The potential of model texts as a feedback instrument (MTFI) in second language (L2) writing has been explored for about two decades and continues to receive increasing interest from L2 scholars. However, to date, there is still an absence of a comprehensive review of studies in this particular area. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) procedure, this study aims to fill this gap by systematically reviewing 25 empirical studies on MTFI dating up to 1 April 2023, specifically focusing on three main aspects: study contexts, methodological characteristics, and primary areas of focus and key findings. The results revealed that existing MTFI studies (1) largely targeted low-intermediate English as a foreign language (EFL) learners at primary schools, (2) primarily adopted a quasi-experimental design involving a three-stage narrative writing task in a classroom-based setting, (3) predominantly focused on writing as a process, and (4) consistently reported MTFI’s potential for promoting L2 writing gains, especially in terms of lexical aspects. These results not only further our understanding about the effect of MTFI on different dimensions of task performance and L2 learning (i.e. L2 writing), but also provide some pedagogical implications for practices. Suggestions for addressing methodological issues in future studies are provided to advance this research domain.
Al-HoorieA.H.VittaJ.P. (2019). The seven sins of L2 research: A review of 30 journals’ statistical quality and their CiteScore, SJR, SNIP, JCR Impact Factors. Language Teaching Research, 23, 727–744.
2.
AllwrightR.L.WoodleyM.P.AllwrightJ.M. (1988). Investigating reformulation as a practical strategy for the teaching of academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 9, 236–256.
3.
BaleghizadehS.ArabF. (2011). Comparing native models and peer feedback in promoting noticing through written output. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5, 63–79.
4.
BatstoneR. (Ed.). (2010). Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning. Oxford University Press.
5.
Cánovas GuiraoJ.Roca de LariosJ.CoyleY. (2015). The use of models as a written feedback technique with young EFL learners. System, 52, 63–77.
6.
CaoZ.MaoZ. (2022). Studies on positive evidence feedback in second language writing: Status quo and implications. RELC Journal, 55, 209–218.
7.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2017). Research methods in education. Routledge.
8.
CoyleY.Cánovas GuiraoJ.Roca de LariosJ. (2018). Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multi-stage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 25–43.
9.
CoyleY.Roca de LariosJ. (2014). Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children’s reported noticing and output production in a L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 451–485.
10.
CoyleY.Roca de LariosJ. (2020). Exploring young learners’ engagement with models as a written corrective technique in EFL and CLIL settings. System, 95, 102374.
11.
CriadoR.Garcés-ManzaneraA.PlonskyL. (2022). Models as written corrective feedback: Effects on young L2 learners’ fluency in digital writing from product and process perspectives. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12, 697–719.
12.
CrosthwaiteP.NingrumS.LeeI. (2022). Research trends in L2 written corrective feedback: A bibliometric analysis of three decades of Scopus-indexed research on L2 WCF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 58, 100934.
13.
DaoP. (2019). Effects of task goal orientation on learner engagement in task performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 59, 315–334.
14.
DaoP. (2020). Effect of interaction strategy instruction on learner engagement in peer interaction. System, 91, 102–244.
15.
DörnyeiZ. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
EllisR. (2008). Learner beliefs and language learning. Asian EFL Journal, 10, 7–25.
17.
EllisR.SkehanP.LiS.ShintaniN.LambertC. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
18.
FerrisD. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181–201.
19.
García MayoM.P.Loidi LabandibarU. (2017). The use of models as written corrective feedback in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 110–127.
20.
Hamano-BunceD. (2022). The effects of direct written corrective feedback and comparator texts on the complexity and accuracy of revisions and new pieces of writing. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221127643
21.
HanaokaO. (2007). Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching Research, 11, 459–479.
22.
HanaokaO.IzumiS. (2012). Noticing and uptake: Addressing pre-articulated covert problems in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 332–347.
23.
HiverP.Al-HoorieA.H.VittaJ.P.WuJ. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 28, 201–230.
24.
IzumiS. (2013). Noticing and L2 development: Theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical issues. In BergleithnerJ.M.FrotaS.N.KeiJ. (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 25–38). University of Hawai’i at Manoa. National Foreign language Resource Center.
25.
KangE.Y. (2020). Using model texts as a form of feedback in L2 writing. System, 89, 102196.
26.
KangE.Y. (2022). The role of working memory in the effects of models as a written corrective strategy. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 61, 1725–1753.
27.
KrashenS. (1982). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Pergamon Press.
28.
KyleK.CrossleyS.A. (2018). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine-grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 333–349.
29.
Larson-HallJ.PlonskyL. (2015). Reporting and interpreting quantitative research findings: What gets reported and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 65, 127–159.
30.
Lázaro-IbarrolaA. (2021). Model texts in collaborative and individual writing among EFL children: Noticing, incorporations, and draft quality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 61, 329–359.
31.
Lázaro-IbarrolaA.VillarrealI. (2021). Are EFL writers motivated or demotivated by model texts and task repetition? Evidence from young collaborative writers. International Journal of English Studies, 21, 29–55.
32.
LiM.StorchN. (2017). Second language writing in the age of CMC: Affordances, multimodality, and collaboration. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 1–5.
