Previous research on translanguaging in classrooms for a language other than English (LOTE) has shown that it helps learners compensate for limited language proficiency. Few studies have investigated how translanguaging promotes learners’ conceptual understanding of the target language. This study aims to investigate how a Chinese teacher mediates conceptual understanding of the target language among 15 Spanish major undergraduates in a Chinese university through pedagogical translanguaging. Data were collected from classroom observations, questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. Microgenesis of the discourse reveals that teacher–student mediation through pedagogical translanguaging facilitates students’ conceptual understanding of Spanish linguistic and cultural knowledge, enhances metalinguistic awareness, and promotes self-regulation. Translanguaging space built up in classroom interaction fosters collaborative dialogue, creating inclusive learning environments. This study may illuminate how multilingual teachers leverage diverse linguistic and sociocultural knowledge to assist students in conceptualizing and internalizing target language form and meaning through translanguaging in LOTE education.
AnN.ZhengY. (2024). Pedagogical translanguaging and trans-semiotizing in a LOTE Arabic classroom: The coordination of semiotic resources in alphabetic teaching and learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2417354
2.
AshleyS.SchaapH.de BruijnE. (2022). Illustrating conceptual understanding in international business undergraduate writing. Research Papers in Education, 38, 499–519.
3.
CenozJ.GorterD. (2021). Pedagogical translanguaging. Cambridge University Press.
4.
CenozJ.GorterD. (2022). Pedagogical translanguaging and its application to language classes. RELC Journal, 53, 342–354.
ChoiJ.LiuK. (2021). Knowledge building through collaborative, translation and translanguaging practices. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 23, 141–156.
7.
CreeseA.BlackledgeA. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching?The Modern Language Journal, 94, 103–115.
DoehlerS.P.LauzonV.F. (2015). Documenting change across time. In MarkeeN. (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 409–424). Portico.
10.
GarcíaO. (2009). Bilingual education bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Wiley-Blackwell.
11.
GarcíaO.LiW. (2014). Language, bilingualism and education. Springer.
12.
GarcíaO.OtheguyR. (2019). Plurilingualism and translanguaging: Commonalities and divergences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23, 17–35.
13.
GarcíaO.SylvanC.E. (2011). Pedagogies and practices in multilingual classrooms: Singularities in pluralities. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 385–400.
14.
GuoH. (2023). Chinese primary school students’ translanguaging in EFL classrooms: What is it and why is it needed?The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32, 211–226.
15.
LantolfJ.P. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition. Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition and L2 development. In AtkinsonD. (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24–47). Routledge.
16.
LantolfJ.P.ThorneS. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
17.
LeonetO.CenozJ.GorterD. (2020). Developing morphological awareness across languages: Translanguaging pedagogies in third language acquisition. Language Awareness, 29, 41–59.
18.
LeontjevD.deBoerM. (2022). Teacher as creator: Orchestrating the learning environment to promote learner development. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221117654
19.
LiD. (2012). Scaffolding adult learners of English in learning target form in a Hong Kong EFL university classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 127–144.
20.
LiD.GaoQ.MaM. (2023). Developing intercultural communicative competence in French-medium content and language integrated learning courses through teacher scaffolding. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras, VIII, 99–113.
21.
LiW. (2011). Multilinguality, multimodality, and multicompetence: Code- and modeswitching by minority ethnic children in complementary schools. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 370–384. Portico.
22.
LiW.GarcíaO. (2022). Not a first language but one repertoire: Translanguaging as a decolonizing project. RELC Journal, 53, 313–324.
23.
LiW.ZhuH. (2013). Translanguaging identities: Creating transnational space through flexible multilingual practices amongst Chinese university students in the UK. Applied Linguistics, 34, 516–35.
24.
MendozaA.OuJ. (2022). CACTI: Use of a survey instrument as a semistructured interview protocol to facilitate teacher retrospection on bi/multilingual practices in EMI. System, 109, Article 102887.
25.
MerriamS.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from ‘Case study research in education’. Jossey-Bass.
26.
MitchellR.MylesF. (2004). Second language learning theories. Edward Arnold.
27.
PerkinsD. (1998). What is understanding? In WiskeM.S. (Ed.), Teaching for understanding: Linking research with practice (pp. 39–57). Jossey-Bass.
28.
PoehnerM.E.InfanteP. (2016). Mediated development: A Vygotskian approach to transforming second language learner abilities. TESOL Quarterly, 51, 332–357.
29.
PoehnerM.E.LeontjevD. (2023). Peer interaction, mediation, and a view of teachers as creators of learner L2 development. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33, 18–32.
30.
PoehnerM.E.van CompernolleR.A. (2011). Frames of interaction in Dynamic Assessment: Developmental diagnoses of second language learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18, 183–198.
31.
TaiK.W.H.KhabbazbashiN. (2019). The mediation and organisation of gestures in vocabulary instructions: A microgenetic analysis of interactions in a beginning-level adult ESOL classroom. Language and Education, 33, 445–468.
32.
TengM.FangF. (2024). Translanguaging pedagogies in developing morphological awareness: The case of Japanese students learning Chinese in China. Applied Linguistics Review, 15, 1477–1506.
33.
van CompernolleR.A. (2010). Incidental microgenetic development in second-language teacher–learner talk-in-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 1, 66–81.
34.
van CompernolleR.A. (2015). Interaction and second language development: A Vygotskian perspective. John Benjamins.
35.
van CompernolleR.A.HeneryA. (2014). Instructed concept appropriation and L2 pragmatic development in the classroom. Language Learning, 64, 549–578.
36.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
37.
WalterD.R.van CompernolleR.A. (2017). Teaching German declension as meaning: A concept-based approach. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11, 68–85.
38.
WangD. (2016). Translanguaging in Chinese foreign language classrooms: Students and teachers’ attitudes and practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22, 138–149.
39.
WangD. (2020). Studying Chinese language in higher education: The translanguaging reality through learners’ eyes. System, 95, Article 102394.
40.
WangW.Curdt-ChristiansenX.L. (2019). Translanguaging in a Chinese–English bilingual education programme: A university-classroom ethnography. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22, 322–337.
41.
WhiteC.S. (2007). Levels of understanding: A guide to the teaching and assessment of knowledge. Journal of Education for Business, 82, 159–163.
42.
WongC.-Y.TianZ. (2025). Maximizing students’ content and language development: The pedagogical potential of translanguaging in a Chinese immersion setting. Learning and Instruction, 95, Article 102023.
