Negotiation serves to solve communication problems in second language (L2) learners’ peer interaction including negotiation of meaning (NoM), negotiation of form (NoF), negotiation of content (NoC) and negotiation of procedure (NoP). The four negotiation types are initiated through negotiation strategies. This study examined how negotiation types and negotiation strategies were distributed and how the distributions developed. The data came from five rounds of group interaction conducted by 52 Chinese postgraduate students in a semester. The findings reveal significant differences in the distributions of negotiation types and negotiation strategies. NoC occurred significantly more frequently than NoM and NoF. Each negotiation type had its major negotiation strategies and they had significantly higher percentages than the other negotiation strategies. Specifically, NoM was mostly initiated by clarification requests, NoF by recasts, NoC by explicit appeals for assistance, and NoP by direct negotiations. Both competitive and supportive growths occurred in the longitudinal trajectories. This study provides a comprehensive and developmental insight into negotiation in EFL learners’ peer interaction and offers significant pedagogical implications.
AubreyS.PhilpottA. (2023). Second language task engagement in face-to-face and synchronous video-based computer-mediated communication modes: Performances and perceptions. System, 115, 1–12.
2.
AzkaraiA.Imaz AgirreI. (2016). Negotiation of meaning strategies in child EFL mainstream and CLIL settings. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 844–870.
3.
AzkaraiA.OliverR.Gil-BerrioY. (2022). Examining deductive versus guided instruction from an interactionist perspective. Language Learning, 72, 125–164.
4.
Azpilicueta-MartínezR.Lázaro-IbarrolaA. (2022). A matter of age: Negotiation for meaning in Child and Adult interactions. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 9–39.
5.
BitchenerJ. (2004). The relationship between the Negotiation of meaning and language learning: A longitudinal study. Language Awareness, 13, 81–95.
6.
DonatoR. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In LantolfJ.AppelG. (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Ablex.
7.
EllisR. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
8.
EllisR. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54, 227–275.
FanY.XuJ. (2020). Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 1–13.
11.
FosterP. (1998). A classroom perspective on negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 1–23.
12.
FosterP.OhtaA.S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26, 402–430.
13.
García MayoM.Lázaro IbarrolaA. (2015). Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System, 54, 40–54.
14.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall.
15.
GassS.MackeyA.Ross-FeldmanL. (2005). Task-based interaction in classroom and laboratory setting. Language Learning, 55, 575–611.
16.
GassS.VaronisE. (1985). Variation in native speaker speech modification to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 37–58.
17.
HardyI.MooreJ. (2004). Foreign language students’ conversational negotiation in different task environment. Applied Linguistics, 25, 340–370.
18.
HidalgoM.A. (2021). Differences in the task-supported negotiations of younger and older children: From repair into prevention. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 59, 395–419.
19.
HidalgoM.Á.Azpilicueta-MartínezR. (2021). A cross-sectional study on task type and negotiation of meaning in CLIL child–child interaction. Porta Linguarum, 35, 183–204.
20.
IwashitaN. (2001). The effect of learner proficiency on interactional moves and modified output in nonnative–nonnative interaction in Japanese as a foreign language. System, 29, 267–287.
21.
JinX.JiangQ.XiongW.FengY.ZhaoW. (2024). Effects of student engagement in peer feedback on writing performance in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32, 128–143.
22.
Larsen-FreemanD.CameronL. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
23.
Lázaro-IbarrolaA.Azpilicueta-MartínezR. (2022). Negotiation of meaning in child–child vs. adult–adult interactions: Evidence from low proficiency EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60, 463–489.
24.
LeeH.HampelR.Kukulska-HulmeA. (2019). Gesture in speaking tasks beyond the classroom: An exploration of the multimodal negotiation of meaning via Skype videoconferencing on mobile devices. System, 81, 26–38.
25.
LiG.ZhangX.LiuL. (2012). English reading for graduate students. China Renmin University Press.
26.
LoewenS.WolffD. (2016). Peer interaction in F2F and CMC contexts. In SatoM.BallingerS. (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 163–184). John Benjamins.
27.
LongM.H. (1981). Questions in foreigner talk discourse. Language Learning, 31, 135–157.
28.
LongM.H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126–141.
29.
LongM.H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In RitchiaW.C.BhatiaT.K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
30.
LongM.H.PorterP. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 207–228.
31.
LongM.H.SatoC. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: forms and functions of teachers’ questions. In SeligerW.LongM.H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268–286). Newbury House.
32.
LysterR. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432.
33.
LysterR.RantaL. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 37–66.
34.
McDonoughK. (2007). Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 323–338). Oxford University Press.
35.
NakahamaK.TylerA.Van LierL. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information-gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 377–405.
36.
NewtonJ. (2013). Incidental vocabulary learning in classroom communication tasks. Language Teaching Research, 17, 164–187.
37.
OliverR. (2002). The pattern of negotiation for meaning in child interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 97–111.
38.
OliverR.PhilpJ.DuchesneS. (2017). Children working it out together: A comparison of younger and older learners collaborating in task based interaction. System, 69, 1–14.
39.
ParlakÖ.ZieglerN. (2016). The impact of recasts on the development of primary stress in a synchronous computer-mediated environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 1–29.
40.
PhilpJ.AdamsR.IwashitaN. (2014). Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning. Routledge.
41.
PicaT. (1996). The essential role of negotiation in the communicative classroom. JALT Journal, 18, 241–268.
42.
PouporeG. (2005). Quality interaction and types of negotiation in problem-solving and jigsaw tasks. In EdwardsC.WilliamJ. (Eds.), Teacher exploring tasks in English language teaching (pp. 242–255). Palgrave MacMillan.
43.
PrabhuN. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.
44.
RibeiroA.EslamiZ.R. (2022). Second language development in face-to-face versus synchronous computer-mediated interactions: Dyadic type and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221098379
45.
RichardsJ.PlattJ.WebberH. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. Longman.
46.
RouhshadA.WigglesworthG.StorchN. (2016). The nature of negotiations in face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in pair interactions. Language Teaching Research, 20, 514–534.
47.
RulonK.McCrearyJ. (1986). Negotiation of content: Teacher-fronted and small-group interaction. In DayR. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 182–199). Newbury House.
48.
SaitoK.AkiyamaY. (2017). Video-based interaction, negotiation for comprehensibility, and second language speech learning: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 67, 43–74.
49.
SearleJ. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In ColeP.MorganJ. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 59–82). Academic Press.
50.
StorchN. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–158.
51.
SwainM. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In GassS.MaddenC. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.
52.
TothP.Gil-BerrioY. (2022). Exploring ‘intersubjectivity negotiation episodes’ and ‘language related episodes’ in second-language peer interaction. Language Learning, 72, 275–313.
53.
Van den BrandenK. (1997). Effects of negotiation on language learners’ output. Language Learning, 47, 589–636.
54.
VaronisE.M.GassS. (1985). Nonnative/nonnative conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71–90.
55.
VerspoorM.van DijkM. (2011). Visualizing interaction between variables. In VerspoorM.de BotK.LowieW. (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Method and techniques (pp. 85–98). John Benjamins.
56.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
57.
WangH. (2019). The influence of creative task engagement on English L2 learners’ negotiation of meaning in oral communication tasks. System, 80, 83–94.
58.
XuJ.ShuJ. (2020). An empirical study of negotiated interaction in college English classroom group work in China. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 52, 868–879.
59.
YoungR. (2008). Language and interaction: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
60.
ZhaoL. (2015). Research on negotiated interactions among Chinese language learners in task-based spoken classroom. Chinese Teaching in the World, 29, 362–376.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
