This quasi-experimental mixed-methods study examined how ChatGPT-mediated rehearsal activities influence English as a second language (ESL) learners’oral proficiency and technology acceptance. Sixty-eight undergraduates were divided into artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted and teacher-led rehearsal groups over 16 weeks. Using repeated-measures analysis and thematic interviews, the results showed observable improvement in fluency and pronunciation among ChatGPT users (Hedges’ g = .72, p < .01), while accuracy gains remained modest. Technology acceptance model analysis indicated that perceived usefulness and enjoyment were key predictors of engagement, aligning with sociocultural theory’s emphasis on scaffolding and self-regulation. Qualitative data revealed iterative feedback and reduced anxiety as mediating processes. The findings highlight the potential of AI-mediated interaction to complement communicative teaching when supported by teacher scaffolding.
BehzadpourS.F.FathiJ.ArefianM. (2025). A model of informal digital learning of English, ideal L2 self, foreign language enjoyment, and student engagement in an EFL context. Teaching English Language, 19(43), 295–352.
2.
CelikB.YildizY.KaraS. (2025). Using ChatGPT as a virtual speaking tutor to boost EFL learners’ speaking self-efficacy. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 102418.
3.
ChengH.F.DörnyeiZ. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 153–174.
4.
DarmawansahD.RachmanD.FebiyaniF.HwangG.J. (2025). ChatGPT-supported collaborative argumentation: Integrating collaboration script and argument mapping to enhance EFL students’ argumentation skills. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 3803–3827.
5.
DavisF.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
6.
Fakher AjabshirZ. (2024). A comparative study of teacher feedback and chatbot feedback on second language learners’ pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic competences. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(16), 9881–9892.
7.
GhafouriM.HassaskhahJ. (2025). From virtual assistant to writing mentor: Exploring the impact of a ChatGPT-based writing instruction protocol on EFL teachers’ self-efficacy and learners’ writing skill. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241239764
8.
HongX.GuoL. (2025). Effects of AI-enhanced multi-display language teaching systems on learning motivation, cognitive load management, and learner autonomy. Education and Information Technologies, 30(12), 17155–17189.
9.
KoçF.Ş.SavaşP. (2025). The use of artificially intelligent chatbots in English language learning: A systematic meta-synthesis study of articles published between 2010 and 2024. ReCALL, 37(1), 4–21.
10.
KohnkeL.ZouD.SuF. (2025). Exploring the potential of GenAI for personalised English teaching: Learners’ experiences and perceptions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100371.
11.
LantolfJ.P. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics: A sociocultural perspective. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml034
12.
LeemingP.HarrisJ. (2025). Measuring speaking proficiency growth in the language classroom: An investigation of practical approaches for teachers. Language Teaching Research, 29(7), 2963–2985. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221130856
13.
LoC.K.YuP.L.H.XuS.NgD.T.K.JongM.S.Y. (2024). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: A systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 50.
14.
MuniandyJ.SelvanathanM. (2025). ChatGPT, a partnering tool to improve ESL learners’ speaking skills: Case study in a Public University, Malaysia. Teaching Public Administration, 43(1), 4–20.
15.
NamaziandostE.ÇakmakF.HeydarnejadT.RezaiA. (2024). The predictive effects of learner autonomy and academic engagement on willingness to communicate, foreign language learning self-esteem, and L2 grit in an EFL context. Acta Psychologica, 250, 104528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104528
16.
RapantaC.FeltonM. (2022). The limits of AI in dialogic education: Why human mediation still matters. AI & Society, 37(4), 1553–1564.
17.
ReindersH.BensonP. (2023). AI and learner autonomy in second language education. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), 1–18.
18.
StorchN. (2017). Sociocultural theory in the L2 classroom. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 69–83). Routledge.
19.
TavakoliP. (2023). Making fluency research accessible to second language teachers: The impact of a training intervention. Language Teaching Research, 27(2), 368–393.
20.
VenkateshV.DavisF.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
21.
VygotskyL. (2011). Interaction between learning and development. Linköpings Universitet.
22.
WiboolyasarinW.WiboolyasarinK.KamonsawadR.JinowatN. (2025). Enhancing collaborative writing with Grammarly-mediated feedback in asynchronous wiki environments: An investigation of group size. English Teaching & Learning, 49(2), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-024-00186-9
23.
XinJ.J. (2024). Investigating EFL teachers’ use of generative AI to develop reading materials: A practice and perception study. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241303321
