This study investigates the extent to which engagement with robotics is associated with cognitive and critical thinking skills among English as a foreign language (EFL) students in technology-enhanced learning environments. Grounded in constructivist learning theory, the research explores potential relationships between robotics-based activities and the development of higher-order thinking in language learners. Data were collected through a structured online questionnaire from 415 valid responses out of 420 distributed, using a convenience sampling method across 12 provinces in China. Validated instruments were employed to assess students’ motivation in computer science within a robotics-integrated curriculum. Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis revealed a significant positive association between robotics engagement and both cognitive and critical thinking skills. Regression results indicated that robotics engagement showed a statistically significant association with these outcomes. The findings of this correlational and SEM-based study suggest that participation in robotics-based activities supports the development of analytical reasoning, problem-solving, and reflective thinking. The study contributes to the literature on educational technology by highlighting the pedagogical value of robotics in EFL contexts and advocating for its integration into language learning curricula to foster intellectual and cognitive growth.
AliS.DevasiaN.ParkH.W.BreazealC. (2021). Social robots as creativity eliciting agents. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, Article 673730.
2.
BensalemE.DerakhshanA.AlenaziF.H.ThompsonA.HariziR. (2024). Modeling the contribution of grit, enjoyment, and boredom to predict English as a foreign language students’ willingness to communicate in a blended learning environment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 132, 144–168.
3.
BereczkiE.O.KárpátiA. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, Article 100791.
4.
BroadbentJ.PoonW.L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13.
5.
ÇelikF.BaturayM.H. (2024). Technology and innovation in shaping the future of education. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 54.
6.
ChenY.ZhiY.DerakhshanA. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into the English as a foreign language classroom: Exploring its impact on Chinese English students’ achievement emotions and willingness to communicate (WTC). European Journal of Education, 60, Article e70157.
7.
DaiK.WangY.L. (2024). Enjoyable, anxious, or bored: Investigating Chinese EFL learners’ classroom emotions and their engagement in technology-based EMI classrooms. System, 123, Article 103339.
8.
DarmawansahD.HwangG.J. (2024). Effects of robot-based multiple low-stakes assessments on students’ oral presentation performance, collective efficacy, and learning attitude. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 2013–2039.
9.
DerakhshanA. (2025). EFL students’ perceptions about the role of generative artificial intelligence (GAI)-mediated instruction in their emotional engagement and goal orientation: A motivational climate theory (MCT) perspective in focus. Learning and Motivation, 90, Article 102114.
10.
DerakhshanA.GhiasvandF. (2024). Is ChatGPT an evil or an angel for second language education and research? A phenomenographic study of research-active EFL teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34, 1246–1264.
11.
DerakhshanA.TaghizadehM.S. (2025). Does artificial intelligence (AI) nurture or hinder language learners’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS)? A phenomenological study on L2 learners’ perspectives and lived experiences. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12824
12.
DerakhshanA.TeoT.KhazaieS. (2025). Investigating the usefulness of artificial intelligence-driven robots in developing empathy for English for medical purposes communication: The role-play of Asian and African students. Computers in Human Behavior, 162, Article 108416.
13.
DerakhshanA.TeoT.Saeedy RobatE.Janebi EnayatM.JahanbakhshA.A. (2024). Robot-assisted language learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 95, 747–774.
14.
DerakhshanA.ZhangL.J. (2024). Applications of psycho-emotional traits in Technology-Based Language Education (TBLE): An introduction to the special issue. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33, 741–745.
15.
DerakhshanA.ZouD.KhazaieS. (forthcoming). Investigating the effectiveness of artificial intelligence-powered robots in learning medical English: A mixed-methods study on sociolinguistic competence and perceptions. Educational Technology and Society, 29.
16.
DingL.WangY. (2024). Unveiling Chinese EFL students’ academic burnout and its prediction by anxiety, boredom, and hopelessness: A latent growth curve modeling. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2407811
17.
DolgopolovasV.DagienėV. (2021). Computational thinking: Enhancing STEAM and engineering education, from theory to practice. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29, 5–11.
18.
FacioneP.A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 1, 1–23.
19.
GaoY.WangQ.WangX. (2024). Exploring EFL university teachers’ beliefs in integrating ChatGPT and other large language models in language education: A study in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44, 29–44.
20.
GuoY.WangY. (2024). Exploring the effects of artificial intelligence application on EFL students’ academic engagement and emotional experiences: A mixed-methods study. European Journal of Education, 60, Article e12812.
21.
HadadS.Shamir-InbalT.BlauI.LeykinE. (2021). Professional development of code and robotics teachers through Small Private Online Course (SPOC): Teacher centrality and pedagogical strategies for developing computational thinking of students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59, 763–791.
22.
HuangF.WangY.ZhangH. (2024). Modeling generative AI acceptance, perceived teachers’ enthusiasm, and self-efficacy to English as foreign language learners’ well-being in the digital era. European Journal of Education, 59, Article e12770.
23.
HwangG.-J.XieH.WahB.W.GaševićD. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, Article 100001.
24.
KhazaieS.DerakhshanA. (2024). Extending embodied cognition through robot’s augmented reality in English for medical purposes classrooms. English for Specific Purposes, 75, 15–36.
25.
KhazaieS.DerakhshanA.KianpourM. (2022). A contributory study into the (non)effect of augmented reality-mediated learning on students’ English nursing purposes comprehension and performance. Language Related Research, 13, 185–219.
26.
KimY.KangS. (2020). Writing to make meaning through collaborative multimodal composing among Korean EFL learners: Writing processes, writing quality and student perception. Computers and Composition, 58, Article 102609.