33.
LongM.RobinsonP. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge University Press.
34.
LuX. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 36–62.
35.
LuquinM.García MayoM.P. (2020). Collaborative writing and feedback: An exploratory study of the potential of models in primary EFL students’ writing performance. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 2, 73–100.
36.
LuquinM.García MayoM.P. (2021). Exploring the use of models as a written corrective feedback technique among EFL children. System, 98, 102465.
37.
LuquinM.García MayoM.P. (2023). The impact of textual enhancement on the acquisition of third person possessive pronouns by child EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0176
38.
LynchT. (2009). Responding to learners’ perceptions of feedback: The use of comparators in second language speaking courses. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3, 191–203.
39.
ManchónR.M. (2011). The language learning potential of writing in foreign language contexts: Lessons from research. In ReicheltM.ChimaskoT. (Eds.), Foreign language writing: Research insights (pp. 44–64). Parlor Press.
40.
ManchónR.M.LeowR.P. (2020). An ISLA perspective on L2 learning through writing. Implications for future research agendas. In ManchónR.M. (Ed.), Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas (pp. 335–355). John Benjamins.
41.
Martínez EstebanN.Roca de LariosJ. (2010). The use of models as a form of written feedback to secondary school pupils of English. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 143–170.
Montealegre RamónF. (2019). Exploring the learning potential of models with secondary school EFL learners. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 32, 155–184.
44.
MuranoiH. (2007). Output practice in the L2 classroom. In DeKeyserR.M. (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 51–84). Cambridge University Press.
45.
NguyenL.Q.NguyenB.T.T.PhuongH.Y. (2024). Exploring the use of model texts as a feedback instrument in expository writing: EFL learners’ noticing, incorporations, and text quality. Assessing Writing, 62, 100890.
46.
NguyenL.Q.LeH.V. (2022). Improving L2 learners’ IELTS task 2 writing: The role of model essays and noticing hypothesis. Language Testing in Asia, 12, 1–20.
47.
Oga-BaldwinW.Q.NakataY. (2017). Engagement, gender, and motivation: A predictive model for Japanese young language learners. System, 65, 151–163.
48.
PageM.J.McKenzieJ.E.BossuytP.M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372, n71.
49.
PawlakM.KrukM. (2022). Individual differences in computer assisted language learning research. Taylor & Francis.
50.
PhuocV.D.BarrotJ.S. (2022). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in L2 writing across proficiency levels: A matter of L1 background?Assessing Writing, 54, 100673.
51.
PicaT.Lincoln-PorterF.PaninosD.LinnellJ. (1996). Language learners’ interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners?TESOL Quarterly, 30, 59–84.
52.
QiD.S.LapkinS. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277–303.
53.
RobinsonP. (1995). Attention, memory and the ‘‘noticing’’ hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283–331.
54.
RoothooftH.Lázaro-IbarrolaA.BultéB. (2022). Task repetition and corrective feedback via models and direct corrections among young EFL writers: Draft quality and task motivation. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221082041
55.
RoseH.McKinleyJ.GallowayN. (2021). Global Englishes and language teaching: A review of pedagogical research. Language Teaching, 54, 157–189.
56.
SachsR.PolioC. (2007). Learners’ uses of two types of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 67–100.
57.
SchmidtR. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
58.
SchmidtR. (2001). Attention. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.
59.
SchmidtR.FrotaS. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In DayR. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Newbury House.
60.
StorchN. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17, 95–114.
61.
StorchN. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters.
62.
StorchN. (2018). Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 51, 262–277.
63.
SwainM. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In GassS.MaddenC. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.
64.
SwainM. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–82). Cambridge University Press.
65.
SwainM. (2000). The output hypotheses and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In LantolfJ. (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford University Press.
66.
TieuL.BakerJ.R. (2022). Using model essays in conjunction with noticing as a feedback instrument in IELTS writing preparation. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17, 380–392.
67.
TruscottJ. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327–369.
68.
VasyletsO.MarínJ. (2021). The effects of working memory and L2 proficiency on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 100786.
69.
VillarrealI.Lázaro-IbarrolaA. (2022). Models in collaborative writing among CLIL learners of English in primary school: Linguistic outcomes and motivation matters. System, 110, 102922.
70.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
71.
YangL.ZhangL. (2010). Exploring the role of reformulations and a model text in EFL students’ writing performance. Language Teaching Research, 14, 464–484.
72.
YangY.YapN.T.AliA.M. (2023). Predicting EFL expository writing quality with measures of lexical richness. Assessing Writing, 57, 100762.
73.
YoonH.-J.PolioC. (2017). The linguistic development of students of English as a second language in two written genres. TESOL Quarterly, 51, 275–301.
74.
ZhangM.PlonskyL. (2020). Collaborative writing in face-to-face settings: A substantive and methodological review. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 100753.
75.
ZhangX. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of second language acquisition between 1997 and 2018. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 199–222.
76.
ZhangX.WangM. (2022). The continuation task and the model-as-feedback writing task in L2 vocabulary learning: Timing of model texts. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221119077
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
