Given that the classroom is a social context that can either satisfy or frustrate learner motivation, pedagogical strategies bound by controlling evaluative frameworks, such as traditional grading systems (TGS), provide little support for long-term learning. This is especially concerning in the world language (WL) classroom where successful learning outcomes are determined by both affective and contextual factors. To this end, this action research examines the design and implementation of an ungrading pedagogical framework we have titled Contract-Based Ungrading (CBU), in order to explore how evaluative systems interplay with motivational factors in the WL classroom. Data sources included teacher and learner artifacts as well as anonymous questionnaires, analyzed using content analysis and extreme case sampling. Following a self-determination theory framework, findings suggest that CBU offers key ingredients for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, which promote motivation in the WL classroom, offering potential for engaged learner participation as well as long-term, meaningful language learning.
Ahmed Abdel-Al IbrahimK.Cuba CarbajalN.ZutaM.E.C.BayatS. (2023). Collaborative learning, scaffolding-based instruction, and self-assessment: Impacts on intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension, motivation, and anxiety. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00229-1
2.
AlamerA.AlrabaiF. (2023). The causal relationship between learner motivation and language achievement: New dynamic perspective. Applied Linguistics, 44(1), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac035
3.
AlamerA.MorinA.J.S.AlrabaiF.AlharfiA. (2023). Introducing the Basic Psychological Needs Frustration in Second Language Scale (BPNF-L2): Examining its factor structure and effect on L2 motivation and achievement. Acta Psychologica, 240, Article 104021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104021
4.
AlaviM.SaminNiaE. (2014). The effect of graded and ungraded writing on EFL learners’ accuracy. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 7(1), 255–264. https://www.academia.edu/24047779/THE_EFFECT_OF_GRADED_AND_UNGRADED_WRITING_ON_EFL_LEARNERS_ACCURACY
5.
AlrabaiF.AlamerA. (2024). The effects of teacher motivational practice on learner L2 achievement: A self-determination theory perspective using structural equation modeling. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241278625
AvineriN. (2017). Research methods for language teaching. Palgrave.
11.
BanegasD.L.ConsoliS. (2020). Action research in language education. In McKinleyJ.RoseH. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 176-187). Routledge.
12.
BlumS.D. (Ed.). (2020). Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (1st ed.). West Virginia University Press.
13.
BrookhartS.M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
14.
BrookhartS.M.GuskeyT.R.BowersA.J.McMillanJ.H.SmithJ.K.SmithL.F.StevensM.T.WelshM.E. (2016). A century of grading research: Meaning and value in the most common educational measure. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 803–848. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672069
15.
BrownA.V. (2013). Understanding the relationship between language performance and university course grades. Foreign Language Annals, 46(1), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12014
16.
BrownA.V.PlonskyL.TeimouriY. (2018). The use of course grades as metrics in L2 research: A systematic review. Foreign Language Annals, 51(4), 763–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12370
17.
CarilloE.C. (2021). The hidden equities in labor-based grading. University Press of Colorado.
18.
ChamberlinK.YasuéM.ChiangI.-C.A. (2023). The impact of grades on student motivation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418819728
19.
ChiaravalliA. (2020). Grades stifle student learning. Can we learn to teach without grades? In BlumS.D. (Ed.), Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead) (pp. 53–73). West Virginia University Press.
20.
ChuG. (2020). The point-less classroom: A math teacher’s ironic choice in not calculating grades. In BlumS.D. (Ed.), Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead) (pp. 161-170). West Virginia University Press.
21.
CookV. (2016). Second language learning and language teaching. Routledge.
22.
DavisW. (2022). Autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence: Exploring the interdependence of basic needs satisfaction in postsecondary world language education. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.52598/jpll/4/1/2
23.
DlaskaA.KrekelerC. (2017). Does grading undermine feedback? The influence of grades on the effectiveness of corrective feedback on L2 writing. The Language Learning Journal, 45(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.848226
24.
DörnyeiZ. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
25.
DörnyeiZ. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Multilingual Matters.
26.
DörnyeiZ. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation (1st ed.). Routledge.
27.
DörnyeiZ.DewaeleJ.M. (2022). Questionnaires in second language research. Routledge.
28.
DörnyeiZ.MuirC. (2019). Creating a motivating classroom environment. In GaoX. (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 719–736). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_36
29.