27.
LaiJ.W.M.BowerM. (2020). Evaluation of technology use in education: Findings from a critical analysis of systematic literature reviews. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36, 241–259.
28.
LaiW.Y.W.LeeJ.S. (2024). A systematic review of conversational AI tools in ELT: Publication trends, tools, research methods, learning outcomes, and antecedents. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100291.
29.
LamK.Y.PutriE.W. (2024). A study on the affordances of digital fairy-tale rewriting: A critical literacy approach to digital multimodal composing. System, 127, Article 103536.
30.
LeTendreG.K.GrayR. (2024). Social robots in a project-based learning environment: Adolescent understanding of robot–human interactions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40, 192–204.
31.
LiangJ.C.HwangG.J. (2023). A robot-based digital storytelling approach to enhancing EFL learners’ multimodal storytelling ability and narrative engagement. Computers and Education, 201, Article 104827.
32.
LiangJ.-C.HwangG.-J.ChenM.-R.A.DarmawansahD. (2023). Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language education: An integrated bibliographic analysis and systematic review approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 31, 4270–4296.
33.
LiuG.X.WangY.L. (2024). Modelling EFL teachers’ intention to integrate informal digital learning of English (IDLE) into the classroom using the theory of planned behavior. System, 120, Article 103193.
34.
MuthmainnahIbna SerajP.M.OteirI. (2022). Playing with AI to investigate human–computer interaction technology and improving critical thinking skills to pursue 21st century age. Education Research International, 2022, Article 6468995.
35.
NiemiH. (2024). AI in education and learning: Perspectives on the education ecosystem. In Streit-BianchiM.GoriniV. (Eds.), New frontiers in science in the era of AI (pp. 169–194). Springer Nature.
36.
PanZ.WangY. (2025). From technology-challenged teachers to empowered digitalized citizens: Exploring the profiles and antecedents of teacher AI literacy in the Chinese EFL context. European Journal of Education, 60, 1–16.
37.
QiS.DerakhshanA. (2025). Technology-based collaborative learning: EFL learners’ social regulation and modifications in their academic emotions and academic performance. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 8611–8636.
38.
QiS.WangY.L. (2024). Sketching the ecology of humor in English language classes: Disclosing the determinant factors. Applied Linguistics Review, 16, 985–1006.
39.
QuJ.WangY.L. (2024). Modelling the interaction between EFL teachers’ personality traits, emotion-regulation strategies, and teachers’ depression: A structural equation approach. European Journal of Education, 59, Article e12727.
40.
RyanR.M.DeciE.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
41.
Serrano-CámaraL.M.Paredes-VelascoM.AlcoverC.-M.Velazquez-IturbideJ.Á. (2014). An evaluation of students’ motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning of programming concepts. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 499–508.
42.
TeoT.KhazaeiS.DerakhshanA. (2022). Exploring teacher immediacy-(non)dependency in the tutored augmented reality game-assisted flipped classrooms of English for medical purposes comprehension among the Asian students. Computers and Education, 179, Article 104406.
43.
TheodoropoulosA.AntoniouA.LepourasG. (2017). Teacher and student views on educational robotics: The Pan-Hellenic competition case. Application and Theory of Computer Technology, 2, 1–23.
44.
TramN.H.M.NguyenT.T.TranC.D. (2024). ChatGPT as a tool for self-learning English among EFL learners: A multi-methods study. System, 127, Article 103528.
45.
VlachopoulosD.MakriA. (2024). A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education: Best practices for the development of 21st century skills, and policy considerations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, Article 101425.
46.
WangC.ZouB.DuY.WangZ. (2024). The impact of different conversational generative AI chatbots on EFL learners: An analysis of willingness to communicate, foreign language speaking anxiety, and self-perceived communicative competence. System, 127, Article 103533.
47.
WangX.GaoY.WangQ.ZhangP. (2024). Fostering engagement in AI-mediate Chinese EFL classrooms: The role of classroom climate, AI literacy, and resilience. European Journal of Education, 60, Article e12874.
48.
WangX.ReynoldsB.L. (2024). Beyond the books: Exploring factors shaping Chinese English learners’ engagement with large language models for vocabulary learning. Education Sciences, 14, Article 496.
49.
WangY.DeakhshanA.GhiasvandF. (2025). EFL teachers’ generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) literacy: A scale development and validation study. System, 133, Article 103791.
50.
WangY.XueL. (2024). Using AI-driven chatbots to foster Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement: An intervention study. Computers in Human Behavior, 159, Article 108353.
51.
WuH.WangY.WangY. (2024). ‘To use or not to use?’: A mixed-methods study on the determinants of EFL college learners’ behavioral intention to use AI in the distributed learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25, 158–178.
52.
XinZ.DerakhshanA. (2025). From excitement to anxiety: Exploring EFL learners’ emotional experiences in the AI-powered classrooms. European Journal of Education, 60, Article e12845.
53.
YangW. (2024). Coding with robots or tablets? Effects of technology-enhanced embodied learning on preschoolers’ computational thinking and social-emotional competence. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62, 718–740.
54.
ZareJ.Ranjbaran MadisehF.DerakhshanA. (2025). Generative AI and English essay writing: Exploring the role of ChatGPT in enhancing learners’ task engagement. Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf045
55.
ZhaiC.WibowoS. (2023). A systematic review on artificial intelligence dialogue systems for enhancing English as foreign language students’ interactional competence in the university. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100134.
56.
ZhangX.ChenY.LiD., et al. (2024). Engaging young students in effective robotics education: An embodied learning-based computer programming approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62, 312–338.
