This qualitative study explored how pre-service English language teaching (ELT) trainees negotiated professional agency and emotional wellbeing and how these two processes interacted during practicum experiences in artificial intelligence (AI) and digitally enriched practicum. Guided by the ecological model of teacher agency (EMTA) and the job demands–resources (JD-R) framework, the study examined how technological affordances and institutional constraints shaped decision-making, identity, and affective experiences. Twelve final-year ELT trainees from a Turkish university undertook a 10-week practicum involving varying degrees of AI integration. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, reflective journals, and artefact analysis, and analysed thematically. Findings highlighted three forms of agency – iterational, practical-evaluative, and projective – manifested in adapting AI-generated content, making real-time pedagogical adjustments, and envisioning professional futures. Emotional wellbeing fluctuated depending on perceived control over AI use, mentor guidance, and alignment with teaching values. A key finding was that agency and wellbeing were mutually shaping rather than independent, with opportunities to adapt AI outputs strengthening confidence and engagement, and mandated or inflexible AI use contributing to frustration and diminished professional ownership. The study shows how AI-infused practicum contexts magnify tensions between innovation and conformity, while identifying the contextual conditions that may weaken or support the agency–wellbeing relationship. Implications stress the need for teacher education to embed critical digital agency, provide emotional support, and allow contextual adaptation of AI tools to build resilient and autonomous future practitioners.
ActonR.GlasgowP. (2015). Teacher wellbeing in neoliberal contexts: A review of the literature. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n8.6
2.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology, 22(3), 309–328.
3.
BakkerA.B.DemeroutiE. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
4.
BeijaardD.MeijerP.C.VerloopN. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18, 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
7.
BrymanA. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
8.
Bütün IkwuegbuZ.HarrisR. (2024). Reflection and agency: The experiences of English language teachers in Türkiye. Reflective Practice, 25, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2024.2304849
9.
CabaroğluN.ÖzG. (2025). Practicum in ELT: A systematic review of 2010–2020 research on ELT practicum. European Journal of Teacher Education, 48, 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.2242577
CromptonH.EdmettA.IchaporiaN.BurkeD. (2024). AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55, 2503–2529. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13460
12.
Cutrim SchmidE.Cvetkovic KienleA.ŞahinH. (2023). Virtual exchanges as authentic scenarios for integrating a plurilingual perspective into EFL teaching and learning. The Language Learning Journal, 51, 544–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2023.2227854
13.
ErtenP. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) proficiency of preservice teachers who will perform language teaching as a foreign language. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13, 604–617. https://doi.org/10.36362/gumus.1038099
14.
EteläpeltoA.VähäsantanenK.HökkäP.PaloniemiS. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
Fokkens-BruinsmaM.TigelaarE.H.Van RijswijkM.M.JansenE.P.W.A. (2024). Preservice teachers’ resilience during times of COVID-19. Teachers and Teaching, 30(7–8), 1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2172391
17.
GubaE.G.LincolnY.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). SAGE.
HobsonA.J. (2021). Averting judgementoring and enhancing the professional learning, development, and well-being of teachers. In AllenT.D.EbyL.T. (Eds.), The art and science of mentoring (pp. 49–64). Information Age.
20.
HubbardP.SchulzeM. (2025). AI and the future of language teaching. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 15, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.378304
21.
IzadiniaM. (2016). Student teachers’ and mentor teachers’ perceptions and expectations of a mentoring relationship. Professional Development in Education, 42, 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.994136
22.
KalajaP. (2016). ‘Dreaming is believing’: The teaching of foreign languages as envisioned by student teachers. In KalajaP.BarcelosA.M.F.AroM.Ruohotie-LyhtyM. (Eds.), Beliefs, agency and identity in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 124–146). Palgrave Macmillan.
KarataşF.YüceE. (2024). AI and the future of teaching: Preservice teachers’ reflections on the use of artificial intelligence in open and distributed learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25, 304–325. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7785
LaiC.MorrisonB. (2013). Towards an agenda for learner and teacher autonomy in computer-assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.10125/4461
LeeS.SongK.S. (2024). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of AI-generated concept explanations: Implications for integrating generative AI in computer science education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100283
31.
LeeS.JeonJ.ChoeH. (2025). Generative AI (GenAI) and pre-service teacher agency in ELT. ELT Journal, 79, 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaf005
32.
LiH.PengX. (2024). Review of preservice English teachers’ teaching practicum in the COVID-19 pandemic. Discover Education, 3, Article 236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00345-x
33.
