Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of incorporating first language (L1) traditional stories into second language (L2) vocabulary review activities on vocabulary retention and learning engagement, with the use of ChatGPT as a tool to assist the teacher in generating review materials. A total of 79 freshmen majoring in Computer Science participated, with 41 in the experimental group and 38 in the control group. In both groups, ChatGPT was used by the teacher to generate multiple-choice questions for the vocabulary review activities, with the experimental group incorporating Chinese traditional stories into the questions, while the control group used questions generated without these stories. This approach helped reduce the teacher’s workload while maintaining their central role in guiding the learning process. Research instruments included a pretest and a posttest to assess vocabulary retention, a questionnaire to measure behavioral, emotional, and cognitive dimensions of learning engagement, and online interviews to explore students’ attitudes towards the use of traditional stories. The results reveal that integrating Chinese traditional stories significantly enhanced students’ behavioral and emotional engagement and improved vocabulary retention. However, it did not significantly affect cognitive engagement, which remained high across both groups. The study also examines the correlations between engagement dimensions and provides insights into potential explanations for these findings, suggesting areas for future research to further optimize L2 vocabulary learning experiences.

Keywords

ChatGPT foreign language learning L1 traditional stories learning engagement vocabulary retention vocabulary review

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albaladejo

S.A.

Coyle

De Larios

J.R.

(2018). Songs, stories, and vocabulary acquisition in preschool learners of English as a foreign language. System, 76, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.05.002

(2024). The relationship between technology acceptance and self-regulated learning: The mediation roles of intrinsic motivation and learning engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 2605–2623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11959-3

Bowen

(1994). Inside teaching. Heinemann.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown

H.D.

Lee

(2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Pearson.

Ding

Zou

(2024). Automated writing evaluation systems: A systematic review of Grammarly, Pigai, and Criterion with a perspective on future directions in the age of generative artificial intelligence. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 14151–14203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12402-3

Dong

Jong

M.S.Y.

King

R.B.

(2020). How does prior knowledge influence learning engagement? The mediating roles of cognitive load and help-seeking. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 591203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591203

Dörnyei

Csizér

(2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23, 421–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.4.421

Elgort

Piasecki

A.E.

(2014). The effect of a bilingual learning mode on the establishment of lexical semantic representations in the L2. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728913000588

10.

Feyzi Behnagh

Yasrebi

. (2020). An examination of constructivist educational technologies: Key affordances and conditions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51, 1907–1919. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13036

11.

Field

(2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.

12.

Fredricks

J.A.

Blumenfeld

P.C.

Paris

A.H.

(2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

13.

Z.G.

(2015). Enhancing vocabulary retention by embedding L2 target words in L1 stories: An experiment with Chinese adult e-learners. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 18, 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2342885

14.

Z.G.

(2024). Exploring the impact of different types of e-learners’ anonymity on their learning engagement in competitive gamified language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2342885

15.

Z.G.

(2025). Gamifying adult e-learners’ language learning by inducing different levels of competition: Impact on motivation, engagement and performance. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 10863–10889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13176-y

16.

Ghosn

I.K.

(2002). Four good reasons to use literature in primary school. ELT Journal, 56, 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.2.172

17.

Griffiths

(2015). What have we learnt from ‘good language learners’? ELT Journal, 69, 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv040

18.

Hassan

McKee

G.T.

(2021). Encouraging student engagement through storytelling. In Auer

M.E.

Hortsch

Michler

Köhler

(Eds.), International conference on interactive collaborative learning (pp. 1009–1020). Springer.

19.

Hwang

G.J.

Zou

Y.X.

(2023). Learning by storytelling and critiquing: A peer assessment-enhanced digital storytelling approach to promoting young students’ information literacy, self-efficacy, and critical thinking awareness. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 1079–1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10184-y

20.

Jones

B.D.

Carter

(2019). Relationships between students’ course perceptions, engagement, and learning. Social Psychology of Education, 22, 819–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09500-x

21.

Kahu

E.R.

(2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

22.

Karami

(2020). The use of schema theory, information-processing theory, and sociocultural theory in teaching culturally unfamiliar texts in second/foreign language classrooms. Educational Practice and Theory, 42, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/42.2.03

23.

