback: Language mindsets and achievement goals. Language Teaching Research, 25, 858–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211018808
59.
PreacherK.J.HayesA.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
RenningerK.A.HidiS.E. (2019). The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning. Cambridge University Press.
62.
RosenzweigE.Q.WigfieldA.EcclesJ.S. (2022). Beyond utility value interventions: The why, when, and how for next steps in expectancy-value intervention research. Educational Psychologist, 57, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1984242
63.
RosenzweigE.Q.WigfieldA.HullemanC.S. (2020). More useful or not so bad? Examining the effects of utility value and cost reduction interventions in college physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112, 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000370
SherfE.N.MorrisonE.W. (2020). I do not need feedback! Or do I? Self-efficacy, perspective taking, and feedback seeking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105, 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000432
66.
ShiB.B.HuangL.Y.LuX.F. (2020). Effect of prompt type on test-takers’ writing performance and writing strategy use in the continuation task. Language Testing, 37, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220911626
67.
TahmouresiS.PapiM. (2021). Future selves, enjoyment and anxiety as predictors of L2 writing achievement. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, Article 100837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100837
68.
TeimouriY.SudinaE.PlonskyL. (2025). Individual differences in language learning and teaching: Growing pains at the theory-methods interface. Learning and Individual Differences, 124, Article 102786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102786
69.
TengL.S. (2024). Individual differences in self-regulated learning: Exploring the nexus of motivational beliefs, self-efficacy, and SRL strategies in EFL writing. Language Teaching Research, 28, 366–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211006881
70.
TengL.S.WeiJ.ZhangL.J. (2024). Longitudinal interactions of L2 learners’ motivations and strategic behavior in strategies-based writing instruction: A self-regulated learning perspective. AILA Review, 37, 188–214. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24026.ten
71.
TroiaG.A.HarbaughA.G.ShanklandR.K.WolbersK.A.LawrenceA.M. (2013). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing, 26, 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9379-2
72.
TsaoJ.-J. (2021). Effects of EFL learners’ L2 writing self-efficacy on engagement with written corrective feedback. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30, 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00591-9
73.
WallerL.PapiM. (2017). Motivation and feedback: How implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers’ motivation and feedback orientation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004
74.
WatkinsD.A.BiggsJ.B. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological, and contextual influences. Hong Kong University Press.
75.
WeiD.Van MenselL.XuC. (2026). Linking mindsets to emotions in foreign language learning: A study integrating situated expectancy-value and control-value theories across proficiency levels. System, 138, Article 103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2026.103975
76.
WeiD.WangP. (2025). Understanding motivation, behaviors, and boredom in L2 learning: Variable-centered and person-centered approaches. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251324693
77.
WidlundA.TuominenH.TapolaA.KorhonenJ. (2020). Gendered pathways from academic performance, motivational beliefs, and school burnout to adolescents’ educational and occupational aspirations. Learning and Instruction, 66, Article 101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101299
78.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ.S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
79.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ.S.FredricksJ.A.SimpkinsS.RoeserR.W.SchiefeleU. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In LambM.E.LernerR.M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socioemotional processes (7th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 657–700). John Wiley.
80.
WilliamsJ.MacKinnonD.P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701758166
81.
WinstoneN.E.NashR.A.ParkerM.RowntreeJ. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52, 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
82.
XuJ.WangY. (2023). Individual differences in L2 writing feedback-seeking behaviors: The predictive roles of various motivational constructs. Assessing Writing, 56, Article 100698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100698
83.
XuJ.WangY. (2024). Do I need feedback or avoid it in L2 writing? Impacts of self-efficacy and shyness on feedback-seeking behavior. Assessing Writing, 59, Article 100805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100805
84.
XuW.ZhaoP.YaoY.PangW.ZhuX. (2023). Effects of self-efficacy on integrated writing performance: A cross-linguistic perspective. System, 115, Article 103065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103065
85.
YaoY.ZhuX.H. (2022). Modeling Chinese high school EFL writers’ language mindsets, goal orientations, and feedback-seeking behavior: The interaction effect between language mindsets and writing competence. Reading and Writing, 37, 539–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10339-6
86.
YuS.ChenB.Levesque-BristolC.VansteenkisteM. (2018). Chinese education examined via the lens of self-determination. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9395-x
87.
ZhanJ.L.YaoY.ZhuX.H. (2023). The mediating effect of feedback-seeking behavior on the relationship between ideal L2 writing self and story continuation writing performance: A multigroup structural equation modeling approach. System, 113, Article 102976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102976
88.
ZhangY. (2024). The impact of teacher academic support and L2 writing self on feedback-seeking behavior. Reading and Writing, 38, 1197–1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10557-0
89.
ZhangY.JiangZ. (2025). Modeling the interplay between teacher support, anxiety and grit in predicting feedback-seeking behavior in L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 64, Article 100920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2025.100920
90.
ZimmermanB.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP.R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.
