This study investigated the effects of different retrieval formats on the acquisition and processing automaticity of second language (L2) verb–noun collocations. Chinese learners of English completed retrieval practice that included a familiarization stage (using flashcards and form–meaning matching practice) and two spaced retrieval attempts (i.e. verb-retrieval-twice, noun-retrieval-twice, verb/noun-retrieval-once) with corrective feedback for each target collocation. In near-immediate and one-week delayed posttests, the acquisition of L2 collocations was assessed by an off-line form recall task (explicit knowledge), and the processing automaticity was operationalized as collocation processing advantage (automatized-explicit knowledge) in an online acceptability judgment task and collocation priming (implicit knowledge) in an online primed lexical decision task. Results showed that: (1) all retrieval formats led to the development of explicit knowledge, initial automatized-explicit knowledge, and implicit knowledge; (2) the formats involving noun retrieval were particularly effective in retaining automatized-explicit knowledge over time; (3) the verb-retrieval-twice format was most beneficial in developing implicit knowledge, as evidenced by the largest priming effects. The findings suggest that focusing learners’ attention on specific components of verb–noun collocations may yield different learning outcomes for the different types of collocational knowledge.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
3.
BiberD.ConradS. (1999). Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In HasselgårdH.OksefjellS. (Eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson (pp. 181–190). Brill.
4.
BjorkR.A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In MetcalfeJ.ShimamuraA. (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). MIT Press.
5.
BjorkR.A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena. In SolsoR.L. (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 123–144). Erlbaum.
6.
BNC XML Edition. (2007). The British National Corpus: Version 3 [computer software]. The BNC Consortium. Available at: http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk (accessed August 2025).
7.
BoersF.DangT.C.T.StrongB. (2017). Comparing the effectiveness of phrase-focused exercises: A partial replication of Boers, Demecheleer, Coxhead, and Webb (2014). Language Teaching Research, 21, 362–380.
8.
BoersF.DemecheleerM.CoxheadA.WebbS. (2014). Gauging the effects of exercises on verb–noun collocations. Language Teaching Research, 18, 54–74.
9.
BrysbaertM.StevensM. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1, 1–20.
10.
ChenA. (2019). Assessing phraseological development in word sequences of variable lengths in second language texts using directional association measures. Language Learning, 69, 440–477.
11.
ChenH.CohenP.ChenS. (2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 39, 860–864.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
13.
DeKeyserR.M. (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press.
14.
ErmanB.WarrenB. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20, 29–62.
15.
FangN.ElgortI.ChenZ. (2024). Effects of retrieval schedules on the acquisition of explicit, automatized-explicit, and implicit knowledge of L2 collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46, 663–685.
16.
FergusonP.Siyanova-ChanturiaA.LeemingP. (2021). Impact of exercise format and repetition on learning verb–noun collocations. Language Teaching Research, 28, 1750–1776.
17.
GarnierM.M.SchmittN. (2015). The PHaVE List: A pedagogical list of phrasal verbs and their most frequent meaning senses. Language Teaching Research, 19, 645–666.
18.
González-fernándezB.SchmittN. (2020). Word knowledge: Exploring the relationships and order of acquisition of vocabulary knowledge components. Applied Linguistics, 41, 481–505.
19.
GreenP.MacLeodC.J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 493–498.
20.
JakubíčekM.KilgarriffA.KovářV.RychlỳP.SuchomelV. (2013). The TenTen corpus family. In: HardieA.LoveR. (Eds.), Seventh International Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL2013) (pp. 125–127). UCREL, Lancaster.
21.
JeongH.DeKeyserR. (2023). Development of automaticity in processing L2 collocations: The roles of L1 collocational knowledge and practice condition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45, 930–954.
22.
KeuleersE.BrysbaertM. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 627–633.
23.
LauferB.GirsaiN. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29, 694–716.
24.
LauferB.WaldmanT. (2011). Verb–noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61, 647–672.
25.
LeeS. (2024). The relationship between receptive and productive knowledge of L2 English collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35, 109–133.