LianA.SyahdanS.ManaluC.NatsirM.H.D. (2025). Practicum anxiety and English language preservice teacher preparation in Indonesia. English Teaching & Learning, 49, 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-024-00171-2
34.
LipponenL.KumpulainenK. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 812–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.001
35.
LuC.LeeJ.C.K.GuM.M. (2025). Integrating digital technologies into teaching: A study on pre-service language teachers’ perceptions and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 19537–19557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13511-x
36.
LuJ.ZhangL. (2025). Negotiating dual roles: An activity theory analysis of university foreign language teacher agency for research in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34, 2023–2033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-025-01011-y
37.
MaX.ZhangP. (2025). How distributed leadership shapes Chinese teachers’ teaching innovation behavior: Mediating roles of teacher collaboration and teachers’ social-emotional learning beliefs. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34, 1977–1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-025-01006-9
38.
MercerS.KostoulasA. (Eds.). (2018). Language teacher psychology. Multilingual Matters.
39.
MercerS.OberdorferP.SaleemM. (2016). Helping language teachers to thrive: Using positive psychology to promote teachers’ professional wellbeing. In Gabryś-BarkerD.GałajdaD. (Eds.), Positive psychology perspectives on foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 213–229). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32954-3_12
40.
MontgomeryD.P.CinagliaC.De CostaP.I. (2024). Enacting well-being: Identity and agency tensions for two TESOL educators. In TajeddinZ.YazanB. (Eds.), Language teacher identity tensions (pp. 212–230). Routledge.
41.
PothC.N. (2023). Dilemmas and opportunities for mixed methods research design: Handbook introduction. In PothC.N. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of mixed methods research design (pp. 1–16).
42.
Pozo-RicoT.PovedaR.Gutiérrez-FresnedaR.CastejónJ.L.Gilar-CorbiR. (2023). Revamping teacher training for challenging times: Teachers’ well-being, resilience, emotional intelligence, and innovative methodologies as key teaching competencies. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S382572
43.
PriestleyM.BiestaG.RobinsonS. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury.
44.
PyhältöK.PietarinenJ.SoiniT. (2012). Do comprehensive school teachers perceive themselves as active professional agents in school reforms?Journal of Educational Change, 13, 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9171-0
45.
RyanR.M.DeciE.L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
46.
SonnentagS.FritzC. (2015). Recovery from job stress: The stressor–detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, S72–S103. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1924
SunF.TianP.SunD.FanY.YangY. (2024). Pre-service teachers’ inclination to integrate AI into STEM education: Analysis of influencing factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55, 2574–2596. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13469
49.
Toker-BradshawŞ.Tezgiden-CakcakY. (2025). Emotion–identity–agency triangle in practicum experience: A pre-service second language teacher’s development of critical emotional reflexivity. RELC Journal, 56, 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241279463
TsuiA.B.M. (2007). Complexities of identity formation: A narrative inquiry of an EFL teacher. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 657–680.
52.
VähäsantanenK. (2015). Professional agency in the stream of change: Understanding educational change and teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.11.006
53.
ValenciaS.W.MartinS.D.PlaceN.A.GrossmanP. (2009). Complex interactions in student teaching: Lost opportunities for learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 304–322.
54.
WengZ.FuY. (2025). Chinese TESOL teacher educators’ perceptions of factors influencing teacher agency. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12841
55.
XuJ. (2025). Exploring language teacher identity development in a teacher professional learning programme. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-025-00327-y
56.
XuY.TaoJ. (2025). The pedagogical and socio-affective dimensions of identity tensions and teacher agency: Case studies of university English teachers teaching online. Language Teaching Research, 29, 3592–3613. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221151047
57.
YuanR.LeeI. (2016). I need to be strong and competent: A narrative inquiry of a student–teacher’s emotions and identities in teaching practicum. Teachers and Teaching, 22, 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1185819
58.
Zawacki-RichterO.MarínV.I.BondM.GouverneurF. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
59.
ZhaiX.ChenW. (2025). Unpacking beliefs and engagement in AI-assisted Chinese learning: A latent profile analysis of Malaysian Chinese as a foreign language learners. European Journal of Education, 60, Article e70101. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70101
60.
ZouB.LivieroS.HaoM.WeiC. (2020). Artificial intelligence technology for EAP speaking skills: Student perceptions of opportunities and challenges. In FreiermuthM.R.ZarrinabadiN. (Eds.), Technology and the psychology of second language learners and users (pp. 433–463). Palgrave Macmillan.
