Research on how foreign language learners use discourse markers (DMs) has largely centered on English, with limited attention to functional category development in other languages such as Spanish. At the same time, the relationship between study-abroad (SA) experience and proficiency in shaping DM usage remains inadequately understood. This study analyzes how proficiency (B1 versus B2 levels) and SA experience (with versus without) relate to Chinese learners’ use of functional DM in Spanish. More specifically, the study employs a between-subjects design with two oral tasks, and the collected DM data were classified into four functional categories: Estructuradores de la Información (EST, information-structuring markers), Conectores (CON, connective markers), Operadores Argumentativos (OA, argumentative operators), and Marcadores Conversacionales (MC, conversational markers), based on a functional–pragmatic framework. Analysis reveals that proficiency is strongly associated with increased frequency, diversity, and functional flexibility in DM deployment, with advanced learners (B2) showing significantly higher frequency, proportion, and preference for MC-type markers. In contrast, SA experience shows a more limited relationship, linked in some cases to a heightened reliance on CON-type markers among lower-proficiency learners (B1). Overall, the study extends DM research into Spanish as a foreign language and clarifies how proficiency and study abroad experience differentially relate to pragmatic development.
AijmerK. (2002). English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus (Vol. 10). John Benjamins Publishing.
2.
AijmerK. (2007). The meaning and functions of the Swedish discourse marker alltså—Evidence from translation corpora. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 6, 31–59. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.123
3.
AijmerK. (2013). Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh University Press.
4.
BlakemoreD. (2002). Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.
5.
Borrego NietoJ. (2013). Más allá de la oración. In Borrego Nieto J (Ed.), Gramática de referencia para la enseñanza de español (pp. 395–422). Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
6.
Borreguero ZuloagaM.De MarcoA. (2021). The role of immersion and non-immersion contexts in L2 acquisition: A study based on the analysis of interactional discourse markers. Corpus Pragmatics, 5(1), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-020-00093-x
7.
BrizA.PonsS.PortolésJ. (Eds), (2008). Diccionario de partículas discursivas del español [Versión electrónica]. https://www.dpde.es/
8.
BrizA.Pons BorderíaS. (2010). Unidades, marcadores discursivos y posición. In Loureda LamasÓ.Acín VillaE.(Eds.), Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy (pp. 327–358). Arco Libros.
9.
BuJ. (2013). A study of the acquisition of discourse markers by Chinese learners of English. International Journal of English Studies, 13(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2013/1/152681
10.
Campillos LlanosL.González GómezP. (2014). Oral production of discourse markers by intermediate learners of Spanish: A corpus perspective. In Romero-TrilloJ. (Ed.), Yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics 2014 (pp. 239–259). Springer.
11.
DavydovaJ.TytusA.E.SchleefE. (2017). Acquisition of sociolinguistic awareness by German learners of English: A study in perceptions of quotative be like. Linguistics, 55(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0011
12.
Diskin-HoldawayC. (2017). The use of the discourse-pragmatic marker ‘like’ by native and non-native speakers of English in Ireland. Journal of Pragmatics, 120, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.08.004
13.
Diskin-HoldawayC. (2021). You know and like among migrants in Ireland and Australia. World Englishes, 40(4), 562. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12541
14.
FraserB. (1999). What are discourse markers?Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 931–952.
Fuentes RodríguezC. (2009). Diccionario de conectores y operadores del español. Arco/Libros.
17.
Fuentes RodríguezC. (2010). Los marcadores del discurso y la lingüística aplicada. In Loureda LamasÓ.Acín VillaE. (Eds.), Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy (pp. 689–735). Universidad de Murcia.
18.
FungL.CarterR. (2007). Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 410–439. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm030
19.
GrieveA.M. (2015). The impact of host family relations and length of stay on adolescent identity expression during study abroad. Multilingua, 34(5), 623–657. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-0089
20.
HasselgrenA. (2002). Learner corpora and language testing: Small words as markers of learner fluency. In GrangerS. (Ed.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 143–173). John Benjamins.
21.
HellermannJ.VergunA. (2007). Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.008
22.
