Learners of English for academic purposes (EAP) encounter various academic and social challenges in their learning pursuits. To explore collaborative ways of energizing their learning behaviour, an intervention was designed and implemented through the participation of 18 EAP learners and their teacher in a Canadian college classroom for one semester. Adopting a participatory action research framework, the group formed a community in which power was gradually shared and collaborative changes were made to lesson design and delivery. Moreover, the learners participated in the design and implementation of social activities in which they interacted with other members of the public and investigated their mini-research projects. Data were collected through recurrent experience sampling surveys (n = 449), semi-structured interviews, and the researcher’s journal and field notes. Results indicated an overall increase in classroom engagement and motivation after implementing the intervention despite the fluctuations of the former and the occasional stagnation of the latter. Furthermore, a linear mixed-effects analysis of repeated measures data revealed significant differences between the learners’ engagement levels before and after implementing the intervention. Finally, the concepts of motivation and engagement and their timescales were complementary, revealing noteworthy information about the learners’ desire to participate in classroom activities, as well as their actual participation in activities.
AubreyS. (2022). Dynamic engagement in second language computer-mediated collaborative writing tasks: Does communication mode matter?Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12, 59–86.
2.
BaldwinM. (2012). Participatory action research. In GreyM.MidgleyJ.WebbS.A.. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social work (pp. 467–482). Sage.
3.
BanegasD.L. (2013). The integration of content and language as a driving force in the EFL lesson. In UshiodaE. (Ed.), International perspectives on motivation: Language learning and professional challenges (pp. 82–97). Palgrave.
4.
BarbayannisG.BandariM.ZhengX.BaquerizoH.PecorK.W.MingX. (2022). Academic stress and mental well-being in college students: Correlations, affected groups, and COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 886344.
5.
BocciM.C. (2016). Youth participatory action research in world language classrooms. Foreign Language Annals, 49(3), 455–478.
6.
ChanL. (2014). Effects of an imagery training strategy on Chinese university students’ possible second language selves and learning experiences. In CsizérK.MagidM. (Eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 357–376). Multilingual Matters.
7.
ChengH.F.DörnyeiZ. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 153–174.
8.
ChengL.FoxJ. (2008). Towards a better understanding of academic acculturation: Second language students in Canadian universities. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65, 307–333.
9.
ChoH.S. (2011). Transformation and agency: participatory action research with bilingual undergraduates. In DavisK.A. (Ed.), Critical qualitative research in second language studies: Agency and advocacy (pp. 297–330). Information Age Publishing.
10.
ConsoliS. (2022). Practitioner research in a UK pre-sessional: The synergy between exploratory practice and student motivation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 57, Article 101108.
11.
DincerA.YesilyurtS.NoelsK.A.Vargas LascanoD.I. (2019). Self-determination and classroom engagement of EFL learners: A mixed-methods study of the self-system model of motivational development. Sage Open, 9(2).
12.
DörnyeiZ. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
13.
DörnyeiZ. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
DörnyeiZ. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Multilingual Matters.
15.
DörnyeiZ. (2019). Towards a better understanding of the L2 learning experience, the Cinderella of the L2 motivational self system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9, 19–30.
16.
DörnyeiZ. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge.
17.
DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (2021). Teaching and researching motivation (3rd ed.). Routledge.
18.
DouglasS.R.LandryM.H.DoeC.ChengL. (2022). English for academic purposes student reflections: factors related to their additional language socialization at a Canadian university. TESL Canada Journal, 39, 21–43.
19.
EgbertJ. (2003). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 87, 499–518.
20.
FinnJ.D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117–142.
21.
FredricksJ.A.BlumenfeldP.C.ParisA.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
22.
FryeD. (1999). Participatory education as a critical framework for an immigrant women’s ESL class. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 501–513.
23.
GallettaA.TorreM.E. (2019). Participatory action research in education. In NoblittG.W. (Ed.) Oxford research encyclopedia of education (pp. 1–30). Oxford University Press.
24.
GuilloteauxM.J. (2013). Motivational strategies for the language classroom: Perceptions of Korean secondary school English teachers. System, 41, 3–14.