Kasahara

(2011). The effect of known-and-unknown word combinations on intentional vocabulary learning. System, 39, 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.001

24.

Kim

(2020). Learning language, learning culture: Teaching language to the whole student. ECNU Review of Education, 3, 519–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120936693

25.

Koraishi

(2023). Teaching English in the age of AI: Embracing ChatGPT to optimize EFL materials and assessment. Language Education and Technology, 3, 55–72. https://doi.org/10.62583/rseltl.v2i4.53

26.

Krashen

(1992). The input hypothesis: An update. In Alatis

J.E.

(Ed.), Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art (pp. 409–431). Georgetown University Press.

27.

Kruk

Peterson

(Eds.). (2020). New technological applications for foreign and second language learning and teaching. IGI Global.

28.

Kuh

G.D.

(2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380309604090

29.

Law

(2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174

30.

Zhou

Chiu

T.K.

(2025). Systematics review on artificial intelligence chatbots and ChatGPT for language learning and research from self-determination theory (SDT): What are the roles of teachers? Interactive Learning Environments, 33, 1850–1864. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2400090

31.

Liang

J.C.

Hwang

G.J.

(2023). A robot-based digital storytelling approach to enhancing EFL learners’ multimodal storytelling ability and narrative engagement. Computers and Education, 201, Article 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104827

32.

Linnenbrink

E.A.

Pintrich

P.R.

(2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223.

33.

Liu

G.X.Y.

Helwig

C.C.

(2022). Autonomy, social inequality, and support in Chinese urban and rural adolescents’ reasoning about the Chinese college entrance examination (Gaokao). Journal of Adolescent Research, 37, 639–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558420914082

34.

Mayer

R.E.

Stull

DeLeeuw

, et al (2009). Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 5–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.04.002

35.

Mihalca

Salden

R.J.

Corbalan

Paas

Miclea

(2011). Effectiveness of cognitive-load based adaptive instruction in genetics education. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.027.

36.

Mohamed

A.M.

(2024). Exploring the potential of an AI-based Chatbot (ChatGPT) in enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching: Perceptions of EFL Faculty Members. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 3195–3217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11917-z

37.

Munna

A.S.

Kalam

M.A.

(2021). Impact of active learning strategy on the student engagement. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 4, 96–114. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008407400330040

38.

Pack

Maloney

(2023). Using generative artificial intelligence for language education research: Insights from using OpenAI’s ChatGPT. TESOL Quarterly, 57, 1571–1582. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3253

39.

Pokrivcakova

(2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7, 135–153. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025

40.

Pye

Holt

Salzman

Bellucci

Lombardi

(2015). Engaging diverse student audiences in contemporary blended learning environments in Australian higher business education: Implications for design and practice. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 19, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v19i0.1251

41.

Soleimani

Akbari

(2013). The effect of storytelling on children’s learning English vocabulary: A case in Iran. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4, 4005–4014. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2024.6.1.11

42.

Tyson

(2023). Shortcomings of ChatGPT. Journal of Chemical Education, 100, 3098–3101. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00361

43.

Ugwuanyi

C.S.

Okeke

C.I.

Ageda

T.A.

(2020). Motivation and self-efficacy as predictors of learners’ academic achievement. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 11, 215–222. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566764.2020/11.3-4.351

44.

Whalen

Mouza

(2023). ChatGPT: Challenges, opportunities, and implications for teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 23, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2023.2263251

45.

Yeh

Mitric

(2019). Voices to be heard: Using social media for digital storytelling to foster language learners’ engagement. TESL-EJ, 23, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v2i1.609

46.

Yeh

H.C.

(2024). Revolutionizing language learning: Integrating generative AI for enhanced language proficiency. Educational Technology and Society, 27, 335–355. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202407_27(3).TP01

47.

Zhai

Wibowo

(2023). A systematic review on artificial intelligence dialogue systems for enhancing English as foreign language students’ interactional competence in the university. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100134

Improving L2 vocabulary retention and learning engagement through L1 traditional stories in review activities using ChatGPT-generated questions

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References