ElbowP. (1997). Grading student writing: Making it simpler, fairer, clearer. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1997(69), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.6911
30.
FaberA.BeaubienC. (2023, September23). Hacking your LMS: Making ungrading more user-friendly. The FLTMAG. https://fltmag.com/ungrading-lms/
31.
FeldmanJ. (2019). Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin.
32.
GardnerR.C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition: The socio-educational model. Peter Lang.
33.
GuskeyT.R. (2000). Grading policies that work against standards. . . And how to fix them. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 84(620), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650008462003
34.
InoueA.B. (2019). Labor-based grading contracts: Building equity and inclusion in the compassionate writing classroom (2nd ed.). University Press of Colorado.
35.
KatopodisC.DavidsonC.N. (2020). Contract grading and peer review. In BlumS.D. (Ed.), Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead) (pp. 105–122). West Virginia University Press.
36.
KohnA. (1999). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise, and other bribes. Houghton Mifflin.
37.
KohnA. (2011). The case against grades. Educational Leadership, 69(3) 28–33.
38.
KostK.PeabodyS.SchickerJ. (2023). Assessments and accessibility: Building a critical German program at Carleton College. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 56(1), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/tger.12235
39.
LichtmanK.VanPattenB. (2021). Was Krashen right? Forty years later. Foreign Language Annals, 54(2), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12552
MesrobianL. (2024). Small steps to ungrading the language classroom. In TomlinA.D.NowikC.M. (Eds.), Effective alternative assessment practices in higher education (pp. 29–37). IAP/Information Age Publishing.
42.
The National Standards Collaborative Board (NSCB). (2015). World-readiness standards for learning languages (4th ed.).
NoelsK.A. (2023). Self-determination theory and language learning. In RyanR. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of self-determination theory (pp. 619–637). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197600047.013.31
45.
NoelsK.A.ClémentR.PelletierL.G. (1999). Perceptions of teachers’ communicative style and students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 23–34. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/0026-7902.00003
OscarsonM.ApelgrenB.M. (2011). Mapping language teachers’ conceptions of student assessment procedures in relation to grading: A two-stage empirical inquiry. System, 39(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.01.014
48.
PrinterL. (2023). Positive emotions and intrinsic motivation: A self-determination theory perspective on using co-created stories in the language acquisition classroom. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231204443
49.
PulfreyC.BuchsC.ButeraF. (2011). Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 683–700. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0023911
50.
RiesbeckC. (2020). Critique-driven learning and assessment. In BlumS.D. (Ed.), Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead) (pp. 123–139). West Virginia University Press.
51.
RyanR. (2022). Self-determination theory and second language research: A match for many reasons. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, Advance online publication. https://www.jpll.org/index.php/journal/article/view/144
52.
RyanR.DeciE.L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness (1st ed.). Guilford Publications.
53.
RyanR.DeciE.L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
54.
SacksteinS. (2015). Hacking assessment: 10 ways to go gradeless in a traditional grades school. Times 10 Publications.
55.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
Schultz-BerginM. (2020). Grade anarchy in the philosophy classroom. In BlumS.D. (Ed.), Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead) (pp. 173–187). West Virginia University Press.
58.
SedorN. (2023). Integrated Performance Assessment (IPA): Implementation, task types, and feedback. Foreign Language Annals, 56(1), 170–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12661
59.
SnowA.M.BrintonD.M. (2017). The content-based classroom: New perspectives on integrating language and content (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press ELT.
60.
StollerF.L.MeyersC.C. (2020). Project-based learning. A five-stage framework to guide language teachers. In Gras-VelázquezA. (Ed.), Project-based learning in second language acquisition: Building communities of practice in higher education (pp. 25–47). Routledge.
SupianoB. (2023, February13). Course correction: Students expect “total flexibility” in the pandemic-era classroom. But is that really what they need?The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/course-correction
63.
UshiodaE. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 195–209). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-012
64.
WeiM.ChenY. (2022). Motivational practices in foreign language teaching: From the perspective of self-determination theory. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2022-0307
65.
WigginsG.P.McTigheJ. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
66.
ZhouS.A.HiverP.Al-HoorieA.H. (2023). Dynamic engagement: A longitudinal dual-process, reciprocal-effects model of teacher motivational practice and L2 student engagement. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231158789