HektnerJ.M.SchmidtJ.A.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Sage.
27.
HiverP. (2022). Engaging the learner: Linking teaching practice to learners’ engagement and development. In Al-HoorieA.H.SzabóF. (Eds.), Researching language learning motivation: A concise guide (pp. 51–59). Bloomsbury.
28.
HiverP.Al-HoorieA.H.MercerS. (Eds.). (2021). Student engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters.
29.
HoiV.N. (2022). A synergetic perspective on students’ perception of classroom environment, expectancy value belief, and engagement in an EFL context. Language Teaching Research, 29, 1069–1093.
30.
HuangH.T.ChanH.Y. (2024). Heritage identity and Indigenous language learning motivation: A case of Indigenous Taiwanese high school students. Modern Language Journal, 108, 127–146.
31.
JamesM.A. (2010). Transfer climate and EAP education: Students’ perceptions of challenges to learning transfer. English for Specific Purposes, 29, 133–147.
32.
JamesM.A. (2023). An exploratory investigation of instructors’ practices and challenges in promoting students’ learning transfer in EAP education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, Article 101263.
33.
JeongK.O. (2019). Online collaborative language learning for enhancing learner motivation and classroom engagement. International Journal of Contents, 15, 89–96.
34.
KaivanpanahS.AlaviS.M.BruceI.HejaziS.Y. (2021). EAP in the expanding circle: Exploring the knowledge base, practices, and challenges of Iranian EAP practitioners. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50, Article 100971.
35.
KeefeK.ShiL. (2017). An EAP program and students’ success at a Canadian university. TESL Canada Journal, 34, 1–24.
36.
KemmisS. (2006). Participatory action research and the public sphere. Educational Action Research, 14, 459–476.
37.
KemmisS.McTaggartR. (2000). Participatory action research. In DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567–606). Sage.
38.
KemmisS.McTaggartR. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–603). Sage.
39.
KemmisS.WilkinsonM. (1998). Participatory action research and the study of practice. In AtwehB.KemmisS.WeeksP. (Eds.), Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice in education (pp. 21–36). Routledge.
40.
LambM. (2020). Motivational teaching strategies. In LambM.CsizérK.HenryA.RyanS. (Eds.), Palgrave Macmillan handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 287–305). Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
LambertC.ZhangG. (2019). Engagement in the use of English and Chinese as foreign languages: The role of learner-generated content in instructional task design. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 391–411.
42.
LambertC.PhilpJ.NakamuraS. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21, 665–680.
43.
LauS. (2013). A study of critical literacy work with beginning English language learners: An integrated approach. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 10, 1–30.
44.
LeeT.S.GardnerD.LauK. (2020). The effects of L2 motivational strategies: within and beyond the L2 classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14, 451–465.
45.
LiN. (2006). Researching and experiencing motivation: A plea for ‘balanced research’. Language Teaching Research, 10, 437–456.
46.
MacIntyreP.D.MackinnonS.P.ClementR. (2009). From integrative motivation to possible selves: The baby, the bathwater, and the future of language learning motivation research. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 43–65). Multilingual Matters.
47.
MagidM. (2014). A motivational programme for learners of English: An application of the L2 motivational self-system. In CsizérK.MagidM. (Eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 333–356). Multilingual Matters.
48.
MagidM.ChanL. (2012). Motivating English learners by helping them visualise their Ideal L2 Self: lessons from two motivational programmes. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 113–125.
MercerS. (2019). Language learner engagement: Setting the scene. In GaoX. (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 1–19). Springer.
51.
MercerS. (2022). Engagement: The active ingredient in language learning. In Al-HoorieA.H.Szabó (Eds.), Researching language learning motivation: A concise guide (pp. 39–50). Bloomsbury Publishing.
52.
MercerS.DörnyeiZ. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
53.
NakamuraS.PhungL.ReindersH. (2021). The effect of learner choice on L2 task engagement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43, 428–441.
54.