26.
LemhöferK.BroersmaM. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 325–343.
27.
LiJ.SchmittN. (2010). The development of collocation use in academic texts by advanced L2 learners: A multiple case study approach. In WoodD. (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 22–46). Continuum.
28.
MatuschekH.KlieglR.VasishthS.BaayenH.BatesD. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315.
29.
McIntoshC. (Ed.) (2015). Oxford collocations dictionary. English–Chinese edition. Oxford University Press (China) / Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
30.
MorrisC.D.BransfordJ.D.FranksJ.J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.
31.
NationI.S.P. (2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists. Available at: https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/lals/resources/paul-nations-resources/vocabulary-lists (accessed August 2025).
32.
NationI.S.P. (n.d.). Vocabulary, the CEFR levels, and word family size. Available from https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/lals/resources/paul-nations-resources/vocabulary-lists (accessed August 2025).
33.
NesselhaufN. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24, 223–242.
34.
NorthbrookJ.AllenD.ConklinK. (2021). ‘Did you see that?’: The role of repetition and enhancement on lexical bundle processing in English learning materials. Applied Linguistics, 43, 453–472.
35.
ObermeierA.ElgortI. (2021). Deliberate and contextual learning of L2 idioms: The effect of learning conditions on online processing. System, 97, Article 102428.
36.
PawleyA.SyderF.H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In RichardsJ.C.SchmidtR.W. (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–225). Routledge.
37.
PlonskyL.DerrickD.J. (2016). A meta-analysis of reliability coefficients in second language research. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 538–553.
38.
SchmidtR.A.BjorkR.A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207–218.
39.
Siyanova-ChanturiaA.Van Lancker SidtisD. (2019). What online processing tells us about formulaic language. In Siyanova-ChanturiaA.PellicerSánchezA. (Eds.), Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective (pp. 38–61). Routledge.
40.
SonbulS.SchmittN. (2013). Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge: Acquisition of collocations under different input conditions. Language Learning, 63, 121–159.
41.
StrongB.BoersF. (2018). The error in trial and error: Exercises on phrasal verbs. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 289–319.
42.
StrongB.BoersF. (2019). Weighing up exercises on phrasal verbs: Retrieval versus trial-and-error practices. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 562–579.
43.
StrongB.LeemingP. (2024). Comparing the effectiveness of verb-focused and particle-focused exercise formats on the recall and recognition of phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241239058
44.
SuzukiY. (Ed.). (2024). Practice and automatization in second language research: Perspectives from skill acquisition theory and cognitive psychology. Routledge.
45.
SuzukiY.ElgortI. (2024). Measuring automaticity in second language comprehension: A methodological synthesis of experimental tasks over three decades (1990–2021). In SuzukiY. (Ed.), Practice and automatization in second language research (pp. 206–234). Routledge.
46.
TadayonifarM.ElgortI.Siyanova-ChanturiaA. (2025). Contextual learning and retention of phrasal verbs: The effects of definition placement and typographic enhancement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 47, 157–180.
47.
TadayonifarM.Siyanova-ChanturiaA.ElgortI. (2025). The effects of definition placement and lag of retrieval practice on contextual learning and retention of phrasal verbs. Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12706
48.
ToomerM.ElgortI. (2019). The development of implicit and explicit knowledge of collocations: A conceptual replication and extension of Sonbul and Schmitt (2013). Language Learning, 69, 405–439.
49.
TuzcuA. (2023). The effects of input mode in learning declarative and nondeclarative knowledge of L2 collocations. System, 113, Article 103006.
50.
UllmanM.T.LovelettJ.T. (2018). Implications of the declarative/procedural model for improving second language learning: The role of memory enhancement techniques. Second Language Research, 34, 39–65.
51.
WebbS.SasaoY.BallanceO. (2017). The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168, 33–69.
52.
WrayA. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
53.
YamagataS.NakataT.RogersJ. (2022). Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of verb–noun collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45, 291–317.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