HuangL. (2019). A Corpus-Based Exploration of the Discourse Marker Well in Spoken Interlanguage. Language and Speech, 62(3), 570–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918798863
23.
HuangL.LinY.GráfT. (2023). Development of the use of discourse markers across different fluency levels of CEFR: A learner corpus analysis. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 33(1), 49–77. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21016.hua
KasperG.RoseK.R. (2002). Epilogue. In Kasper, G. & K. R. Rose. (Eds.), Pragmatic development in a second language (pp. 305–312). Blackwell Publishing.
26.
LiuB. (2013). Effect of first language on the use of English discourse markers by L1 Chinese speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 45(1), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.002
27.
López SerenaA.Borreguero ZuloagaM. (2010). Los marcadores del discurso y la variación lengua hablada vs. lengua escrita. In Loureda LamasÓ.Acín VillaE. (Eds.), Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy (pp. 415–496). Arco Libros.
28.
MagliacaneA. (2020). Erasmus students in an Irish study abroad context: A longitudinal analysis of the use of ‘well’ and ‘like’. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 5(1), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.18008.mag
29.
MagliacaneA.HowardM. (2019). The role of learner status in the acquisition of pragmatic markers during study abroad: The use of ‘like’ in L2 English. Journal of Pragmatics, 146, 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.026
30.
Martín ZorraquinoM.A. (2005). El tratamiento lexicográfico de los marcadores del discurso y la enseñanza de ELE. In Castillo CarballoM.A.Cruz MoyaO.García PlateroJ.M.Mora GutiérrezJ.P.(Eds.), Las gramáticas y los diccionarios en la enseñanza del español como segunda lengua. Deseo y realidad: Actas del XV Congreso Internacional de ASELE. Sevilla, 22–25 de septiembre de 2004 (pp. 53–70). Universidad de Sevilla.
31.
Martín ZorraquinoM.A.Montolío DuránE. (Eds.). (1998). Los marcadores del discurso: Teoría y análisis. Arco Libros.
32.
Martín ZorraquinoM.A.PortolésJ. (1999). Los marcadores del discurso. In BosqueI.DemonteV. (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (Vol. 3, pp. 4051–4213). Espasa Calpe.
33.
Montolío DuránE. (1998). La teoría de la relevancia y el estudio de los marcadores del discurso. In Martín ZorraquinoM.A.Montolío DuránE. (Eds.), Los marcadores del discurso: Teoría y análisis (pp. 93–120). Arco Libros.
34.
MüllerS. (2005). Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse (Vol. 138). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
35.
Neary-SundquistC. (2013). Task type effects on pragmatic marker use by learners at varying proficiency levels. L2 Journal, 5(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5070/L25212104
36.
Neary-SundquistC. (2014). The use of pragmatic markers across proficiency levels in second language speech. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 637–663. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.4.4
37.
Nogueira da SilvaA.M. (2011). Enseñanza de los marcadores del discurso para aprendices brasileños de E/LE: Análisis de manuales de E/LE y de narrativas orales de aprendices brasileños. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Salamanca.
38.
PanZ. (2025). The use of English pragmatic markers by learners of English from different linguacultural backgrounds. Contrastive Pragmatics, 6(2), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10120
39.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.3) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
40.
Romero-TrilloJ. (2002). The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(6), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00022-X
41.
Romero-TrilloJ. (2019). Pragmatic markers. In ChapelleC.A. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (1st ed., pp. 1–7). Wiley.
42.
Santos RíoL. (2003). Diccionario de partículas. Luso-Española de Ediciones.
43.
SchiffrinD. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.
44.
WongJ. (2000). The token “yeah” in nonnative speaker English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3301_2
45.
XiaoH.-Z.DaiC.-Y.DongL.-Z. (2021). The development of interlanguage pragmatic markers in alignment with role relationships. Pragmatics, 31(4), 617–646. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20013.xia
46.
YaoJ.M. (2012). Clasificación de los marcadores del discurso en chino mandarín. Philologica Urcitana. Revista de Iniciación a la Investigación en Filología, 7, 5–20.
47.
YounS.J. (2023). The use of discourse markers across pragmatic performance levels and task types. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231189032