OrdemE. (2021). Participatory action research in a listening–speaking class in second language teaching: Towards a critical syllabus. Educational Action Research, 31, 4–20.
55.
PapiM.AbdollahzadehE. (2012). Teacher motivational practice, student motivation, and possible L2 selves: An examination in the Iranian EFL context. Language learning, 62, 571–594.
56.
PhungL. (2017). Task preference, affective response, and engagement in L2 use in a US university context. Language Teaching Research, 21, 751–766.
57.
PhungL.NakamuraS.ReindersH. (2021). The effect of choice on affective engagement: Implications for task design. In HiverP.MercerS.Al-HoorieA. (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 163–181). Multilingual Matters.
58.
PinnerR. (2019). Authenticity and teacher–student motivational synergy: A narrative of language teaching. Routledge.
59.
QiuX.LoY.Y. (2017). Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use. Language Teaching Research, 21, 681–698.
60.
RiveraK.M. (1999). Popular research and social transformation: A community-based approach to critical pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 485–500.
61.
RueschA.BownJ.DeweyD.P. (2012). Student and teacher perceptions of motivational strategies in the foreign language classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 15–27.
62.
RyanS. (2009). Self and identity in L2 motivation in Japan: The ideal L2 self and Japanese learners of English. 120, 143. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 120–143). Multilingual Matters.
63.
SampsonR.J. (2016). Complexity in classroom foreign language learning motivation: A practitioner perspective from Japan. Multilingual Matters.
64.
SatoM. (2020). Generating a roadmap for possible selves via a vision intervention: Alignment of second language motivation and classroom behavior. TESOL Quarterly, 55, 427–457.
65.
SatoM.LaraP. (2019). Interaction vision intervention to increase second language motivation: A classroom study. In SatoM.LoewenS. (Eds.), Evidence-based second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition studies (pp. 287–313). Routledge.
66.
ShernoffD.J.KellyS.TonksS.M.AndersonB.CavanaghR.F.SinhaS.AbdiB. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43, 52–60.
67.
SkinnerE.A.PitzerJ.R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer.
68.
SulisG.PhilpJ. (2021). Exploring connections between classroom environment and engagement in the foreign language classroom. In HiverP.Al-HoorieA.H.MercerS. (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 101–129). Multilingual Matters.
69.
SvalbergA. M. L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language awareness, 18(3-4), 242-258.
70.
TaguchiT.MagidM.PapiM. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–97). Multilingual Matters.
71.
Teravainen-GoffA. (2023). Intensity and perceived quality of L2 engagement: Developing a questionnaire and exploring engagement of secondary school language learners in England. System, 112, Article 102955.
72.
ThornbergR.CharmazK. (2014). Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (5th ed., pp. 153–169). Sage.
73.
TweedieM.G.KimM. (2015). EAP curriculum alignment and social acculturation: Student perceptions. TESL Canada Journal, 33, 41–57.
74.
UshiodaE. (2016). Language learning motivation through a small lens: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 49, 564–577.
75.
UshiodaE. (2022). Ema Ushioda’s essential bookshelf: Teacher engagement with classroom motivation research. Language Teaching, 58, 87–98.
76.
Van ViegenS.RussellB. (2019). More than language: Evaluating a Canadian university EAP bridging program. TESL Canada Journal, 36, 97–120.
77.
WangN.ChenJ.TaiM.ZhangJ. (2021). Blended learning for Chinese university EFL learners: Learning environment and learner perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34, 297–323.
78.
YashimaT. (2009). International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 144–163). Multilingual Matters.
79.
YuS.JiangL.ZhouN. (2023). The impact of L2 writing instructional approaches on student writing motivation and engagement. Language Teaching Research, 27, 958–973.
80.
ZhouS.A.HiverP.Al-HoorieA.H. (2023). Dynamic engagement: A longitudinal dual-process, reciprocal-effects model of teacher motivational practice and L2 student engagement. Language Teaching Research. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231158789
81.
ZhouS.A.HiverP.ZhengY. (2023). Modeling intra- and inter-individual changes in L2 classroom engagement. Applied linguistics, 44, 1047–1076.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
